What Is Your Diagnosis?

Melanie L. Mutz Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Search for other papers by Melanie L. Mutz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Tracy L. Gieger Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Search for other papers by Tracy L. Gieger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVIM, DACVR
,
Melissa A. Parsons-Doherty Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Search for other papers by Melissa A. Parsons-Doherty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Lorrie Gaschen Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Search for other papers by Lorrie Gaschen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, Dr Habil, DVM, Dr med vet
, and
Nathalie Rademacher Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

Search for other papers by Nathalie Rademacher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet, DACVR

History

A 9-year-old spayed female mixed-breed dog was evaluated for an interdigital mass on the left forelimb. The mass had been resected 7 months previously but recurred 2 months later and had since increased dramatically in size and had begun to ulcerate. The dog's history included amputation of the fourth digit on the right hind limb for a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor approximately 2 years previously.

Physical examination revealed a large, red, nodular, fixed, expansile mass measuring approximately 4 × 4 cm between the second and third digits of the left forelimb. A thick band of tissue was palpable on the craniodorsal aspect of the limb extending from the digit to just distal to the elbow joint. Multiple variably sized, firm, nonpainful cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules were present diffusely over the head, neck, and both forelimbs, including additional interdigital masses. Results of CBC, serum biochemical analysis, and urinalysis were unremarkable. Cytologic evaluation of a fine-needle aspirate of the mass was nondiagnostic, and cytologic evaluation of the left prescapular lymph node revealed reactive lymphoid hyperplasia with hemorrhage. Radiographs of the left forelimb were obtained (Figure 1).

Figure 1—
Figure 1—

Mediolateral (A) and craniocaudal (B) radiographic views of the left forelimb of a 9-year-old female mixed-breed dog evaluated for an interdigital mass.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 239, 4; 10.2460/javma.239.4.431

Determine whether additional imaging studies are required, or make your diagnosis from Figure 1—then turn the page

Diagnostic Imaging Findings and Interpretation

A large (3 × 3.5 × 2.5-cm), lobulated, soft tissue opacity mass is superimposed with the left second digit with evidence of mild, smooth periosteal new bone formation of the second phalanx but no bone lysis. Numerous smaller (5- to 10-mm) soft tissue opacity nodules surrounding the circumference of the limb extending proximally are also evident (Figure 2). Differential diagnoses for both lesions included granulomatous disease, bacterial infection, sterile abscesses, or neoplasia.

Figure 2—
Figure 2—

Same craniocaudal (A) radiographic image as in Figure 1 with a close-up image (B) of the digits. Notice the large soft tissue opacity mass (arrows) at the dorsal aspect of the second digit with multifocal, small, cutaneous nodules extending proximally around the circumference of the limb (asterisks). On the close-up image of the second phalanx, notice the mild, smooth periosteal new bone formation without evidence of bone lysis.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 239, 4; 10.2460/javma.239.4.431

Abdominal ultrasonography revealed multiple rounded hypoechoic and anechoic lesions within the cortex of the left kidney that were up to 1.5 cm in diameter, some of which deformed the kidney's capsular margin. The anechoic structure was septated and had an eccentric, thick capsular rim. (Figure 3). In the cranial and caudal poles of the right kidney, a large, round hypoechoic structure was noted within the cortex along with multiple smaller hypoechoic foci. With the concurrent dermal lesions, renal cystadenoma or cystadenocarcinoma was considered the most likely diagnosis.

Figure 3—
Figure 3—

Longitudinal ultrasonographic grayscale image of the left kidney of the dog in Figure 1. The left side of the body is to the top, and cranial is to the left. Notice the multiple well-defined hypoechoic (arrows) and anechoic (asterisk) areas within the cortex, some of which deform the kidney's capsular margin.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 239, 4; 10.2460/javma.239.4.431

Comments

A digital amputation was performed, and histologic examination of the associated mass revealed proliferating spindle cells with moderate amounts of collagenous stroma.

The presence of multiple firm, cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules was consistent with a diagnosis of nodular dermatofibrosis. Nodular dermatofibrosis is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with renal cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma in dogs characterized by multiple variably sized cutaneous or subcutaneous collagenous nodules.1,2 A genetic predisposition has been detected in German Shepherd Dogs, in which it has been shown to be inherited.2

The mean reported age at onset of skin lesions is 6 years,3 whereas the mean age at diagnosis of renal changes is 8 years,1 so nodular dermatofibrosis appears to be a slowly progressive disease and many affected dogs can have a good quality of life for several years. In German Shepherd Dogs, lesions have been detected in dogs as young as 4.7 years of age.4 Unfortunately, renal changes are almost always bilateral and there is no known treatment.1 Most affected dogs are euthanized because of progressive neoplasia or renal failure.1 Metastasis is found at necropsy in 50% of affected dogs,2 most commonly to lymph nodes, lung, liver, pleura, or peritoneum.1

Nodular dermatofibrosis should be suspected in any dog with diffuse, variably sized skin nodules. Histologic examination of affected tissue is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Abdominal ultrasonography is indicated to identify renal changes, although they may not be present for months to years after the development of skin lesions. In German Shepherd Dogs, screening for renal lesions before breeding may be useful in dogs that are potentially genetic carriers.4

  • 1.

    Turek MM. Cutaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Vet Dermatol 2003;14:286287.

  • 2.

    Lingaas F, Comstock KE, Kirkness EF, et al. A mutation in the canine BHD gene is associated with hereditary multifocal renal cystadenocarcinoma and nodular dermatofibrosis in the German Shepherd Dog. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:30433053.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Bonsdorff T, Jansen J, Lingaas F. Second hits in the FLCN gene in a hereditary renal cancer syndrome in dogs. Mamm Genome 2008;19:121126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Moe L, Lium B. Computed tomography of hereditary multifocal renal cystadenocarcinomas in German Shepherd Dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997;38:335343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 105 0 0
Full Text Views 1484 1184 81
PDF Downloads 714 440 46
Advertisement