Stability of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in the presence of fomites commonly found on farms

Eugene C. Pirtle From the Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Search for other papers by Eugene C. Pirtle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
and
George W. Beran From the Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.

Search for other papers by George W. Beran in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Objective—

To determine the survival of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) on nonliving substances (fomites) at 25 to 27 C.

Design—

Prospective controlled study.

Sample Population—

3 solid, 6 porous, and 7 liquid fomites.

Procedure—

The fomites were contaminated with known concentrations of PRRSV. Samples for virus isolation were obtained on day 0 through day 11, assayed in cell cultures, and stained with fluorescent antibody conjugate.

Results—

The virus was recovered only on day-0 samples of alfalfa, wood shavings, straw, plastic, boot rubber, and stainless steel. Virus was isolated from city water through day 11, from well water through day 9, and from 2 buffer solutions for 4 and 6 days. The virus was isolated only on day 0 from swine saliva, urine, and fecal slurry.

Clinical Implications—

Results indicated that PRRSV is a fairly labile virus, but because of its duration of viability in water, contamination of drinking water and lagoons by PRRSV-shedding swine would serve as sources of virus to infect susceptible swine. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:390-392)

Objective—

To determine the survival of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) on nonliving substances (fomites) at 25 to 27 C.

Design—

Prospective controlled study.

Sample Population—

3 solid, 6 porous, and 7 liquid fomites.

Procedure—

The fomites were contaminated with known concentrations of PRRSV. Samples for virus isolation were obtained on day 0 through day 11, assayed in cell cultures, and stained with fluorescent antibody conjugate.

Results—

The virus was recovered only on day-0 samples of alfalfa, wood shavings, straw, plastic, boot rubber, and stainless steel. Virus was isolated from city water through day 11, from well water through day 9, and from 2 buffer solutions for 4 and 6 days. The virus was isolated only on day 0 from swine saliva, urine, and fecal slurry.

Clinical Implications—

Results indicated that PRRSV is a fairly labile virus, but because of its duration of viability in water, contamination of drinking water and lagoons by PRRSV-shedding swine would serve as sources of virus to infect susceptible swine. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:390-392)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 524 517 20
PDF Downloads 83 80 6
Advertisement