Collection of percutaneous muscle biopsy specimens from the gluteus medius muscle is commonly used to investigate skeletal muscle physiology and metabolism in horses.1–10 However, no standardized depth has been established for sample collection, and typical gluteus medius biopsy depths range from 1 to 9 cm below the muscle fascia.2,3 The gluteus medius muscle in horses is composed of mixed fiber types, where MHC isoforms vary with depth.2,3,11,12 Although the proportions of various fiber types in the gluteus medius muscle vary with breed of horse,13 in general, there is an increase in type I fibers and a decrease in type II fibers in the deep versus superficial aspect of the gluteus medius muscle in Thoroughbreds,2,3 stock-type horses,2,11 and Andalusians.12
The depth-related differences in muscle MHC content have been associated with differences in various metabolic properties of the muscle,14 including activities of enzymes involved in aerobic and anaerobic energy production pathways.2,3 The increase in type I fibers with increasing muscle depth has also been associated with an increase in capillary density,11 which aids in the delivery of oxygen and substrates to these oxidative fibers. Therefore, a need exists to determine whether biopsy depth influences other metabolic properties, such as protein metabolism.
In an athletic species, such as horses, development and maintenance of muscle mass are important. Protein is the largest nonwater component of skeletal muscle in horses15; therefore, skeletal muscle mass is ultimately determined by the balance between the rates of muscle protein synthesis and breakdown.16 Muscle protein synthesis is regulated through the mTOR-mTORC1 signaling pathway. The upstream regulators of mTOR signaling include insulin (which acts through Akt), amino acids, and exercise, which activate mTOR through independent pathways.17,18 Once activated, mTOR is then able to phosphorylate its downstream targets, including 4EBP1 and S6K1. Ribosomal protein S6 kinase subsequently phosphorylates rpS6. Increases in mTOR signaling are associated with an increase in muscle protein synthesis rates,19,20 provided that sufficient amino acids are present.21
Although little research has been conducted regarding the regulation of mTOR signaling in equine skeletal muscle, research performed by our group has shown that mTOR signaling in that muscle type increases after feeding in growing4 and mature4,5 horses and that the magnitude of the signaling response to feeding is greater in yearlings than in 2-year-old horses.4 In 2 previous studies of mTOR signaling in horses, biopsy specimens of the gluteus medius muscle were obtained from a standardized depth of 6 cm5 or at 50% of the muscle's depth,4 but muscle fiber types at the site of biopsy were not characterized in either study. Research evidence suggests that variation in muscle fiber type can alter the degree of mTOR signaling activation in response to anabolic stimuli (exercise in rodents22,23 and humans24,25 and feeding in piglets26), with type II fibers being more responsive to exercise and feeding stimuli. Because of the role of mTOR signaling in the development and maintenance of muscle mass, there is a need to understand the factors that regulate this signaling pathway in horses. Through determination of whether mTOR signaling in response to the anabolic stimuli of feeding varies with sampling depth in the equine gluteus medius, valuable information can be obtained for use in the design of future studies of mTOR signaling in horses.
The objective of the study reported here was to determine whether biopsy depth would affect the postprandial activation of mTOR signaling in the gluteus medius muscle of middle-aged horses. We hypothesized that differences would be evident in the degree of mTOR signaling activation (ie, amount of phosphorylation of the mTOR signaling proteins) because of variations in fiber type composition as biopsy depth varied from 6 to 10 cm below the surface of the skin.
Materials and Methods
Animals—Six healthy Thoroughbred mares (mean ± SD age, 13.4 ± 3.4 years; mean body weight, 536 ± 45 kg) of moderate body condition (body condition score, 5/9 to 7/927) were used in the study. Mares were housed in partially covered dry lot pens measuring 3 × 15 m, with crushed limestone provided for footing. Free access to water and salt was provided. Diets were designed to meet all nutrient requirements of idle adult horses,28 and all feeds were analyzed at a commercial laboratory.a Horses were allowed to acclimate to the diet and housing for 1 week before muscles biopsies were obtained. All procedures used in the study were approved by the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Experimental procedures—Individual meals were provided twice daily (8 AM and 3 PM). Diets consisted of alfalfa hay cubes (mean ± SD digestible energy, 9.84 ± 0.12 MJ/kg; crude protein, 17.0 ± 0.2%; acid detergent fiber, 35.2 ± 0.8%; neutral detergent fiber, 44.9 ± 1.3%; crude fat, 2.3 ± 0.1%; and ash, 9.5 ± 0.2%) and a ration balancer (digestible energy, 9.79 ± 0.04 MJ/kg; crude protein, 14.9 ± 0.2%; acid detergent fiber, 22.5 ± 0.8%; neutral detergent fiber, 43.2 ± 0.4%; crude fat, 3.6 ± 0.1%; and ash, 12.9 ± 0.1%)b provided at a rate of 1.75% and 0.2% of body weight/d, respectively.
On the day prior to obtaining muscle biopsy specimens, horses were fed their afternoon meals of hay cubes and ration balancer at 3 PM and all horses were finished eating by 5 PM. On the morning of obtaining muscle biopsy specimens (approx 15 hours after feeding), horses were weighed on an electronic scalec and then fed a high-protein pellet at 3 g/kg of body weight (digestible energy, 13.02 ± 0.12 MJ/kg; crude protein, 36.3 ± 0.7%; acid detergent fiber, 6.8 ± 0.3%; neutral detergent fiber, 13.8 ± 0.8%; crude fat, 3.9 ± 0.1%; and ash, 17.2 ± 0.3%).d This time point was designated 0 minutes. Horses were not offered hay cubes during this time. The amino acid composition of the high-protein pellet has been reported elsewhere.5 A feeding protocol similar to the one used in the present study resulted in a 4-fold increase in plasma insulin concentration, an approximately 25% to 125% increase in plasma concentrations of indispensable (essential) amino acids, and an increase in the degree of upstream and downstream mTOR signaling in the gluteus medius muscle in the postprandial versus postabsorptive state.4,5
At 60 minutes, each horse was lightly sedated with xylazine hydrochloride (0.3 mg/kg, IV) and positioned in a set of equine stocks.e The biopsy site was standardized as the point of intersection of 2 imaginary lines: one between the tuber sacrale and the tuber ischii and the other between the tuber coxae and the tail head. The site was aseptically scrubbed and a local anesthetic (12 mL of 2% lidocaine solution) was injected into the area. Muscle biopsy specimens (approx 400 to 500 mg each) were collected via an incision in the gluteus medius muscle at depths of 6, 8, and 10 cm below the surface of the skin with a custom-made Bergstrom needle (length, 18 cm; depth, 6 mm), as described elsewhere.1 The cutting window of the Bergstrom needle was 1.4 cm in length, so muscle specimens were actually collected from 4.6 to 6 cm, 6.6 to 8 cm, and 8.6 to 10 cm below the surface of the skin for the 6-, 8-, and 10-cm biopsy depths, respectively. The deepest 100 mg of each sample was immediately processed for Western blot analysis, and the remaining muscle tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until analysis for amino acid concentrations and MHC isoforms. Phenylbutazone (1 g, PO, q 12 h, for 48 hours) was administered to each horse after biopsy specimen collection to alleviate any potential discomfort associated with the procedure.
Amino acids analysis—Concentrations of free amino acids in muscle specimens were measured through reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographyf of phenyl isothiocyanate derivatives as described.5
Muscle homogenate preparation for Western blot analysis—A portion (approx 100 mg) of each biopsy specimen was homogenized at 7 μL/mg wet tissue weight in buffer solution (20mM HEPES, 2mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 50mM NaF, 100mM KCl, 0.2mM EDTA, and 50mM β-glycerophosphate [pH, 7.4]), containing 20 μL of protease inhibitorg/mL. After centrifugation of homogenates at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C, supernatant was harvested and frozen in aliquots at −80°C until subsequent analysis.
Prior to performance of Western blot analysis, the protein concentration of the homogenates was measured with a Bradford assay kit.h Fifty microliters of supernatant was added to 25 μL of 3× Laemmli buffer (125mM Tris hydrochloride [pH, 6.8], 4% [wt/vol] SDS, 20% [vol/vol] glycerol, 100mM dithiothreitol, and 0.01% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue), and then 1× Laemmli buffer was added to each sample mixture to yield a protein concentration of 2 μg/μL. Each sample mixture was boiled for 5 minutes and placed on ice prior to gel electrophoresis.
Western blot analysis—The amount of each of 4EBP1 (total and phosphorylated at Thr37/46), Akt (total and phosphorylated at Ser473), S6K1 (total and phosphorylated at Thr389), and rpS6 (total and phosphorylated at Ser235/236 and Ser240/244) in biopsy specimens of the gluteus medius muscle was determined with a reported Western blot protocol.4 Briefly, proteins were separated in electrophoretic gels containing 8% acrylamide-N,N′-methylene-bisacrylamide (29:1; Akt, S6K1, and rpS6) or 12% acrylamide-N,N′-methylene-bisacrylamide (19:1; 4EBP1) via electrophoresis. Samples were standardized by the amount of protein loaded per well for electrophoresis (20 μg of protein was loaded for Akt, rpS6, and 4EBP1, and 35 μg of protein was loaded for S6K1). A positive control cell extract (calyculin A-treated Jurkat cells)i was also loaded on each gel.
After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to 0.45-μm polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Individual rabbit polyclonal antibodiesi were applied that recognized total Akt and Akt at Ser473, (1:2,000 dilutions); total S6K1 (1:1,000 dilution) and S6K1 at Thr389 (1:500 dilution); and rpS6 at Ser235/236 and Ser240/244 (1:2,000 dilutions). Rabbit monoclonal antibodiesi specific to total 4EBP1 and 4EBP1 at Thr37/46 (1:1,000 dilutions) and total rpS6 (1:10,000 dilution) were also used. The secondary antibody used was a goat anti-rabbit IgG (heavy and light chains) with conjugated horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000 dilution).j Membranes were developed with a chemiluminescence kit,k and patterns were made visible on x-ray film through the use of a film processor.l Band densities were quantified as the mean band intensity multiplied by the number of pixels with a computer software program.m
Electrophoretic gels were assayed in duplicate, and the same membrane was used to probe for the total and phosphorylated forms of the proteins with different primary antibodies by stripping the membrane following phosphorylated protein measurement and then incubating and reprobing the membrane for the total protein.4
Myofibrillar protein preparation—The samples of muscle tissue that were flash-frozen at the time of obtaining muscle biopsy specimens were pulverized prior to myofibrillar protein analysis. After tissues were thawing on dry ice, the muscle that was flash-frozen was divided into (approx 50-mg) portions and homogenized with a manual Dounce homogenizer in 9 μL/mg tissue wet weight of buffer solution (250mM sucrose, 25mM NaCl, and 20mM Tris [pH, 7.4]). Following centrifugation (20,000 time; g for 30 minutes at 4°C), the supernatant was removed and the pellet resuspended in homogenizing buffer (250 μL). After determination of protein concentrations,h 40 μL of each sample was added to 20 μL of 3× Laemmli buffer (0.15M Tris [pH, 6.8], 6% [wt/vol] SDS, 75mM dithiothreitol, 0.06% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue, and 40% [wt/vol] glycerol). An amount of 1time; Laemmli buffer was added to each sample mixture to yield a protein concentration of 0.2 μg/μL. The sample mixture was boiled for 2 minutes and immediately placed on ice prior to gel electrophoresis.
Separation of MHC isoforms via electrophoresis—The percentage of MHC isoform in the gluteus medius muscle was determined with electrophoresis, followed by silver staining similar to described methods.29 In short, myofibrillar proteins in the portions of muscle biopsy specimens that had been processed and stored in Laemmli buffer were separated via electrophoresis in gels containing 30% glycerol and 8% acrylamide-N,N′-methylene-bisacrylamide (50:1). Samples were standardized by the amount of protein loaded per well for electrophoresis (2 μg of myofibrillar proteins was loaded), and specimens of mouse gastrocnemius muscle served as a control sample on each gel. Gels were run at 4°C for 40 hours with a constant voltage of 70 V and then stained with a kitj in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. Band densities were quantified as the mean band intensity multiplied by the number of pixels with a computer software program.m
Statistical analysis—Amounts of mTOR signaling proteins are reported as a ratio of the phosphorylated to total forms for each protein (arbitrary units), with the ratios for each protein at the 6-cm depth set to 1. To correct for intergel differences in electrophoresis, blotting, and x-ray development conditions, prior to calculating the ratios, band densities were first standardized to the band density of the control sample that was run on each gel. Proportions of MHC isoforms are reported as percentages of total MHC.
Statistical softwaren was used to perform repeated-measures ANOVA, with depth and block as the fixed effects and horse nested in block as the subject. The lowest value of the Schwarz Bayesian criterion was used to select the variance-covariance matrix for use in the model. When the fixed effect of depth was significant for a variable, all pairwise comparisons of the 6-, 8-, and 10-cm least squares means were made via a Tukey test with statistical software.° Results are reported as least squares mean ± pooled SEM. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
All horses consumed the entire high-protein meal within 30 minutes after feeding. A significant (P < 0.05) effect of biopsy depth within the gluteus medius muscle was identified on muscle concentrations of free alanine, aspartate, glutamate, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, proline, and valine (Table 1). Biopsy depth had no effect on ratios for phosphorylation of Akt at Ser473 (P = 0.06), S6K1 at Thr389 (P = 0.66), rpS6 at Ser235/236 and Ser240/244 (P = 0.21), and 4EBP1 at Thr37/46 (P = 0.62) 60 minutes after the high-protein pellet was consumed (Figure 1). Biopsy depth also had no impact on total amounts of any of the proteins evaluated (P > 0.05). Myosin heavy chain analysis revealed a significant effect of biopsy depth on the percentage of MHC IIA (P = 0.03) and IIX (P = 0.02) isoforms in muscle specimens (Figure 2). However, there was no effect (P = 0.42) of biopsy depth on the percentage of MHC I isoforms. The percentage of MHC IIA and IIX isoforms increased by 21% and decreased by 21%, respectively, as the biopsy depth increased from 8 to 10 cm. Individual horses differed in the actual percentage of each fiber type at each depth, as shown by SDs that were 10.6% at 6 cm, 8.6% at 8 cm, and 9.1% at 10 cm for MHC IIA; 9.5% at 6 cm, 9.1% at 8 cm, and 9.8% at 10 cm for MHC IIX; and 9.8% at 6 cm, 7.6% at 8 cm, and 6.0% at 10 cm for MHC I.
Least squares mean muscle amino acid concentrations (mmol/g of wet muscle tissue) in biopsy specimens of gluteus medius muscle obtained 6, 8, and 10 cm below the skin in 6 adult mares.
Amino acid | 6 cm | 8 cm | 10 cm | Pooled SEM | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alanine | 697a | 944b | 744a,b | 102 | 0.05 |
Asparagine | 60 | 60 | 59 | 6 | 0.97 |
Aspartate | 70a | 94b | 68a | 9 | 0.02 |
Citrulline | 41 | 50 | 46 | 6 | 0.48 |
Glutamate | 305a | 442b | 390a,b | 49 | 0.03 |
Glutamine | 246 | 303 | 257 | 35 | 0.46 |
Glycine | 664 | 471 | 664 | 133 | 0.50 |
Histidine | 58 | 68 | 53 | 8 | 0.24 |
Isoleucine | 55a | 69b | 56a | 4 | 0.004 |
Leucine | 105a | 135b | 111a | 10 | 0.007 |
Lysine | 296 | 189 | 267 | 128 | 0.67 |
Methionine | 36a | 50b | 39a | 4 | 0.004 |
Ornithine | 15 | 26 | 17 | 9 | 0.59 |
Phenylalanine | 48 | 64 | 104 | 29 | 0.39 |
Proline | 94a | 122b | 100a | 9 | 0.004 |
Serine | 144 | 150 | 137 | 12 | 0.45 |
Threonine | 170 | 207 | 173 | 34 | 0.69 |
Tryptophan | 18 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0.56 |
Tyrosine | 61 | 104 | 62 | 24 | 0.36 |
Valine | 111a | 148b | 119a | 9 | 0.005 |
Values with different superscript letters are significantly (P < 0.05) different.
Discussion
The gluteus medius muscle was selected for use in the present study because it is the largest muscle of horses' hind limbs by mass,30 it plays a key role in locomotion as a hip joint extensor and abductor, and biopsy samples are commonly obtained from this muscle in studies6–10 of muscle physiologic and metabolic properties in horses. Furthermore, changes in muscle fiber composition with biopsy depth have been extensively characterized in the gluteus medius muscle of various breeds of horses,2,3,11,12 and these depth-related changes have been associated with changes in the activities of enzymes involved in energy production in the skeletal muscle, with glycolytic (type IIX) fiber abundance being associated with lactate dehydrogenase activity and oxidative (type I and type IIA) fiber abundance being associated with citrate synthase activity.2,3
The gluteus medius muscle is also the only muscle that has been evaluated with regard to mTOR signaling and its activation in response to feeding in horses.4,5 However, to the authors' knowledge, ours is the first study to examine the effects of gluteus medius muscle biopsy depth on the degree of mTOR signaling activation in fed horses.
No effect of biopsy depth was identified on the activation of downstream mTOR signaling 60 minutes after horses were fed, despite changes in proportions of MHC isoforms in the specimens. Therefore, provided that specimens of gluteus medius muscle are collected between 6 and 10 cm below the skin surface, the degree of mTOR signaling activation can be compared among middle-aged horses in a fed state.
Biopsy depth was determined from the skin surface rather than from the gluteal muscle fascia, as has been done in other studies2,11,12 of the effects of gluteus medius depth on fiber type composition and muscle metabolism. Although we did not measure rump fat depth, in other studies4,31 involving adult horses of a similar size to our horses, rump fat depth was approximately 2 cm. One can therefore infer that biopsy specimens were obtained 4, 6, and 8 cm below the muscle fascia, which is consistent with the muscle depths used in the previous studies.2,11,12 In another study,2 the gluteus medius muscle was removed from stock horses (mean weight, 365 kg) after slaughter and its depth was measured to be approximately 8 cm. The Thoroughbred mares of the present study weighed almost 50% more than the stock horses did,2 so the total depth of the gluteus medius muscle of the Thoroughbreds likely exceeded 8 cm. It follows that the 3 biopsy depths that we used represented locations from approximately one-third to one-half of the muscle depth (6-cm sample) to the near maximal depth (10-cm sample) of the gluteus medius muscle.
Extensive variation in proportions of fiber types in the gluteus medius muscle exists among breeds of horses.13 Previous measures of gluteus medius fiber type composition in Thoroughbreds revealed 0% to 35% type I fibers, 26% to 61% type IIA fibers, and 10% to 79% type IIX fibers in the gluteus medius muscle, depending on biopsy depth.3,13,32 In the Thoroughbred mares of the present study, the percentage of the various fiber types at each depth were near the midpoints the aforementioned ranges.3,13,32 Previous research has also shown that although the degree of intrasubject variation can be minimized through standardization of biopsy sites,32,33 a high degree of intersubject variation exists in fiber type composition at any given biopsy site or depth.2,3,33 We also found that individual horses of the same breed differed in the actual percentage of each fiber type at each biopsy depth.
Despite the high intersubject variation in the proportions of MHC isoforms at each depth, all horses had the same general response to increasing biopsy depth: as the depth of the biopsy increased from 6 to 10 cm below the surface of the skin, proportions of MHC IIA, MHC IIX, and MHC I isoforms in muscle tissues increased, decreased, and remained unchanged, respectively. The differences in proportions of MHC IIA and MHC IIX fiber types were consistent with previous reports,2,3,11,12 in which percentages of MHC IIA and MHC IIX isoforms (or percentage of type IIA and IIX fibers, respectively) increased and decreased, respectively, from the superficial to deep aspect of the gluteus medius muscle in horses. However, unlike in those reports,2,3,11,12 no significant increase in the percentage of MHC I isoform was identified with increasing biopsy depth in the present study. This lack of an increase could have been related to the biopsy protocol used. The greatest increase in the percentage of slow oxidative fibers (equivalent to MHC I) in another study2 was identified in the deepest portion of the gluteus medius muscle. Because the deepest biopsy site in our study may not have been at the maximal muscle depth, any dramatic changes in the proportion of MHC I isoforms might have been overlooked.
Alternatively, the study12 that showed the largest increase in the proportion of MHC I isoform with increasing muscle depth involved Andalusians, which appear to have had a much higher amount of MHC I in the deep region of the gluteus medius muscle (59% to 70% of total MHC quantity12) than was reported for Thoroughbreds at a comparable depth (0% to 35% of total muscle fibers as type I fibers3). The lack of a significant increase in MHC I proportion with increasing muscle depth in the present study might have been attributable to these breed differences. Another possible explanation relates to the actual site within the muscle where the biopsy was performed. Many external landmarks have been used to standardize the biopsy site of the gluteus medius in horses, including one-third to two-thirds of the distance between the tuber coxae and the tailhead,3,34 10 to 25 cm caudodorsal from the tuber coxae,1,12,32 and in the region between the tuber sacrale and tuber coxae.34,35 A previous study34 revealed variation in the MHC composition of the gluteus medius muscle, even at a constant depth, with biopsy specimens obtained from the muscle region.
Although changes in MHC isoform content were identified with increasing biopsy depth, no significant effect of biopsy depth was evident on the degree of activation of any of the mTOR signaling factors evaluated, even at the 8-cm depth where high muscle concentrations of the branched chain amino acids, which stimulate mTOR signaling in other species,20,36–38 was identified. Generally, studies20,36–38 in which a beneficial effect on muscle mTOR signaling activation was identified for dietary supplementation with leucine or branched chain amino acids involved a rate of supplementation that resulted in at least a doubling of plasma leucine concentration. Although plasma amino acid concentrations were not measured in our study, previous studies4,5 involving similar horse feeding protocols showed that plasma branched chain amino acid concentrations were only 24% to 45% higher than preprandial concentrations 60 to 80 minutes after feeding. The muscle branched chain amino acid concentrations at the 8-cm biopsy depth were significantly greater than those at the other depths in the present study, but the 25% to 33% increase in their concentrations did not appear large enough to elicit an increase in the mTOR signaling response.
The present study is not the first to involve investigation of the association between muscle fiber type composition and mTOR signaling response to anabolic stimuli. In rodents, the phosphorylation of mTOR22 and S6K123 varies across different muscles in response to contractile activity, and different fiber types (type II vs type I) may be the cause for the greater mTOR signaling response in the predominantly type II muscle. Similarly, in humans, type II muscle fibers have a greater activation of S6K1 immediately following25 and 1 hour24 and 2 hours24,25 after resistance exercise than do type I fibers; however, the degree of Akt and mTOR phosphorylation in response to exercise appears unaffected by fiber type,24 suggesting that the fiber-type specific increase in S6K1 activation is through an Akt- or mTOR-independent mechanism. In the present study, feeding rather than exercise was used to stimulate mTOR-related signaling. Activation of mTOR signaling and fractional muscle protein synthesis in piglets do not appear to be dependent on fiber type.26 Rather, the muscle group with the highest proportion of fast twitch (type II) fibers has the greatest degree of mTOR signaling and protein synthesis after feeding. In human skeletal muscle; however, no correlation exists between muscle fiber type proportions and muscle fractional protein synthesis rates at rest before or following an infusion of an amino acid solution.39 The relationship among muscle fiber types, mTOR signaling, and rates of muscle protein synthesis is clearly an area where additional research is warranted.
In the present study, although significant differences in proportions of MHC IIA and MHC IIX isoforms were evident with biopsy depth, the proportion of total MHC II isoform was similar across depths (87%, 89%, and 90% at 6, 8, and 10 cm, respectively), which may explain the lack of an effect of depth on downstream mTOR signaling in fed horses. The previous studies22–25 that found effects of fiber type composition on the degree of mTOR signaling did not differentiate between among type II fiber classes; therefore, our results are in general agreement with the previous findings.
Another factor that has been associated with variations in muscle fiber type and biopsy depth in horses11 and that affects mTOR signaling in other species40 is the amount of blood flow to the muscles, which would affect the delivery of amino acids and insulin to muscle tissue. Although muscle capillarity was not characterized in the present study, a previous study11 that predominantly involved Thoroughbreds showed that the differences in muscle capillarity with biopsy depth were present at shallow gluteus medius depths (from 2 to 4 cm). However, in the range of muscle biopsy depths in our study (approx 4 to 8 cm below the fascia), we also found no further changes in capillarity with increasing depth, providing additional support for the lack of differences in postprandial mTOR signaling among the depths of muscle from which biopsy specimens were obtained.
If the amount of anabolic stimulation (meal size or composition) or timing of the biopsy after feeding was inappropriate, then we may not have measured the maximal mTOR signaling response and may not have been able to detect depth-related differences in mTOR signaling activation. Although other studies4,5 involved obtaining muscle biopsy samples 90 minutes after feeding in horses, a study26 involving piglets found that mTOR signaling and fractional synthesis rates in various types of skeletal muscle are activated from as early as 30 to 60 minutes after feeding. A feeding protocol similar to the one we used resulted in plasma glucose, insulin, and amino acid concentrations that were significantly higher than preprandial values from 40 to 60 minutes after feeding in another equine study.5 Therefore, it appears unlikely that the feeding protocol or biopsy timing contributed to the absence of depth-related differences in mTOR activation.
Another factor that may have affected the responsiveness of mTOR signaling in the gluteus medius muscle in the study horses was horse age, which was approximately 13 years. Although feeding activates mTOR signaling in the gluteus medius muscle of horses of various ages,4,5 the degree of activation is greater in yearlings than in 2 year olds,4 showing an age-related decline in the responsiveness of mTOR signaling to feeding. Because muscle mTOR signaling appears to be more sensitive to feeding in young horses, the amount of feeding stimulation in the present study may not have been sufficient to elicit detectable differences in the activation of mTOR signaling with muscle depth in middle-aged horses. Had younger horses been used, depth-related signaling differences may have been observed.
Although additional research is necessary to determine whether biopsy depth has a significant effect on the degree of mTOR signaling in response to anabolic stimuli other than feeding such as exercise or hormone administration and whether similar responses occur in other major muscle groups, the present study provided valuable information regarding the optimization of biopsy procedures for evaluating the regulation of mTOR signaling in the gluteus medius muscle of horses after feeding. Further knowledge of the factors that regulate muscle protein synthesis will allow for the design of management and feeding strategies to promote the development and maintenance of muscle mass in horses of all ages.
ABBREVIATIONS
4EBP1 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 |
Akt | Protein kinase B |
MHC | Myosin heavy chain |
mTOR | Mammalian target of rapamycin |
rpS6 | Ribosomal protein S6 |
S6K1 | Ribosomal protein S6 kinase |
Dairy One Forage Laboratory, Ithaca, NY.
Triple Crown Lite, Southern States Cooperative Inc, Richmond, Va.
TI-500, Transcell Technology Inc, Buffalo Grove, Ill.
Triple Crown 30% Performance Supplement, Southern States Cooperative Inc, Richmond, Va.
HS equine stocks, Priefert Rodeo & Ranch Equipment, Mount Pleasant, Tex.
3.9 × 300-mm PICO-TAG reverse-phase column, Waters Corp, Milford, Mass.
Sigma P8340, Sigma Aldrich Corp, St Louis, Mo.
Thermo Scientific, Rockford, Ill.
Cell Signaling Technology Inc, Boston, Mass.
Silver Stain Plus, BioRad, Hercules, Calif.
Amersham ECL Plus western blotting detection reagents, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ.
Kodak X-OMAT film processor, Kodak Health Imaging Division, Rochester, NY.
Adobe Photoshop elements, version 8.0, Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, Calif.
Proc MIXED, SAS, version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
PDIFF option in the LSMEANS statement, SAS, version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
References
1. Lindholm A & Piehl K. Fibre composition, enzyme activity and concentrations of metabolites and electrolytes in muscles of Standardbred horses. Acta Vet Scand 1974; 15: 287–309.
2. Kline KH, Bechtel PJ. Changes in the metabolic profile of the equine gluteus medius as a function of sampling depth. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol 1988; 91: 815–819.
3. Sewell DA, Harris RC, Marlin DJ. Skeletal muscle characteristics in 2 year-old race-trained Thoroughbred horses. Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol 1994; 108: 87–96.
4. Wagner AL, Urschel KL. Developmental regulation of the activation of translation initiation factors in response to feeding in the skeletal muscle of horses. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73: 1241–1251.
5. Urschel KL, Escobar J & McCutcheon LJ, et al. Effect of feeding a high-protein diet following an 18-hour period of feed withholding on mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent signaling in skeletal muscle of mature horses. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 248–255.
6. Tiley HA, Geor RJ, McCutcheon LJ. Effects of dexamethasone administration on insulin resistance and components of insulin signaling and glucose metabolism in equine skeletal muscle. Am J Vet Res 2008; 69: 51–58.
7. Rivero JL, Ruz A & Marti-Korff S, et al. Effects of intensity and duration of exercise on muscular responses to training of Thoroughbred racehorses. J Appl Physiol 2007; 102: 1871–1882.
8. Annandale EJ, Valberg SJ & Mickelson JR, et al. Insulin sensitivity and skeletal muscle glucose transport in horses with equine polysaccharide storage myopathy. Neuromuscul Disord 2004; 14: 666–674.
9. Waller AP, Geor RJ & Spriet LL, et al. Oral acetate supplementation after prolonged moderate intensity exercise enhances early muscle glycogen resynthesis in horses. Exp Physiol 2009; 94: 888–898.
10. Liburt NR, Adams AA & Betancourt A, et al. Exercise-induced increases in inflammatory cytokines in muscle and blood of horses. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010;(38):280–288.
11. Serrano AL, Petrie JL & Rivero JL, et al. Myosin isoforms and muscle fiber characteristics in equine gluteus medius muscle. Anat Rec 1996; 244: 444–451.
12. López-Rivero JL, Serrano AL & Diz AM, et al. Variability of muscle fibre composition and fibre size in the horse gluteus medius: an enzyme-histochemical and morphometric study. J Anat 1992; 181: 1–10.
13. Snow DH, Guy PS. Muscle fibre type composition of a number of limb muscles in different types of horse. Res Vet Sci 1980; 28: 137–144.
14. Schiaffino S & Reggiani C. Molecular diversity of myofibrillar proteins: gene regulation and functional significance. Physiol Rev 1996; 76: 371–423.
15. Badiani A, Nanni N & Gatta PP, et al. Nutrient profile of horse-meat. J Food Compost Anal 1997; 10: 254–269.
16. Tipton KD, Ferrando AA. Improving muscle mass: response of muscle metabolism to exercise, nutrition and anabolic agents. Essays Biochem 2008; 44: 85–98.
17. Miyazaki M, Esser KA. Cellular mechanisms regulating protein synthesis and skeletal muscle hypertrophy in animals. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 1367–1373.
18. Kimball SR. The role of nutrition in stimulating muscle protein accretion at the molecular level. Biochem Soc Trans 2007; 35: 1298–1301.
19. Liu Z, Jahn LA & Wei L, et al. Amino acids stimulate translation initiation and protein synthesis through an Akt-independent pathway in human skeletal muscle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 5553–5558.
20. Escobar J, Frank JW & Suryawan A, et al. Physiological rise in plasma leucine stimulates muscle protein synthesis in neonatal pigs by enhancing translation initiation factor activation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005; 288:E914–E921.
21. Escobar J, Frank JW & Suryawan A, et al. Amino acid availability and age affect the leucine stimulation of protein synthesis and eIF4F formation in muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 293:E1615–E1621.
22. Parkington JD, Siebert AP & LeBrasseur NK, et al. Differential activation of mTOR signaling by contractile activity in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003; 285:R1086–R1090.
23. Baar K & Esser K. Phosphorylation of p70(S6k) correlates with increased skeletal muscle mass following resistance exercise. Am J Physiol 1999; 276:C120–C127.
24. Tannerstedt J, Apro W & Blomstrand E. Maximal lengthening contractions induce different signaling responses in the type I and type II fibers of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 1412–1418.
25. Koopman R, Zorenc AH & Gransier RJ, et al. Increase in S6K1 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle following resistance exercise occurs mainly in type II muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 290:E1245–E1252.
26. Gazzaneo MC, Orellana RA & Suryawan A, et al. Differential regulation of protein synthesis and mTOR signaling in skeletal muscle and visceral tissues of neonatal pigs after a meal. Pediatr Res 2011; 70: 253–260.
27. Henneke DR, Potter GD & Kreider JL, et al. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares. Equine Vet J 1983; 15: 371–372.
28. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of horses. 6th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
29. Talmadge RJ, Roy RR. Electrophoretic separation of rat skeletal muscle myosin heavy-chain isoforms. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 2337–2340.
30. Crook TC, Cruickshank SE & McGowan CM, et al. Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab. J Anat 2008; 212: 144–152.
31. Vick MM, Adams AA & Murphy BA, et al. Relationships among inflammatory cytokines, obesity, and insulin sensitivity in the horse. J Anim Sci 2007; 85: 1144–1155.
32. Lindner A, Dag S & Marti-Korff S, et al. Effects of repeated biopsying on muscle tissue in horses. Equine Vet J 2002; 34: 619–624.
33. Wood CH, Ross TT & Armstrong JB, et al. Homogeneity of muscle fiber composition in the M gluteus medius of the horse. J Equine Vet Sci 1988; 8: 294–296.
34. Valette JP, Barrey E & Jouglin M, et al. Standardisation of muscular biopsy of gluteus medius in French trotters. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999;(30):342–344.
35. Eizema K, van den Burg MM & de Jonge HW, et al. Myosin heavy chain isoforms in equine gluteus medius muscle: comparison of mRNA and protein expression profiles. J Histochem Cytochem 2005; 53: 1383–1390.
36. Suryawan A, Torrazza RM & Gazzaneo MC, et al. Enteral leucine supplementation increases protein synthesis in skeletal and cardiac muscles and visceral tissues of neonatal pigs through mTORC1-dependent pathways. Pediatr Res 2012; 71: 324–331.
37. Zeanandin G, Balage M & Schneider SM, et al. Differential effect of long-term leucine supplementation on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in old rats: an insulin signaling pathway approach. Age (Dordr) 2012;34: 371–387.
38. Glynn EL, Fry CS & Drummond MJ, et al. Excess leucine intake enhances muscle anabolic signaling but not net protein anabolism in young men and women. J Nutr 2010; 140: 1970–1976.
39. Mittendorfer B, Andersen JL & Plomgaard P, et al. Protein synthesis rates in human muscles: neither anatomical location nor fibre-type composition are major determinants. J Physiol 2005; 563: 203–211.
40. Timmerman KL, Lee JL & Dreyer HC, et al. Insulin stimulates human skeletal muscle protein synthesis via an indirect mechanism involving endothelial-dependent vasodilation and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 signaling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 3848–3857.