Clarifying the relationship of veterinary medical education and moral development

Donnie J. Self From the Department of Humanities in Medicine, 164 Reynolds Medical Bldg, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1114 (Self); Family Practice Associates of Beeville, PO Box 970, Beeville, TX 78104 (Olivarez); American Medical Association, 515 N State Street, Chicago, IL 60610 (Baldwin); and Office of the Dean, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4461 (Shadduck).

Search for other papers by Donnie J. Self in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Margie Olivarez From the Department of Humanities in Medicine, 164 Reynolds Medical Bldg, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1114 (Self); Family Practice Associates of Beeville, PO Box 970, Beeville, TX 78104 (Olivarez); American Medical Association, 515 N State Street, Chicago, IL 60610 (Baldwin); and Office of the Dean, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4461 (Shadduck).

Search for other papers by Margie Olivarez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
DeWitt C. Baldwin Jr. From the Department of Humanities in Medicine, 164 Reynolds Medical Bldg, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1114 (Self); Family Practice Associates of Beeville, PO Box 970, Beeville, TX 78104 (Olivarez); American Medical Association, 515 N State Street, Chicago, IL 60610 (Baldwin); and Office of the Dean, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4461 (Shadduck).

Search for other papers by DeWitt C. Baldwin Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
John A. Shadduck From the Department of Humanities in Medicine, 164 Reynolds Medical Bldg, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1114 (Self); Family Practice Associates of Beeville, PO Box 970, Beeville, TX 78104 (Olivarez); American Medical Association, 515 N State Street, Chicago, IL 60610 (Baldwin); and Office of the Dean, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4461 (Shadduck).

Search for other papers by John A. Shadduck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Objective

To clarify the relationship between veterinary medical education and moral development in response to 2 previous studies that presented conflicting evidence that the experience of veterinary medical education may inhibit moral development.

Design

The Defining Issues Test (DIT) was used to survey the moral reasoning of veterinary medical students at the beginning and end of their education.

Sample Population

First- and fourth-year veterinary medical students.

Procedure

The moral reasoning of 98 veterinary medical students was assessed at the beginning of their first semester of veterinary medical education and again, 4 years later, at the end of their last semester to determine whether their moral reasoning scores would reflect the expected maturity-related increases usually found at this age range and education level.

Results

The DIT scores ranged from 8.3 to 70.0 for first-year students and from 16.7 to 76.7 for fourth-year students. The first-year mean was 44.0 and the fourth-year mean was 45.4.The mean change of +1.45 points was not significant. Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between the moral reasoning scores and age; however, there was a significant correlation between the moral reasoning scores and gender, with females scoring higher on the first and second test. The difference in the rate of change between tests by gender was not significant.

Conclusion

This study appears to confirm the findings of an earlier study suggesting veterinary medical education inhibits an increase of moral reasoning in veterinary medical students. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;209:2002–2004)

Objective

To clarify the relationship between veterinary medical education and moral development in response to 2 previous studies that presented conflicting evidence that the experience of veterinary medical education may inhibit moral development.

Design

The Defining Issues Test (DIT) was used to survey the moral reasoning of veterinary medical students at the beginning and end of their education.

Sample Population

First- and fourth-year veterinary medical students.

Procedure

The moral reasoning of 98 veterinary medical students was assessed at the beginning of their first semester of veterinary medical education and again, 4 years later, at the end of their last semester to determine whether their moral reasoning scores would reflect the expected maturity-related increases usually found at this age range and education level.

Results

The DIT scores ranged from 8.3 to 70.0 for first-year students and from 16.7 to 76.7 for fourth-year students. The first-year mean was 44.0 and the fourth-year mean was 45.4.The mean change of +1.45 points was not significant. Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between the moral reasoning scores and age; however, there was a significant correlation between the moral reasoning scores and gender, with females scoring higher on the first and second test. The difference in the rate of change between tests by gender was not significant.

Conclusion

This study appears to confirm the findings of an earlier study suggesting veterinary medical education inhibits an increase of moral reasoning in veterinary medical students. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;209:2002–2004)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 568 568 146
PDF Downloads 30 30 6
Advertisement