Correction: Systematic evaluation supports the use of ELISA for quantification of calprotectin in equine feces, a first step toward noninvasive quantification of intestinal inflammation in horses

In the AJVR article “Systematic evaluation supports the use of ELISA for quantification of calprotectin in equine feces, a first step toward noninvasive quantification of intestinal inflammation in horses” (Am J Vet Res. Published online July 9, 2024. doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.04.0110), the original Table 1 was incorrect. The authors would like to correct their article by amending the table to the following:

Table 1

Results of spike recovery analysis for calprotectin (CP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) measurement by ELISA for fecal samples prepared by 4 methods: 1X PBS or fecal extraction buffer (FEB), filtered or unfiltered.

Pearson correlation F test t test Passing-Bablok regression
Protocol R P value P value P value Intercept (95% CI) Slope (95% CI)
CP PBS unfiltered 0.988 .01 .2 .6 4.21 (3.41 to 11.26) 0.49 (0.23 to 0.75)
PBS filtered 0.980 .01 .4 .7 6.58 (−0.67 to 12.46) 0.58 (0.1 to 0.79)
FEB unfiltered 0.973 .03 .8 .9 3.67 (−12.38 to 8.89) 0.76 (0.31 to 1.17)
FEB filtered 0.992 .008 .7 .7 0.86 (−12.19 to 3.67) 1.19 (0.9 to 1.55)
MPO PBS unfiltered 0.968 .03 .2 .6 −5.34 (−96.56 to 0.75) 1.51 (1.05 to 3.01)
PBS filtered 0.967 .03 .1 .5 −9.38 (−119.98 to 0.56) 1.9 (1.14 to 3.7)
FEB unfiltered 0.972 .03 .1 .5 −14.24 (−110.35 to 0.55) 2.22 (1.09 to 3.69)
FEB filtered 0.994 .006 > .9 > .9 1.25 (−17.18 to 12.81) 1.02 (0.62 to 1.21)

For the diagnostic test, R < 0.975 suggests the presence of analytical error; a two-sample t test was used to assess systematic error, and an F test was used to assess random error.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 42 42 42
PDF Downloads 21 21 21
Advertisement