• 1.

    Willis NG, Monroe FA, Potworowski A, et al. Envisioning the future of veterinary medical education: the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges foresight project, final report. J Vet Med Educ 2007;34:141.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Fettman MJ, Rollin BE. Modern elements of informed consent for general veterinary practitioners. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:13861393.

  • 3.

    Rollin BE. The use and abuse of Aesulapian authority in veterinary medicine. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:11441149.

  • 4.

    Rollin BE. An introduction to veterinary medical ethics. 2nd ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2006.

  • 5.

    Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. RCVS guide to professional conduct. London: Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, 2010.

  • 6.

    AVMA website. Principles of veterinary medical ethics of the AVMA. Available at: www.avma.org/issues/policy/ethics.asp. Accessed Mar 12, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Tannenbaum J. Animals and the law: property, cruelty, rights. Soc Res (New York) 1995;62:539607.

  • 8.

    Segal J. Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.

  • 9.

    Heifferon B, Brown S. Introduction. In: Heifferon B, Brown S, eds. Rhetoric of healthcare: essays toward a new disciplinary inquiry. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2008;113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Morgan CA, McDonald M. Ethical dilemmas in veterinary medicine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2007;37:165179.

  • 11.

    Roter DL. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2000;39:515.

  • 12.

    King JS, Moulton B. Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making. Am J Law Med 2006;32:429501.

  • 13.

    Shaw JR, Adams CL, Bonnett BN, et al. Veterinarian-client-patient communication during wellness appointments versus appointments related to a health problem in companion animal practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233:15761586.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelen T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? Soc Sci Med 1997;44:681692.

  • 15.

    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelen T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revising the shared decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;46:651661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Casey RA, Bradshaw JWS. Owner compliance and clinical outcome measures for domestic cats undergoing clinical behavior therapy. J Vet Behav 2008;3:114124.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Beauchamp TJ, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

  • 18.

    Dworkin G. The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

  • 19.

    Gert B. Coercion and freedom. In: Pennock JR, Chapman JW, eds. Coercion. New York: Atherton Press, 1972;3637.

  • 20.

    Tannenbaum J. Ethics and human–companion animals interaction; a plea for a veterinary ethics of the human–companion animal bond. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1985;15:431447.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Tannenbaum J. Veterinary medical ethics: a focus of conflicting interests. J Soc Issues 1993;49:143156.

  • 22.

    Arkow P. Application of ethics to animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998;59:193200.

  • 23.

    Diekema DS, Marcuse EK. Ethical issues in the vaccination of children. In: Burgio GR, Lantos JD, eds. Primum non nocere today. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998;3747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Gillon R. Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals.” J Med Ethics 2003;29:307312.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 105 NE 92 (NY, 1914).

  • 26.

    Reibl v Hughes (1980) 114 DLR (3d).

  • 27.

    Re C (adult: refusal of medical treatment) [1994] 1 All ER 819.

  • 28.

    Re B (adult: refusal of medical treatment) [2002] 2 All ER 449.

  • 29.

    Kant I. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Paton HJ, trans. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.

  • 30.

    Mill JS. On liberty. Glasgow, Scotland: William Collins and Sons, 1962.

  • 31.

    Donchin A. Understanding autonomy relationally: toward a reconfiguration of bioethical principles. J Med Philos 2001;26:365386.

  • 32.

    Hannah HW. When can failure to inform support a malpractice claim? J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:14191420.

  • 33.

    Carson T. Deception and withholding information in sales. In: Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE, eds. Ethical theory and business. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International, 2004;434442.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Packard V. The hidden persuaders. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin, 1957.

  • 35.

    Brooman S, Legge D. Law relating to animals. London: Cavendish Publishing International, 1997.

  • 36.

    Radford M. Animal welfare law in Britain. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

  • 37.

    Main DCJ. Offering the best to patients: ethical issues associated with the provision of veterinary services. Vet Rec 2006;158:6266.

  • 38.

    Yeates JW. Response and responsibility: an analysis of veterinary ethical conflicts. Vet J 2009;182:36.

  • 39.

    Christy A, Boothroyd RA, Petrilla J, et al. The reported prevalence of mandated community treatment in two Florida samples. Behav Sci Law 2003;21:493502.

  • 40.

    Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB, et al. Effects of involuntary outpatient commitment on subjective quality of life in persons with severe mental illness. Behav Sci Law 2003;21:473491.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Callahan D. Autonomy: a moral good, not a moral obsession. Hastings Cent Rep 1984;14:4042.

  • 42.

    Curtis LC, Hodge M. Ethics and boundaries in community support services: new challenges. New Dir Ment Health Serv 1995;66:4359.

  • 43.

    Lützen K. Subtle coercion in psychiatric practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 1998;5:101107.

  • 44.

    Rollin BE. Updating veterinary medical ethics. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978;173:10151018.

  • 45.

    Hewer v Bryant [1969] 3 All ER 449, [1970] 1 QB 357.

  • 46.

    People (ex rel Wallace) v Labrenz 104 NE 2d 769 (Ill, 1952).

  • 47.

    B v Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto [1995] 1 SCR 315.

  • 48.

    Brown JP, Silverman JD. The current and future market for veterinarians and veterinary medical services in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215:161183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Francione GL. Animals, property and legal welfarism—unnecessary suffering and the humane treatment of animals. Rutgers Law Rev 1994;46:721770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Bearup BJ. Pets: property and the paradigm of protection. J Anim Law 2007;3:173191.

  • 51.

    AVMA website. Ownership vs guardianship. Terminology describing the relationship between animals and their owners. Available at: www.avma.org/issues/policy/animal_welfare/ownership.asp. Accessed Sep 24, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    McMillan FD. Maximizing quality of life in ill animals. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003;39:227235.

  • 53.

    Yeates J, Main DCJ. Assessment of companion animal QOL in research and practice. J Small Anim Pract 2009;50:274281.

  • 54.

    Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Monahan J. Endorsement of personal benefit of outpatient commitment among persons with severe mental illness. Psychol Public Policy Law 2003;9:7093.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Markowitz FE. Modeling processes in recovery from mental illness: relationships between symptoms, life satisfaction, and self-concept. J Health Soc Behav 2001;42:6479.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Noordsy D, Torrey W, Mueser K, et al. Recovery from severe mental illness: an intrapersonal and functional outcome definition. Int Rev Psychiatry 2002;14:318326.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Wagner LC, King M. Existential needs of people with psychotic disorders in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Br J Psychiatry 2005;186:141145.

  • 58.

    Roth LH, Meisel A, Lidz CW. Tests of competency to consent to treatment. Am J Psychiatry 1977;134:279284.

  • 59.

    Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;319:16351638.

  • 60.

    Re M (child: refusal of medical treatment) [1999] 2 FLR 1097, (2000) 52 BMLR 124.

  • 61.

    Glick SM. The morality of coercion. J Med Ethics 2000;26:393395.

  • 62.

    Frankfurt H. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. J Philos 1971;68:520.

  • 63.

    Brandt RB. A theory of the good and the right. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1979.

  • 64.

    Janssens MJPA, Rooij MFAM, Ten Have HAMJ, et al. Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives. J Med Ethics 2004;30:453458.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    Berlin I. Two concepts of liberty. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1958.

Advertisement

The ethics of influencing clients

James W. Yeates BSc(Hons), BVSc1 and David C. J. Main BVetMed, PhD2
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, and Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, BS40 5DU, England.
  • | 2 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Faculty of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, BS40 5DU, England.

Contributor Notes

Supported by BSAVA Petsavers and RSPCA Bristol.

The authors thank David Lamb, Paul Roger, and Sean Wensley for their comments.

Address correspondence to Mr. Yeates (James.Yeates@bristol.ac.uk).