Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestation stalls versus group pens with electronic sow feeders

Leena Anil Department of Clinical and Population Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Leena Anil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Kristy M. G. Bhend Department of Animal Science, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, WI 54022.

Search for other papers by Kristy M. G. Bhend in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Samuel K. Baidoo Department of Animal Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Samuel K. Baidoo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Rebecca Morrison Department of Animal Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Rebecca Morrison in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
John Deen Department of Clinical and Population Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by John Deen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To compare the location and severity of injuries in pregnant sows housed in individual gestation stalls with that in pregnant sows housed in dynamic groups in pens with electronic sow feeders.

Design—Prospective study.

Animals—100 pregnant sows of parity 1 to 3 and various body weights.

Procedure—Fifty sows each were randomly allotted to gestation stalls or group pens with electronic sow feeders. Injuries were scored on the basis of location, number, and depth of wounds. Injury scores for sows in both housing systems were compared during a period of 90 days. The influence of factors such as duration of stay in the housing system, parity, and body weight on sow injuries was also examined.

Results—Injury scores were higher in group pens with electronic sow feeders. As body weight increased, injury scores decreased for sows housed in group pens with electronic sow feeders and increased for sows housed in gestation stalls. There was a significant negative association between second parity and total injury scores.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Modifications in housing system design and management procedures are needed to reduce injuries in pregnant sows. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:1334–1338)

Abstract

Objective—To compare the location and severity of injuries in pregnant sows housed in individual gestation stalls with that in pregnant sows housed in dynamic groups in pens with electronic sow feeders.

Design—Prospective study.

Animals—100 pregnant sows of parity 1 to 3 and various body weights.

Procedure—Fifty sows each were randomly allotted to gestation stalls or group pens with electronic sow feeders. Injuries were scored on the basis of location, number, and depth of wounds. Injury scores for sows in both housing systems were compared during a period of 90 days. The influence of factors such as duration of stay in the housing system, parity, and body weight on sow injuries was also examined.

Results—Injury scores were higher in group pens with electronic sow feeders. As body weight increased, injury scores decreased for sows housed in group pens with electronic sow feeders and increased for sows housed in gestation stalls. There was a significant negative association between second parity and total injury scores.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Modifications in housing system design and management procedures are needed to reduce injuries in pregnant sows. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:1334–1338)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 299 0 0
Full Text Views 869 619 28
PDF Downloads 294 91 4
Advertisement