Predictors of long-term survival in dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma

Laura Marconato Clinica Veterinaria L'Arca, Vico Cacciottoli 46–47, 80129 Naples, Italy.

Search for other papers by Laura Marconato in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Damiano Stefanello Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Search for other papers by Damiano Stefanello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Paola Valenti Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Search for other papers by Paola Valenti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Ugo Bonfanti Clinica Veterinaria Gran Sasso, Via Donatello 26, 20131 Milan, Italy.

Search for other papers by Ugo Bonfanti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Stefano Comazzi Department of Animal Pathology, Hygiene, and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Search for other papers by Stefano Comazzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Paola Roccabianca Department of Animal Pathology, Hygiene, and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Search for other papers by Paola Roccabianca in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Mario Caniatti Department of Animal Pathology, Hygiene, and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Search for other papers by Mario Caniatti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Giorgio Romanelli Clinica Veterinaria Nerviano, Via Lampugnani 3, 20014 Nerviano, Italy.

Search for other papers by Giorgio Romanelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Federico Massari Clinica Veterinaria Nerviano, Via Lampugnani 3, 20014 Nerviano, Italy.

Search for other papers by Federico Massari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Eric Zini Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland.

Search for other papers by Eric Zini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine factors predicting survival in dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma.

Design—Retrospective cohort study.

Animals—127 dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma evaluated at 4 veterinary hospitals from 2000 to 2009.

Procedures—Records were reviewed to identify dogs with completely staged high-grade multicentric lymphoma treated with chemotherapy. Data collected included signalment, history, hematologic findings, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Long-term survival was defined as surviving > 2 years after diagnosis. Variables were analyzed for associations with dogs living > 2 years.

Results—Among the 127 enrolled dogs, 13 (10%) survived > 2 years with a median survival time of 914 days (range, 740 to 2,058 days). Survival rates at 3, 4, and 5 years were 4%, 3%, and 1 %, respectively. At diagnosis, 11 of the 13 long-term survivors had a body weight ≥ 10 kg, PCV ≥ 35%, absence of ionized hypercalcemia, centroblastic lymphoma, immunophenotype B, absence of bone marrow involvement, and lymphoma stages I through IV and were not previously treated with corticosteroids. The same combination of factors was present in 26 of 114 (23%) dogs surviving ≤ 2 years, yielding a negative predictive value of 97.8% for long-term survivors. Four of the 6 long-term survivors that died during the study died of another cancer; 3 of them had osteosarcoma.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Absence of the aforementioned combination of variables at diagnosis may help identify dogs with lymphoma that will not survive > 2 years. Other types of neoplasia, in particular osteosarcoma, may develop in long-term–surviving dogs.

Abstract

Objective—To determine factors predicting survival in dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma.

Design—Retrospective cohort study.

Animals—127 dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma evaluated at 4 veterinary hospitals from 2000 to 2009.

Procedures—Records were reviewed to identify dogs with completely staged high-grade multicentric lymphoma treated with chemotherapy. Data collected included signalment, history, hematologic findings, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Long-term survival was defined as surviving > 2 years after diagnosis. Variables were analyzed for associations with dogs living > 2 years.

Results—Among the 127 enrolled dogs, 13 (10%) survived > 2 years with a median survival time of 914 days (range, 740 to 2,058 days). Survival rates at 3, 4, and 5 years were 4%, 3%, and 1 %, respectively. At diagnosis, 11 of the 13 long-term survivors had a body weight ≥ 10 kg, PCV ≥ 35%, absence of ionized hypercalcemia, centroblastic lymphoma, immunophenotype B, absence of bone marrow involvement, and lymphoma stages I through IV and were not previously treated with corticosteroids. The same combination of factors was present in 26 of 114 (23%) dogs surviving ≤ 2 years, yielding a negative predictive value of 97.8% for long-term survivors. Four of the 6 long-term survivors that died during the study died of another cancer; 3 of them had osteosarcoma.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Absence of the aforementioned combination of variables at diagnosis may help identify dogs with lymphoma that will not survive > 2 years. Other types of neoplasia, in particular osteosarcoma, may develop in long-term–surviving dogs.

In human medicine, cancer survivors are defined as patients living for 5 years or longer after diagnosis.1 Advances in diagnostic tools and progress of chemotherapeutic strategies during the past decades have resulted in remarkable increases in survival rates for many people with chemoresponsive cancers including, among others, testicular cancer, ovarian germ cell tumors, high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma.2–5 Although survival rates are increasing, surviving patients may experience many health challenges and treatment-induced complications,4,5 often caused by alkylating chemotherapeutic drugs, such as the induction of second malignancies.6–8

Lymphoma is the most common hematopoietic tumor in dogs, and its incidence is rising, probably because of improved diagnostic procedures and treatments, aging of the pet dog population, and exposure to environmental risk factors.9–11 In dogs, lymphomas are cytologically grouped into 2 main categories with different incidence rates and biological behavior. Low-grade lymphomas, which are less common, are characterized by a slow growth rate and indolent biological behavior. High-grade lymphomas are biologically aggressive and typically fatal within a few weeks when appropriate treatments are not instituted.9,12 Distinction of lymphoma on the basis of immunophenotype has also gained interest among clinicians because it appears to correspond with prognosis. In fact, B-cell and T-cell high-grade lymphomas typically have divergent patterns of sensitivity to chemotherapy, with B-cell malignancies being more chemosensitive, thereby yielding better results when chemotherapy is attempted.9 Multiagent chemotherapy, which incorporates drugs such as l-asparaginase, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin, with or without prednisone, is the treatment of choice for high-grade lymphomas. Such protocols have resulted in complete remission rates of 60% to 90% and median survival times of 6 to 12 months.9

Despite the high frequency of response to multiagent chemotherapy, curative treatment remains elusive for most dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma. In particular, dogs with similar signalment, stage and substage of disease, immunophenotype, and tumor anatomic location may respond differently to the same chemotherapeutic protocol. This phenomenon is partly attributable to the biology of the malignant cells, which undergo major genetic and epigenetic changes during their growth and proliferation.13 As a consequence of these rearrangements, natural history and response to chemotherapy may vary among animals. In addition, pharmacogenetic factors as well as tumor microenvironment may influence the response of tumor cells to treatment.

Although many data have been published on the outcome of chemotherapy in dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma, to the authors' knowledge there are no reports specifically focused on long-term survivors, such as dogs living beyond 2 years after diagnosis. Most dogs with lymphoma have a life expectancy of < 1 to 1.5 years, and < 10% survive longer than 2 years.9 The precise characterization of the dogs that survive > 2 years would be useful in practice and in the design of future clinical trials. Indeed, identification of these dogs may help in the selection of treatments specific to the individual dog and its disease characteristics. In addition, owners may be more willing to treat their dogs if a long survival can be anticipated at diagnosis. The aim of the study reported here was to determine the proportion of dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma living beyond 2 years after diagnosis and to identify clinical, biological, and treatment characteristics associated with survival > 2 years.

Materials and Methods

Dogs—Medical records were reviewed to identify dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma evaluated at the authors' veterinary hospitals during a 9-year period (2000 to 2009). Similarly diseased dogs from a previous study14 were also enrolled. Dogs were eligible for inclusion if they were naive to chemotherapy when first evaluated and if they received at least 1 dose of chemotherapy afterward. Administration of corticosteroids prior to diagnosis was not considered an exclusion criterion. Dogs euthanized at the time of diagnosis were excluded.

Diagnosis of lymphoma was established on the basis of cytologic examination of lymph nodes. When available, the following data were retrieved for each included dog at the time of diagnosis: signalment (breed, age, sex, and body weight), history (including previous administration of corticosteroids), tumor cytologic characterization according to the updated Kiel classification system,15 stage and substage according to the World Health Organization clinical staging system,16 PCV, serum total LDH activity, immunophenotype as determined by use of flow cytometry of a lymph node aspirate and peripheral blood as well as marrow blood, identification of bone marrow involvement, evidence of hypercalcemia, and type of treatment (first-line treatments and rescue protocols). Information pertaining to overall survival time, disease-free interval, occurrence of relapse, and cause of death was recorded. Whether a second malignancy developed during or after treatment was also recorded.

Response assessment—Response was classified as complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, or progressive disease. Complete remission indicated 100% reduction in size of all measurable lesions for at least 21 days, partial remission indicated > 50% but < 100% reduction of all measurable lesions for at least 21 days, stable disease indicated < 50% reduction or no change in size of all measurable lesions and lack of new neoplastic foci for at least 21 days, and progressive disease indicated an increase in > 25% of all measurable lesions or the appearance of new neoplastic foci.

Statistical analysis—Dogs that lived > 2 years after diagnosis were defined as long-term survivors. By the end of the study, dogs that had survived ≤ 2 years after diagnosis served as a comparison group. To reduce bias, only dogs that had died during the 2-year period were included in the comparison group.

The following potential predictor variables were investigated for an association with long-term survival by use of backward elimination logistic regression: age (< or ≥ 2 years), sex (male or female), breed (purebred or crossbred), body weight at diagnosis (< or ≥ 10 kg [22 lb]), PCV at diagnosis (< or ≥ 35%), serum LDH activity at diagnosis (high or within reference limits), ionized hypercalcemia at diagnosis (presence or absence), Kiel classification (centroblastic or other), immunophenotype (B-cell vs T-cell lymphoma), bone marrow involvement at diagnosis (presence or absence), lymphoma stage (V or I through IV) and substage (a or b) at diagnosis, corticosteroids administered within the 2 weeks prior to diagnosing lymphoma (yes or no), and number of relapses (none or ≥ 1). Age was categorized as < or ≥ 2 years because lymphoma is generally considered more aggressive in young versus old dogs. Body weight was categorized as < or ≥ 10 kg because small breeds (ie, < 10 kg) are generally considered less susceptible to lymphoma; thus, if affected, the disease may have a different biological behavior. In addition, small breeds can have longer remissions than large breeds, attributable to higher dose intensity achieved with chemotherapy administered according to body surface.17 Packed cell volume was categorized as < or ≥ 35% because anemia is usually defined as PCV < 35%, and anemia may be associated with a decrease in survival time.18–20 Lymphoma stage was categorized as V or I through IV because stage V has been associated with poorer outcome, compared with the other stages.9 Univariate logistic regression was first used to identify variables with a value of P ≤ 0.25; these variables were then investigated further with multivariate logistic regression.

To verify whether a combination of outcome variables, rather than individual ones, may help in identifying dogs living > 2 years at diagnosis, collected data were further evaluated. The aforementioned dichotomous variables were assessed in dogs with lymphoma living > 2 years, and the most common combination of variables was identified; the proportion of dogs with that combination of those attributes was then calculated. The proportion of dogs with lymphoma living ≤ 2 years with the same combination was also calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and 95% CIs of the combination for predicting dogs living > 2 years were calculated.

The proportion of dogs surviving > 2 years that developed a second malignancy was compared with the proportion of dogs surviving ≤ 2 years by use of the Fisher exact test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses. All analyses were performed with the aid of a computer software package.a

Results

Dogs—One hundred twenty-seven dogs fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Among them, 13 (10%) survived > 2 years. Overall, survival rates at 3, 4, and 5 years were 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively.

Dogs surviving > 2 years (long-term survivors) comprised 6 (46%) sexually intact males and 7 (54%) females (4 spayed and 3 sexually intact). Median age was 11 years (range, 5 to 14 years), and median body weight was 44.6 kg (98.1 lb; range, 5.0 to 62.0 kg [11 to 136.4 lb]). Six dogs were crossbred, 2 were Rottweilers, and there was 1 each of Pointer, Boxer, Yorkshire Terrier, Bernese Mountain Dog, and Doberman Pinscher. Median PCV at diagnosis of lymphoma was 43% (range, 35% to 49%). None of the dogs in this group had a PCV < 35%. Of 10 dogs in which serum LDH activity was determined at initial evaluation, 2 had activity within reference limits and 8 had high activity.

Three of the 13 long-term survivors had stage III, and 10 had stage IV lymphoma. Eleven had substage a, and 2 had substage b. Immunophenotype was B in all dogs. In 12 dogs, the morphological classification was centroblastic lymphoma, and in 1 dog, the classification was medium-cell macronucleated lymphoma. Two dogs were already receiving corticosteroids when first admitted to the hospital for initial staging. All dogs achieved a lasting complete remission after first-line chemotherapy with a CHOP-based regimen (n = 12) or doxorubicin alone (1). In 7 the 13 dogs, lymphoma recurred after a median of 177 days (range, 98 to 420 days). At relapse, dogs were treated again with a CHOP-based protocol (n = 4) or with a combined strategy (3), consisting of the same chemotherapeutic drugs administered according to the following scheme: l-asparaginase and vincristine (week 1), vincristine and cyclophosphamide (weeks 2 and 3), and doxorubicin (week 4).

Seven long-term survivors were alive and in complete remission from lymphoma at the end of the study, after a median follow-up period of 1,263 days (range, 740 to 1,785 days). One of them developed a prostatic carcinoma while still in complete remission from lymphoma. Six long-term survivors died during the study period, with a median survival time of 914 days (range, 740 to 2,058 days; Figure 1). Among these, 4 died because of another malignant tumor, including appendicular osteosarcoma (n = 3) and oral melanoma (1); in addition, 1 died from recurrent lymphoma and another died of a nonneoplastic disease.

Figure 1—
Figure 1—

Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicating the percentage of dogs (n = 127) with lymphoma that survived as a function of time. The vertical dashed line depicts the 2-year cutoff used to distinguish short-term from long-term survivors. × = Censored dog.

Citation: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 238, 4; 10.2460/javma.238.4.480

Of the 114 dogs surviving ≤ 2 years, there were 61 (54%) females (of which 36 were spayed) and 53 (46%) males (of which 47 were sexually intact), with a median age of 8.5 years (range, 3 to 18 years) and median body weight of 50.7 kg (111.5 lb; range, 2.6 to 62.0 kg [5.7 to 136.4 lb). The most represented breeds were German Shepherd Dog (n = 18), Boxer (7), Labrador Retriever (7), Rottweiler (5), and Dogo Argentino (4). The remaining were purebred but represented by 1 or 2 dogs/breed (n = 45) or were crossbred (28).

Information on PCV was available for 112 dogs, and the median PCV at initial evaluation was 39.5% (range, 16% to 63%). Eighty-four (75%) dogs had a PCV ≥ 35%, whereas the remaining 28 (25%) had a PCV < 35%. In 65 dogs, serum LDH activity was measured at diagnosis; in 19 (29%) of these dogs, it was within reference limits and in 46 (71%), it was high.

One of the 114 (1%) dogs living < 2 years had stage Ib lymphoma, 21 (18%) had stage III (15 with substage a and 6 with substage b), 58 (51%) had stage IV (36 with substage a and 22 with substage b), and 34 (30%) had stage V (14 with substage a and 20 with substage b). Of the 112 dogs in which immunophenotype was determined, 82 (73%) had B-cell lymphoma and 30 (27%) had T-cell lymphoma.

Of the 108 dogs in which the Kiel classification system was used to describe tumor morphology, 68 (63%) had centroblastic lymphoma, 11 (10%) had large-cell anaplastic lymphoma, 10 (9%) had medium-cell macro-nucleated lymphoma, 8 (7%) had immunoblastic lymphoma, 6 (6%) had lymphoblastic lymphoma, 3 (3%) had Burkitt's-like lymphoma, 1 (1%) had pleomorphic lymphoma, and 1 (1%) had T-zone lymphoma.

At admission, 38 of the 114 (33%) dogs were already receiving corticosteroids. Regarding first-line chemotherapeutic regimens, 96 (84%) dogs were treated with a CHOP-based protocol, 9 (8%) with doxorubicin alone, 5 (4%) with l-asparaginase (alone or combined with other drugs), 2 (2%) with lomustine alone, and 2 (2%) with chlorambucil alone.

Median survival time for dogs living < 2 years was 180 days (range, 4 to 724 days). At the end of the data collection period, 103 (90%) dogs were identified as having died as a result of disease, and 11 (10%) had died as a result of other causes. The dogs that died of other causes included 3 that developed a second malignancy (ie, gastric carcinoma, carcinoid, or melanoma). The proportion of dogs with a second malignancy was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in dogs that lived > 2 years (38%) than in dogs that lived ≤ 2 years (3%).

Factors associated with dogs with lymphoma living > 2 years—Results of backward elimination logistic regression analysis suggested that dogs that were crossbred and had no disease relapses were more likely to live for > 2 years than were other dogs. When multivariate analysis was used to assess independence of these variables, absence of relapse was significantly (P = 0.04) associated with dogs living > 2 years (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.15 to 12.20) but not being crossbred (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 0.95 to 11.42; P = 0.07).

Considering all variables at diagnosis, 11 of the 13 dogs with lymphoma that lived > 2 years after initial presentation had the following most common combination of characteristics: body weight ≥ 10 kg, PCV ≥ 35%, absence of ionized hypercalcemia, presence of centroblastic lymphoma, immunophenotype B, absence of bone marrow involvement, lymphoma stage I through IV, and no prior corticosteroid treatment. The same combination was present at diagnosis in 26 of 114 (23%) dogs surviving ≤ 2 years. The combination of characteristics had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI, 53.7% to 97.3%), specificity of 77.2% (95% CI, 68.2% to 84.3%), and positive and negative predictive value of 29.7% (95% CI, 16.4% to 47.2%) and 97.8% (95% CI, 91.4% to 99.6%), respectively, to identify dogs with lymphoma living > 2 years.

Discussion

Over the past decade, great progress has been made in the treatment of high-grade multicentric lymphoma in dogs.9 Improved knowledge of biology of lymphoma, the optimal use of a various cytotoxic agents, and stratification of treatments on the basis of tumor and patient characteristics have gradually increased long-term survival. Despite these gains in cancer treatment, whether some dogs with lymphoma can be considered cured is not clear.

In 1986, Appelbaum et al21 published some preliminary data on peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, claiming that dogs receiving transplants were cured of their lymphoma. To the authors' knowledge, this is the only report in veterinary medicine specifically addressing the issue of a cure in lymphoma patients. Nevertheless, according to their data, 3 of 12 dogs were alive and in complete remission at the end of the study, 334, 631, and 727 days following transplantation.21 Dogs in complete remission and alive after 1 to 2 years after diagnosis were assumed to be cured.

Five-year survival is often considered a landmark event for humans with cancer, representing a good indicator of therapeutic success.1 Because dogs have a shorter life cycle, it may be hypothesized that such a time frame could be reduced to 2 years in dogs. If this assumption is valid, then given the results of the present study involving prolonged follow-up in dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma, cure was not uncommon. An important fraction (10%) of dogs achieved long-term survival (> 2 years), lymphoma continued indefinitely to be in remission in most of them, and the cause of death was attributable to diseases other than lymphoma in 5 of the 6 long-term survivors that died before the study ended.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that only the absence of relapse was significantly associated with lymphoma in dogs living > 2 years. However, because of the low number of long-term survivors (ie, 13 dogs) and resulting limited statistical power, it cannot be excluded that additional variables might have been associated with long-term survival. By considering characteristics at diagnosis of dogs with lymphoma living > 2 years, it was possible to identify a common characteristics pattern among these dogs (85% of dogs affected). Data on these characteristics were retrieved from the clinical history, physical examination findings, and laboratory analysis results without the need for more sophisticated tests and included the following: body weight, PCV, calcemia, morphological description of lymphoid cells, immunophenotype, bone marrow status, clinical stage, and use of corticosteroids prior to diagnosis. Accordingly, 11 of the 13 dogs living > 2 years concurrently had at diagnosis a body weight ≥ 10 kg, PCV ≥ 35%, absence of ionized hypercalcemia, centroblastic lymphoma, immunophenotype B, absence of bone marrow involvement, lymphoma stage I through IV, and lack of pretreatment with corticosteroids. The same combination was evident in a considerably smaller percentage (23%) of dogs living ≤ 2 years.

This combination of results yielded a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 77% to identify dogs with lymphoma living beyond 2 years. Although the specificity of this combination for detection of long-term survivors was not high, it is worth noticing that the negative predictive value was very high (98%) given the prevalence of long-term survivors in our study sample, suggesting that when the aforementioned factor combination was not present, dogs with lymphoma were very unlikely to survive > 2 years. The predictive values obtained, however, are specific to the conditions in the present study and in other settings would vary according to the prevalence of long-term survivors in those settings. The presence of each of the combination variables by itself has been shown by others to be significantly related to survival time.14,18,19,22–26 Consequently, it was not surprising that the combination of these was coupled with longer survival. Because these variables were not influenced by the adopted chemotherapeutic protocol in our analyses, their combination may be useful in clinical practice to estimate survival expectation. However, additional validation is required to confirm the combination's value in predicting the probability of long-term survival in dogs with lymphoma.

Unexpectedly, median body weight was quite large in both groups (44.6 kg in dogs surviving > 2 years and 50.7 kg in dogs surviving ≤ 2 years). Any breed of dog is susceptible to developing lymphoma; therefore, we would have expected these body weight values to be in the range of 20 to 25 kg. The fact that body weight varied widely in both dog groups suggests that each group was heterogeneous; however, because median body weights and ranges were similar between survivor groups, the bias associated with the unexpectedly high values was likely minor.

Although long-term survival was achieved in approximately 10% of dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma, possible treatment-related long-term effects were evident. Indeed, second malignancies developed in 5 of the long-term survivors and accounted for most (67%) deaths, with recurrent disease and other causes accounting for 17% of deaths each. By contrast, in dogs surviving < 2 years, the main cause of death remained progressive lymphoma (n = 103 [90%]). The risk of dying from a second malignancy ranked third among the long-term survivors, with only 3 dogs developing another malignancy. However, it is possible that the dogs in this group died before living long enough to develop a second type of cancer.

The extent to which development of a second malignancy may be attributable to a genetic predisposition for developing cancer or the potential of a specific type of cancer to predispose affected dogs to second malignancies is unclear. Importantly, in human oncology, evidence has accumulated indicating that a considerable amount of second malignancies are attributable to chemotherapy, mainly to alkylating agents.4–8 Multiagent chemotherapy, which represents a milestone for the treatment of high-grade multicentric lymphoma in dogs, involves a combination of antineoplastic drugs, each with antilymphoma properties and nonoverlapping mechanisms of action. Most chemotherapeutic agents possess carcinogenic properties, thereby raising concern about possible risks in relation to development of a second cancer. In human oncology, patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy are at increased risk for a second cancer relative to other such patients, including other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors (eg, colorectal carcinoma or lung, brain, kidney, and prostate cancer).27–30 Second bone malignancies are more common after childhood cancer31,32; nevertheless, the same association was not observed in the present study, as the 3 dogs that developed osteosarcoma were already adults (7, 8, and 10 years of age) when lymphoma was first diagnosed. Another dog developed oral melanoma, whereas an additional dog developed prostatic carcinoma.

More accurate diagnostic testing and better therapeutic approaches for dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma have lead to improved outcomes in affected dogs. Lack of the combination of variables at diagnosis that we identified may help to identify dogs with lymphoma that will not live longer than 2 years. Conversely, early detection of long-term survivors remains difficult. Absence of relapse, which was associated with dogs living > 2 years, is a follow-up variable and as such cannot be useful at first diagnosis. Furthermore, long-term survival of dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma may be linked to an increased chance of developing a second malignancy, particularly osteosarcoma. Owners of long-term surviving dogs need to be informed about potential late development of new cancers, and well-timed follow-up appointments are required for their early detection. Achievement of a balance between treatment effectiveness and minimization of hazards late in the course of treatment may represent a challenge for veterinary oncologists.

ABBREVIATIONS

CHOP

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone

CI

Confidence interval

LDH

Lactate dehydrogenase

OR

Odds ratio

a.

SPSS, version 11.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill.

References

  • 1.

    Feuerstein M. Defining cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv 2007; 1: 57.

  • 2.

    Gospodarowicz M. Testicular cancer patients: considerations in long-term follow-up. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008; 22: 245255.

  • 3.

    Zanetta GBonazzi CCantù M, et al. Survival and reproductive function after treatment of malignant germ cell ovarian tumors. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 10151020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Haddy TBAdde MAMcCalla J, et al. Late effects in long-term survivors of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 20702079.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Hagemeister FB. Hodgkin's lymphoma in younger patients: lessons learned on the road to success. Oncology 2007; 21: 434440.

  • 6.

    Travis LBCurtis REGlimelius B, et al. Second cancers among long-term survivors of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 19321937.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Neglia JPFriedman DLYasui Y, et al. Second malignant neoplasms in five-year survivors of childhood cancer: childhood cancer survivor study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 618629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Ng AKTravis LB. Subsequent malignant neoplasms in cancer survivors. Cancer J 2008; 14: 429434.

  • 9.

    Vail DMYoung KM. Canine lymphoma and lymphoid leukemia. In: Withrow SJVail DM, eds. Withrow & MacEwen's small animal clinical oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2007;699722.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Pastor MChalvet-Monfray KMarchal T, et al. Genetic and environmental risk indicators in canine non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: breed associations and geographic distribution of 608 cases diagnosed throughout France over 1 year. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 301310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Marconato LLeo CGirelli R, et al. Association between waste management and cancer in companion animals. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 564569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Raskin RE. Lymphoid system. In: Raskin REMeyer DJ, eds. Atlas of canine and feline cytology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2001;111.

  • 13.

    Savage PStebbing JBower M, et al. Why does chemotherapy cure only some cancers? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2009; 6: 4352.

  • 14.

    Marconato LBonfanti UStefanello D, et al. Cytosine arabinoside in addition to VCAA-based protocols for the treatment of canine lymphoma with bone marrow involvement: does it make the difference? Vet Comp Oncol 2008; 6: 8089.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Fournel-Fleury CMagnol JPBricaire P, et al. Cytohistological and immunological classification of canine malignant lymphomas: comparison with human non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Comp Pathol 1997; 117: 3559.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Vail DMYoung KM. Hematopoietic tumors: lymphoma and lymphoid leukemia. In: Withrow SJVail DM, eds. Withrow and MacEwen's small animal clinical oncology. 4th ed. St Louis: WB Saunders Co, 2007;699733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Zemann BIMoore ASRand WM, et al. A combination chemotherapy protocol (VELCAP-L) for dogs with lymphoma. J Vet Intern Med 1998; 12: 465470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Miller AGMorley PSRao S, et al. Anemia is associated with decreased survival time in dogs with lymphoma. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 116122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Abbo AHLucroy MD. Assessment of anemia as an independent predictor of response to chemotherapy and survival in dogs with lymphoma: 96 cases (1993–2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 18361842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Tvedten HWeiss DJ. Classification and laboratory evaluation of anemia. In: Feldman BFZinkl JGJain NC, eds. Schalm's veterinary hematology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;143150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Appelbaum FRDeeg HJStorb R, et al. Cure of malignant lymphoma in dogs with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 1986; 42: 1922.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Garrett LDThamm DHChun R, et al. Evaluation of a 6-month chemotherapy protocol with no maintenance therapy for dogs with lymphoma. J Vet Intern Med 2002; 16: 704709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Greenlee PGFilippa DAQuimby FW, et al. Lymphomas in dogs. A morphologic, immunologic, and clinical study. Cancer 1990; 66: 480490.

  • 24.

    Ponce FMagnol JPLedieu D, et al. Prognostic significance of morphological subtypes in canine malignant lymphomas during chemotherapy. Vet J 2004; 167: 158166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Teske Evan Heerde PRutteman GR, et al. Prognostic factors for treatment of malignant lymphoma in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205: 17221728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Jagielski DLechowski RHoffmann-Jagielska M, et al. A retrospective study of the incidence and prognostic factors of multicentric lymphoma in dogs (1998–2000). J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2002; 49: 419424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Sacchi SMarcheselli LBari A, et al. Second malignancies after treatment of diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a GISL cohort study. Haematologica 2008; 93: 13351342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Moser ECNoordijk EMvan Leeuwen FE, et al. Risk of second cancer after treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; n EORTC cohort study. Haematologica 2006; 91: 14811488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Mudie NYSwerdlow AJHiggins CD, et al. Risk of second malignancy after non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a British Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 15681574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Tward JDWendland MMShrieve DC, et al. The risk of secondary malignancies over 30 years after treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2006; 107: 114118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Hawkins MMWilson LMBurton HS, et al. Radiotherapy, alkylating agents, and risk of bone cancer after childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 270278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Tucker MAD'Angio GJBoice JD, et al. Bone sarcomas linked to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in children. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 588593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 710 0 0
Full Text Views 2066 1246 43
PDF Downloads 1271 577 33
Advertisement