Prevalence, outcome, and health consequences associated with persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus in feedlot cattle

Guy H. Loneragan Feedlot Research Group, Division of Agriculture, College of Agriculture, Nursing, and Natural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79016.

Search for other papers by Guy H. Loneragan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Daniel U. Thomson Cactus Operating Ltd, 2209 W 7th St, Amarillo, TX 79106.
Present address is the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Daniel U. Thomson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, DVM
,
Donald L. Montgomery Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, 6610 Amarillo Blvd W, Amarillo, TX 79106.
Present address is Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory, 1174 Snowy Range Rd, Laramie, WY 82070.

Search for other papers by Donald L. Montgomery in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Gary L. Mason Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Gary L. Mason in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Robert L. Larson Commercial Agriculture Program, University Extension, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Search for other papers by Robert L. Larson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To estimate prevalence of cattle persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) at arrival at a feedlot, prevalence of chronically ill and dead PI cattle, and the magnitude of excess disease attributable to a PI animal.

Design—Cross-sectional and cohort studies.

Animals—2,000 cattle at the time they arrived at a feedlot, 1,383 chronically ill cattle from 7 feedlots, and 1,585 dead cattle from a single feedlot.

Procedure—Skin biopsy specimens were collected and evaluated via immunohistochemistry. Cattle were characterized as either PI or not PI with BVDV on the basis of characteristic immunostaining. Follow-up was obtained for the 2,000 cattle from which samples were collected at arrival, and health outcomes were determined for cattle exposed and not exposed to a PI animal.

Results—Prevalence of PI cattle was 0.3% at arrival, 2.6% in chronically ill cattle, and 2.5% in dead cattle. Risk of initial treatment for respiratory tract disease was 43% greater in cattle exposed to a PI animal, compared with those not exposed to a PI animal. Overall, 15.9% of initial respiratory tract disease events were attributable to exposure to a PI animal.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Relatively few PI cattle arrive at feedlots. However, those cattle are more likely to require treatment for respiratory tract disease and either become chronically ill or die than cattle that are not PI. In addition, they are associated with an increase in the incidence of respiratory tract disease of in-contact cattle. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:595–601)

Abstract

Objective—To estimate prevalence of cattle persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) at arrival at a feedlot, prevalence of chronically ill and dead PI cattle, and the magnitude of excess disease attributable to a PI animal.

Design—Cross-sectional and cohort studies.

Animals—2,000 cattle at the time they arrived at a feedlot, 1,383 chronically ill cattle from 7 feedlots, and 1,585 dead cattle from a single feedlot.

Procedure—Skin biopsy specimens were collected and evaluated via immunohistochemistry. Cattle were characterized as either PI or not PI with BVDV on the basis of characteristic immunostaining. Follow-up was obtained for the 2,000 cattle from which samples were collected at arrival, and health outcomes were determined for cattle exposed and not exposed to a PI animal.

Results—Prevalence of PI cattle was 0.3% at arrival, 2.6% in chronically ill cattle, and 2.5% in dead cattle. Risk of initial treatment for respiratory tract disease was 43% greater in cattle exposed to a PI animal, compared with those not exposed to a PI animal. Overall, 15.9% of initial respiratory tract disease events were attributable to exposure to a PI animal.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Relatively few PI cattle arrive at feedlots. However, those cattle are more likely to require treatment for respiratory tract disease and either become chronically ill or die than cattle that are not PI. In addition, they are associated with an increase in the incidence of respiratory tract disease of in-contact cattle. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:595–601)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 291 0 0
Full Text Views 841 675 18
PDF Downloads 227 107 10
Advertisement