• 1.

    Thomason JJDouglas JESears W. Morphology of the laminar junction in relation to the shape of the hoof capsule and distal phalanx in adult horses (Equus caballus). Cells Tiss Org 2001; 168:295311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Hinterhofer CStanek CBinder K. Elastic modulus of equine hoof horn, tested in wall samples, sole samples and frog samples at varying levels of moisture. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1998; 111:217221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Thomason J. The hoof as a smart structure. In: Floyd AMansmann R, eds. Equine podiatry. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2007;4656.

  • 4.

    Dejardin LMArnoczky SPCloud GL. A method for determination of equine hoof strain patterns using photoelasticity: an in vitro study. Equine Vet J 1999; 31:232237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Ovnicek GErfle JPeters D. Wild horse hoof patterns offer a formula for preventing and treating lameness, in Proceedings. 41st Annu Conv Am Assoc Equine Pract 1995;258260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Ovnicek G. Sole thickness and heel growth in laminitic feet. Equine Foot Sci 2004; 24:301.

  • 7.

    Rooney JR. Functional anatomy of the foot. In: Floyd AMansmann R, eds. Equine podiatry. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2007;5773.

  • 8.

    Hampson BAMorton JMMills PC, et al. Monitoring distances travelled by horses using GPS tracking collars. Aust Vet J 2010; 88:176181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Stashak TS. The foot. In: Stashak TS, ed. Adams' lameness in horses. 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;717.

  • 10.

    Kummer MGeyer HImboden I, et al. The effect of hoof trimming on radiographic measurements of the front feet of normal warmblood horses. Vet J 2006; 172:5866.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    van Heel MCBarneveld Avan Weeren PR, et al. Dynamic pressure measurements for the detailed study of hoof balance: the effect of trimming. Equine Vet J 2004; 36:778782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Dejardin LMArnoczky SPCloud GL, et al. Photoelastic stress analysis of strain patterns in equine hooves after four-point trimming. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:467473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Hood DBaker SWagner. Effects of ground surface on solar load distribution, in Proceedings. 40th Annu Conv Am Assoc Equine Pract 1997;360362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Back WMacAllister CGHeel MC, et al. Vertical frontlimb ground reaction forces of sound and lame warmbloods differ from those in quarter horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2007; 27:123129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Heel MCBack W. Ground surface and poly-urethane (PU) filling alter the pressure distribution pattern in square standing horses, in Proceedings. Prog Equine Vet Sports Med 2006;592596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Hampson BARamsey GMacintosh AM, et al. Morphometry and abnormalities of the feet of Kaimanawa feral horses in New Zealand. Aust Vet J 2010; 88:124131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Roepstorff LJohnston CDrevemo S. In vivo and in vitro heel expansion in relation to shoeing and frog pressure. Equine Vet J Suppl2001;(33):5457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Thomason JJJofriet JC. Analysis of strain and stress in the equine hoof capsule using finite element methods: comparison with principal strains recorded in vivo. Equine Vet J 2002; 34:719725.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Hood DMTaylor DWagner IP. Effects of ground surface deformability, trimming, and shoeing on quasistatic hoof loading patterns in horses. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:895900.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Thomason JJ. Variation in surface strain on the equine hoof wall at the midstep with shoeing, gait, substrate, direction of travel, and hoof shape. Equine Vet J Suppl1998;(26):8695.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    McClinchey HLThomason JJJofriet JC. Isolating the effects of equine hoof shape measurements on capsule strain with finite element analysis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16:6775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Jackson J. The natural horse and its hooves. In: Jackson J, ed. The natural horse. Harrison, Ark: Star Ridge Publishing, 1997;6796.

  • 23.

    Colles CM. The relationship of frog pressure to heel expansion. Equine Vet J 1989; 21:1316.

  • 24.

    Linford RLO'Brien TRTrout DR. Qualitative and morphometric radiographic findings in the distal phalanx and digital soft tissues of sound Thoroughbred racehorses. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54:3851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Somers JGSchouten WGFrankena K, et al. Development of claw traits and claw lesions in dairy cows kept on different floor systems. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88:110120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Sole depth and weight-bearing characteristics of the palmar surface of the feet of feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds

Brian A. Hampson M. Animal Studies (Animal Physiotherapy)1, Alexandra D. Connelley BVSc2, Melody A. de Laat BVSc3, Paul C. Mills BVSc, PhD4, and Chris C. Pollitt BVSc, PhD5
View More View Less
  • 1 Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • | 2 Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • | 3 Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • | 4 Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • | 5 Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

Abstract

Objective—To determine solar load-bearing structures in the feet of feral horses and investigate morphological characteristics of the sole in feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds.

Sample—Forelimbs from cadavers of 70 feral horses and 20 domestic Thoroughbreds in Australia.

Procedures—Left forefeet were obtained from 3 feral horse populations from habitats of soft substrate (SS [n = 10 horses]), hard substrate (HS [10]), and a combination of SS and HS (10) and loaded in vitro. Pressure distribution was measured with a pressure plate. Sole depth was measured at 12 points across the solar plane in feet obtained from feral horses from SS (n = 20 horses) and HS (20) habitats and domestic Thoroughbreds (20).

Results—Feet of feral horses from HS habitats loaded the periphery of the sole and hoof wall on a flat surface. Feral horses from HS or SS habitats had greater mean sole depth than did domestic Thoroughbreds. Sole depth was greatest peripherally and was correlated with the loading pattern.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The peripheral aspect of the sole in the feet of feral horses had a load-bearing function. Because of the robust nature of the tissue architecture, the hoof capsule of feral horses may be less flexible than that of typical domestic horses. The application of narrow-web horseshoes may not take full advantage of the load-bearing and force-dissipating properties of the peripheral aspect of the sole. Further studies are required to understand the effects of biomechanical stimulation on the adaptive responses of equine feet.

Abstract

Objective—To determine solar load-bearing structures in the feet of feral horses and investigate morphological characteristics of the sole in feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds.

Sample—Forelimbs from cadavers of 70 feral horses and 20 domestic Thoroughbreds in Australia.

Procedures—Left forefeet were obtained from 3 feral horse populations from habitats of soft substrate (SS [n = 10 horses]), hard substrate (HS [10]), and a combination of SS and HS (10) and loaded in vitro. Pressure distribution was measured with a pressure plate. Sole depth was measured at 12 points across the solar plane in feet obtained from feral horses from SS (n = 20 horses) and HS (20) habitats and domestic Thoroughbreds (20).

Results—Feet of feral horses from HS habitats loaded the periphery of the sole and hoof wall on a flat surface. Feral horses from HS or SS habitats had greater mean sole depth than did domestic Thoroughbreds. Sole depth was greatest peripherally and was correlated with the loading pattern.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The peripheral aspect of the sole in the feet of feral horses had a load-bearing function. Because of the robust nature of the tissue architecture, the hoof capsule of feral horses may be less flexible than that of typical domestic horses. The application of narrow-web horseshoes may not take full advantage of the load-bearing and force-dissipating properties of the peripheral aspect of the sole. Further studies are required to understand the effects of biomechanical stimulation on the adaptive responses of equine feet.

Contributor Notes

Supported by The Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; Australian Government; and the Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland.

Address correspondence to Mr. Hampson (b.hampson1@uq.edu.au).