Nerve blocks applied to the distal aspect of a limb (distal to the carpus or tarsocrural joint) of horses usually cause desensitization of the area of innervation within 5 minutes. However, it takes at least 20 minutes for nerve blocks that are performed more proximally in a limb to provide desensitization sufficient to cause observable improvement in the gait.2–5 A decrease in the time required to perform some lameness examinations might be achieved by increasing the rapidity of onset of regional nerve blocks.
Chloroprocaine is an ester local anesthetic that is quickly metabolized to para-aminobenzoic acid, which has the potential to cause allergic reactions. For this reason, clinical use of ester local anesthetics has largely been replaced by the use of amide local anesthetics, which have low potential to cause allergic reactions. However, the ester local anesthetics procaine and chloroprocaine are still commonly used in human medicine, primarily for obstetric purposes. Because chloroprocaine has a rapid onset, its use in diagnostic analgesia might be advantageous when performing median or ulnar regional nerve blocks in horses. To our knowledge, no reports exist of the use of chloroprocaine for diagnostic analgesia in horses. The objective of the study reported here was to evaluate onset of analgesia with 3% chloroprocaine hydrochloride and 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride when performing median and ulnar nerve blocks in horses with naturally occurring lameness. We hypothesized that use of 3% chloroprocaine for median and ulnar nerve blocks would result in a more rapid onset but shorter duration of analgesia than when these nerve blocks were performed with 2% mepivacaine.
No third-party funding or support was received in connection with this study or the writing or publication of the manuscript. The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest.
The authors thank Taylor Gwynn, Cassie Claunch, and Jessica Brown for technical assistance with lameness evaluation of study subjects.
Maximum difference in relative vertical height of the head between right and left halves of the stride
Minimum difference in relative vertical height of the head between right and left halves of the stride
Carbocaine-V, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY.
Nesacaine-MPF, Fresenius Kabi LLC, Lake Zurich, Ill.
The Q, with lameness locator, Equinosis LLC, Columbia, Mo.
PROC MIXED, SAS, version 9.1, SAS Institue Inc, Cary, NC.
1. Wyn-Jones G. Diagnosis of the causes of lameness. In: Wyn-Jones G, ed. Equine lameness. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1988;1–20.
3. Barr A. Musculoskeletal diseases. In: Taylor FGR, Hillyer MH, eds. Diagnostic techniques in equine medicine. London: WB Saunders Co, 1997;231–270.
4. Bassage LH II, Ross MW. Diagnostic analgesia. In: Ross MW, Dyson S, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;100–135.
5. Wright I, Dyson S, Kannegieter N, et al. The locomotor system. In: Higgins A, Wright I, eds. The equine manual. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1995;797–919.
6. Baxter G, Stashak T. Perineural and intrasynovial anesthesia. In: Baxter G, ed. Adams and Stashak's lameness in horses. 6th ed. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011;173–202.
7. Wheat JD, Jones K. Selected techniques of regional anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Large Anim Pract 1981;3:223–246.
8. Keegan KG, Yonezawa Y, Pai P, et al. Evaluation of a sensor-based system of motion analysis for detection and quantification of forelimb and hind limb lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 2004;65:665–670.
9. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, et al. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2012;73:368–374.
10. Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1216–1231.
11. Littell RC, Pendergast J, Natarajan R. Modelling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data. Stat Med 2000;19:1793–1819.
13. Datta S, Kodali BS, Segal S. Local anesthetic pharmacology. In: Datta S, Kodali BS, Segal S, eds. Obstetrical anesthesia handbook. 5th ed. New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2010;18–28.
15. Strichartz GR, Sanchez V, Arthur GR, et al. Fundamental properties of local anesthetics. 11. Measured octanol:buffer partition coefficients and pK values of clinically used drugs. Anesth Analg 1990;71:158–170.
16. Bedforth N, Hardman J. Drug toxicity and selection. In: McLeod G, McCartney C, Wildsmith J, eds. Principals and practice of regional anaesthesia. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2013;68–77.