What Is Your Diagnosis?

Renee A. McDougall 1Veterinary Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Group, 10975 Guilford Rd, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.

Search for other papers by Renee A. McDougall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPH
and
David L. Dycus 1Veterinary Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Group, 10975 Guilford Rd, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.

Search for other papers by David L. Dycus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

History

A 5-year-old 43.0-kg (94.6-lb) castrated male Rottweiler was evaluated for a second opinion because of a chronic draining tract along the medial aspect of the right tibia. Bilateral cranial cruciate ligament ruptures had been diagnosed approximately 14 months earlier, and the dog had undergone a left tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) followed by a right TPLO approximately 14 and 10 months earlier, respectively. In addition, 5 months before being evaluated at our facility, the dog was examined by the primary care veterinarian for signs including a semi-firm swelling and a draining tract along the medial aspect of the right stifle joint that were presumed to be the result of a draining abscess, consistent with a surgical site infection. The dog was empirically treated with marbofloxacin (4.1 mg/kg [1.9 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h for 10 days) and pain medications, including gabapentin (6.2 mg/kg [2.8 mg/kg], PO, q 24 h) and carprofen (no dosage provided). Because there was no improvement after 8 weeks of antimicrobial treatment, bacterial culture and susceptibility testing were performed on a sample of the draining fluid. Results indicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudointermedius that was susceptible to doxycycline, chloramphenicol, and amikacin. The dog underwent a right TPLO explant procedure following the culture results. No additional culture was performed at the time of surgery. After surgery, administration of amikacin (15.0 mg/kg [6.8 mg/lb], SQ, q 24 h) was initiated. During the following 3 months and before referral to our hospital, the dog was examined by the primary care veterinarian 5 times for continued drainage along the medial aspect of the right tibia. A second bacterial culture and susceptibility testing were performed during that time, and results were unchanged. Therefore, treatment with amikacin was continued.

On initial examination at our hospital, the dog had mild weight-bearing lameness (grade 1/5 to 2/51) in its left hind limb and would off-load the left hind limb at a stance. The left hind limb had no evidence of a draining tract; however, 2 tracts draining seropurulent fluid were noted along the medial aspect of the right tibia. The more proximal draining tract was located at the distal aspect of the previous surgical incision, and the other draining tract was located approximately 2 to 3 cm more caudally and distally. No signs of pain were elicited with movement of the right stifle joint through its range of motion or with long bone palpation of the right hind limb. Results of a CBC and serum biochemical analyses were unremarkable, and orthogonal radiographic views of the right stifle joint were obtained (Figure 1).

Figure 1—
Figure 1—

Mediolateral (A) and craniocaudal (B) radiographic views of the right stifle joint of a 5-year-old 43.0-kg (94.6-lb) castrated male Rottweiler that was evaluated for a 5-month history of 2 draining tracts following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and subsequent implant removal and antimicrobial treatment.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 254, 9; 10.2460/javma.254.9.1045

Determine whether additional imaging studies are required, or make your diagnosis from Figure 1—then turn the page →

Radiographic Findings and Interpretation

Radiography of the right stifle joint revealed well-demarcated, smoothly margined lysis along the caudal and medial aspect of the tibial diaphysis and proximal metaphysis (Figure 2). Increased opacity of the tibia along the area outlining the region of bony lysis was evident, and there was a narrow zone of transition between the margin of bony lysis and the appearance of normal cortex. On the craniocaudal radiographic view, an ill-defined soft tissue opacity was evident adjacent to the area of bony lysis. On the mediolateral radiographic view, caudal displacement of the popliteus and gastrocnemius muscles created a mass effect caudal to the proximal aspect of the tibia. In both views, an irregular margin of the tibia, suggestive of a periosteal reaction, was evident just proximal and distal to this mass effect.

Figure 2—
Figure 2—

Same radiographic images as Figure 1. There is evidence of bony fusion from the previous tibial plateau leveling osteotomy with mild thickening of the patellar ligament at its insertion (long arrow; A). Also evident are osteolysis with subchondral increased opacity (short arrows; A and B) along the caudal and proximal aspects of the tibia and a mass effect (outlined by asterisks; A and B) in the adjacent soft tissue that displaces the popliteus and gastrocnemius muscles caudally. Additionally, irregular margins of the tibia at the proximal and distal aspect of this mass effect are suggestive of a periosteal reaction.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 254, 9; 10.2460/javma.254.9.1045

The combined presence of cortical bony lysis and an irregular periosteal reaction suggested an aggressive bony lesion. The differential diagnosis list for these findings and the mass effect included a soft tissue neoplasia with secondary soft tissue or bony infection and an abscess with secondary osteomyelitis from a chronic implant-associated infection and possible antimicrobial resistance. Given the dog's history of long-term infection and antimicrobial treatment, the differential diagnosis of abscess formation with secondary osteomyelitis was prioritized, and the potential presence of a foreign body (eg, gauze) was not considered, although placement of gauze caudal to the proximal aspect of the tibia to protect the popliteal artery during the TPLO procedure has been described.2

Treatment and Outcome

The dog was anesthetized and underwent surgical exploration of its draining tracts. The distal draining tract was incised and followed to a communication with the proximal draining tract. The underlying subcutaneous tissue was incised, as was fibrous tissue that was encountered. The incision was extended proximally for better visualization. The pes anserinus was elevated to expose the proximal aspect of the tibia. Abundant fibrous tissue was encountered caudal to the tibia in the region of the popliteus muscle. Blunt dissection revealed an intact, nonradiopaque gauze sponge located medially and caudally to the proximal aspect of the tibia. The gauze sponge was extracted, and samples of the deep subcutaneous tissue adjacent to where the gauze had been were submitted for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing.

The dog recovered uneventfully and was discharged the following morning. Results of bacterial culture and susceptibility testing indicated methicillin-resistant S pseudointermedius that was susceptible to doxycycline, chloramphenicol, and amikacin. Given the dog's history of extended treatment with amikacin, treatment with amikacin was discontinued and chloramphenicol (41.8 mg/kg [19.0 mg/kg], PO, q 8 h for 6 weeks) was initiated along with recheck CBCs every 2 weeks until chloramphenicol was discontinued.

A final evaluation was performed 7 weeks after surgery, which was also 7 days after the last dose of chloramphenicol was administered. At the recheck examination, the owners reported that the dog had no signs of right hind limb lameness or incisional discharge. Clinical evaluation confirmed the same.

Comments

Gossypiboma is the term used for a granulomatous inflammatory reaction caused by cotton, most commonly a retained surgical sponge, towel, or gauze,3 left in a patient after surgery. There are 2 types of foreign-body reactions that may result from the presence of retained surgical gauze: an aseptic granulomatous reaction that may result in delayed or no clinical signs or an exudative reaction that often results in the formation of a draining sinus and subsequent infection.3 Radiographic features of a retained surgical sponge may include a localized whirl-like gas pattern, mass effect, peripheral calcification, and bony lysis.3,4

In the dog of the present report, differential diagnosis required consideration of a mass effect combined with bony changes. The presence of a distinct zone of transition to normal bone suggested a non-aggressive lesion. On the other hand, indications of cortical destruction and irregular periosteal reaction suggested an aggressive lesion such as neoplasia or osteomyelitis.5 In hindsight, gossypiboma could have explained the radiographic findings and the dog's lack of response to long-term antimicrobial treatment.

In addition to radiography, other diagnostic imaging modalities (MRI, CT, or ultrasound) could have been considered to help narrow the differential diagnosis list and identify a treatment plan. In humans, T2-weighted MRI findings for retained gauze may include a well-defined wall with a whorled internal structure.6 Findings on CT for gossypiboma in humans include a foreign body with a whirl-like, wavy, striped, or spotted internal structure, which is not consistent with the presence of an abcess.7,8 Ultrasonography may reveal less specific characteristics, including the presence of a well-demarcated primarily hypoechoic mass with echogenic material.8 Further, fine-needle aspiration has also been used to diagnose gossypiboma in dogs.3

In human medicine, risk factors favoring retention of surgical sponges have been identified and include emergency surgery, a change in the intended surgical procedure, and patient obesity.9 Further research is required to determine whether similar risk factors apply in veterinary medicine.

Efforts should be made to reduce risks of surgical sponges being left in patients because retained sponges may have a clinical impact on patient morbidity and death. In a case series,3 2 of 8 dogs died from complications of sponge retention. Delayed complications have also been reported, including 3 reports10–12 of osteosarcoma, 2 instances of which were identified caudal to the proximal aspect of the tibia years after surgical correction of a cranial cruciate ligament tear.

Gossypiboma is a rare, preventable complication. We suggest that veterinarians use radiopaque gauze and count gauze sponges at the beginning and end of surgery. Both of these preventative measures are standard practice in human medicine,9 and given the subtle radiographic signs of a gossypiboma,3 use of radiopaque gauze could be particularly useful for practices in which radiographic interpretation is primarily performed by practitioners who are not board-certified veterinary radiologists. In addition, findings in the dog of the present report underscored that practitioners should consider gossypiboma as a differential diagnosis in patents with a history of surgery and appropriate suggestive findings on physical and radiographic examinations.

References

  • 1. Carr BJ, Dycus DL. Canine gait analysis. Todays Vet Pract 2016;6:93100.

  • 2. Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of the cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993;23:777795.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Merlo M, Lamb CR. Radiographic and ultrasonographic features of retained surgical sponge in eight dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:279283.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Olnick HM, Weens SH, Rogers JV. Radiologic diagnosis of retained surgical sponges. J Am Med Assoc 1955;159:15251527.

  • 5. Thrall DE. Principles of radiographic interpretation of the appendicular skeleton. In: Thrall DE, ed. Textbook of veterinary diagnostic radiology. 6th ed. St Louis: WB Saunders, 2012;252267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Kim CK, Park BK, Ha H. Gossypiboma in abdomen and pelvis: MRI findings in four patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:814817.

  • 7. Choi BI, Kim SH, Yu ES, et al. Retained surgical sponge: diagnosis with CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:10471050.

  • 8. Kokubo T, Ital Y, Ohtomo K, et al. Retained surgical sponges: CT and US appearance. Radiology 1987;165:415418.

  • 9. Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, et al. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:229235.

  • 10. Pardo AD, Adams WH, McCracken MD, et al. Primary jejunal osteosarcoma associated with a surgical sponge in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:935938.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Bradley WA. Extraskeletal soft tissue compound osteosarcoma intimately associated with a retained surgical sponge. Aust Vet Pract 1995;25:172175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Miller MA, Rhonda AL, Fauber A, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma associated with retained surgical sponge in a dog. J Vet Diagn Invest 2006;18:224228.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 157 0 0
Full Text Views 1212 881 36
PDF Downloads 546 210 10
Advertisement