Introduction
Small intestinal incarceration (SII) describes a disease of the intestines caused by the entrapment of parts of the small intestine through congenital or acquired openings in the mesentery, omentum, mesometrium, and remnants of embryonic structures (internal herniation) or in the abdominal wall (external hernias).1 Small intestinal incarceration has been reported in numerous textbooks1–4 and recently in a review article.5 External hernias may be acquired or congenital5; most of the latter are umbilical, inguinal, or scrotal hernias.5 The literature relating to umbilical hernias is immense, and only the most recent works are mentioned here.6–8 Most external hernias in adult cattle result from horn injuries5,9 or other blunt trauma or are sequelae of laparotomy, advanced pregnancy, or fragile abdominal musculature in old and thin cows.6,10,11 The literature on internal hernias is sparse. Internal hernias may also be congenital or acquired. Incarcerated omental,12,13 mesenteric,13–15 and epiploic (omental) foramen hernias16 have been described in several cattle, and in 1 cow the intestines herniated through the omentum into the omental bursa.17 The incarceration that results from recoil of the spermatic cord following castration by traction in growing cattle has been the topic of several reports.18–21 Other structures including the mesometrium and remnants of embryonic structures can be involved in herniation and SII,1,2,4,22 but specific relevant reports are lacking. Prolapse of part of the jejunum through a ventral rectal tear that was caused by dystocia23 and jejunal incarceration in a partially everted urinary bladder24 were also considered forms of SII.25
The clinical manifestation and outcome of SII vary with the degree, extent, and location of the incarceration.1 In cattle with only partial or intermittent obstruction of passage of ingesta, clinical signs of illness may continue for several days, accompanied by continuous or recurrent colic and reduced but not absent fecal output.1 Cattle with complete obstruction of passage of ingesta have characteristic clinical signs analogous to those seen in cattle with mechanical ileus including obtunded demeanor, anorexia, severely or completely diminished rumen and intestinal motility, and positive ballottement and/or percussion and simultaneous auscultation on the right side. The rectum contains scant or no feces, and dilated loops of small intestine may be palpated transrectally or visualized by transabdominal ultrasound. Surgery to reduce and resect the affected bowel and repair the hernia (if possible) is the treatment of choice for SII and has been described extensively.1,2,4,12,13,16,22,26 Compared with other forms of mechanical ileus, reports of cattle with SII are rare. The goal of this study was therefore to describe the clinical and laboratory findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of 85 cattle with SII.
Methods
The medical records of 85 cattle diagnosed with SII at the Department of Farm Animals, University of Zurich, from 1987 to 2019 were analyzed. Sixty cattle had internal SII and 25 had external SII. External hernias were those in the abdominal wall, and internal hernias were those in the greater omentum, mesentery, and mesometrium. Categorization of hernias was based on surgical findings or the results of postmortem examination or both. The present work is based on a dissertation.27
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Cattle that were at least 1 year of age, had SII in an internal or external hernia at the time of admission, and had a definitive diagnosis of SII via laparotomy or postmortem examination were included. Eighteen cattle with internal SII were excluded because they had been published previously.13
Clinical examination
All cattle underwent a standard clinical examination as described.28,29 The clinical examination procedure was conducted by the first author or under the supervision of the first or second author. The general condition was evaluated by determining the demeanor, behavior, posture including recumbency, appetite, signs of abdominal pain, appearance of the hair coat and muzzle, skin elasticity, position of the eyes in the sockets, and skin surface temperature. General condition was classified as normal or mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal. Cattle with a normal general condition were bright and alert and had normal behavior, posture, and appetite. The general condition was considered mildly abnormal when a mild decrease in alertness and/or mild signs of colic (defined later) were present. A moderate decrease in alertness and sometimes occasional grunting or bruxism, or both, and marked signs of colic were observed in cattle with a moderately abnormal general condition. Cattle with a severely abnormal general condition showed marked apathy and were sometimes recumbent and unable to rise. The rumen was assessed for the degree of fill and number and intensity of contractions. Foreign body tests included the pole test, back grip, and percussion of the abdominal wall over the region of the reticulum with a rubber hammer. Each test was carried out 4 times, and the reaction of the animal was observed each time. A test was considered positive when it elicited a short grunt a minimum of 3 out of 4 times. Ballottement and simultaneous auscultation as well as percussion and simultaneous auscultation of the abdomen on both sides were also carried out. Ballottement and simultaneous auscultation were considered positive when splashing sounds were heard with a stethoscope while the abdominal wall was manually balloted to produce a swinging motion. Percussion and simultaneous auscultation were considered positive when a ringing or ping sound was heard on percussion of the abdominal wall with the handle of a percussion hammer. Rectal examination was done in all cattle. Feces were assessed subjectively for color, consistency, amount, fiber particle length, and any abnormal contents.
The number and severity of signs of colic/abdominal pain were determined as described.30–32 Signs of mild colic included mild restlessness, shifting of weight in the hind limbs, looking at the flank, lifting the tail, lifting of individual limbs, and tail swishing. Signs of moderate colic were moderate restlessness, brief periods of recumbency, kicking with the hind limbs, arching of the back, and marked tail swishing. Signs of severe colic consisted of marked restlessness, frequent lying down and rising, sweating, grunting, and violent kicking at the abdomen. In addition, the cattle were divided into colic, indolence (dullness), and intoxication phases depending on the stage of illness.30,31 The colic phase was the initial phase accompanied by the previously described signs of pain. The indolence phase followed the colic phase and was characterized by apathy and markedly abnormal general condition. The last phase was intoxication, in which cattle had tachycardia, congested scleral blood vessels, pale mucous membranes, cool skin surface temperature, sunken eyes, and a dry muzzle.
Laboratory analyses
The collection and examination of blood, urine, and rumen fluid were done as described.32 In brief, the PCV, WBC count, and concentrations of total protein and fibrinogen were analyzed (Contraves AL820 analyzer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; or CELL-DYN 3500, Abbott Diagnostics). The concentrations of serum BUN, calcium, inorganic phosphorus, potassium, chloride, bilirubin, and the activities of the enzymes AST and GGT were determined at 37 °C with the use of an automated analyzer (Cobas Mira, Cobas Integra 700, or Cobas Integra 800; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd) and the manufacturer’s reagents (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd) according to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. The venous blood gas analysis was performed with a rapid analyzer (RapidLab 248 analyzer; Siemens). Urine samples were collected by free-flow catch or catheterization in 78 cattle. Urine samples were analyzed with a test strip (Combur 9; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd), and the urine specific gravity was determined with a refractometer (A.KRÜSS Optronic GmbH). The concentration of rumen chloride was determined with a chloride analyzer (MK II Chloride Analyser 926S; Sherwood Scientific).
Ultrasonographic examination
The ultrasonographic examination of the abdomen of 62 cattle was carried out from the right as described,32,33 and in 6 others, only an abdominal wall hernia was examined. In the 62 cattle undergoing routine abdominal ultrasonography, an abdominal wall hernia was also evaluated ultrasonographically in 13. Briefly, the area from the tuber coxae to the eighth intercostal space and from the transverse processes of the vertebrae to the linea alba on the right side was examined with a 3.5- to 6.5-MHz convex transducer (Logiq 7; GE HealthCare). The appearance of loops of small intestine and their diameter, contents, and motility were assessed. In addition, the appearance, position, and nature of the contents of the cecum and proximal and spiral ansa of the colon and the presence of cecal dilatation were noted.
Diagnosis
A diagnosis of ileus based on the clinical examination was made when the lead signs were characteristic of mechanical ileus, including signs of colic, reduced or absent fecal output, and progressive deterioration in general demeanor.34 When the signs mentioned earlier were accompanied by an external hernia, a diagnosis of SII was made. SII within an internal hernia could not be diagnosed clinically or ultrasonographically and relied on laparotomy or postmortem examination or both. A final diagnosis of both forms of hernia (external and internal) was made during laparotomy or postmortem examination or both.
Surgery
Cattle with internal hernias underwent standing right-flank laparotomy. In cattle that had difficulty standing or that were already recumbent, the right flank laparotomy was done in left lateral recumbency.32 Distal paravertebral anesthesia or proximal paravertebral anesthesia was used at the preference of the surgeon in charge. A 25- to 30-cm incision was made in the midparalumbar fossa, and the muscles, fasciae, and peritoneum were incised with a scalpel. The abdominal cavity was explored in a standardized fashion.25,35 Internal herniation/incarceration was recognized when distended small intestines entered a rent in the greater omentum, mesentery, or mesometrium. When comorbidities such as intestinal rupture and peritonitis could be ruled out, the herniated intestines were reduced manually by gently pushing them back into the less occupied areas (caudodorsal) of the abdomen. If the cecum or ascending colon was filled with gas, suction was applied with an 18-gauge needle (38-mm length; B. Braun Medical Inc) attached to a sterile Heidelberger extension line (B. Braun Medical Inc), the other end of which was attached to the suction system. The centesis site was sutured with a 2.0 monofilament suture material in a cruciate pattern. When necessary, the defect in the omentum or mesentery through which the bowel had herniated was enlarged manually. In the hernias we observed, the muscles tended to deviate or rupture in different directions, depending on their anatomical course over the body wall (eg, the transverse abdominal muscle ruptured in a dorsoventral direction and the internal oblique muscle in a caudodorsal or cranioventral direction). Therefore, the transverse muscle could be easily split beyond the visible rent in the internal oblique muscle. To ensure complete visualization and subsequent closure of the transverse muscle in this situation, the internal oblique muscle had to be retracted, severed further by manual traction, or incised with scissors. This procedure was modified depending on the situation and the muscles. An attempt was then made to close the defect. When this was not feasible because the area could not be exteriorized, the defect was enlarged sufficiently to reasonably prevent future herniation. Severely compromised intestines were resected and anastomosed after local anesthesia and ligation of the associated mesenteric blood vessels. The devitalized bowel was removed after 2 bowel clamps were applied on each side, and the bowel was resected between them. Single interrupted sutures were placed in the mesenteric and antimesenteric borders, approximately 180° apart. The bowel wall was sutured with a 2-0 USP monofilament absorbable suture material (Covidien Biosyn; Medtronic) in a full-thickness simple continuous suture pattern, interrupted once on each side to avoid a purse-string effect. Protruding mucosa was oversewn with the same monofilament absorbable suture material in a partial thickness Cushing suture pattern. The rent in the mesentery was closed with braided absorbable suture material (Covidien 0 Polysorb or 2 USP; Medtronic). After the surgical procedure, an antibiotic, most commonly amoxicillin (7 mg/kg body weight), was infused into the abdomen in 1 L of isotonic saline solution or polyvinylpyrrolidone. The peritoneum was closed together with the fascia and the transverse abdominal muscle in 1 layer with braided absorbable suture material (Covidien Polysorb TM, 2 USP; Medtronic) in a simple continuous suture pattern. The internal oblique and external oblique abdominal muscles were closed separately with the same suture material in a simple continuous suture pattern. The subcutaneous tissue was adapted with a continuous mattress suture pattern (Covidien Polysorb TM, 0 USP; Medtronic), and the skin was closed with skin staples (Covidien size 35w appose single-use surgical skin stapler; Medtronic).
In cattle with an external hernia, the surgical approach was directly over the hernia and the size of the incision depended on the size of the hernia. Distal paravertebral anesthesia, infiltration anesthesia, or general anesthesia was used depending on the situation and the surgeon’s preference. Herniated intestines with minimal signs of devitalization were simply reduced, which was facilitated by enlarging the hernial ring when necessary. When feasible, devitalized intestines underwent resection and end-to-end anastomosis. Intraperitoneal medication (amoxicillin, 7 mg/kg) was administered, and the abdominal wall was closed. A 12 X 12-inch (30 X 30-cm) Ethicon RML hernia repair mersilene polyester fiber mesh or a 12 X 12-inch (30 X 30-cm) Ethicon vicryl knitted flat mesh was used in some cases. Whenever feasible, the hernia was closed without mesh by use of the techniques and suture materials described for a standard laparotomy closure. If the latter was not possible, the peritoneum, fascia, and muscles were adapted to the greatest extent possible. The mesh was then placed on top of the sutured area, and its 4 corners were fixed to the fascia and internal and external oblique muscles with simple interrupted sutures. The adjacent muscles and fascia were then pulled toward each side of the mesh with braided absorbable suture material (usually Covidien USP 2-0 Polysorb, 1/2 circle atraumatic needle; Medtronic) in a simple continuous suture pattern.
Postoperative treatment
The 33 cattle that were successfully operated and subsequently discharged were fasted for at least 24 hours postoperatively before feeding was gradually resumed. Medical treatment included fluid therapy (33 of 33), antibiotics (33 of 33), analgesics (33 of 33), prokinetic drugs (23 of 33), and electrolyte replacement (17 of 33) as described.30 In Switzerland, where the cattle were treated, all drug products were commercially available and legal for use in cattle as reported to have been administered in the present study.
All cattle received 10 L of a solution containing 50 g of glucose and 9 g of sodium chloride per liter daily for 1 to 7 days (median, 3 days) administered as a slow IV drip via an indwelling jugular vein catheter (Abbocath-T 14G, 14 cm; Abbott) that was maintained for 3 days. Antibiotic treatment included penicillin G procaine (12,000 IU/kg, IM; 24 of 33), amoxicillin (7 mg/kg, IM; 3 of 33), and penicillin G procaine followed by amoxicillin administered IM (6 of 33). Antibiotics were administered for 3 to 4 days (median, 4 days) in most cattle. All cattle received a daily injection of flunixin meglumine (1 mg/kg), ketoprofen (3 mg/kg), or a combination of flunixin meglumine and metamizole (35 mg/kg) given IV for 2 to 6 days (median, 3 days). Prokinetic drugs were used in 23 cattle for a duration of 2 to 15 days (median, 4 days). Two cows received neostigmine (40 to 45 mg in 10 L of a solution containing 50 g of glucose and 9 g of sodium chloride per liter) administered via continuous drip infusion over 24 hours, and 21 received IM metoclopramide (30 mg), usually 7 to 9 at 8-hour intervals, before its use in farm animals was discontinued in Switzerland. Seven cows with hypocalcemia (calcium < 2.0 mmol/L) received 500 mL of 40% calcium borogluconate IV. Hypokalemia (potassium < 4.0 mmol/L) in 15 cattle was treated with daily oral doses of 60 to 100 g of potassium chloride until normokalemia occurred. One cow with hypophosphatemia (inorganic phosphorus < 1.0 mmol/L) was treated with 350 g of sodium dihydrogen phosphate PO.
Euthanasia/slaughter and postmortem examination
Cattle were euthanized using pentobarbital (80 mg/kg, IV) or, in earlier years, sent to the slaughter facility of the Veterinary Hospital (the meat was used for zoo-animal feeding) during or after the initial examination when the owner did not consent to surgery. Cattle were euthanized intraoperatively when severe lesions including ruptured intestines, fibrinous peritonitis, or hemorrhagic infarction were seen or complications occurred, including becoming recumbent on the right side during surgery with exteriorization and subsequent contamination of the intestines. Cattle were also euthanized after surgery when the clinical condition deteriorated. All cattle that died or were euthanized underwent postmortem examination, whereas in slaughtered cattle, only the internal organs were inspected.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed via commercially available software (SPSS Statistics, version 26.0; IBM Corp) as described recently.29 Data are reported as numbers, percentages, means, SDs, medians, and 95% CIs for means, medians, and percentages. The 95% CI for the percentages was calculated with an online program (sample size calculators for designing clinical research).36 Frequencies were determined for all variables, and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test the data for normality. Means ± SD were calculated for normal data and medians for nonnormal data. In addition, the 95% CIs were calculated for the means and medians. The variables heart rate and rectal temperature over time (days 0 to 7) were analyzed with the general linear model, choosing ANOVA with repeated measures and replacing polynomial contrasts with difference. Differences in nominal data between external and internal hernia data (in terms of whether the surgery could be completed successfully and whether the hernias could be closed completely) were analyzed with the χ2 test. A value of P < .05 was considered significant.
Results
Cattle and history
Eighty-five cattle fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 60 had internal and 25 had external SII. Supplementary Table S1 outlines the sex, age, breed, and pregnancy status of the cattle and the history of the disease course. The signalment, location of the hernia, treatment, and outcome of each cattle are shown in Supplementary Table S2. Treatment and outcome are summarized in Figure 1.
General condition, vital signs, abdominal contour, and signs of pain
The general condition was mildly to severely abnormal in all cattle (Table 1), and 3 of 85 cows (3.5%) were recumbent upon admission. The most common abnormal vital signs in the initial examination were lower-than-normal rectal temperature (60.7% [51 of 84]), tachycardia (51.8% [44 of 85]), and tachypnea (42.4% [36 of 85]). Fifteen of 85 cattle (17.6%) had bilateral abdominal distension, and all 25 cattle with external hernias had a prominent abdominal bulge (Figure 2). Nine hernias were on the left side, 16 on the right side, 14 in the flank, 7 cranial to the udder, and 4 in the inguinal area. The size of the hernias ranged from 8 X 8 cm to 25 X 25 cm.
General condition, vital signs, and abdominal contour in 85 cattle with small intestinal incarceration (SII) due to external (n = 25) and internal (60) hernias. Retrospective study of the medical records of cattle admitted to the Department of Farm Animals, University of Zurich, from 1987 to 2019.
Variable | Finding | No. (%) of cattle | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
General condition (n = 85) | Mildly abnormal | 7 (8.3) | 3–16 |
Moderately abnormal | 54 (63.5) | 52–74 | |
Severely abnormal | 24 (28.2) | 19–39 | |
Rectal temperature (n = 84; median, 38.4 °C; range, 35.2–39.7 °C) | Normal (38.5–39.0 °C) | 27 (32.1) | 22–43 |
Decreased (35.2–38.4 °C) | 51 (60.7) | 49–71 | |
Increased (39.1–39.7 °C) | 6 (7.2) | 2–13 | |
Heart rate (n = 85; median, 84 beats/min; range, 44–100 beats/min) | Normal (60–80 beats/min) | 38 (44.7) | 34–56 |
Decreased (44–59 beats/min) | 3 (3.5) | 1–10 | |
Mildly increased (81–100 beats/min) | 28 (32.9) | 23–44 | |
Moderately increased (101–120 beats/min) | 10 (11.8) | 6–21 | |
Severely increased (121–160 beats/min) | 6 (7.1) | 3–15 | |
Respiratory rate (n = 85; median, 24 breaths/min; range, 12–60 breaths/min) | Normal (15–25 breaths/min) | 47 (55.3) | 44–66 |
Decreased (12–14 breaths/min) | 2 (2.3) | 0.3–8 | |
Increased (26–60 breaths/min) | 36 (42.4) | 32–54 | |
Abdominal distension (n = 85) | Bilateral abdominal distension | 15 (17.6) | 10–27 |
Prominent abdominal bulge in 25 cows with external hernia | 25 (100.0) | 86–100 | |
Body side of the external hernia (n = 25) | Left side | 9 (36.0) | 18–57 |
Right side | 16 (64.0) | 43–82 | |
Location of the external hernia (n = 25) | Flank | 14 (56.0) | 35–76 |
Cranial to the udder | 17 (28.0) | 47–85 | |
Inguinal area | 4 (16.0) | 5–36 |
Twenty-five of 85 cattle (29.4%) had 1 or 2 nonspecific signs of pain (Table 2). Thirty-three of 85 cattle (38.8%) were in the colic phase (abdominal pain). These included lordosis, treading, kicking, restlessness, lying down and rising, and sweating. The cattle with colic had 1 to 4 signs of abdominal pain. These were assessed as mild to severe. Thirty-eight of 85 cattle (44.7%) were in the indolence phase (dullness phase) and 14 (16.5%) were in the intoxication phase at the time of admission. In addition, 56.5% (48 of 85) of the cattle had a tense abdominal wall and 2.4% (2 of 85) had an arched back.
Signs of pain in 85 cattle with SII due to external (n = 25) and internal (60) hernias in the retrospective study described in Table 1.
Variable | Finding | No. (%) of cattle | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Nonspecific signs of pain (n = 85) | Muscle fasciculations | 11 (12.9) | 7–22 |
Spontaneous grunting | 7 (8.2) | 3–16 | |
Piloerection | 6 (7.1) | 3–15 | |
Bruxism | 3 (3.5) | 1–10 | |
Stage of illness (n = 85) | Colic phase | 33 (38.8) | 28–50 |
Indolence phase (dullness) | 38 (44.7) | 34–56 | |
Intoxication phase | 14 (16.5) | 0–26 | |
No. of signs of colic (n = 85) | 1 sign | 11 (12.9) | 7–22 |
2 signs | 6 (7.1) | 3–15 | |
3 signs | 2 (2.3) | 0.3–8 | |
4 signs | 4 (4.7) | 1–12 | |
No. of signs of colic not reported | 10 (11.8) | 6–21 | |
Not in the colic phase | 52 (61.2) | 50–72 | |
Colic signs of pain (n = 85) | Lordosis | 18 (21.2) | 13–31 |
Treading | 10 (11.8) | 6–21 | |
Kicking | 8 (9.4) | 4–18 | |
Restlessness | 7 (8.2) | 3–16 | |
Lying down and rising | 4 (4.7) | 1–12 | |
Sweating | 4 (4.7) | 1–12 | |
Colic signs not described in detail | 10 (11.8) | 6–21 | |
Not in the colic phase | 52 (61.2) | 50–72 | |
Severity of colic (n = 85) | Mild | 16 (18.8) | 11–29 |
Moderate | 9 (10.6) | 5–19 | |
Severe | 8 (9.4) | 4–18 | |
Not in the colic phase | 52 (61.2) | 50–72 |
Digestive tract abnormalities
The digestive tract abnormalities are listed in Table 3. Rumen motility was reduced or absent in 98.8% (84 of 85) and intestinal motility in 89.4% (76 of 85) of all cattle. Ballottement and/or percussion and simultaneous auscultation on the right side of the abdomen were positive in 57.6% (49 of 85) of the cattle. Transrectal palpation revealed dilated loops of small intestines and a distended rumen in 38.8% (33 of 85). The fecal output was reduced or absent in 90.6% (77 of 85) of the cattle. In a few cattle, the feces were dark to black and included mucus, blood, and fibrin.
Digestive tract abnormalities in 85 cattle with SII in external (n = 25) and internal (60) hernias (frequency distributions) in the retrospective study described in Table 1.
Variable | Finding | No. (%) of cattle | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Rumen motility (n = 85) | Normal (2 or 3 strong contractions/2 min) | 1 (1.2) | 0.3–6 |
Decreased | 52 (61.2) | 50–72 | |
Absent | 32 (37.6) | 27–49 | |
Foreign body tests (n = 75) | All negative | 40 (53.3) | 41–65 |
At least 1 test positivea | 23 (30.7) | 21–42 | |
Equivocal | 12 (16.0) | 9–26 | |
BSA and PSA on the left side (n = 84) | Both tests negative (normal) | 84 (100) | 96–100 |
BSA and PSA on the right side (n = 85) | Both tests negative (normal) | 36 (42.4) | 32–54 |
Only BSA positive | 27 (31.8) | 22–43 | |
Only PSA positive | 7 (8.2) | 3–16 | |
Both tests positive | 15 (17.6) | 10–27 | |
Intestinal motility (n = 85) | Normal | 9 (10.6) | 5–19 |
Decreased | 51 (60.0) | 49–70 | |
Absent | 25 (29.4) | 20–40 | |
Transrectal findingsb (n = 85) | Normal | 49 (57.6) | 46–68 |
Rumen dilated | 33 (38.8) | 28–50 | |
Dilated loops of small intestines | 33 (38.8) | 28–50 | |
Taught mesentery | 2 (2.4) | 0.3–8 | |
Other findingsc | 7 (8.2) | 3–1 | |
Feces, amount (n = 85) | Normal | 8 (9.4) | 4–18 |
Fecal output reduced | 49 (57.7) | 46–68 | |
Rectum empty | 28 (32.9) | 23–44 | |
Feces, degree of comminution (n = 85) | Normal (well digested) | 50 (58.8) | 48–69 |
Moderately digested | 6 (7.1) | 3–15 | |
Poorly digested | 1 (1.2) | 0.3–6 | |
Rectum empty | 28 (32.9) | 23–44 | |
Feces, consistency (n = 85) | Normal (well digestion) | 26 (30.6) | 21–42 |
Thick pulpy | 18 (21.2) | 13–31 | |
Thin pulpy | 8 (9.4) | 4–18 | |
Pasty | 5 (5.9) | 2–13 | |
Rectum empty | 28 (32.9) | 23–44 | |
Feces, color and abnormal contents in the rectumd (n = 85) | Normal (olive color) | 49 (57.6) | 46–68 |
Dark | 7 (8.2) | 3–16 | |
Mucus | 13 (15.3) | 8–25 | |
Blood | 11 (12.9) | 7–22 | |
Fibrin | 6 (7.1) | 3–15 | |
Several abnormal contents | 16 (18.8) | 11–29 | |
Rectum empty | 28 (32.9) | 23–44 |
BSA = Ballottement and simultaneous auscultation. PSA = Percussion and simultaneous auscultation.
aPositive: at least 3 of 4 attempts elicited a grunt. bThe total number of findings was 124 (145.8%) because 39 cattle had > 1 abnormal transrectal finding. cOther findings: transrectal examination elicited a marked pain response (3 of 85), crepitus (so-called snowball crunching) related to peritonitis (1 of 85), severe enlargement of the urinary bladder (1 of 85), tenesmus (1 of 85), or uterine torsion (1 of 85). dThe total number of findings was 130 (152.8%) because 44 cattle had > 1 abnormal finding.
Other clinical findings
Other clinical findings were reduced skin surface temperature on the rump (< 37 °C; 74.1% [63 of 85]), reduced skin turgor (tenting of pinched skin lasting > 2 seconds; 60.7% [51 of 85]), sunken eyes (51.8% [44 of 85]), prolonged capillary refill time (> 2 seconds; 50.0% [41 of 82]), moderate to severe scleral injection (45.2% [38 of 84]), dry and cool muzzle (43.5% [37 of 85]), pale oral mucosa (25.9% [22 of 85]), and ammonia-like or otherwise foul breath (23.5% [20 of 85]).
Urinalysis
The most common findings were aciduria (pH < 7.0; 38.2% [29 of 76]), hemoglobinuria/hematuria (26.9% [21 of 78]), and glucosuria (25.6% [20 of 78]).
Laboratory findings
The laboratory findings are listed in Supplementary Table S3. Hemoconcentration occurred in 70.6% (60 of 85) of the cattle with a concomitant increase in serum urea concentration (azotemia) in 61.4% (51 of 83). Electrolyte abnormalities included hypocalcemia (81.8% [36 of 44]), hypokalemia (72.6% [61 of 84]), hypochloremia (49.4% [41 of 83]), hypophosphatemia (20.9% [7 of 43]), and hypermagnesemia (70.4% [31 of 44]). Metabolic alkalosis was diagnosed on the basis of an increase in blood pH in 27.7% (18 of 65), increase in bicarbonate concentration in 33.8% (22 of 65), and positive base excess in 63.1% (41 of 65) of the cattle.
Ultrasonographic findings
The principal findings were dilated loops of small intestines (92.6% [63 of 68]), subjectively reduced or absent small intestinal motility (95.2% [59 of 62]), and fluid in the abdomen (48.5% [33 of 68]; Supplementary Table S4). The largest diameter of the dilated small intestine (median) was on average 5.4 cm (95% CI, 5.0 to 5.6 cm). Empty poststenotic loops of small intestines were seen in 8.8% (6 of 68) of the cattle. Internal hernias could not be visualized, whereas small intestines could be seen in 17 of the 19 external hernias that were scanned (Figure 3); fluid and/or fibrin between intestinal loops were seen in 10 of the latter. Ultrasonographically, fibrin appeared as irregularly shaped echogenic masses or strands between the intestinal loops. Abomasal dilatation, characterized by a subjectively dilated abomasum filled with hypoechogenic ingesta and fluid, was diagnosed in 19.1% of the cattle. The abomasal folds appeared as thin, echogenic, wavy structures.
Comorbidities
One or several comorbidities were diagnosed in 22.4% (19 of 85) of the cattle including fatty liver syndrome (n = 3); mastitis (3); vaginitis (1); abscess of the perimetrium (1), reticulum (1), or liver (1); cecal dilatation (1); perforated reticular (1) or abomasal ulcer (1); sole ulcer (1); keratitis (1); endometritis (1); calving trauma (1); solar dermatitis (1); and abortion (1).
Treatment and outcome
Twelve of the 85 cattle died during or immediately after the initial examination or were euthanized because of a grave prognosis or because the owners did not consent to surgery (Figure 1). One cow with an incarcerated external hernia that was erroneously diagnosed as phlegmon caused by a horn injury died after medical treatment. Seventy-two cattle were operated, and 30 of these were euthanized intraoperatively. Of the 42 cattle in which the surgery was completed, 9 died or were euthanized postoperatively because of worsening condition, and 33 (7 of 25 with external hernias and 26 of 60 with internal hernias) were discharged after successful postoperative treatment. Of the 9 nonsurviving cattle, 1 was euthanized on the day of surgery and the remainder died or were euthanized on days 1 to 7 (median, 2 days) after surgery. Overall, 61.2% (52 of 85; 95% CI, 50% to 72%) of the cattle did not survive and 38.8% (33 of 85; 95% CI, 28% to 50%) were discharged.
Surgical findings and intraoperative complications
Of the 72 operated cattle, 59 were standing, 3 were sedated and recumbent, and 7 underwent general anesthesia during surgery. In the remaining 3, surgery was started with the animal standing and finished in sternal or lateral recumbency because the cow suddenly became recumbent.
The 60 cattle with internal hernias underwent right flank laparotomy, which was supplemented in 1 cow with an additional right paramedian approach to facilitate access to the herniated intestines. The 60 internal hernias included hernias in the greater omentum (38 of 60), mesojejunum (19 of 60), mesoduodenum (1 of 60), and mesometrium (2 of 60). Of 38 internal hernias into the greater omentum, only the visceral layer of the greater omentum was involved in 34 cattle; therefore, the incarcerated intestines were located in the omental bursa. In 4 cattle, the intestines had herniated through the visceral and parietal layers of the greater omentum and the incarcerated small intestines were located immediately adjacent to the peritoneum. The size of the hernial ring ranged from 2 to 100 cm, and the length of the incarcerated intestines ranged from 12 cm to 10 m. Of the 60 cattle with internal hernias, 52 had 1, 6 had 2, and 2 had 3 hernias because the omentum was torn in different locations.
In the 12 operated cattle with external hernias, the surgical approach was directly over the hernia. Two of the 12 cattle underwent laparotomy first, but because the incarceration could not be reduced, they were euthanized. Seven of the operated hernias were on the left side and 5 were on the right. They were located distal to the paralumbar fossa and cranial to the flank fold (10 of 12) or caudal to the last rib (2 of 12). Surgery was done with distal paravertebral anesthesia (4 of 12), local infiltration of anesthetic (1 of 12), or general anesthesia (inhalation with halothane or isoflurane, 6 of 12; IV xylazine/ketamine, 1 of 12). The size of the hernial rings varied from 7 to 25 cm, and the length of the prolapsed intestines ranged from 10 cm to 10 m. When required, the hernial ring was enlarged to facilitate reduction. This was achieved manually or, when this was not possible, with blunt-blunt surgical scissors. A mesh was used in 3 cows (vicryl; Johnson & Johnson [in 2 cows]; mersilene, Ethicon [in 1 cow]) for closure of the hernial ring, and 4 were sutured with a continuous suture pattern.
The cattle with external and internal hernias did not differ significantly in terms of whether the surgery could be completed successfully (68.8% [11 of 16] vs 55.4% [31 of 56]; difference P = .34; χ2 = 0.9), but significantly more of the external hernias could be closed completely (90.9% [10 of 11]) compared with internal hernias (41.9% [13 of 31]; difference P = .02; χ2 = 7.9). Two (6.5% [2 of 31]) of the internal hernias could be partially closed, whereas all other hernias (9.1% [1 of 11 external hernias] and 51.6% [16 of 31 internal hernias]) could not be closed.
In 92.9% (79 of 85) of all cattle, only the small intestines had signs of devitalization, and in 7.1% (6 of 85), the large intestines were also involved (these numbers include the 4 nonoperated animals in which the diagnosis was confirmed during postmortem examination). The degree of intestinal devitalization was slight (discoloration of some sections of the intestine was seen but intestinal texture was normal) to moderate (the intestinal wall was more fragile than normal and diffusely dark red) in 28.2% (24 of 85). The remaining 35.3% (30 of 85) had severe intestinal devitalization characterized by black discoloration and what appeared to be necrosis of the incarcerated intestines. Severe intestinal changes accompanied by peritonitis occurred in 18.8% (16 of 85) of the cattle. In 17.7% (15 of 85), the severity of the intestinal changes had not been recorded. Other pathological changes were fibrin deposits between the intestines in 9 cattle, intestinal rupture in 5, liver abscesses in 3, adhesions in 2, and cecal dilatation in 1 cow. To summarize, in 66.7% (28 of 42) of the cattle in which the surgery was completed, reduction of the incarcerated intestines was all that was required, whereas in the remaining 33.3% (14 of 42), resection of parts of the intestines was necessary. One cow with an intestinal hernia in the greater omentum required a second surgery 6 days later because part of the damaged jejunum was no longer patent. After resection of 2 m of jejunum, the heifer made a full recovery.
Short-term outcome of the 42 cattle in which surgery was completed
Nine cattle died or were euthanized within 7 days (median, 2 days) of surgery because their condition became progressively worse (Figure 1). The health status of the remaining 33 cattle returned to normal within 1 to 16 days (median, 2.0 days) after surgery. With 1 exception, appetite normalized within 1 to 16 days (median, 3 days; in cow No. 8, appetite returned to normal after discharge from our clinic). Defecation normalized within 1 to 17 days (median, 3 days). The median rectal temperature of the 33 surviving cattle increased from 38.4 °C on the day of admission to 38.7 °C 7 days later (P = .25), and the median heart rate ranged from 72 to 80 beats/min during the same period (P = .46). Thirty-three cattle were discharged within 5 to 22 days (median, 6 days) after surgery. The health status of the discharged cattle was considered good in 28 and moderate in 5.
Postmortem findings
All hernias were confirmed at postmortem examination (Figure 2). One of the cows with a mesometrial hernia had a uterine abscess. Sixteen of 52 cattle had generalized peritonitis and 5 had localized peritonitis, 4 had ruptured intestines and 3 had multiple abomasal ulcers. One cow was tentatively diagnosed with postoperative paralytic ileus (dilated and ingesta-filled intestines with no mechanical obstruction). Based on the intraoperative and postmortem findings, the jejunum was affected in 72 cattle, the duodenum and ileum in 1 cow each, and multiple small intestinal segments in 9 cattle. No information was available for the remaining 2 cattle.
Long-term outcome of the discharged cattle
The long-term outcome was determined 2 years after discharge via telephone interview. Of the 33 (38.8%) discharged cattle, milk production and reproductive performance were good in 11. The hernia had been closed completely in 6 of these and left open in the remaining 5. Three cows had been slaughtered because of recurrence of the hernia (the hernia had not been closed in 2 cows) and 12 others because of economic or other health reasons. The outcome was not known for the remaining 5 cattle.
Final diagnoses
On the basis of surgical and/or postmortem findings, ileus attributable to SII in an external hernia was diagnosed in 29.4% (25 of 85) and ileus attributable to SII in an internal hernia in 70.6% (60 of 85) of the cattle. The latter included hernias in the greater omentum (38 of 60), mesojejunum (19 of 60), mesoduodenum (1 of 60), and mesometrium (2 of 60). With the exception of 1 cow, external hernia was definitively diagnosed on the basis of the clinical findings (signs of ileus with an abdominal protrusion). In all the cattle with internal hernia, laparotomy was required for a diagnosis.
Discussion
Only 29.4% (25 of 85) of the cattle had SII in an external hernia, which was seen as a bulge of varying size in the abdominal wall. At least 60% (15 of 25) of these had a history of a horn injury from another cow. Horn injuries are a common cause of external hernias.5,9,10 Advanced pregnancy is a possible risk factor for herniation because of increased tension on the mesentery and pressure on other organs and serosal surfaces, causing tears of the abdominal wall or mesentery.10 Twenty-one cattle in the present study were between 30 and 41 weeks pregnant.
Similar to small intestinal intussusception30 and ileal impaction,37 the most frequent abnormal gastrointestinal findings in the cattle of this study were reduced or absent rumen motility (98.8% [84 of 85]), little or no feces in the rectum (90.6% [77 of 85]), and reduced or absent intestinal motility (89.4% [76 of 85]). No feces and absent intestinal motility are cardinal findings in cattle with ileus, whereas rumen atony primarily points to a severe illness, often not related to the digestive system.30 Different forms of ileus vary greatly with respect to the occurrence of dilated small intestinal loops. In the present study, dilated small intestines were palpated transrectally in only 38.8% (33 of 85) of the cattle, which was in agreement with the results of another study13 of cattle with internal hernias (38.9% [7 of 18]) but higher than in cattle with intussusception (24.6% [31 of 126])30 and lower than in cattle with ileum obstipation, in which dilated small intestines were palpated in 86.4% (19 of 22) and dilated large intestines in 13.6% (3 of 22).37 The ability to palpate dilated small intestines transrectally depends on the location of the affected segment of intestine: those in the anterior part of the abdomen are not palpable, and those in the caudal part may be palpable as distended segments of the intestine.3
The principal laboratory abnormalities were those related to shock, such as hemoconcentration (70.6% [60 of 85]) and azotemia (61.4% [51 of 83]). Hypokalemia (72.6% [61 of 84]), positive base excess (63.1% [41 of 65]), hypercapnia (55.4% [36 of 65]), and hypochloremia (49.4% [41 of 83]) suggested that abomasal reflux characterized by hypochloremic, hypokalemic, metabolic alkalosis contributed to the development of shock (hypochloremia, hypokalemia, and finally hemoconcentration and prerenal azotemia). In cattle with intestinal strangulation, the severity of laboratory changes depended mainly on the anatomical location of the strangulation and thus the degree of reflux.38 Strangulation of the proximal small intestine resulted in more rapid and severe changes than distally located lesions. The median serum chloride concentration was lowest in cows with duodenal strangulation and highest in cattle with ileal strangulation. As a result of compensatory mechanisms, cattle with duodenal strangulation also had the highest bicarbonate concentration, Pco2, base excess, and blood pH and the lowest serum potassium concentration.
Hypocalcemia, which occurred in 81.8% of the cattle, is also commonly seen in other forms of ileus and may be attributable to anorexia, gastrointestinal stasis, and ischemia-related decrease in gastrointestinal absorption and possibly milk production.22,39 Hypocalcemia was seen less often in cattle with mesenteric torsion (57.4%).32 This may be because mesenteric torsion results in rapid onset of clinical signs, leaving less time for hypocalcemia to develop.
Another common finding in cattle with ileus is hypermagnesemia, which was seen in 70.4% (31 of 44) of the animals and possibly caused by impaired glomerular filtration attributable to dehydration.40
Ultrasonography allowed the direct visualization of incarcerated intestines in external hernias and thus confirmation of the clinical diagnosis. In cattle with internal hernia, on the other hand, a diagnosis of ileus could be made on the basis of dilated intestines and reduced or absent intestinal motility. However, the cause of the ileus could not be identified. The same was found in cattle with constipation involving the ileum,37 internal hernia,13 strangulation,38 and mesenteric torsion.32 In contrast, the bowel-within-bowel pattern could be visualized in 5.3% (7 of 123) of cattle with small intestinal intussusception30 and blood coagula were seen as hyperechoic masses in 19.0% (12 of 63) of cattle with hemorrhagic bowel syndrome.41
The diagnosis of incarcerated external hernia is usually straightforward based on the presence of an abdominal bulge combined with clinical signs of ileus. The diagnosis of internal herniation is much more difficult if not impossible because there are no pathognomonic clinical, laboratory, or ultrasonographic findings; the differential diagnosis includes all forms of mechanical ileus such as intussusception, strangulation, or volvulus. Therefore, cattle with a tentative diagnosis of ileus should undergo surgery without delay.
Surgery is the treatment of choice for SII and has been described extensively.1,2,4,12,13,16,22,26 Most external hernias are accessed via an incision over the hernial sac or ring,5 and internal hernias require a laparotomy via the right flank.13 The surgical treatment of external hernia has recently been reviewed.5,9,42 There are essentially 2 methods: herniorrhaphy and hernioplasty with the use of resorbable or nonresorbable mesh. We used herniorrhaphy in external hernias. The recommendation for internal hernias is to manually reduce the herniated intestines, possibly after enlarging the orifice through which the bowel has become entrapped,35 and then close the orifice.1,2 In the present study, the orifice could be closed completely in 54.8% (23 of 42) of the cattle. In an earlier study,13 hernias in the greater omentum could be completely closed in 45.4% (5 of 11) of the cattle. In another study12 of 4 cattle with omental hernias, all could be closed. In agreement with the previously cited authors,1,2 we recommend surgical closure of the hernial ring after reduction of the hernia. Inability to do so is no reason to euthanize the cattle; instead, the hernial ring should be enlarged bluntly to prevent future bowel entrapment.
In an earlier study13 of 18 cattle with internal herniation, a telephone follow-up approximately 2 years after surgery showed that there had been no recurrence. On the basis of these findings, we concluded that internal hernias may close spontaneously or do not cause further problems. In the present study, the defect had been closed completely in 6 of the cattle that had a favorable long-term outcome. The defect was left open in 5, and 2 of those cattle were slaughtered because of recurrence of internal herniation. Therefore, closure should be attempted whenever feasible.
The discharge rate of 38.8% (33 of 85) of the cattle with SII was similar to that of cattle with small intestinal volvulus (38.3% [18 of 47])29 and intussusception (44.4% [56 of 126])30 but lower than in cattle with internal herniation (55.6% [10 of 18]),13 small intestinal strangulation (81.7% [49 of 60]),38 and ileum impaction (100% [22 of 22]).37 Only cattle with mesenteric torsion had a lower discharge rate (23.0% [14 of 61]).32 These different rates are most likely related to the different degrees of severity of the ileus but also to the time interval between onset of illness and surgery. Delaying surgery in cattle with mechanical ileus increases the risk of irreparable changes such as tissue necrosis and peritonitis.
The diagnosis of an incarcerated external hernia is usually straightforward, whereas internal SII necessitates laparotomy or postmortem examination for a definitive diagnosis. The important take-home message is that SII should be included in the differential diagnosis in cattle with absent intestinal motility and a lack of fecal output even when dilated intestines cannot be palpated transrectally.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials are posted online at the journal website: avmajournals.avma.org.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the technicians of the Medical Laboratory for the hematological and biochemical analyses, veterinary students for monitoring the cattle during the night, and agricultural assistants for their help with the clinical examinations. Thanks also go out to the many veterinarians who examined and treated the patients and assisted in surgery.
Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose. No AI-assisted technologies were used in the generation of this manuscript.
Funding
The authors have nothing to disclose.
References
- 1.↑
Dirksen G, Doll K. Einschnürung, Abklemmung, Kompression des Darmes. In: Dirksen G, Gründer HD, Stöber M, eds. Innere Medizin und Chirurgie des Rindes. Parey Buchverlag; 2002:530-531.
- 2.↑
Radcliffe RM. Small-intestine surgery in cattle. In: Fubini SL, Ducharme NG, eds. Farm Animal Surgery. Elsevier; 2017:309-317.
- 3.↑
Constable PD, Hinchcliff KW, Done SH, Grünberg W. Diseases of the intestines of ruminants. In: Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs, and Goats. Elsevier; 2017:523-530.
- 4.↑
Francoz D, Guard CL. Obstructive intestinal diseases. In: Smith BP, Van Metre DC, Pusterla N, eds. Large Animal Internal Medicine. Elsevier; 2020:895-899.
- 5.↑
Amare E, Haben F. Hernias in farm animals and its management technique: a review. Int J Clin Stud Med Case Rep. 2020;4:1-9.
- 6.↑
Hartnack AK, Niehaus AJ, Lakritz J, Coetzee JF, Kleinhenz MD. Analgesic efficacy of an intravenous constant rate infusion of a morphine-lidocaine-ketamine combination in Holstein calves undergoing umbilical herniorrhaphy. Am J Vet Res. 2020;81(1):25-32. doi:10.2460/ajvr.81.1.25
- 7.
Fatima A, Arif Khan M, Aslam S, et al. Comparative evaluation of different techniques for herniorrhaphy in calves. Pol J Vet Sci. 2022;25(2):207-212. doi:10.24425/pjvs.2022.141804
- 8.↑
Spadola F, Neve VC, Costa GL, et al. Surgical approach and etiopathogenetic considerations to the umbilical tumefactions in cattle: case review in twenty years (2000/2020). Vet Anim Sci. 2022;17:100258. doi:10.1016/j.vas.2022.100258
- 9.↑
Koller U, Lischer CL, Auer JA. Implantation von synthetischen Netzen zum Verschluss von Bauchwandrupturen in der ventralen Flanke bei der Kuh: Eine retrospektive Studie über 16 Fälle. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2001;143(7):351-358.
- 11.↑
Dirksen G. Abschnürung, Einklemmung und Kompression des Darmes. In: Rosenberger G, ed. Krankheiten des Rindes. Paul Parey; 1970:318-320.
- 12.↑
Pardon B, Vertenten G, Durie I, et al. Four cases of omental herniation in cattle. Vet Rec. 2009;165(24):718-721.
- 13.↑
Ruf-Ritz J, Braun U, Hilbe M, Muggli E, Trösch L, Nuss K. Internal herniation of the small and large intestines in 18 cattle. Vet J. 2013;197(2):374-377. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.01.020
- 14.
van der Velden MA. Mesenteric hernia in a cow. Vet Rec. 1984;115(16):414. doi:10.1136/vr.115.16.414
- 15.↑
De Moor A, Bouckaert JH, Oyaert W. Acute Darmobstructies bij het Rund. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdschr. 1962;63:193-210.
- 16.↑
Deprez P, Hoogewijs M, Vlaminck L, Vanschandevijl K, Lefère L, van Loon G. Incarceration of the small intestine in the epiploic foramen of three calves. Vet Rec. 2006;158(25):869-870. doi:10.1136/vr.158.25.869
- 17.↑
Muggli E, Lesser M, Braun U, Nuss K. Herniation of the gravid uterus through a mesoduodenal defect and concurrent omental hernia in a cow. Vet Surg. 2014;43(1):91-94. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12087.x
- 18.↑
Wolfe DF, Mysinger PW, Carson RL, Powers RD, Rice DN. Incarceration of a section of small intestine by remnants of the ductus deferens in steers. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987;191(12):1597-1598.
- 19.
Scott PR, Kinder AE, Blake NA, Hawe C. ‘Gut-tie’ in a recently castrated steer. Vet Rec. 1997;140(21):559-560. doi:10.1136/vr.140.21.559
- 20.
Norman T. ‘Gut-tie’ in steers. Vet Rec. 1997;140(26):687-688.
- 21.↑
Lores M, Haruna JA, Ortenburger A. Bilateral ‘gut-tie’ in a recently castrated steer. Can Vet J. 2006;47(2):155-157.
- 22.↑
Fubini SL, Yeager AE, Divers TJ. Obstructive diseases of the small intestine. In: Peek SF, Divers TJ, eds. Rebhun’s Diseases of Dairy Cattle. Elsevier; 2018:224-230.
- 23.↑
Charmillot B. Perforation du rectum et prolapsus du jéjunum d’une vache: entérectomie. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 1976;118(12):553-556.
- 24.↑
Frazer GS. Uterine torsion followed by jejunal incarceration in a partially everted urinary bladder of a cow. Aust Vet J. 1988;65(1):24-25. doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14925.x
- 25.↑
Desrochers A, Anderson DE. Intestinal surgery. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2016;32(3):645-671. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2016.05.007
- 26.↑
Yepez PJ, Klabnik JL, Lozier JW, et al. Surgical management and outcome of acquired inguinal hernias in mature bulls: 13 cases (2005-2017). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021;259(8):909-913. doi:10.2460/javma.259.8.909
- 27.↑
Bennien E. Klinische, labordiagnostische und sonographische Befunde sowie Therapie und Verlauf bei 244 Rindern mit Ileus infolge Inkarzeration, Obstruktion und Kompression. Dr Med Vet Thesis. University of Zurich, 2022. Accessed October 10, 2024. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/219589/1/219589.pdf
- 29.↑
Braun U, Gerspach C, Volz C, Hilbe M, Nuss K. Small intestinal volvulus in 47 cows. Can Vet J. 2024;65(3):267-277.
- 30.↑
Braun U, Gerspach C, Volz C, Boesiger M, Hilbe M, Nuss K. A retrospective review of small intestinal intussusception in 126 cattle in Switzerland. Vet Rec Open. 2023;10(1):e58. doi:10.1002/vro2.58
- 32.↑
Braun U, Gerspach C, Volz C, Hilbe M, Nuss K. Dilated small and large intestines combined with a severely abnormal demeanor are characteristic of mesenteric torsion in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023;261(10):1531-1538. doi:10.2460/javma.23.05.0243
- 33.↑
Braun U. Ultrasonography of the gastrointestinal tract in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009;25(3):567-590. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.07.004
- 34.↑
Dirksen G. Ileus beim Rind. In: Dirksen G, Gründer HD, Stöber M, eds. Innere Medizin und Chirurgie des Rindes. Parey Buchverlag; 2002:514-517.
- 35.↑
Smith DF. Surgery of the bovine small intestine. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1990;6(2):449-460. doi:10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30869-0
- 36.↑
Kohn MA, Senyak J. Sample size calculators. University of California-San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Accessed October 10, 2024. https://www.sample-size.net
- 37.↑
Nuss K, Lejeune B, Lischer C, Braun U. Ileal impaction in 22 cows. Vet J. 2006;171(3):456-461. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.02.024
- 38.↑
Braun U, Gerspach C, Loss S, Hilbe M, Nuss K. Small intestinal strangulation in 60 cattle: clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings, treatment and outcome. BMC Vet Res. 2023;19(1):233. doi:10.1186/s12917-023-03797-9
- 39.↑
Hussain SA, Uppal SK, Randhawa CS, Sood NK. Bovine intestinal obstruction: blood gas analysis, serum C-reactive protein and clinical, haematological and biochemical alterations. J Appl Anim Res. 2015;43(2):224-230. doi:10.1080/09712119.2014.963093
- 40.↑
Grünberg W, Constable P, Schröder U, Staufenbiel R, Morin D, Rohn M. Phosphorus homeostasis in dairy cows with abomasal displacement or abomasal volvulus. J Vet Intern Med. 2005;19(6):894-898. doi:10.1892/0891-6640(2005)19[894:phidcw]2.0.co;2
- 41.↑
Braun U, Forster E, Steininger K, et al. Ultrasonographic findings in 63 cows with haemorrhagic bowel syndrome. Vet Rec. 2010;166(3):79-81. doi:10.1136/vr.c178
- 42.↑
Farman RH, Al-Husseiny SH, Al-Ameer ANA. Surgical treatment of hernia in cattle: a review. Al-Qadisiyah J Vet Med Sci. 2018;17(2):61-68. doi:10.29079/vol17iss2art506