Antibiotic and sulfonamide residues from Food Safety Inspection Service bob veal calf tissues by region, from October 1987 to September 1988

Dennis J. Wilson From the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (Wilson, Franti) and the Veterinary Extension (Norman), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Dennis J. Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM
,
Charles E. Franti From the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (Wilson, Franti) and the Veterinary Extension (Norman), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Charles E. Franti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Ben B. Norman From the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (Wilson, Franti) and the Veterinary Extension (Norman), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Ben B. Norman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
Free access

Summary

Of 3,095 bob veal carcasses declared positive to the calf antibiotic and sulfonamide test (cast) performed by USDA-FSIS personnel during the fiscal year 1988, 967 were submitted to USDA-FSIS laboratories for intensified antimicrobial evaluation of kidney, liver, and muscle specimens. In the western region, cast-positive specimens were analyzed from certified calves, that is, calves declared free of antimicrobials by their producers. In the midwestern and eastern regions, 20% of the cast-positive carcass submissions were certified and 20% had not been certified. Among the regions, neomycin was the most commonly reported agent from kidney specimens; however, there were some distinct differences among regions (24.6% of the specimens in the Midwest, 37. 4% in the East, and 46.8% in the West). Reports of gentamicin in specimens also were different among regional laboratories (9.0% in the Midwest, 12.1% in the East, 3.1% in the West). Sulfamethazine was less frequently reported by the western laboratory, never exceeding 2% among the 3 tissues tested, whereas the eastern and midwestern laboratories had at least 1 tissue type that was ≥9%. Not all specimens were subjected to sulfonamide evaluation. Regional patterns were noticed for unidentified microbial inhibitors, which were most evident for liver in which 24.6% of the specimens at the western laboratory were classified as having unidentified microbial inhibitors, and only 6.3% of specimens at the eastern laboratory were classified as having unidentified microbial inhibitors.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 632 209 11
PDF Downloads 60 34 0
Advertisement