Evaluation of 5 serologic assays to detect Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals

Ronald J. Martens Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by Ronald J. Martens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Noah D. Cohen Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by Noah D. Cohen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, MPH, PhD, DACVIM
,
M. Keith Chaffin Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by M. Keith Chaffin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS, DACVIM
,
Shinji Takai Department of Animal Hygiene, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Kitasato University, Towada, Japan.

Search for other papers by Shinji Takai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Charity L. Doherty Veterinary Dynamics Inc, 1525 Templeton Rd, Templeton, CA 93465.

Search for other papers by Charity L. Doherty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Arthur B. Angulo Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, 1 Sippel Rd, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by Arthur B. Angulo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Ronnie F. Edwards Heart of Texas Equine Clinic, 8533 E Hwy 84, Waco, TX 76705.

Search for other papers by Ronnie F. Edwards in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Abstract

Objective—To determine the sensitivity and specificity of 5 serologic assays used to diagnose Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals and to determine whether any of the assays could be used to identify affected foals prior to the onset of clinical signs or to differentiate between affected and unaffected foals when clinical signs first become apparent.

Design—Nested case-control study.

Animals—26 foals.

Procedure—Serum samples were obtained from all foals at 2, 4, and 6 or 7 weeks of age. Additional samples were obtained from affected foals at the time of diagnosis of R equi pneumonia and from agematched unaffected foals. Samples were tested with 3 ELISA, an agar gel immunodiffusion assay, and a synergistic hemolysis inhibition assay.

Results—Sensitivity and specificity data indicated that none of the assays could be used to reliably differentiate affected from unaffected foals at any testing period. Proportions of foals that had an increase in test values between paired samples collected at 4 and 6 or 7 weeks of age were not significantly different between affected and unaffected foals. For all assays, result values increased significantly over time; however, the rate of increase was not significantly different between affected and unaffected foals.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that serologic assays, whether performed on single or paired samples, cannot be used to reliably establish, confirm, or exclude a diagnosis of R equi pneumonia in foals. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:825–833)

Abstract

Objective—To determine the sensitivity and specificity of 5 serologic assays used to diagnose Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals and to determine whether any of the assays could be used to identify affected foals prior to the onset of clinical signs or to differentiate between affected and unaffected foals when clinical signs first become apparent.

Design—Nested case-control study.

Animals—26 foals.

Procedure—Serum samples were obtained from all foals at 2, 4, and 6 or 7 weeks of age. Additional samples were obtained from affected foals at the time of diagnosis of R equi pneumonia and from agematched unaffected foals. Samples were tested with 3 ELISA, an agar gel immunodiffusion assay, and a synergistic hemolysis inhibition assay.

Results—Sensitivity and specificity data indicated that none of the assays could be used to reliably differentiate affected from unaffected foals at any testing period. Proportions of foals that had an increase in test values between paired samples collected at 4 and 6 or 7 weeks of age were not significantly different between affected and unaffected foals. For all assays, result values increased significantly over time; however, the rate of increase was not significantly different between affected and unaffected foals.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that serologic assays, whether performed on single or paired samples, cannot be used to reliably establish, confirm, or exclude a diagnosis of R equi pneumonia in foals. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:825–833)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 65 0 0
Full Text Views 776 759 152
PDF Downloads 66 50 5
Advertisement