Peritonitis in horses: 67 cases (1985-1990)

Jan F. Hawkins From the Departments of Food Animal and Equine Medicine (Hawkins, Bowman, Roberts) and Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology (Cowen), College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Jan F. Hawkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Karl F. Bowman From the Departments of Food Animal and Equine Medicine (Hawkins, Bowman, Roberts) and Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology (Cowen), College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Karl F. Bowman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Malcolm C. Roberts From the Departments of Food Animal and Equine Medicine (Hawkins, Bowman, Roberts) and Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology (Cowen), College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Malcolm C. Roberts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
, and
Peter Cowen From the Departments of Food Animal and Equine Medicine (Hawkins, Bowman, Roberts) and Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology (Cowen), College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Peter Cowen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Summary

Peritonitis was diagnosed in 67 horses between 1985 and 1990: 14 horses developed septic peritonitis after intestinal rupture, 25 horses developed peritonitis after abdominal surgery, and 28 horses had peritonitis not associated with intestinal rupture or abdominal surgery. Forty of 67 horses (59.7%) did not survive. Nonsurvivors had higher heart rates (P = 0.01), RBC count (P = 0.039), serum creatinine concentration (P = 0.036), pcv (P = 0.007), and anion gap (P = 0.005); lower venous blood pH (P = 0.002); and a greater number of bacterial species cultured from peritoneal fluid samples (P = 0.054), compared with those from survivors. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have signs of abdominal pain (P < 0.000), circulatory shock (P = 0.009), and bacteria in peritoneal fluid samples (P = 0.042). Physical examination and peritoneal fluid analysis were the most valuable diagnostic aids for intestinal rupture. Peritonitis after abdominal surgery resulted in high mortality (56%); peritonitis not associated with intestinal rupture or abdominal surgery had lower mortality (42.9%). Clinical and laboratory indices can be of value in determining the prognosis for horses with peritonitis.

Summary

Peritonitis was diagnosed in 67 horses between 1985 and 1990: 14 horses developed septic peritonitis after intestinal rupture, 25 horses developed peritonitis after abdominal surgery, and 28 horses had peritonitis not associated with intestinal rupture or abdominal surgery. Forty of 67 horses (59.7%) did not survive. Nonsurvivors had higher heart rates (P = 0.01), RBC count (P = 0.039), serum creatinine concentration (P = 0.036), pcv (P = 0.007), and anion gap (P = 0.005); lower venous blood pH (P = 0.002); and a greater number of bacterial species cultured from peritoneal fluid samples (P = 0.054), compared with those from survivors. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have signs of abdominal pain (P < 0.000), circulatory shock (P = 0.009), and bacteria in peritoneal fluid samples (P = 0.042). Physical examination and peritoneal fluid analysis were the most valuable diagnostic aids for intestinal rupture. Peritonitis after abdominal surgery resulted in high mortality (56%); peritonitis not associated with intestinal rupture or abdominal surgery had lower mortality (42.9%). Clinical and laboratory indices can be of value in determining the prognosis for horses with peritonitis.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 956 932 40
PDF Downloads 170 157 8
Advertisement