Survival rate and short-term fertility rate associated with the use of fetotomy for resolution of dystocia in mares: 72 cases (1991–2005)

Augusto Carluccio Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Search for other papers by Augusto Carluccio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Alberto Contri Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Search for other papers by Alberto Contri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Umberto Tosi Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Search for other papers by Umberto Tosi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Ippolito De Amicis Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Search for other papers by Ippolito De Amicis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Claudio De Fanti Veterinary Clinical Department, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia, Italy

Search for other papers by Claudio De Fanti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Abstract

Objective—To determine survival rate, complications, and short-term fertility rate after fetotomy in mares.

Design—Retrospective study.

Animals—72 mares with severe dystocia.

Procedures—Records from 1991 to 2005 were searched for mares with dystocia in which a fetotomy was performed. Data relating to presentation and position of foals; survival rate, complications, and short-term fertility rate in mares; and 45-day pregnancy rate in mares bred 2 to 3 months after fetotomy were recorded.

Results—Anterior fetal presentation was detected for 54 of 72 (75%) mares, posterior presentation was detected for 13 (18.1%), and transverse presentation was detected for 5 (6.9%). One fetus in anterior presentation was hydrocephalic. Survival rate after fetotomy was 95.8%. Complications included retained fetal membranes (5.5%), laminitis (6.9%), vaginal and cervical lacerations (2.8%), and delayed uterine involution (2.8%). Mares bred 2 to 3 months after fetotomy had good short-term fertility, with a mean pregnancy rate of 79.4% at 45 days after breeding.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The survival rate was high, compared with rates reported after cesarean section, and short-term fertility rate was similar to those reported for mares that had a controlled vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Fetotomy performed by a skilled veterinarian on a nonviable fetus should be considered as a means of quick and safe correction of dystocia that does not necessarily impair short-term fertility in affected mares.

Abstract

Objective—To determine survival rate, complications, and short-term fertility rate after fetotomy in mares.

Design—Retrospective study.

Animals—72 mares with severe dystocia.

Procedures—Records from 1991 to 2005 were searched for mares with dystocia in which a fetotomy was performed. Data relating to presentation and position of foals; survival rate, complications, and short-term fertility rate in mares; and 45-day pregnancy rate in mares bred 2 to 3 months after fetotomy were recorded.

Results—Anterior fetal presentation was detected for 54 of 72 (75%) mares, posterior presentation was detected for 13 (18.1%), and transverse presentation was detected for 5 (6.9%). One fetus in anterior presentation was hydrocephalic. Survival rate after fetotomy was 95.8%. Complications included retained fetal membranes (5.5%), laminitis (6.9%), vaginal and cervical lacerations (2.8%), and delayed uterine involution (2.8%). Mares bred 2 to 3 months after fetotomy had good short-term fertility, with a mean pregnancy rate of 79.4% at 45 days after breeding.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The survival rate was high, compared with rates reported after cesarean section, and short-term fertility rate was similar to those reported for mares that had a controlled vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Fetotomy performed by a skilled veterinarian on a nonviable fetus should be considered as a means of quick and safe correction of dystocia that does not necessarily impair short-term fertility in affected mares.

Dystocia is one of the true emergency situations encountered in equine practice.1–3 In normal births, foals are born within 20 to 30 minutes after rupture of the chorioallantoic membrane.4–6 Few foals born > 40 minutes after chorioallantioc membrane rupture survive,7 and none born > 90 minutes after chorioallantoic membrane rupture survive.8 The prevalence of dystocia varies among breeds, with reported percentages of 4% in Thoroughbreds9 and 10% in draft breeds.10 The long extremities of equine fetuses predispose mares to foaling problems,7,10,11 and malposture of extremities is regarded as a primary cause of dystocia in mares.2,12

When a veterinarian encounters a mare with dystocia, the aim is not only to deliver a viable foal but also to preserve the health and fertility of the mare. Four procedures are used to correct dystocia in mares. These include assisted vaginal delivery, in which the mare is conscious and the intact foal is delivered through the vaginal canal with manual assistance; controlled vaginal delivery, in which the mare is anesthetized and has controlled delivery of an intact foal through the vaginal canal; cesarean section, in which the foal is removed through a uterine incision after celiotomy; and fetotomy, which involves vaginal removal of a nonviable foal in 2 or more pieces in a conscious mare.1

Guidelines for correction of dystocia in mares have been proposed,5,8,13,14 but the choice of method is likely to be influenced by various factors.15,16 Fetal viability; financial considerations such as the mare's value, reproductive future, and costs of hospitalization4,17; availability of obstetric assistance and equipment; and owner preference18 all influence the choice of method used to resolve dystocia that cannot be corrected manually. A practitioner should ascertain that the fetus is viable (with signs such as limb withdrawal, ocular reflex, swallowing reflex, heart beat, and anal reflex) before commencing fetal manipulation in the birth canal to avoid unnecessary vaginal injury that may endanger future fertility.3 Damage to the vaginal mucosal surface can result in formation of adhesions, which may reduce fertility.19

Cesarean section is indicated when all other methods of fetal extraction are ineffectual or attended by high risk for nonsurvival.15 Survival rates for mares that underwent cesarean section for dystocia were 80%10 and 85%8 in 2 studies, and in another study,15 the primary cause of death from cesarean section was hemorrhage associated with hysterotomy.

Fetotomy is an obstetric operation that enables the size of a nonviable fetus to be rapidly decreased so that it can be extracted safely through a mare's vaginal canal. In 1 study,20 fetotomy performed by an expert clinician did not cause uterine damage in mares, as confirmed by the monitoring of changes in protein concentration and cellularity of peritoneal fluid. Fetotomy should be performed only in mares in which the fetus is confirmed to be nonviable or has malformations of sufficient severity to render it nonviable.12,18,19 Partial fetotomy has been considered the method of choice for rapid, safe correction of dystocia that cannot be resolved manually.16 One or 2 appropriately positioned fetotomy cuts can substantially decrease the time required to extract a nonviable fetus. However, > 3 cuts may be necessary when the autolyzed state of the fetus renders uterine surgery too risky or owners are unwilling or unable to meet the cost of surgery.18

A frequent mistake is to elect to perform fetotomy after a mare's reproductive tract has been traumatized by unproductive attempts at manual correction.19 Much of the damage attributed to fetotomy may be a result of inappropriate and prolonged vaginal manipulation rather than from the technique itself.18 However, a poor prognosis for future fertility is associated with mares that undergo cesarean section after prolonged vaginal manipulation.7-10,19

The purpose of the study reported here was to analyze the survival rate and complications of fetotomy performed in mares with dystocia and a nonviable fetus. We hypothesized that fetotomy by an experienced clinician could be performed quickly and inexpensively, would have a low risk of fatality, and would not affect short-term fertility of the mare.

Criteria for Selection of Cases

Records from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo and the Veterinary Clinical Department, University of Bologna were searched. Records for 72 mares with dystocia and in which the fetuses were nonviable were reviewed. All mares were those in which a fetotomy had been performed at stud farms from 1991 through 2005. During this period, viable foals in mares with dystocia were born via assisted vaginal delivery or cesarean section (those data were not analyzed). Theriogenologists on the veterinary school staff performed dystocia examinations and fetotomies at the stud farms.

Procedures

Data collection—Information pertaining to breed, age, and parity was recorded. Fetal presentation, position, and posture were determined by transrectal palpation, and the information was recorded. The time from chorioallantoic membrane rupture to arrival of a veterinarian at the stud farm was estimated from the history provided by farm personnel at the time clinical examination was performed.

Fetotomy—For examination of dystocia, the tail of each mare was tied to 1 side and the perineal area carefully cleansed. The examiner, wearing a sterile glove and with proper lubrication, determined whether there were lacerations in the birth canal, appropriate cervical relaxation, and uterine muscular spasm. The birth canal was lubricated with polyethylene polymer powdera and clean water, which were instilled into the uterine lumen by means of a sterile stomach tube and pump. Assisted vaginal delivery and manual resolution of dystocia were attempted, but manipulations were kept to a minimum, and repeated in-and-out arm movements were avoided.

Fetotomy was performed on each nonviable fetus with the mare sedated and standing in a stall bedded with clean straw. Detomidine chloridrate (0.8 mg/kg [0.36 mg/lb], IV) and butorphanol (0.01 to 0.02 mg/kg [0.005 to 0.01 mg/lb], IV) were used for sedation, and 5 to 7 mL of 2% lidocaine was used for epidural anesthesia. Equipment used to perform fetotomy consisted of a Thygesen fetotome (85 cm), Liess wire saw, wire-saw sounding line, curved introducer, wire-saw threader, and 2-armed Krey-Schöttler obstetric hook; an obstetric snare and chain; and eyehooks, handgrips for the wire saw, and sterile rubber sleeves. After introducing the fetotome into the birth canal, the clinician passed the wire saw over the fetal body part to be amputated and held the head of the instrument securely against the relevant part of the fetus. An assistant applied handgrips to the wire saw and commenced cutting with slow, short toand-fro arm movements. To keep the amount of heat generated to a minimum, length of the arm movements and pressure applied on the wire saw were increased only after the wire was properly seated.

Mares were monitored via follow-up examinations for 7 days after fetotomy. Mares with retained fetal membranes (ie, fetal membranes were not expelled within 3 to 6 hours after fetotomy) were treated with oxytocin (20 units, IV) every 1 to 2 hours until the fetal membranes were expelled. Owners were advised that mares should not be bred for at least 2 months after fetotomy.

For the purposes of the study reported here, short-term fertility was considered to be the pregnancy rate at 45 days after breeding. Pregnancy was determined by use of transrectal ultrasonography and visual confirmation of a fetal heartbeat. To evaluate the effect of fetotomy on resumption of reproductive activity, the percentage of mares pregnant 45 days after breeding was compared with that in 124 control mares that were bred after a normal parturition.

Statistical analysis—Comparison between short-term fertility in mares in which a fetotomy was performed and control mares was made by use of commercial software.b Values of P ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Records for 72 mares examined for severe dystocia were included in the study. Breeds represented were Standardbred (n = 38 mares), Thoroughbred (27), Breton (5), and Andalusian (2). Mares were from 5 to 13 years of age, and all were multiparous. All fetuses were nonviable, likely because of the time between detection of dystocia and arrival of a veterinarian (range, 6 to 18 hours).

During initial examination, mares had signs of severe dystocia resulting from loss of fetal viability and abnormalities in fetal presentation, position, or posture. Fifty-four (75%) fetuses were in anterior presentation, 13 (18.1%) were in posterior presentation, and 5 (6.9%) were in transverse presentation. The most common type of fetal malposture for foals in anterior presentation was deviation of the head and neck (n = 31 [57.4%] foals in anterior presentation). Of those 31 fetuses, the head and neck were deviated laterally in 21 (67.7%) and ventrally in 10 (32.3%). Other types of fetal malposture included carpal flexion (n = 11 foals) and shoulder joint flexion (6). Carpal flexion was more often bilateral (n = 10 foals) than unilateral (1), and the frequency of unilateral shoulder joint flexion (3) was the same as that of bilateral shoulder joint flexion (3). Other causes of dystocia in fetuses in anterior presentation included foot-nape posture (n = 2 [3.7%] foals) and 1 (1.8%) each for incomplete extension of the elbow joint, dog-sitting posture, fetal macrosomia associated with trauma to the birth canal, and hydrocephalus. Malposture associated with posterior presentation included tibiotarsal joint flexion (n = 8 foals) and hip joint flexion (5).

Fetotomy had been performed in all mares because examination revealed that the fetus was nonviable, there were financial considerations, or both. Partial fetotomy was performed in 71 of 72 (98.6%) mares with dystocia, and dystocia was resolved with 2 cuts in 67 of 71 (94.4%) mares and with 3 cuts in the other 4 (5.6%) mares. The remaining fetus required 5 cuts to enable removal. That fetus was in anterior presentation and had an enlarged dorsum and hind limbs; cuts were made through the carpal joint of both forelimbs and the neck, thorax, and pelvis.

Mean ± SD time between arrival of a veterinarian and fetal extraction was 12.8 ± 6.8 minutes (range, 5 to 42 minutes). Information pertaining to examinations conducted by other personnel prior to arrival was not reported. The time between rupture of the chorioallantois and arrival of a veterinarian (range, approx 6 to 18 hours) was determined on the basis of information provided by stud farm personnel. Complications after fetotomy included retained fetal membranes (n = 4 [5.5%] mares), laminitis (5 [6.9%]), vaginal and cervical lacerations (2 [2.8%]), and delayed uterine involution (2 [2.8%]). No instances of metritis, peritonitis, or radial or facial nerve paralysis were recorded. The fatality rate was 4.2% (3 mares). One of those 3 mares (1.4% of all mares in the study) had rupture of the uterine wall after a fall and died from subsequent hemorrhage. The other 2 mares that died had signs of severe endotoxemia after prolonged dystocia and fetal maceration.

Sixty-eight of 69 mares that survived were bred 2 to 3 months after fetotomy; 55 became pregnant (pregnancy rate, 79.4%). One mare was euthanized because it fractured a hind limb approximately 2 months after dystocia. Of 124 control mares, 102 (82.3%) became pregnant. The difference in pregnancy rate between mares in which a fetotomy was performed and control mares was not significant (P = 0.419; χ2 = 0.654).

Discussion

Dystocia in mares is considered to be a true emergency, and the duration of attempts to deliver a foal substantially influences the survival rate of affected foals.14 In 1 study21 of mares, 99% of the foals were in anterior presentation, 1% were in posterior presentation, and 0.1% were in transverse presentation. In another study12 of 601 mares with dystocia, 67.9% had a foal in anterior presentation, 15.8% had a foal in posterior presentation, and 16.3% had a foal in transverse presentation. Other investigators2 found that 76% of 141 mares with dystocia had a fetus in anterior presentation, 14% had a fetus in posterior presentation, and 10% had a fetus in transverse presentation. These findings were in agreement with results of the study reported here in which 75% of the fetuses were in anterior presentation, 18.1% were in posterior presentation, and 6.9% were in transverse presentation. However, our findings cannot be extrapolated to other populations of mares because the mares we evaluated had severe and lengthy dystocia and the prevalences of the various fetal presentations may not be representative of other populations of mares with dystocia. In contrast to findings in another study2 that involved fetal position, we found that the dorsosacral position was the most common in fetuses in anterior and posterior presentation.

The nonviable fetuses in the mares of the study reported here had probably died because of the lengthy period of dystocia (6 to 18 hours). In 1 study,22 42% of foals were alive when delivered after a mean of 1.8 hours of dystocia, whereas another study8 revealed that only 11% of foals were alive at delivery when dystocia lasted 5 to 6 hours. A nonviable fetus is regarded as an indication for fetotomy, provided the clinician is experienced in the technique.12,19 In 1 study,16 partial fetotomy was the method of choice for resolution in > 80% of mares in which reduction of dystocia was not amenable to manual correction. Fetotomy can correct dystocia quickly by decreasing the size of a fetus and enabling safe extraction. In the study reported here, mean time required for assessment, induction of local anesthesia, and fetotomy was 12.8 minutes. Injuries caused by prolonged manipulation associated with assisted vaginal delivery that can injure tissues of the birth canal and reduce fertility were thus avoided.18 Furthermore, fetotomy can spare owners the expense and risk involved with cesarean section.12,19 Survival rates of 80%10 to 85%8 have been reported in mares undergoing elective cesarean section. In our study, the mortality rate was 4.2%, which is less than the 15% reported for elective cesarean section in another study.8 This finding was surprising given the lengthy period of dystocia in our study mares. These findings contrasted with those of another study22 in which only 5 of 9 mares in which a fetotomy was performed survived to discharge. The disparity may be a result of differences in the way the participant mares were selected or in the skill of the veterinarians who performed the fetotomy. In the study reported here, fetotomy was performed immediately after mares were examined for fetal viability; therefore, manipulations of the fetus in the birth canal were minimized. However, it could not be determined with certainty from the records that there had been no preceding attempts at manipulation. Results of fetotomy vary and depend on a veterinarian's experience and the facilities available10,17,23; however, our results support the conclusion that this technique can be efficacious.

Short-term fertility rates in mares after fetotomy in the study reported here were not significantly different from those in mares that gave birth naturally to a foal at the veterinary school breeding farm or rates reported for nontreated mares in research conditions.24,25 In 1 study,22 59% of mares treated because of dystocia and bred in the same year gave birth to live foals the following year; however, this rate cannot be compared with our results because we only recorded the 45-day pregnancy rate.

Fetotomy performed promptly on a nonviable fetus by a skilled veterinarian may permit avoidance of unnecessary cesarean section in mares. Fetotomy should be considered a viable option for safe and quick correction of fetal malposture with a low risk of fatalities and no ill effects on short-term fertility, but these results depend on the obstetric skills of the attending veterinarian.

a.

J-Lube, Jorgensen Laboratories, Loveland, Colo.

b.

Medcalc, version 9.0.1.1, MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium.

References

  • 1

    Embertson RM. Dystocia and caesarean section: the importance of duration and good judgement. Equine Vet J 1999;31:179180.

  • 2

    Frazer GS, Perkins NR, Blanchard TL, et al. Prevalence of fetal maldispositions in equine referral hospital dystocias. Equine Vet J 1997;29:111116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Frazer GS, Perkins NR, Embertson RM. Normal parturition and evaluation of the mare in dystocia. Equine Vet Educ 1999;11:4146.

  • 4

    Youngquist Y. Equine referral hospital dystocias, in Proceedings. Annu Meet Soc Theriogenol 1988;7384.

  • 5

    Blanchard TL, Varner DD, Elmore RG, et al. Management of dystocias in mares: examination, obstetrical equipment and vaginal delivery. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1989;11:745753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Embertson RM, Bernard WV, Hance SR, et al. Hospital approach to dystocia in the mare, in Proceedings. 41st Annu Conv Am Assoc Equine Pract 1995;41:1314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Roberts SJ. Veterinary obstetric and genital disease (theriogenology). 3rd ed.North Pomfret, Vt: David & Charles, 1986;277352.

  • 8

    Freeman DE, Hungerford LL, Schaeffer D, et al. Caesarean section and other methods for assisted delivery: comparison of effects on mare mortality and complications. Equine Vet J 1999;31:203207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Vandeplassche MM. Selected topics in equine obstetrics, in Proceedings. Am Assoc Equine Pract 1992;38:623628.

  • 10

    Vandeplassche MM. Dystocia. In:McKinnon A, Voss J, ed.Equine reproduction. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1993;578587.

  • 11

    Pascoe JR, Meagher DM, Wheat JD. Surgical management of uterine torsion in the mare: a review of 26 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1981;179:351354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Vandeplassche MM. The pathogenesis of dystocia and fetal malformation in the horse. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1987;35:547552.

  • 13

    Vandeplassche MM. Caesarean section in horses. In:Grunsell CSG, Hill FWG, ed.The veterinary annual. 14th ed.Bristol, England: John Wright & Sons Ltd, 1973;7378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Embertson RM. The indications and surgical techniques for caesarean section in the mare. Equine Vet Educ 1992;4:3136.

  • 15

    Vandeplassche MM, Spincemaille J, Bouters R, et al. Some aspect of equine obstetrics. Equine Vet J 1971;4:105109.

  • 16

    Vandeplassche MM. Obstetrician's view of the physiology of equine parturition and dystocia. Equine Vet J 1980;12:4549.

  • 17

    Vandeplassche MM. Embryotomy and cesarotomy. In:Oehme F, ed.Textbook of large animal surgery. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co, 1988;598622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Frazer GS. Fetotomy technique in the mare. Equine Vet Educ 2001;13:151159.

  • 19

    Frazer GS. Review of the use of fetotomy to correct dystocia in the mare, in Proceedings. 43rd Annu Conv Am Assoc Equine Pract 1997;43:262268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Frazer GS, Burba D, Paccamonti D, et al. The effects of parturition and peripartum complications on the peritoneal fluid composition of the mares. Theriogenology 1997;48:919931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Vandeplassche MM. The normal and abnormal presentation, position and posture of the foal-fetus during gestation and at parturition. Vlaams Diergeneesk Tijdschr 1957;26:168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Byron CR, Embertson RM, Bernard WV, et al. Dystocia in referral hospital setting: approach and results. Equine Vet J 2002;35:8285.

  • 23

    Blanchard T, Bierschwal C, Youngquist R, et al. Sequelae to percutaneous fetotomy in the mare. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983;182: 1127.

  • 24

    Ginther OJ, Bergfelt DR. Embryo reduction before day 11 in mares with twin conceptuses. J Anim Sci 1988;66:17271731.

  • 25

    McKinnon AO, Squires EL. Morphologic assessment of the equine embryo. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;192:401406.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 226 0 0
Full Text Views 1244 894 21
PDF Downloads 478 208 3
Advertisement