Coronavirus isolation from nasal swab samples in cattle with signs of respiratory tract disease after shipping

J. Storz From The Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (Storz), and the Research and Development Center, Sanofi Animal Health Inc. Lenexa, KS 66285 (Stine, Liem, Anderson).

Search for other papers by J. Storz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
L. Stine From The Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (Storz), and the Research and Development Center, Sanofi Animal Health Inc. Lenexa, KS 66285 (Stine, Liem, Anderson).

Search for other papers by L. Stine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
A. Liem From The Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (Storz), and the Research and Development Center, Sanofi Animal Health Inc. Lenexa, KS 66285 (Stine, Liem, Anderson).

Search for other papers by A. Liem in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
G. A. Anderson From The Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (Storz), and the Research and Development Center, Sanofi Animal Health Inc. Lenexa, KS 66285 (Stine, Liem, Anderson).

Search for other papers by G. A. Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
Free access

Objective

To monitor the prevailing viral respiratory tract infections in cattle after transportation to feedlots.

Animals

100 cattle with signs of respiratory tract disease on arrival at 2 feedlots.

Procedures

Nasal swab samples were obtained from each animal and were used for inoculation of defined cell culture systems that detected bovine viruses known to cause respiratory tract infections, as well as viruses previously not recognized as respiratory pathogens for cattle.

Results

Bovine respiratory coronaviruses were isolated from 38 of the 100 cattle, including 6 of 50 cattle from California, 22 of 31 cattle from Oklahoma, 6 of 11 cattle from Texas, and 4 of 8 cattle of unknown origin. Parainfluenza 3 viruses also were isolated from 4 California cattle, but other bovine viruses were not detected.

Clinical Implications

The high rate of coronavirus isolations from feedlot cattle with signs of respiratory tract disease implied wide distribution and high susceptibility among cattle to this infection, which had not been detected by use of viral isolation systems in previous etiologic evaluations of feedlot cattle affected with bovine respiratory disease complex. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 208:1452-1455)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 864 436 27
PDF Downloads 139 81 10
Advertisement