Editorial Type:
Disaster Medicine

Injuries and illnesses in working dogs used during the disaster response after the bombing in Oklahoma City

Roberta A. Duhaime From the Injury Prevention Service-0307, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117-1299 (Duhaime, Mallonee); Center for Animal Disease Information and Analysis, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA-APHIS, Veterinary Services, 555 S Howe St, Fort Collins, CO 80521 (Norden, Corso); and Department of Environmental Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521-1271 (Salman).

Search for other papers by Roberta A. Duhaime in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 DVM
,
Dianne Norden From the Injury Prevention Service-0307, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117-1299 (Duhaime, Mallonee); Center for Animal Disease Information and Analysis, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA-APHIS, Veterinary Services, 555 S Howe St, Fort Collins, CO 80521 (Norden, Corso); and Department of Environmental Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521-1271 (Salman).

Search for other papers by Dianne Norden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 DVM
,
Barbara Corso From the Injury Prevention Service-0307, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117-1299 (Duhaime, Mallonee); Center for Animal Disease Information and Analysis, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA-APHIS, Veterinary Services, 555 S Howe St, Fort Collins, CO 80521 (Norden, Corso); and Department of Environmental Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521-1271 (Salman).

Search for other papers by Barbara Corso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 DVM, MS
,
Sue Mallonee From the Injury Prevention Service-0307, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117-1299 (Duhaime, Mallonee); Center for Animal Disease Information and Analysis, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA-APHIS, Veterinary Services, 555 S Howe St, Fort Collins, CO 80521 (Norden, Corso); and Department of Environmental Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521-1271 (Salman).

Search for other papers by Sue Mallonee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 RN, MPH
, and
M. D. Salman From the Injury Prevention Service-0307, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK, 73117-1299 (Duhaime, Mallonee); Center for Animal Disease Information and Analysis, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA-APHIS, Veterinary Services, 555 S Howe St, Fort Collins, CO 80521 (Norden, Corso); and Department of Environmental Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521-1271 (Salman).

Search for other papers by M. D. Salman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 BVMS, PhD
Free access

Objectives

To determine characteristics of working dogs used during the disaster response after the bombing in Oklahoma City and risk factors for injuries and illnesses of those dogs, and to document recommendations for future disaster responses.

Design

Survey.

Study Population

Information for 74 working dogs used at the bombing site.

Procedures

Dog handlers were identified and asked to complete a questionnaire. Questions were asked about the training and use of each dog, use of paw protection, injuries and illnesses incurred, possible effects after completion of duty at Oklahoma City, and handler's experience.

Results

Data were obtained for all 74 dogs used at the site. Handlers of 69 of 74 (93%) dogs responded. The dogs had been extensively trained and were used 491 dog-days at the site, with 46 dogs used in search, 14 in patrol, 12 in explosive-detection duty, and 2 in search/patrol. Fifteen (22%) dogs became ill. Nineteen (28%) dogs incurred 20 injuries. Footpad injuries constituted 18 of the injuries. Only 16 of 69 (23%) dogs were provided with paw protection. Dogs were more likely to be injured when they were used in a search capacity, were used during the first 2 days after the bombing, were German Shepherd Dogs, or were older.

Clinical Implications

Although working in a highrisk environment, injuries to dogs were few, and most were minor. Specific recommendations could facilitate use of dogs in disaster situations and improve safety for those dogs. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212: 1202–1207)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1005 444 68
PDF Downloads 175 113 17
Cover Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Issue:
15 Apr 1998
Advertisement