Knowledge and attitudes of residents in two areas of Massachusetts about rabies and an oral vaccination program in wildlife

Michael W McGuill From the Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 305 South St, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 (McGuill, Kreindel, DeMaria), and the Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Rabies Section, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop G-33, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Rupprecht).

Search for other papers by Michael W McGuill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Silvia M. Kreindel From the Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 305 South St, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 (McGuill, Kreindel, DeMaria), and the Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Rabies Section, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop G-33, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Rupprecht).

Search for other papers by Silvia M. Kreindel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPH
,
Alfred DeMaria Jr. From the Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 305 South St, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 (McGuill, Kreindel, DeMaria), and the Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Rabies Section, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop G-33, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Rupprecht).

Search for other papers by Alfred DeMaria Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Charles Rupprecht From the Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 305 South St, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 (McGuill, Kreindel, DeMaria), and the Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Rabies Section, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop G-33, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Rupprecht).

Search for other papers by Charles Rupprecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, PhD

Objective—

To compare public knowledge and attitudes about rabies and an oral rabies vaccination program in raccoons.

Design—

Random-digit dial telephone survey.

Sample Population—

Residents of 2 areas of Massachusetts.

Procedure—

Residents of 2 areas of Massachusetts were called to participate in a telephone survey. One area (Cape Ann) included 8 towns, most of which have had rabies in raccoons since 1993. The second area (Cape Cod) included 7 towns, 5 of which have not had rabies in raccoons. Calls were made to 642 persons, and of these, 265 agreed to participate in the survey. Of the nonrespondents who were subsequently contacted again, half agreed to participate. Data were analyzed using a statistical program. Fisher’s exact and χ2 tests were used to determine associations.

Results—

Residents from the area virtually free of rabies in raccoons were significantly less likely to consider rabies as a potential health threat for children in their household. The perception of rabies as a threat was higher for residents in the endemic area. Residents in both areas considered rabies control to be a high priority and supported use of state funding for an oral vaccination program.

Clinical Implications—

People recognize dangers associated with rabies and believe that oral vaccination programs will decrease the risk of exposure. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;211:305–309)

Objective—

To compare public knowledge and attitudes about rabies and an oral rabies vaccination program in raccoons.

Design—

Random-digit dial telephone survey.

Sample Population—

Residents of 2 areas of Massachusetts.

Procedure—

Residents of 2 areas of Massachusetts were called to participate in a telephone survey. One area (Cape Ann) included 8 towns, most of which have had rabies in raccoons since 1993. The second area (Cape Cod) included 7 towns, 5 of which have not had rabies in raccoons. Calls were made to 642 persons, and of these, 265 agreed to participate in the survey. Of the nonrespondents who were subsequently contacted again, half agreed to participate. Data were analyzed using a statistical program. Fisher’s exact and χ2 tests were used to determine associations.

Results—

Residents from the area virtually free of rabies in raccoons were significantly less likely to consider rabies as a potential health threat for children in their household. The perception of rabies as a threat was higher for residents in the endemic area. Residents in both areas considered rabies control to be a high priority and supported use of state funding for an oral vaccination program.

Clinical Implications—

People recognize dangers associated with rabies and believe that oral vaccination programs will decrease the risk of exposure. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;211:305–309)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 597 578 12
PDF Downloads 43 36 1
Advertisement