Medical treatment of horses with ileal impactions: 10 cases (1990–1994)

R. Reid Hanson From the Department of Large Animal Surgery and Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, 133 McAdory Hall, Auburn University, AL 36849-5522.

Search for other papers by R. Reid Hanson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
John Schumacher From the Department of Large Animal Surgery and Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, 133 McAdory Hall, Auburn University, AL 36849-5522.

Search for other papers by John Schumacher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Jay Humburg From the Department of Large Animal Surgery and Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, 133 McAdory Hall, Auburn University, AL 36849-5522.

Search for other papers by Jay Humburg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
, and
Suzann Carson Dunkerley From the Department of Large Animal Surgery and Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, 133 McAdory Hall, Auburn University, AL 36849-5522.

Search for other papers by Suzann Carson Dunkerley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Objective

To evaluate clinical and laboratory findings for horses treated medically for ileal impactions.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Animals

10 horses with primary ileal impaction that were treated successfully with medical treatment alone.

Procedure

Medical records were reviewed for all horses with naturally developing ileal impaction seen at our hospital between 1990 and 1994.

Results

Transrectal palpation revealed an impaction in the midabdominal area in all horses. Generalized distention of the small intestine was evident in 6 horses, whereas 4 horses were examined early in the course of the condition and did not have intestinal distention. Treatment consisted of intravenous administration of a balanced electrolyte solution, nasogastric intubation and siphonage, and administration of analgesics. Mineral oil was administered after gastric reflux had ceased. Mean time for resolution of ileal impaction was 11.7 hours.

Clinical Implications

Medical treatment may be a viable alternative for horses that cannot have surgery, provided persistent signs of severe pain or progressive gaseous distention of the small intestine are not features of the condition. Improvement of cardiovascular status, reduction in signs of abdominal pain, decrease in distention of loops of small intestine during repeated transrectal examination, softening of the impaction, and decreases in amounts of gastric reflux were indicative of a response to medical treatment. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:898–900)

Objective

To evaluate clinical and laboratory findings for horses treated medically for ileal impactions.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Animals

10 horses with primary ileal impaction that were treated successfully with medical treatment alone.

Procedure

Medical records were reviewed for all horses with naturally developing ileal impaction seen at our hospital between 1990 and 1994.

Results

Transrectal palpation revealed an impaction in the midabdominal area in all horses. Generalized distention of the small intestine was evident in 6 horses, whereas 4 horses were examined early in the course of the condition and did not have intestinal distention. Treatment consisted of intravenous administration of a balanced electrolyte solution, nasogastric intubation and siphonage, and administration of analgesics. Mineral oil was administered after gastric reflux had ceased. Mean time for resolution of ileal impaction was 11.7 hours.

Clinical Implications

Medical treatment may be a viable alternative for horses that cannot have surgery, provided persistent signs of severe pain or progressive gaseous distention of the small intestine are not features of the condition. Improvement of cardiovascular status, reduction in signs of abdominal pain, decrease in distention of loops of small intestine during repeated transrectal examination, softening of the impaction, and decreases in amounts of gastric reflux were indicative of a response to medical treatment. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:898–900)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 587 568 21
PDF Downloads 58 48 5
Advertisement