• 1.

    Mumford EL, Traub-Dargatz JL, Carman J, et al. Occurrence of infectious upper respiratory tract disease and response to vaccination in horses on six sentinel premises in northern Colorado. Equine Vet J 2003; 35: 7277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Mumford JA, Jessett D, Dunleavy U, et al. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of experimental equine influenza ISCOM vaccines. Vaccine 1994; 12: 857863.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, et al. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev 1992; 56: 152179.

  • 4.

    Tumova B. Equine influenza—a segment in influenza virus ecology. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 1980; 3: 4559.

  • 5.

    Crawford PC, Dubovi EJ, Castleman WL, et al. Transmission of equine influenza virus to dogs. Science 2005; 310: 482485.

  • 6.

    Payungporn S, Crawford PC, Kouo TS, et al. Influenza A virus (H3N8) in dogs with respiratory disease, Florida. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14: 902908.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Annu Rev Biochem 2000; 69: 531569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Von Grotthuss M, Rychlewski L. Influenza mutation from equine to canine. Science 2006; 311: 12411242.

  • 9.

    Plotkin JB, Dushoff J. Codon bias and frequency-dependent selection on the hemagglutinin epitopes of influenza A virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 71527157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Verhoeyen M, Fang R, Jou WM, et al. Antigenic drift between the haemagglutinin of the Hong Kong influenza strains A/Aichi/2/68 and A/Victoria/3/75. Nature 1980; 286: 771776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Shakin-Eshleman SH, Spitalnik SL, Kasturi L. The amino acid at the X position of an Asn-X-Ser sequon is an important determinant of N-linked core-glycosylation efficiency. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 63636366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Ye Y, Si ZH, Moore JP, et al. Association of structural changes in the V2 and V3 loops of the gp120 envelope glycoprotein with acquisition of neutralization resistance in a simian-human immunodeficiency virus passaged in vivo. J Virol 2000; 74: 1195511962.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Zhang M, Gashen B, Blay W, et al. Tracking global patterns of N-linked glycosylation site variation in highly variable viral glycoproteins: HIV, SIV, and HCV envelopes and influenza hemagglutinin. Glycobiology 2004; 14: 12291246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Ito T. Interspecies transmission and receptor recognition of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Immunol 2000; 44: 423430.

  • 15.

    Suzuki Y, Ito T, Suzuki T, et al. Sialic acid species as a determinant of the host range of influenza A viruses. J Virol 2000; 74: 1182511831.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Busch MG, Bateman AC, Landolt GA, et al. Identification of amino acids in the HA of H3 influenza viruses that determine infectivity levels in primary swine respiratory epithelial cells. Virus Res 2008; 133: 269279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Matrosovich MN, Matrosovich TY, Gray T, et al. Human and avian influenza viruses target different cell types in cultures of human airway epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 46204624.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Thompson CI, Barclay WS, Zambon MC, et al. Infection of human airway epithelium by human and avian strains of influenza A virus. J Virol 2006; 80: 80608068.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Wan H, Perez DR. Amino acid 226 in the hemagglutinin of H9N2 influenza viruses determines cell tropism and replication in human airway epithelial cells. J Virol 2007; 81: 51815191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Nelson KM, Schram BR, McGregor MW, et al. Local and systemic isotype-specific antibody responses to equine influenza virus infection versus conventional vaccination. Vaccine 1998; 16: 13061313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Landolt GA, Karasin AI, Phillips L, et al. Comparison of the pathogenesis of two genetically different H3N2 influenza A viruses in pigs. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 19361941.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Kaverin NV, Webster RG. Impairment of multicycle influenza virus growth in Vero (WHO) cells by loss of trypsin activity. J Virol 1995; 69: 27002703.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Bals R, Beisswenger C, Blouquit S, et al. Isolation and air-liquid interface culture of human large airway and bronchiolar epithelial cells. J Cyst Fibros 2004; 3 (suppl 2):4951.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Soboll G, Hussey S, Minke JM, et al. Onset and duration of immunity to equine influenza virus resulting from canarypoxvectored (ALVAC) vaccination. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2010; 135: 100107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Landolt GA, Karasin AI, Hofer C, et al. Use of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay and cell culture methods for detection of swine influenza A viruses. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 119124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Chambers TM, Holland RE, Tudor LR, et al. A new modified live equine influenza virus vaccine: phenotypic stability, restricted spread and efficacy against heterologous virus challenge. Equine Vet J 2001; 33: 630636.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Mumford JA, Hannant D, Jessett DM. Experimental infection of ponies with equine influenza (H3N8) viruses by intranasal inoculation or exposure to aerosols. Equine Vet J 1990; 22: 9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ito T, Couceiro JN, Kelm S, et al. Molecular basis for the generation in pigs of influenza A viruses with pandemic potential. J Virol 1998; 72: 73677373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Bosch FX, Garten W, Klenk HD, et al. Proteolytic cleavage of influenza virus hemagglutinins: primary structure of the connecting peptide between HA1 and HA2 determines proteolytic cleavability and pathogenicity of avian influenza viruses. Virology 1981; 113: 725735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Rott R, Reinacher M, Orlich M, et al. Cleavability of hemagglutinin determines spread of avian influenza viruses in the chorioallantoic membrane of chicken embryo. Arch Virol 1980; 65: 123133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Vigerust DJ, Ulett KB, Boyd KL, et al. N-linked glycosylation attenuates H3N2 influenza viruses. J Virol 2007; 81: 85938600.

Advertisement

Evaluation of infectivity of a canine lineage H3N8 influenza A virus in ponies and in primary equine respiratory epithelial cells

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 2 Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 3 Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 4 Departments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 5 Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 6 Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 7 Departments of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 8 Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate whether an equine-derived canine H3N8 influenza A virus was capable of infecting and transmitting disease to ponies.

Animals—20 influenza virus-seronegative 12- to 24-month-old ponies.

Procedures—5 ponies were inoculated via aerosol exposure with 107 TCID50 of A/Canine/Wyoming/86033/07 virus (Ca/WY)/pony. A second group of 5 ponies (positive control group) was inoculated via aerosol exposure with a contemporary A/Eq/Colorado/10/07 virus (Eq/CO), and 4 sham-inoculated ponies served as a negative control group. To evaluate the potential for virus transmission, ponies (3/inoculation group) were introduced 2 days after aerosol exposure and housed with Ca/WY- and Eq/CO-inoculated ponies to serve as sentinel animals. Clinical signs, nasal virus shedding, and serologic responses to inoculation were monitored in all ponies for up to 21 days after viral inoculation. Growth and infection characteristics of viruses were examined by use of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and primary equine and canine respiratory epithelial cells.

Results—Ponies inoculated with Ca/WY had mild changes in clinical appearance, compared with results for Eq/CO-inoculated ponies. Additionally, Ca/WY inoculation induced significantly lower numbers for copies of the matrix gene in nasal secretions and lower systemic antibody responses in ponies than did Eq/CO inoculation. The Ca/WY isolate was not transmitted to sentinel ponies.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Inoculation of ponies with the canine H3N8 isolate resulted in mild clinical disease, minimal nasal virus shedding, and weak systemic antibody responses, compared with responses after inoculation with the equine H3N8 influenza isolate. These results suggested that Ca/WY has not maintained infectivity for ponies.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate whether an equine-derived canine H3N8 influenza A virus was capable of infecting and transmitting disease to ponies.

Animals—20 influenza virus-seronegative 12- to 24-month-old ponies.

Procedures—5 ponies were inoculated via aerosol exposure with 107 TCID50 of A/Canine/Wyoming/86033/07 virus (Ca/WY)/pony. A second group of 5 ponies (positive control group) was inoculated via aerosol exposure with a contemporary A/Eq/Colorado/10/07 virus (Eq/CO), and 4 sham-inoculated ponies served as a negative control group. To evaluate the potential for virus transmission, ponies (3/inoculation group) were introduced 2 days after aerosol exposure and housed with Ca/WY- and Eq/CO-inoculated ponies to serve as sentinel animals. Clinical signs, nasal virus shedding, and serologic responses to inoculation were monitored in all ponies for up to 21 days after viral inoculation. Growth and infection characteristics of viruses were examined by use of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and primary equine and canine respiratory epithelial cells.

Results—Ponies inoculated with Ca/WY had mild changes in clinical appearance, compared with results for Eq/CO-inoculated ponies. Additionally, Ca/WY inoculation induced significantly lower numbers for copies of the matrix gene in nasal secretions and lower systemic antibody responses in ponies than did Eq/CO inoculation. The Ca/WY isolate was not transmitted to sentinel ponies.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Inoculation of ponies with the canine H3N8 isolate resulted in mild clinical disease, minimal nasal virus shedding, and weak systemic antibody responses, compared with responses after inoculation with the equine H3N8 influenza isolate. These results suggested that Ca/WY has not maintained infectivity for ponies.

Contributor Notes

Supported by a grant from the College Research Council at Colorado State University.

Presented as an oral presentation at the Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases 90th Annual Meeting, Chicago, December 2009.

The authors thank Dr. D. Paul Lunn and Susan Bennett for technical assistance and Matthew Dubois, Kyle Innes, Julie Blossom, and Natalia Fernando for animal assistance during the study.

Address correspondence to Dr. Landolt (landoltg@colostate.edu).