• 1. Nelson SA, Krotscheck U, Rawlinson J, et al. Long-term functional outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy versus extracapsular repair in a heterogeneous population of dogs. Vet Surg 2013;42:38–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Gatineau M, Dupuis J, Planté J, et al. Retrospective study of 476 tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011;24:333–341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993;23:777–795.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Au KK, Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D, et al. Comparison of short- and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitation and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization. Vet Surg 2010;39:173–180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Christopher SA, Beetem J, Cook JL. Comparison of long-term outcomes associated with three surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Vet Surg 2013;42:329–334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Cook JL, Luther JL, Beetem J, et al. Clinical comparison of a novel extracapsular stabilization procedure and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2010;39:315–323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Kim SE, Pozzi A, Banks SA, et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on femorotibial contact mechanics and stifle kinematics. Vet Surg 2009;38:23–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Lee JY, Kim G, Kim JH, et al. Kinematic gait analysis of the hind limb after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy in ten dogs. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2007;54:579–584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. de Medeiros M, Bustinduy MS, Radke H, et al. Early kinematic outcome after treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture by tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011;24:178–184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Böddeker J, Druen S, Meyer-Lindenberg A, et al. Computerassisted gait analysis of the dog: comparison of two surgical techniques of the ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012;25:11–21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Zink MC, VanDyke JB. Canine sports medicine and rehabilitation. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013;5–6,208.

  • 12. Hart SK, Southwood LL, Aceto HW. Impact of colic surgery on return to function in racing Thoroughbreds: 59 cases (1996–2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;244:205–211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Hu AJ, Bramlage L. Racing performance of Thoroughbreds with superficial digital flexor tendonitis treated with desmotomy of the accessory ligament of the superficial digital flexor: 332 cases (1989–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;244:1441–1448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Busfield BT, Kharrazi DF, Starkey C, et al. Performance outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the National Basketball Association. Arthroscopy 2009;25:825–830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Bizzini M, Hancock D, Impellizzeri F. Suggestions from the field of return to sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: soccer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42:304–312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Myer GD, Schmitt LC, Brent JL, et al. Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:377–387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, et al. Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:538–543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Barber-Westin SD, Noyen FR. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1697–1705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Warner SJ, Smith MV, Wright RW, et al. Sport-specific outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1129–1134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Narducci E, Waltz A, Gorski, et al. The clinical utility of functional performance tests within one-year post-acl reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2011;6:333–342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Thomeé R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, et al. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:1143–1151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Thomee R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, et al. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1798–1805.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Hollinger J. Pro basketball forecast: 2005–2006. Lincoln, Neb: Potomac Books Inc, 2005;100–102.

  • 24. Carey JL, Huffman GR, Prekh GS, et al. Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament injuries to running backs and wide receivers in the National Football League. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1911–1917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Levy M, Hall C, Trentacosta N, et al. A preliminary retrospective survey of injuries occurring in dogs participating in canine agility. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009;22:321–324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Cullen KL, Dickey JP, Bent LR, et al. Internet-based survey of the nature and perceived causes of injury to dogs participating in agility training and competition events. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;243:1010–1018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Kellgren JH, Lawrence J. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502.

  • 28. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, et al. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:41–48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Shah VM, Andrews JR, Fleisig GS, et al. Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Football League athletes. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:2233–2239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Brophy RH, Schmitz L, Wright RW, et al. Return to play and future ACL injury risk after ACL reconstruction in soccer athletes from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:2517–2522.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, et al. Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:1567–1573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, et al. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med 2012;22:116–121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:446–452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Brophy RH, Gill CS, Lyman S, et al. Effect on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscectomy on length of career in National Football League athletes: a case control study. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:2102–2107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Hulse D, Beale B, Kerwin K. Second look arthroscopic findings after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2010;39:350–354.

  • 36. Czuppon S, Racette BA, Klein SE, et al. Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:356–364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Rate of return to agility competition for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament tears treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

View More View Less
  • 1 The VCA Animal Specialty and Emergency Center, 1535 S Sepulveda Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90025.
  • | 2 Veterinary Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Group, 10975 Guilford Rd, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
  • | 3 Department of Molecular & Comparative Pathobiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
  • | 4 Veterinary Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Group, 10975 Guilford Rd, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
  • | 5 Veterinary Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Group, 10975 Guilford Rd, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine rate of and factors associated with return to agility competition for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) rupture treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO).

DESIGN Retrospective case series with nested case-control study.

ANIMALS 31 dogs involved in agility competition with CrCL tears treated by TPLO at a private veterinary clinic from 2007 through 2013.

PROCEDURES Medical records were reviewed to collect information on dog signalment, lesion characteristics, and surgical data. Owners completed a survey regarding whether and when their dog returned to agility competition after TPLO and, if so, how the dog performed. Performance data before and after TPLO were compared.

RESULTS 20 of 31 (65%) dogs returned to agility competition after TPLO, 16 (80%) of which returned within 9 months after TPLO. The mean convalescent period for returning dogs was 7.5 months (range, 3 to 12 months). No dog that returned to competition sustained an injury to the affected limb during the follow-up period. No significant difference was identified between dogs that returned or did not return to agility competition regarding severity of osteoarthritis or proportions with meniscal injury or partial (vs complete) CrCL tears.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE These data suggested that the prognosis for returning to agility competition was good for dogs undergoing TPLO. None of the evaluated lesion characteristics were associated with return to competition. Rate of return to competition and duration of the convalescent period may be useful outcome variables for future investigations involving orthopedic procedures in dogs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine rate of and factors associated with return to agility competition for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) rupture treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO).

DESIGN Retrospective case series with nested case-control study.

ANIMALS 31 dogs involved in agility competition with CrCL tears treated by TPLO at a private veterinary clinic from 2007 through 2013.

PROCEDURES Medical records were reviewed to collect information on dog signalment, lesion characteristics, and surgical data. Owners completed a survey regarding whether and when their dog returned to agility competition after TPLO and, if so, how the dog performed. Performance data before and after TPLO were compared.

RESULTS 20 of 31 (65%) dogs returned to agility competition after TPLO, 16 (80%) of which returned within 9 months after TPLO. The mean convalescent period for returning dogs was 7.5 months (range, 3 to 12 months). No dog that returned to competition sustained an injury to the affected limb during the follow-up period. No significant difference was identified between dogs that returned or did not return to agility competition regarding severity of osteoarthritis or proportions with meniscal injury or partial (vs complete) CrCL tears.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE These data suggested that the prognosis for returning to agility competition was good for dogs undergoing TPLO. None of the evaluated lesion characteristics were associated with return to competition. Rate of return to competition and duration of the convalescent period may be useful outcome variables for future investigations involving orthopedic procedures in dogs.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Appendix S1 (PDF 263 kb)

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Heidorn (snheidorn@gmail.com).