Complications associated with lateral fabellotibial suture surgery for cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs: 363 cases (1997–2005)

Sue A. Casale Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536.

Search for other papers by Sue A. Casale in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
and
Robert J. McCarthy Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536.

Search for other papers by Robert J. McCarthy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVS

Abstract

Objective—To report the complication rate for a commonly performed procedure (lateral fabellotibial suture [LFS]) used in the treatment of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) injury.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Animals—305 dogs evaluated for 363 incidents of CCL injury from January 1997 through December 2005 and treated with LFS.

Procedures—Medical records were reviewed for information on breed, sex, age, body weight, clinical history, duration of surgery and anesthesia, primary surgeon, percentage of ligament tear, condition of medial meniscus, unilateral versus bilateral disease, implant material, duration of follow-up, and perioperative and postoperative complications.

Results—363 LFS procedures met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Complications (n = 65) were recorded for 63 of the 363 (17.4%) surgical procedures. Multiple complications developed in 2 dogs. In 26 (7.2%) dogs, a second surgery was required to manage the complications. Breed, side on which surgery was performed, implant material, percentage ligament tear, meniscal condition and treatment, bandage use, perioperative antimicrobial use, and experience of surgeon did not influence the complication rate. Factors significantly associated with a higher rate of complications were high body weight and young age of dog at the time of surgery.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—LFS is associated with a lower perioperative and postoperative complication rate than has been reported for other surgical procedures to repair CCL injury. Heavier and younger dogs had more complications. Complication rate must be considered when choosing a surgical treatment for dogs with CCL injury.

Abstract

Objective—To report the complication rate for a commonly performed procedure (lateral fabellotibial suture [LFS]) used in the treatment of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) injury.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Animals—305 dogs evaluated for 363 incidents of CCL injury from January 1997 through December 2005 and treated with LFS.

Procedures—Medical records were reviewed for information on breed, sex, age, body weight, clinical history, duration of surgery and anesthesia, primary surgeon, percentage of ligament tear, condition of medial meniscus, unilateral versus bilateral disease, implant material, duration of follow-up, and perioperative and postoperative complications.

Results—363 LFS procedures met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Complications (n = 65) were recorded for 63 of the 363 (17.4%) surgical procedures. Multiple complications developed in 2 dogs. In 26 (7.2%) dogs, a second surgery was required to manage the complications. Breed, side on which surgery was performed, implant material, percentage ligament tear, meniscal condition and treatment, bandage use, perioperative antimicrobial use, and experience of surgeon did not influence the complication rate. Factors significantly associated with a higher rate of complications were high body weight and young age of dog at the time of surgery.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—LFS is associated with a lower perioperative and postoperative complication rate than has been reported for other surgical procedures to repair CCL injury. Heavier and younger dogs had more complications. Complication rate must be considered when choosing a surgical treatment for dogs with CCL injury.

Damage of the CCL in dogs is one of the most common injuries encountered by veterinarians and is the most common cause of lameness of the stifle joint.1,2 Stifle joint instability from CCL rupture results in pain, lameness, and progressive degenerative joint disease.3 Early surgical stabilization is recommended, particularly in dogs weighing > 15 kg (33 lb), because poor results are reported for most dogs that undergo nonoperative management.4 A variety of surgical techniques for management of CCL injury have been described, and currently, a single best technique has not been determined.5,6 One of the most widely performed procedures is extracapsular stabilization with LFS.7,a

The LFS technique is a modification of the extracapsular technique first reported in 1970.8 Stability is provided to the stifle joint by passing heavy, nonabsorbable suture material behind the lateral sesamoid bone of the gastrocnemius muscle and through 1 or 2 bone tunnels made in the tibial tuberosity The suture position is intended to mimic the orientation of the CCL, thus eliminating cranial drawer motion. The LFS technique relies on periarticular fibrosis for permanent stabilization of the joint.9,10 Imbrication of the lateral fascia at the time of surgery may help to further stabilize the stifle joint.9,10 Good to excellent clinical outcome in 77% to 82% of dogs that underwent LFS surgery has been reported.11 Numerous reports of complications associated with other surgical techniques to treat dogs with CCL rupture exist, but few reports of complications associated with the LFS approach have been published. For example, suture reactions were detected in 18% to 21% of dogs after extra-articular stabilization of the stifle joint widi multifilament, polyamide suture.12,13,b Other complications associated with that procedure were not described. The purpose of the study reported here was to evaluate the rate and range of complications that develop after a large number of LFS surgeries.

Materials and Methods

Case selection—Records were reviewed to identify dogs evaluated at the Foster Hospital for Small Animals at the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine and that underwent LFS surgery for management of CCL injury from January 1997 through December 2005. A dog was eligible for inclusion when the diagnosis of CCL injury was confirmed at surgery a follow-up examination was performed, and the medical record included signalment, details of the surgical procedure, postoperative management, and follow-up examination.

Medical records review—Data obtained from the medical records included signalment, body weight, affected limb, and nature (unilateral vs bilateral) of the CCL rupture. Surgery time (interval from skin incision to closure) and anesthesia time (interval from induction to discontinuation of gas anesthesia), primary surgeon (staff surgeon vs resident), extent of CCL damage (complete vs partial rupture), meniscal damage and treatment (excision vs release), implant type, postoperative bandage application, and duration of follow-up were recorded. Type and number of complications were also recorded.

A complication was defined as any undesirable outcome associated with the surgical procedure or occurring after surgery that was confirmed via physical examination of the dog at the hospital. Complications were categorized as intraoperative, neurologic, infection (confirmed via positive result of bacteriologic culture of a sample obtained from the surgical site), incisional (without positive result of bacteriologic culture), meniscal, and implant related. Complication rate was defined as the number of surgical procedures with complications divided by the total number of surgical procedures.

Surgical treatment—All dogs underwent standard lateral parapatellar arthrotomy for exploration of the stifle joint. Remnants of the CCL were removed, and the menisci were inspected. When a meniscal tear was evident, the torn component was removed. When the meniscus was intact, the caudal horn of the medial meniscus was left intact or a meniscal release was performed at the discretion of the surgeon. Medial meniscal release was accomplished by severing the meniscotibial ligament of the caudal horn of the medial meniscus. The LFS surgeries were performed by passing suture material around the lateral sesamoid of the gastrocnemius muscle and through 1 or 2 bone tunnels created in the proximal aspect of the tibia. The suture material was then secured with hand ties or a commercially available crimp clamp system.c The LFS technique, a modification of the original extracapsular technique,8 varied primarily in the type of implant material used. Anesthetic protocols varied and were not evaluated.

Most dogs received perioperative administration of cefazolind (22 mg/kg [10 mg/lb], IV, q 2 h). A modified Robert Jones bandage was applied to the affected limbs of most dogs after surgery. Bandage removal was at the discretion of the surgeon, and the duration that the limb remained bandaged varied from 24 hours to 2 weeks. Dogs were typically discharged 48 hours after surgery, and suture removal was performed 10 to 14 days after surgery. Dogs generally returned for suture removal at 2 weeks and a follow-up appointment at 6 weeks after surgery. Postoperative administration of analgesics and antimicrobials was at the discretion of the surgeon, but most dogs were treated with narcotic analgesics for 48 hours and discharged with instructions for owner administration of NSAIDs. Postoperative antimicrobials were not routinely used.

Statistical analysis—Data were examined graphically, and data that were not normally distributed were transformed before analysis. Data are reported as mean ± SD for normally distributed data or median and range for nonparametric data. Distributions of categoric data (eg, type of surgery and sex) were compared by use of a χ test. Continuous variables (eg, surgery time, age, and body weight) were compared by use of independent t tests. Statistical analysis was performed with commercial statistical software.e A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.

Results

Of the 490 records of dogs with LFS procedures during the study period, 305 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. Fifty-eight dogs underwent bilateral LFS surgery, for a total of 363 surgeries performed. Nine of the bilateral LFS procedures were performed during the same anesthetic episode. In addition, 5 dogs had bilateral surgery consisting of LFS surgery performed on 1 stifle joint and TPLO performed on the contralateral stifle joint, one of which was performed during the same anesthetic episode. The TPLO surgeries were not counted in the total number of surgeries. One hundred ninety-three LFS surgeries were performed on the left stifle joint, and 170 were performed on the right stifle joint.

Signalment—The 305 dogs that underwent LFS surgery consisted of 175 (57.4%) neutered females, 10 (3.3%) sexually intact females, 111 (36.4%) neutered males, and 9 (2.9%) sexually intact males. Median age of dogs at the time of surgery was 6 years (range, 0.8 to 15.1 years), and median body weight was 31.8 kg (70.0 lb; range, 2.5 to 104 kg [5.5 to 228.8 lb]). Males (median weight, 36.0 kg [79.2 lb]; range, 3.0 to 104.0 kg [6.6 to 228.8 lb]) were significantly (P < 0.001) heavier than females (29.0 kg [63.8 lb]; range, 2.5 to 71.2 kg [5.5 to 156.61b]). Sixty-six (21.6%) dogs were of mixed breeds, whereas 239 (78.4%) were purebred. Fifty-five breeds were represented, and the most common were Labrador Retriever (n = 64; 21.0%), Rottweiler (17; 5.6%), Golden Retriever (16; 5.2%), and German Shepherd Dog (9; 3.0%).

Surgery—Median duration of surgery was 65 minutes (range, 21 to 147 minutes), and median duration of anesthesia was 126 minutes (range, 53 to 272 minutes). There was perioperative administration of cefazolinc during 346 (95.3%) surgeries. A bandage was applied after 328 (90.4%) surgeries; however, duration of bandaging was not recorded.

In 315 (86.8%) LFS surgeries, the implant material used was nylon leader line/ The nylon ranged in size from a test weight of 20 to 80 lb, with 60 lb being the most common size used (n = 128 surgeries; 40.6%). One suture was placed in 80 surgeries, 2 sutures in 172 surgeries, 3 sutures in 3 surgeries, and 4 sutures in 1 surgery (all were LFSs). In 59 surgeries, the number of sutures was not recorded. In 81 (25.7%) surgeries, the nylon suture was secured with crimps. In the remaining surgeries, the suture was secured by hand ties. Other materials used include braided polyester (21; 5.8%) and polypropylene (2; 0.6%). The material used in 25 (6.9%) surgeries was not recorded.

Arthrotomy with evaluation of the CCL and menisci was performed during all surgeries. A complete tear of the CCL was reported for 233 (64.2%) surgeries. Damage to the caudal horn of the medial meniscus was reported in 136 (37.5%) surgeries. In dogs with damaged menisci, the torn or crushed component was excised. In dogs in which menisci were intact, MMR was performed (n = 113; 71.1%) or the meniscus was left intact (46; 28.9%). The condition of the medial meniscus and associated treatment (removal, MMR, or left intact) were not reported in 68 (18.7%) instances. Two hundred thirty-eight (65.6%) LFS procedures were performed by a board-certified surgeon; the remainder was performed by surgical residents. Median duration of follow-up was 30 weeks (range, 2 to 312 weeks).

Complications—Sixty-five complications resulting from 63 of the 363 (17.4%) LFS procedures were recorded. One complication was recorded for 61 dogs, and 2 complications were recorded for 2 dogs. No dog in the study group had > 2 complications. Two of the 9 dogs that underwent bilateral LFS surgery in the same anesthetic episode developed complications. Both dogs had 1 complication on 1 limb. This was not significantly (P = 0.47) different from results for dogs that underwent unilateral surgery. Side of surgery did not influence the complication rate; the percentage of LFS procedures that resulted in complications on the left hind limb (n = 30; 47.6%) was not significantly (P = 0.33) different from the percentage of surgeries that resulted in complications on the right hind limb (33; 52.4%).

Median age of dogs with complications after LFS surgery was 4.8 years (range, 0.8 to 10.9 years), which was significantly (P = 0.048) younger than the median age of dogs that did not develop complications (6.1 years; range, 0.8 to 15.1 years). Median body weight of dogs that developed complications was 35.7 kg (78.5 lb; range, 7.7 to 60 kg [16.9 to 132 lb]), which was significantly (P = 0.003) heavier than dogs that did not develop a complication (31 kg [68.2 lb]; range, 2.5 to 104 kg). Sex of dog influenced the rate of surgery-related complications significantly (P = 0.021), with more neutered and unneutered males (n = 35) developing complications than neutered and unneutered females (28).

Of the 63 dogs that developed complications, 15 (23.8%) dogs were of mixed breeds. The 4 most common breeds that developed complications were Labrador Retriever (n = 16; 25.4%), Rottweiler (5; 7.9%), Golden Retriever (3; 4.8%), and Boxer (3; 4.8%). Median duration of surgery in dogs that developed complications was 70 minutes (range, 30 to 145 minutes), and median duration of anesthesia was 128 minutes (range, 68 to 240 minutes). There were no differences in durations of surgery (P = 0.55) and anesthesia (P = 0.90) between dogs that developed complications and those that did not. Fifty-eight (92.1%) dogs that developed complications received cefazolin in the perioperative period. A soft-padded bandage was applied to the affected limbs of 58 (92.1%) dogs after surgery. The complication rate was not influenced by the administration of cefazolin in the perioperative period (P = 0.18) or by bandaging after surgery (P = 0.84).

Nylon was the implant material in 56 (88.9%) surgeries that resulted in complications. Type of implant material used during LFS surgeries was not significantly (P = 0.64) associated with the percentage of surgeries that resulted in complications. Board-certified surgeons performed 238 surgeries, including the surgeries on 38 of the 63 (60.3%) dogs that developed complications (16.0% complication rate), whereas surgical residents acted as the primary surgeon for 125 surgeries, including those that involved the other 25 (39.7%) dogs that developed complications (20.0% complication rate). The difference between complication rates was not significantly (P = 0.36) different.

An intraoperative complication was recorded in 1 (0.3%) LFS procedure. In the affected dog, the suture tore through the attachment of the lateral sesamoid of the gastrocnemius muscle when the suture was tightened. A screw and washer were then substituted for the sesamoid attachment. No additional treatment was required, and the dog recovered without any additional complications.

Neurologic deficits attributed to peroneal nerve damage during surgery were evident in 1 dog after surgery. The day after surgery, the dog was observed dragging its leg, which was originally attributed to the bandage. Knuckling of the toes continued after the bandage was removed. The dog was discharged but returned to the hospital 5 days after surgery for electromyographic evaluation. The electromyogram confirmed blocked nerve conduction at the level of the stifle joint. Because improvement was dramatic in the first week after surgery, no additional treatment was performed. By 4 weeks after surgery, no neurologic deficits were apparent.

Surgical site infection, confirmed by use of positive results of bacteriologic culture of samples from surgical sites, developed after 14 (3.9%) surgeries. Infection was detected within the first year after surgery in all situations, with most (n = 9) dogs developing an infection within 6 weeks after surgery. Staphylococcus spp (n = 12), Streptococcus spp (1), and Pseudomonas spp (1) were isolated from samples obtained at the time of second surgery or arthrocentesis. Three dogs that developed an infection did not receive cefazolin in the perioperative period. Nylon was the implant material in most dogs (n = 13) that developed an infection. Additional surgery was performed in all 14 dogs. Treatment included exploration of the stifle joint and joint lavage (n = 13), antimicrobials (12), implant removal (10), implant removal with replacement (1), and exploration of the incision and lavage (1). No additional treatment was required in 12 dogs. A third surgery for lavage of the stifle joint was performed in 2 dogs; in both, results of bacteriologic culture at the time of the third surgery remained positive.

Incisional complications were recorded in 32 (8.8%) LFS procedures, consisting of self-trauma (n = 13), swelling and discharge (12), and bandage-related (10) complications. Eight dogs with swelling and discharge, 8 with self-trauma, and 2 with moist dermatitis secondary to the bandage were empirically treated with antimicrobials. Additional treatments included Elizabethan collars, warm compresses, topical application of cortisone ointment, and acepromazineg sedation. In 1 dog, arthrocentesis was performed, and the joint fluid was submitted for bacteriologic culture (with negative culture results). All incisional complications resolved and required no additional treatment.

Meniscal complications developed after 7 (1.9%) LFS procedures. Dogs were examined for lameness between 20 and 52 weeks after surgery. All dogs underwent exploration of the stifle joint, during which a tear of the caudal horn of the medial meniscus was identified and excised. All 7 dogs had intact menisci when the original surgery was performed, and MMR had not been performed in any of the affected dogs. One dog had a positive result of bacteriologic culture at the time of the second surgery.

Implant-related complications were recorded after 10 (2.8%) LFS procedures. Swelling associated with the suture material developed between 6 and 44 weeks after surgery in 6 dogs. In all 6 dogs, the implant material used was monofilament nylon leader line. In 1 dog, crimps were used to secure the suture, whereas in the 5 remaining dogs, hand ties were used. Two dogs underwent an additional surgery for implant removal. In 1 dog, the swelling was drained, and the problem resolved with antimicrobial treatment and warm compresses applied to the affected area. Three dogs received no additional treatment. In 4 dogs, persistent lameness not associated with swelling led to implant removal between 14 and 38 weeks after surgery. In 2 dogs, results of a bacteriologic culture of the implant material obtained at surgery were negative, and the suture was not replaced. In 2 dogs, instability was suspected to be the cause of the lameness, and the implant was replaced in both dogs.

Of the dogs that developed complications, 49 (77.8%) required additional treatment. Twenty-six of 63 (41.3%) surgeries with a complication required a second surgery, resulting in an overall rate of additional surgery attributable to complications of 7.2%.

Discussion

Repair of CCL injury is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in dogs, and many different techniques have been described. The LFS method was first reported over 30 years ago and is still commonly performed today with minor modifications in technique. Although LFS surgeries are common, additional information on the frequency and range of complications associated with the procedure was needed. In the study reported here, the overall complication rate associated with LFS surgeries (17.4%) was less than that reported for other techniques used in the management of CCL injury. The complication rate following TPLO is reportedly between 19% and 28%.14–16 The rate associated with tibial tuberosity advancement is 31%, and that associated with fibular head transposition is 16.5% to 27%.17–19

Signalment of dogs in the present study was similar to that in other reports7,14,15,20; Labrador Retriever, Rottweiler, Golden Retriever, and German Shepherd Dog were the most common breeds. Data regarding general admissions to the hospital over the period of the study were not available, so whether these breeds were over-represented in our sample was unknown.

In the present study, the rate of complications associated with the LFS procedure was not associated with breed. Median age of dogs (6 years) was slightly higher than that reported for other studies.14,15 To our knowledge, no studies have revealed an association between age of dog and increased risk of postoperative complications. In our study, dogs that developed postsurgical complications were significantly younger than those that did not develop complications. It is possible that the younger dogs developed more complications because they were more active and postoperative restriction of exercise was more challenging, compared with the situation in older dogs. Age of dog at the time of CCL rupture decreases as body weight increases,20,21 suggesting that larger dogs may tear their CCL earlier.

Although results of other studies4,22 indicate that body weight is a factor in recovery from CCL surgery, with improved clinical outcome in light dogs, surgery-associated complication rates were not considered. Body weight of dogs that developed complications in the present study was significantly higher than that of dogs without complications. Body condition score was not routinely recorded and was therefore not considered; however, body condition is an important consideration because as many as 71% of dogs with CCL rupture are overweight.23 In human surgical patients, obesity is a risk factor for surgical site infection.24–26 Another veterinary study27 revealed that obese dogs and cats appeared to have higher postsurgical infection rates than did nonobese dogs and cats; however, the differences were not significant. In the present study, significantly more male than female dogs developed complications after the LFS procedure. This was an unexpected finding but may have been attributable to differences in body weight between sexes because males were significantly heavier than females.

Durations of surgery and anesthesia for dogs that developed a complication (including infection) were not significantly different from respective durations of surgery and anesthesia for dogs that did not develop a complication. Longer durations of surgery and anesthesia are reportedly correlated with an increased probability of infection,27–30 but this phenomenon was not evident in our study. Risk of infection in dogs reportedly doubles with approximately every 70 minutes of surgery time.28 Because the median duration of the LFS procedure was short (65 minutes) and the range of durations of surgery was fairly narrow in our study, it is possible that there was not enough variation in either of these variables to detect an association with complication rate. In addition, other potential risk factors such as the number of people in the surgical suite, hypotension or hypothermia of dogs while anesthetized, and underlying endocrinopathies or immunodeficiencies27 were not considered in the present study.

Surgeon experience was not associated with complication rate after the LFS procedure. This finding is similar to that of another study14 Most surgeries in the present study were performed by board-certified surgeons. Because the study took place in a veterinary teaching hospital, even when the resident acted as a primary surgeon, the procedure was often overseen by a staff surgeon.

Dogs that underwent LFS surgery had an infection rate of 3.9/100 surgeries, which was within the expected (2.5% to 5.8%) infection rate reported for most clean surgical procedures in veterinary28,31 and human25 surgery. Only dogs with a positive result of bacteriologic culture of samples from the joint or deep to the incision were classified as having an infection. Dogs categorized as having incisional complications that were empirically treated with antimicrobials were not included in this group; therefore, the actual infection rate may have been higher than 3.9/100 surgeries. In another study13 > 21% of dogs required implant removal after LFS surgery because of infection, but a multifilament sutureb available only in cassettes was used as the implant material. Positive results of bacteriologic cultures of joint material were obtained in 10.3% of dogs after LFS surgery in another study32; however, the sample included only 29 dogs, and 11 dogs had an unsatisfactory outcome after surgery. The low infection rate in the present study may have been the result of improved surgical implants or techniques. Alternatively, low-grade infections may not have been clinically apparent in some dogs.32

Infection attributable to surgery was treated aggressively; all dogs underwent an additional surgery for implant removal, joint lavage, or irrigation of the incision. Staphylococcus spp were the most common bacteria isolated from these infections, which is consistent with findings of other studies.12,13,33 Infection rates following other types of surgical procedures for CCL repair have been reported. Infection is associated with 1.3% of fibular head transposition procedures18 and 7.8% of intracapsular repairs in which a screw and spiked washer are used.33 Infection rates after TPLO are reportedly as high as 8.9%,15 although not all infections were confirmed via bacteriologic culture in the associated study Infection develops after 3% of TPLO procedures when only dogs with positive results of bacteriologic culture are included.14 After tibial tuberosity advancement procedures, 2.6% of dogs develop infections.17 Although perioperative antimicrobial use did not influence the complication rate in the present study, most (95.3%) dogs received cefazolin during the surgical procedure.

Incisional complications developed after 8.8% of the LFS procedures. This finding is similar to that of other studies in which complications following other methods of CCL repair were investigated. For example, incisional complications reportedly develop after 3.6% to 15.1% of TPLO and 8.9% of tibial tuberosity advancement procedures.14–17 None of the dogs that underwent the LFS procedure and developed an incisional complication in our study had additional problems. Lack of an association between incisional complications and development of infection after CCL surgery has been reported14 and is supported by the results of the present study. Application of a bandage in the postoperative period did not appear to influence the rate of complications in our study, but bandages were applied to > 90% of dogs after surgery. Duration of postoperative bandaging varied from 24 hours to 2 weeks, depending on tolerance of the dog and bandage care by the owners. Many bandages were removed by owners or referring veterinarians, so an accurate determination of duration of bandaging was not possible for most dogs. Although a bandage may help prevent self-inflicted trauma to the incision, there were also 7 bandage-related complications.

The meniscus plays an important role in stabilization and function of the stifle joint. It aids in load transmission and energy absorption during weight bearing.34 Removal of menisci from clinically normal stifle joints results in increased load and wear of the articular cartilage and development of osteoarthritis.34 The medial meniscus also acts as a wedge between the femoral and tibial condyles, preventing additional cranial tibial translation in CCL-deficient stifle joints.35 Without the CCL, the medial meniscus becomes the primary restraint against cranial tibial thrust and is prone to injury35.

Meniscal injuries reportedly occur in approximately 50% of dogs with CCL rupture.36–39 Damage to the caudal horn of the medial meniscus occurred in 37.5% of dogs in the present study. Because most meniscal tears involve the thin inner portion of the meniscus, which is avascular and heals poorly, removal of the torn component is usually recommended.40 All dogs that had meniscal tears at the time of the first surgery had the torn component removed. The proportion of dogs with meniscal injury requiring a second surgery after LFS without meniscectomy or MMR is reportedly 13.8%.36 In the present study, dogs with intact menisci at the time of surgery had the meniscus left intact, or MMR was performed axially by severing the meniscotibial ligament. Meniscal complications only occurred in dogs that had intact menisci at the original surgery and that did not have MMR performed. Seven meniscal tears occurred after surgery among the 46 dogs that did not undergo MMR.

Once MMR became a standard procedure during LFS surgeries at our hospital in mid 1998, postoperative meniscal tears ceased to occur, indicating that MMR may prevent future meniscal injury after LFS surgery However, controversy exists regarding the use of MMR. Elimination of the wedge effect by displacing the caudal horn of the meniscus may not only prevent additional injury to the meniscus but also eliminate the stability function of the meniscus and is similar to caudal horn hemimeniscectomy35 Additional research is necessary to determine whether MMR leads to poorer outcome because of subsequent development of severe osteoarthritis, although MMR had no effects on dog owner-assessed outcome after TPLO in another study41.

Implant complications such as suture reaction developed in 2.8% of dogs that underwent LFS surgery This percentage is lower than that of another report.12 However, multifilament suture was the only implant material in the other study, and in the present study, the most commonly used type of implant was monofilament nylon leader line. All of the dogs that developed an inflammatory reaction to the suture material in the present study had nylon implants. Although the knot from hand ties may contribute to irritation of the soft tissue, there was no difference in the proportion of dogs that had suture reactions when crimps versus hand ties were used.

The duration of follow-up in the present study (median, 30 weeks) was similar to that of other studies15–17 in which surgical complications after TPLO and tibial tuberosity advancement were evaluated. For TPLO, the range of follow-up in 1 study15 was 6 months to 4 years for 78% of the affected dogs, but the median duration of follow-up was not reported. In a different study16 the longest duration of follow-up for 93% of dogs was 8 weeks, which may explain the lower reported complication rate. Following tibial tuberosity advancement, 92% of affected dogs had inhospital evaluation 3 to 63 weeks (mean, 13.5 weeks) after surgery17 Telephone follow-up with owners was performed for 90% of these dogs at 3 to 15 months (mean, 8.4 months) after surgery.

Several limitations of the present study need to be considered when interpreting the findings. Because this was a retrospective study, dogs were not randomly assigned to undergo the LFS procedure. Other procedures for CCL injuries were being performed at the teaching hospital during the study period. Choice of procedure may have been influenced by signalment of affected dogs and financial concerns of owners. Another potential limitation is that only dogs that returned for follow-up were included in the study. It is possible that there were complications that we were unaware of because some dogs may have been reevaluated by the referring veterinarians. It is also possible that the true complication rate was lower than was reported here because dogs that developed surgery-related problems may have been more likely to be returned for follow-up examination. Because of the large number of dogs included in the study and the long study period, contact of dog owners was not attempted.

Results of the present study indicated that the overall complication rate after LFS surgery was 17.4%, with additional surgery required in 7.2% of affected dogs. The overall complication rate was lower than that reported for other methods for surgical treatment of CCL rupture. Insufficient evidence is currently available to recommend any specific surgical procedure for CCL injury in dogs on the basis of clinical outcome; however, complication rate should be an important consideration when recommending a method of surgical repair for CCL ruptures in dogs. High body weight and young age are associated with a higher complication rate, and owners should be warned of this when options for management of CCL ruptures are discussed.

Abbreviations

CCL

Cranial cruciate ligament

LFS

Lateral fabellotibial suture

MMR

Medial meniscal release

TPLO

Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

References

  • 1.

    Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994;7:5969.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Ness MG, Abercromby RH, May C, et al. A survey of orthopaedic conditions in small animal veterinary practice in Britain. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996;9:4352.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Tirgari M. Changes in the canine stifle joint following rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Small Anim Pract 1977;19:1726.

  • 4.

    Vasseur PB. Clinical results following nonoperative management for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 1984;13:243246.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Conzemius MG, Evans RB, Besancon MF, et al. Effect of surgical technique on limb function after surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:232236.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Aragon CL, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005;34:9398.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Lampman TJ, Lund EM, Lipowitz AJ. Cranial cruciate disease: current status of diagnosis, surgery, and risk for disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003;16:122126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    DeAngelis M, Lau RE. A lateral retinacular imbrication technique for the surgical correction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970;57:7984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Piermattei DL, Flo GL. The stifle joint. In: Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE, eds. Brinker, Piermattei and Flo's handbook of small animal orthopedics and fracture repair. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2006;562632.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Vasseur PB. Stifle joint. In: Slatter DH, ed. Textbook of small animal surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2003;20902133.

  • 11.

    Chauvet AE, Johnson AL, Pijanowski GJ, et al. Evaluation of fibular head transposition, lateral fabellar suture, and conservative treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in large dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996;32:247255.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Dulisch M. Suture reaction following extra-articular stifle stabilization in the dog. Part 1: a retrospective study of 161 stifles. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981;17:569571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Dulisch ML. Suture reaction following extra-articular stabilization in the dog. Part II: a prospective study of 66 stifles. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981;17:572574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL, et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;222:184193.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Priddy NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR, et al. Complications with and owner assessment of the outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;222:17261732.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Stauffer KD, Tuttle TA, Elkins AD, et al. Complications associated with 696 tibial plateau leveling osteotomies (2001–2003). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2006;42:4450.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Lafaver S, Miller NA, Stubbs WP, et al. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Vet Surg 2007;36:573586.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Mullen HS, Matthiesen DT. Complications of transposition of the fibular head for stabilization of the cranial cruciate-deficient stifle in dogs: 80 cases (1982–1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;195:12671271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Dupuis J, Harari J, Papageorges M, et al. Evaluation of fibular head transposition for repair of experimental cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs. Vet Surg 1994;23:112.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Duval JM, Budsberg SC, Flo GL, et al. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215:811814.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:10161019.

  • 22.

    Smith GK, Torg JS. Fibular head transposition for repair of cruciatedeficient stifle in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;187:375383.

  • 23.

    Moore KW, Read RA. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog—a retrospective study comparing surgical techniques. Aust Vet J 1995;72:281285.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:6269.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Chesney D, Sales J, Elton R, et al. Infection after knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 1509 cases. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:355359.

  • 26.

    Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Obesity is a major risk factor for prosthetic infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:153158.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Brown DC, Conzemius MG, Shofer F, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;210:13021306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F, et al. A prospective study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2004;33:542550.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Beal MW, Brown DC, Shofer FS. The effects of perioperative hypothermia and the duration of anesthesia on postoperative wound infection rate in clean wounds: a retrospective study. Vet Surg 2000;29:123127.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Nicholson M, Beal M, Shofer F, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infection in clean-contaminated wounds: a retrospective study of 239 dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2002;31:577581.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Vasseur PB, Levy J, Dowd E, et al. Surgical wound infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching hospital. Vet Surg 1988;17:6064.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Hill CM, Conzemius MG, Smith GK, et al. Bacterial culture of the canine stifle joint following surgical repair of ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999;12:15.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Roush JK, Kirby BM, Manley PA, et al. Chronic osteomyelitis associated with orthopedic implants and cranial cruciate repair in three dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990;196:11231126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Hulse DA, Shires PK. The meniscus: anatomy, function and treatment. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1983;5:765774.

  • 35.

    Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Apelt D, et al. Effect of medial meniscal release on tibial translation after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006;35:486494.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Metelman LA, Schwarz PD, Salman M, et al. An evaluation of three different cranial cruciate ligament surgical stabilizations procedures as they relate to postoperative meniscal injuries. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995;8:118123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Flo GL, DeYoung D. Meniscal injuries and medial meniscectomy in the canine stifle. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1978;14:683689.

  • 38.

    Ralphs SC, Whitney WO. Arthroscopic evaluation of menisci in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injuries: 100 cases (1999–2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:16011604.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Dupuis J, Harari J. Cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries in dogs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1993;15:215232.

  • 40.

    Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to injury. An experimental study in the dog. Am J Sports Med 1983;11:131141.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Thieman KM, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, et al. Effect of meniscal release on rate of subsequent meniscal tears and owner-assessed outcome in dogs with cruciate disease treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006;35:705710.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
a.

Leighton RL. Preferred method of repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a survey of ACVS diplomats specializing in canine orthopedics (abstr). Vet Surg 1999;28:194A.

b.

Vetafil, S. Jackson Inc, Washington, DC.

c.

Secures Inc, Charlton, Mass.

d.

Apothecon, Princeton, NJ.

e.

Systat, version 10.2, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill.

f.

Monofilament nylon suture, Securos Inc, Charlton, Mass.

g.

PromAce, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Overland Park, Kan.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 551 0 0
Full Text Views 2381 1734 253
PDF Downloads 1339 750 62
Advertisement