Comparison of the bacterial flora of the duodenum in healthy cats and cats with signs of gastrointestinal tract disease

Dr. Karen L. Johnston Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, the Royal Veterinary College, University of London, N Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK.
Present address is the Animal Referral Hospital, 444 Liverpool Rd, S Strathfield, Sydney 2136, Australia.

Search for other papers by Dr. Karen L. Johnston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, PhD
,
Nigel C. Swift


Search for other papers by Nigel C. Swift in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 B Vet Med, BVSc, DACVIM
,
Dr. Myra Forster-van Hijfte


Search for other papers by Dr. Myra Forster-van Hijfte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
H. Carolien Rutgers

Search for other papers by H. Carolien Rutgers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS, DACVIM
,
Anne Lamport

Search for other papers by Anne Lamport in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
,
Olivier Ballàvre

Search for other papers by Olivier Ballàvre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Dr. Roger M. Batt


Search for other papers by Dr. Roger M. Batt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether a colony environment predisposes healthy cats to high bacterial counts, including counts of obligate anaerobes, in the duodenum and whether increased numbers of bacteria could be found in the duodenum of cats with signs of chronic gastrointestinal tract disease.

Design—Prospective study.

Animals—20 healthy control cats (10 from a colony environment and 10 pet cats) and 19 cats with a history of chronic gastrointestinal tract disease.

Procedure—Undiluted duodenal fluid was quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by bacteriologic culture under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Serum concentrations of cobalamin and folate were also measured.

Results—Significant differences were not detected in the numbers of bacteria found in the duodenum of cats housed in a colony environment, compared with pet cats fed an identical diet prior to sampling. All healthy cats were, therefore, combined into 1 control group. Compared with healthy cats, cats with clinical signs of gastrointestinal tract disease had significantly lower counts of microaerophilic bacteria, whereas total, anaerobic, and aerobic bacterial counts were not significantly different. None of the cats with disease had total bacterial counts higher than expected from the range established in the control cats. Differences were not detected in regard to serum folate or cobalamin concentrations between diseased and healthy cats.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—These findings indicated that healthy colony cats and pet cats have high numbers of bacteria in the duodenum, including high numbers of obligate anaerobes. Our findings also suggest that bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine is not a common clinical syndrome in cats with chronic nonobstructive gastrointestinal tract disease. ( J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:48–51)

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether a colony environment predisposes healthy cats to high bacterial counts, including counts of obligate anaerobes, in the duodenum and whether increased numbers of bacteria could be found in the duodenum of cats with signs of chronic gastrointestinal tract disease.

Design—Prospective study.

Animals—20 healthy control cats (10 from a colony environment and 10 pet cats) and 19 cats with a history of chronic gastrointestinal tract disease.

Procedure—Undiluted duodenal fluid was quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by bacteriologic culture under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Serum concentrations of cobalamin and folate were also measured.

Results—Significant differences were not detected in the numbers of bacteria found in the duodenum of cats housed in a colony environment, compared with pet cats fed an identical diet prior to sampling. All healthy cats were, therefore, combined into 1 control group. Compared with healthy cats, cats with clinical signs of gastrointestinal tract disease had significantly lower counts of microaerophilic bacteria, whereas total, anaerobic, and aerobic bacterial counts were not significantly different. None of the cats with disease had total bacterial counts higher than expected from the range established in the control cats. Differences were not detected in regard to serum folate or cobalamin concentrations between diseased and healthy cats.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—These findings indicated that healthy colony cats and pet cats have high numbers of bacteria in the duodenum, including high numbers of obligate anaerobes. Our findings also suggest that bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine is not a common clinical syndrome in cats with chronic nonobstructive gastrointestinal tract disease. ( J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:48–51)

Advertisement