Year two of follow-up evaluation of a randomized, blind field trial of a commercial feline leukemia virus vaccine

Janet M. Scarlett From the Department of Clinical Sciences, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 (Scarlett) and SmithKline Beecham Animal Health, 1600 Paoli Pike, West Chester, PA 19386 (Pollock).

Search for other papers by Janet M. Scarlett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
and
Roy V.H. Pollock From the Department of Clinical Sciences, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 (Scarlett) and SmithKline Beecham Animal Health, 1600 Paoli Pike, West Chester, PA 19386 (Pollock).

Search for other papers by Roy V.H. Pollock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Summary

A blind randomized field trial of a commercial FeLV vaccine was conducted. Cats on study were vaccinated with either a commercial FeLV vaccine or a placebo, then housed with FeLV-positive cats in a ratio of approximately 2 study cats to 1 infected cat (results of the first 12 months of the study have been reported). All surviving placebo-treated and FeLV-vaccinated cats were re-vaccinated 1 year after initial exposure to FeLV-infected cats. Exposure continued for an additional 12 months, and the viremia status of the cats was monitored by immunofluorescent antibody (ifa) and elisa testing at 4-month intervals. During the second year of observation, 1 additional FeLV-vaccinated cat had positive results of 2 consecutive elisa tests, but remained ifa negative. Classifying this cat as persistently viremic reduced the estimate of the preventable fraction, but did not alter the conclusions drawn earlier, viz, that vaccination appreciably reduces the number of cats that become persistently viremic after long-term natural exposure.

Summary

A blind randomized field trial of a commercial FeLV vaccine was conducted. Cats on study were vaccinated with either a commercial FeLV vaccine or a placebo, then housed with FeLV-positive cats in a ratio of approximately 2 study cats to 1 infected cat (results of the first 12 months of the study have been reported). All surviving placebo-treated and FeLV-vaccinated cats were re-vaccinated 1 year after initial exposure to FeLV-infected cats. Exposure continued for an additional 12 months, and the viremia status of the cats was monitored by immunofluorescent antibody (ifa) and elisa testing at 4-month intervals. During the second year of observation, 1 additional FeLV-vaccinated cat had positive results of 2 consecutive elisa tests, but remained ifa negative. Classifying this cat as persistently viremic reduced the estimate of the preventable fraction, but did not alter the conclusions drawn earlier, viz, that vaccination appreciably reduces the number of cats that become persistently viremic after long-term natural exposure.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 624 302 12
PDF Downloads 55 35 0
Advertisement