Pharmacokinetics and physiologic effects of intramuscularly administered xylazine hydrochloride-ketamine hydrochloride-butorphanol tartrate alone or in combination with orally administered sodium salicylate on biomarkers of pain in Holstein calves following castration and dehorning

Sarah L. Baldridge Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Sarah L. Baldridge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Johann F. Coetzee Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Johann F. Coetzee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Steve S. Dritz Food Animal Health and Management Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Steve S. Dritz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
James B. Reinbold Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by James B. Reinbold in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Ronette Gehring Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Ronette Gehring in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, MMedVet (Pharm)
,
James Havel PharmCATS Bio-analytical Services, 2005 Research Park Circle, Manhattan, KS 66502.

Search for other papers by James Havel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
, and
Butch Kukanich Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Butch Kukanich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of xylazine, ketamine, and butorphanol (XKB) administered IM and sodium salicylate (SAL) administered PO to calves and to compare drug effects on biomarkers of pain and distress following sham and actual castration and dehorning.

Animals—40 Holstein bull calves from 3 farms.

Procedures—Calves weighing 108 to 235 kg (n = 10 calves/group) received one of the following treatments prior to sham (period 1) and actual (period 2) castration and dehorning: saline (0.9% NaCl) solution IM (placebo); SAL administered PO through drinking water at concentrations from 2.5 to 5 mg/mL from 24 hours prior to period 1 to 48 hours after period 2; butorphanol (0.025 mg/kg), xylazine (0.05 mg/kg), and ketamine (0.1 mg/kg) coadministered IM immediately prior to both periods; and a combination of SAL and XKB (SAL+XKB). Plasma drug concentrations, average daily gain (ADG), chute exit velocity, serum cortisol concentrations, and electrodermal activity were evaluated.

Results—ADG (days 0 to 13) was significantly greater in the SAL and SAL+XKB groups than in the other 2 groups. Calves receiving XKB had reduced chute exit velocity in both periods. Serum cortisol concentrations increased in all groups from period 1 to period 2. However, XKB attenuated the cortisol response for the first hour after castration and dehorning and oral SAL administration reduced the response from 1 to 6 hours. Administration of XKB decreased electrodermal activity scores in both periods.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—SAL administered PO through drinking water decreased cortisol concentrations and reduced the decrease in ADG associated with castration and dehorning in calves.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of xylazine, ketamine, and butorphanol (XKB) administered IM and sodium salicylate (SAL) administered PO to calves and to compare drug effects on biomarkers of pain and distress following sham and actual castration and dehorning.

Animals—40 Holstein bull calves from 3 farms.

Procedures—Calves weighing 108 to 235 kg (n = 10 calves/group) received one of the following treatments prior to sham (period 1) and actual (period 2) castration and dehorning: saline (0.9% NaCl) solution IM (placebo); SAL administered PO through drinking water at concentrations from 2.5 to 5 mg/mL from 24 hours prior to period 1 to 48 hours after period 2; butorphanol (0.025 mg/kg), xylazine (0.05 mg/kg), and ketamine (0.1 mg/kg) coadministered IM immediately prior to both periods; and a combination of SAL and XKB (SAL+XKB). Plasma drug concentrations, average daily gain (ADG), chute exit velocity, serum cortisol concentrations, and electrodermal activity were evaluated.

Results—ADG (days 0 to 13) was significantly greater in the SAL and SAL+XKB groups than in the other 2 groups. Calves receiving XKB had reduced chute exit velocity in both periods. Serum cortisol concentrations increased in all groups from period 1 to period 2. However, XKB attenuated the cortisol response for the first hour after castration and dehorning and oral SAL administration reduced the response from 1 to 6 hours. Administration of XKB decreased electrodermal activity scores in both periods.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—SAL administered PO through drinking water decreased cortisol concentrations and reduced the decrease in ADG associated with castration and dehorning in calves.

Societal concerns for the moral and ethical treatment of livestock and other animals have increased, particularly since the early 1990s.1 Negative public perception of procedures involved with castration and dehorning is mounting, with calls for the development of practices that minimize pain associated with common cattle husbandry practices. Use of analgesia and anesthesia during painful procedures such as castration and dehorning has been suggested by organizations such as the AVMA; however, FDA-approved drugs labeled for the treatment of pain in cattle do not currently exist.2,3 To enable the cattle industry to effectively respond to this challenge, research is necessary to evaluate the welfare implications of existing husbandry practices and to identify practical and cost-effective strategies for relieving pain in cattle.

Identification of robust biomarkers for the objective measurement of pain is needed to evaluate analgesic efficacy during procedures such as castration and dehorning. The process of evaluating pain is especially complex in prey species, such as cattle, that inherently conceal pain.3 In previous research,4–8 biomarkers investigated for associations with the pain and distress of castration and dehorning have included serum cortisol concentration, heart rate, acute phase protein values, and in vitro interferon-γ production. Other potential indicators include behavior scores, ADG, feed intake, activity in the cattle chute, and vocalization.4,6–10

The magnitude of the increase in serum cortisol concentration (as indicated by the change in the height [Cmax] and duration [Tmax] of the concentration peak), the integrated response (as indicated by the AUEC), or both reportedly correspond with the predicted noxious stimuli during the procedure.5 However, the results of studies in which ADG was used an indicator for pain have been equivocal. For example, a study10 revealed calves undergoing castration have a decrease in ADG, compared with calves not undergoing castration; however, a treatment effect (xylazine and butorphanol vs no treatment) was not observed. Additionally, information is deficient on the use of cattle exit velocity out of a squeeze chute and EDA for the objective measurement of pain in newly castrated and dehorned calves. Because chute exit velocity has been used in temperament and reactivity studies11,12 in cattle, exit velocity may be useful in determining the effect of a painful procedure and sedative treatment on calf behavior. Another potential means of pain assessment, EDA, is a measurement of electrical resistance of a tissue path between 2 electrodes applied to the skin and can be influenced by changes in sympathetic nervous outflow during periods of pain, anxiety, and distress.13 We hypothesized that sympathetic outflow may increase after castration and dehorning, although the findings of 1 study14 of EDA assessment in rats undergoing surgery were equivocal.

Although many reports describe the effects of castration or dehorning on cattle, to our knowledge, there are no reports of the pain response when these procedures are performed in series. In a recent survey15 of US veterinarians that were members of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners or the Academy of Veterinary Consultants, 90% indicated castration and dehorning are commonly performed at the same time in many production systems. Castration by surgery (testicles pulled and severed) alone causes a peak in cortisol concentrations of 68 nmol/L in 2- to 4-month-old calves and 129 nmol/L in 5.5-month-old calves 30 minutes after the procedure.16 Furthermore, hot iron dehorning alone causes an increase in plasma cortisol concentration to approximately 80 nmol/L 30 minutes afterward and 45 nmol/L 60 minutes afterward in 10- to 12-week-old Holstein calves receiving no local anesthesia.17

Options for mitigation of pain in livestock include analgesics and local anesthetics, which could be administered prior to painful procedures through the use of various drug regimens. The goal of such preemptive analgesia is to prevent CNS sensitization (so-called wind-up pain).18 Potential preemptive analgesics include NSAIDs, opioid drugs, α2-adrenergic receptor agonists, and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists.19 Salicylic acid derivatives, including aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and SAL, were the first NSAIDs to be used in modern medicine and are still widely used for their analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties.20

In a previous bovine castration study,21 plasma concentrations of SAL > 25 μg/mL coincided with a reduction in peak cortisol concentrations, compared with concentrations in cattle castrated with no analgesia. Although the veterinary forms of aspirin are extensively marketed with label claims for the treatment of fever, inflammation, and pain, they have never been approved by the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine for these indications.22 Therefore, the legality of using salicylic acid derivatives in cattle is questionable because these are technically compounded products. Salicylate is more soluble in water than is aspirin and may offer a convenient and cost-effective means of providing an NSAID in drinking water. However, use of SAL is only permitted in an approved formulation under the supervision of a veterinarian to alleviate suffering, provided use does not result in a violative tissue residue.23

The pain response associated with castration and dehorning performed concurrently on calves and the mitigation of this response has not been described. Furthermore, data exist on the pharmacokinetic parameters and associated effects of IM administration of XKB.24,25 However, studies of salicylate administered PO through free-choice water consumption alone or in combination with XKB prior to castration and dehorning are lacking in the published literature. If SAL provided in the drinking water alone or in combination with a parenterally administered sedative and analgesic were to attenuate signs of distress without causing recumbency in calves, this would offer veterinarians and producers a practical and cost-effective way to reduce pain and distress associated with castration and dehorning. The purpose of the study reported here was to evaluate the effects of XKB administered IM alone or in combination with SAL continuously administered PO through free-choice water consumption on ADG, chute exit velocity, EDA, and cortisol response of calves following serial castration and dehorning.

Materials and Methods

Animals—In June 2008, 40 horned sexually intact male Holstein calves between 2 and 4 months of age and weighing 108 to 235 kg were acquired from 3 farms in Kansas for use in the study. On arrival, the calves were measured for scrotal circumference, horn-base diameter, and horn length. Additionally, all calves received an SC injection of tulathromycina (2.5 mg/kg) as metaphylactic treatment against bovine respiratory disease, 8-way clostridial vaccine,b 4-way modified-live viral respiratory disease vaccine,c and pour-on insecticide.d For sustained fly control, application of the pour-on solution was repeated every 7 to 10 days for the duration of the study. Five pens were used to house calves (8 calves/pen) in a drylot confinement facility at Kansas State University. Ad libitum access to brome hay was provided to each calf. A ration (3.6 kg/calf/d) from a typical beef feedlot receiving diet was also provided for the duration of the study.

Three days before entering a phase, participating calves were transferred from the drylot facility to the Animal Resource Facility at the university and individually allocated to indoor pens (area, 13.40 m2). Over a 2-day period (trial days −6 to −4), calves were acclimated to housing in individual pens, during which time each calf was restrained with a rope halter within its respective pen for at least 10 to 15 minutes. Each calf was conditioned to walking through an alleyway and restraining in a cattle chute once prior to the start of each phase. Calves were housed in this facility throughout their phase for 10 days.

Study preparation—This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Kansas State University. Because calves in the placebo group were anticipated to have pain as a result of castration and dehorning, all calves were assessed 3 times daily for behavioral signs of excessive pain for a 72-hour period after the procedures. To do this, attitude, gait, appetite, time spent lying down, scrotal swelling, and horn bud assessment were assigned a score from 0 (prestudy levels) to 5 (significantly altered), with a score ≥ 3 requiring notification of the university veterinarian. A rescue analgesic protocol for administration of flunixin meglumine (2.2 mg/kg, IV, q 12 h) was in place if calves had a score ≥ 3 in 1 or more categories after castration and dehorning.

To facilitate repeated blood sample collection and minimize calf distress that could potentially confound cortisol concentration measurements, indwelling catheters were placed in the left jugular vein of each calf approximately 24 hours before period 1 (day −3) began. On that morning, calves were individually restrained in a squeeze chute. The area over the jugular vein was clipped of hair and aseptically prepared by use of povidone iodine soap and 70% isopropyl alcohol solution. The catheter insertion site was infiltrated with approximately 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine HCl solutione SC. A 10- to 15-mm stab incision was made through the skin with a No. 21 surgical blade to facilitate placement of a 14-gauge 13-cm catheterf in the jugular vein. The indwelling catheter was sutured to the skin to ensure catheter placement, and an injection port was secured. To maintain catheter patency throughout the phase, 3 mL of flush solution (3 U of heparin sodium/mL of saline [0.9% NaCl] solutiong) was instilled into the catheter.

Study design—A 2-period, parallel design study was conducted, with treatments in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The factors were period (sham castration and sham dehorning [period 1] or castration and dehorning [period 2]), SAL administration (yes or no), and XKB administration (yes or no). All calves were weighed approximately 1 week before the start of the study. Prior to study commencement, the 40 calves were blocked by body weight and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups (10 calves/group) by use of a random number–generating software packageh so that mean body weight, scrotal circumference, horn diameter, and horn length were balanced across the treatment groups. Scrotal circumference was measured at the point of maximum scrotal diameter by use of a scrotal circumference tape measurer.i Horn diameter was measured with calipers at the base of the horn near the head, at the point where the horn enters the frontal sinus. Horn length was measured from the base of the horn to the tip on the lateral aspect.

Treatments consisted of sterile saline solution administered IM (placebo); 2.5 to 5 mg of SALj/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption initiated 24 hours (day −3) prior to period 1 and continued until 48 hours (day 2) after period 2 (SAL); xylazine HClk (0.05 mg/kg), ketamine HCll (0.1 mg/kg), and butorphanol tartratem (0.025 mg/kg) administered IM immediately prior to castration and dehorning in periods 1 and 2 (XKB); and a combination of treatments (SAL+XKB). For SAL administration, four 19-L plastic buckets were weighed. Sodium salicylate powdern was added to 10 L of tap water in plastic buckets to achieve a final concentration of 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL. Fifteen to 45 mL of molasses was mixed in with the solution to increase palatability depending on the volume of water consumption. Filled buckets were hung from a chain in each pen for calves assigned to SAL or SAL+XKB treatment.

During each trial, water buckets were inspected 3 times/d. After near depletion of the medicated solution in the bucket, the remaining contents were weighed and dumped out and the bucket was refilled with a freshly prepared volume of medicated solution. On days −3 and −1, 12 hours prior to sham castration and actual castration, respectively, 2 buckets with differing concentrations of the medicated solution (1.5 and 2.5 mg/mL or 2.5 and 5 mg/mL) were offered to calves to improve the consumption of salicylate and to achieve maximum plasma salicylate concentrations. Calves in the SAL and SAL+XKB groups were offered the medicated solution from 24 hours prior to period 1 to 48 hours after period 2. Forty-eight hours after period 2, calves were offered a final bucket of the medicated solution. Calves were allowed to finish the bucket of medicated solution, and then a bucket of fresh tap water was offered. Calves in the placebo and XKB groups were offered tap water ad libitum via self-filling water units.

The study was completed in five 10-day phases from June 30 to August 11, 2008. Eight calves were assigned to 1 of the 5 phases (2 calves/treatment group/phase for a total of 8 calves/phase). The group with the heaviest calves was assigned to the first phase and the group with the lightest calves was assigned to the last phase to minimize variations in body weight, scrotal circumference, and horn diameter by the time the procedures were performed. Each phase was divided into 2 periods, with the procedures performed exactly 48 hours from the other: sham castration and sham dehorning on day −2 (period 1) and castration and dehorning on day 0 (period 2). All castration and dehorning procedures were performed by the same veterinarian (JBR).

Surgical procedures—On day −2 of each phase, approximately 30 minutes prior to commencement of sham castration and dehorning, calves scheduled for treatment in that phase were fitted with a rope halter and relocated as a group into a holding pen with an adjacent alleyway leading to the squeeze chute. Approximately 2 minutes prior to sham castration, the selected calves were individually led into a squeeze chute with a rope halter and a blood sample was collected for measurement of baseline serum cortisol concentration (all treatment groups) and baseline plasma SAL concentration (SAL and SAL+XKB only). The order of castration and dehorning was predetermined before the start of each trial to maintain consistency between study days with the following order of the treatment groups: placebo, SAL, XKB, SAL+XKB, placebo, SAL, XKB, and SAL+XKB (8 calves total). At time point 0 of day −2 (period 1), a volume of saline solution equivalent to the volume of XKB administered to calves in the XKB group was administered IM to the placebo and SAL groups. Calves in the XKB and SAL+XKB groups were administered butorphanol tartrate (0.025 mg/kg), xylazine (0.05 mg/kg), and ketamine (0.1 mg/kg) at the same time point. Immediately after drug or placebo administration, the scrotum was cleaned with a 0.1% chlorhexidine solution, the apex of the scrotum was manually extended and ventrally elongated, and each testicle was then repeatedly manipulated (4 to 5 times for the left and right testicle) dorsally and ventrally within the scrotum for approximately 20 seconds (sham castration). The calf's head was then restrained with a halter by extending and flexing the neck laterally to the right, and the hair was trimmed around the base of the left horn (sham dehorning). This process was similarly repeated for the right horn (sham dehorning). The 5-minute blood sample was collected in the chute prior to release of the calf. After release from the chute, the calf exited through another alleyway (set up for measurement of chute exit time) and then restrained prior to each successive sample collection at the intervals described. The process was repeated on each calf in period 1.

During period 2, calves were similarly restrained and blood samples were collected as in period 1. The scrotum was cleaned. Castration was performed by use of a closed surgical castration technique without the provision of local anesthesia. To do so, the apex of the scrotum was secured manually and extended distally, and the distal third of the scrotum was removed with a No. 10 scalpel blade. The right testicle and spermatic cord was exteriorized by blunt dissection of the scrotal fascia. The cremaster muscle and then the testicular artery and vein, epididymis, and vas deferens were stripped ventrally via digital manipulation and traction. The remaining connective tissue was incised with the scalpel blade. The same procedure was used to remove the left testicle. After castration, the calf's head was restrained as in period 1. The left horn was removed by use of a Barnes dehorning instrument.n Hemostasis was achieved through thermocautery by use of a hot iron.n The head was released and restrained as in period 1. The right horn was removed with the same procedure for the left horn. The head was released from restraint, the 5-minute blood sample was collected, and the calf was released from the squeeze chute as in period 1. This process was performed on each calf assigned to that particular phase during period 2.

Outcome measurements—Upon release from the squeeze chute into the alleyway at the time of catheterization and after processing in period 1 and 2, the calf passed through a series of 2 wireless photo sensorso positioned 1.5 and 3 m from the exit of the chute. The time elapsed for each calf to travel the 1.5 m between these 2 sensors (ie, chute exit velocity) was recorded by use of an electronic timero equipped with a printer.o

To compute ADG, body weights of calves were determined by use of a squeeze chute with a scalep that was used for the entire study. The 8 calves assigned to each phase were weighed the morning of days −3, −2 (the day of sham procedures), 0 (the day of actual procedures), 1, and 2 to determine the mean change in body weight. The calves were then weighed at 4, 6, and 13 days after castration and dehorning.

Blood samples were collected immediately prior to sham castration and sham dehorning and castration and dehorning in periods 1 and 2 (ie, 0 minutes) and at 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 hours. At approximately 30 seconds prior to each sample collection, 5 mL of blood was drawn from the indwelling catheter of the left jugular vein and directly returned; this process was repeated 3 times so that the third repetition was completed immediately prior to the scheduled sample collection. At the designated time, blood was drawn from the indwelling catheter into 20-mL Luer syringesq and transferred to evacuated tubes containing lithium heparin (sample total volume, 6 mL) and evacuated tubes with no additive (sample total volume, 8 mL). Additionally, 5 mL of flush solution was injected into the indwelling catheter after each sample collection to maintain patency of the catheter. The evacuated tubes were immediately stored on ice until centrifugation (10 minutes at 3,000 × g) to separate blood components. Plasma or serum was then transferred into cryovials and frozen at −80°C prior to sample analysis.

Electrodermal activity was measured during phases 3, 4, and 5 of the study (6 calves/treatment) by use of a commercially available pain assessment device.r This device was only available for use during the last 3 phases of the study. The device consisted of 2 electrodes that transmit an electric current when touched on a hairless area of an animal's skin. For the measurement, these electrodes were placed across the nasal planum of each calf, and a numeric score between 0 and 9.9 was digitally displayed on the device (0 = calm or no pain; 9.9 = tense or severe pain). Readings were obtained immediately prior to procedures in periods 1 and 2 and then at 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the initial reading for each period. Readings were also obtained during castration and at dehorning.

Serum cortisol concentrations were determined by use of a solid-phase competitive chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay and an automated analysis systems as described.21 A minimum serum sample volume of 100 μL was used for analysis. The calibration range for the assay was 28 to 1,380 nmol of cortisol/L; analytic sensitivity was 5.5 nmol of cortisol/L. Cortisol samples were analyzed within 3 months after collection. Cortisol reportedly remains stable in human serum after 42 years of storage at −20°C.26 The laboratory technician performing the analysis was unaware of which treatment the calves had received.

Plasma concentrations of xylazine (H+; m/z, 221.2 → 90.1), butorphanol (H+; m/z, 328.3 → 157.1), and ketamine (H+; m/z, 238.1 → 125.0) were determined via high-pressure liquid chromatographyt and tandem mass spectrometry.u Fifty microliters of an internal standard (ketamine-D4 [100 ng/mL] in a 50:50 mixture of acetonitrile and water; m/z, 242.2 → 129.0) was used for ketamine and xylazine plasma concentration determination. Norketamine-D4 (100 ng/mL) in a 50:50 mixture of acetonitrile and water (m/z, 228.1 → 129.0) was used as an internal standard for butorphanol. The internal standards combined with 400 μL of acetonitrile were added to each 100-μL aliquot of plasma to create standards and quality controls. Each sample was mixed with a vortex machine for approximately 20 seconds to precipitate the proteins and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 6,500 × g.

Approximately 400 μL of supernatant was filtered by use of a 0.45-μm filter.v The fluid volume of the filtrate was evaporated under nitrogen at 40°C by use of a dry-down unit. Dried extracts were reconstituted in 100 μL of starting mobile phase (0.2% acetic acid in water and 0.2% acetic acid in acetonitrile [5:95]), mixed with a vortex device, and transferred to autosampler vials for injection. The mobile phase consisted of 0.2% acetic acid in water (starting mobile phase) and 0.2% acetic acid in acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min (transitioning mobile phase). The mobile phase gradient consisted of 5% of transitioning mobile phase from 0 to 1.0 minutes, a linear gradient to 80% of transitioning mobile phase at 4.5 minutes, and a return to the starting mobile phase. The total runtime of analysis was 7 minutes. Analyte separation was achieved by use of a C18 columnw maintained at 40°C. The method was accurate and precise across a linear dynamic range of 0.5 to 100.0 ng/mL.

Quality controls of known drug concentrations were analyzed during sample analysis for monitoring of method performance. The coefficient of variation of 45 quality-control samples over 5 analytic runs was ≤ 2.1% and ≤ 4.5% for xylazine, ≤ 9.9% and ≤ 10.7% for butorphanol, and ≤ 8.3% and ≤ 5.8% for ketamine. All samples were analyzed within 6 months after collection. Xylazine and ketamine reportedly remain stable for at least 2 months of storage at −20°C.27 However, the stability of butorphanol has not been reported. The laboratory technician (JH) performing the analysis was unaware of which treatment calves had received (XKB and SAL+XKB).

Plasma salicylate concentrations were determined by use of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay kitx as described.21 The limit of quantification range was 5 to 800 μg of salicylate/mL. Quality-control samples (10 to 400 μg of salicylate/mL in typical untreated bovine serum) were analyzed and compared with the calibration curve prior to analysis. Deviation of quality-control concentrations > 10% resulted in recalibration. A calibration curve was constructed with 6 calibration points (duplicate samples in typical untreated bovine serum; 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 μg of salicylate/mL). All samples were analyzed within 5 months after collection (SLB).

Pharmacokinetic analysis—The pharmacokinetic properties (Tmax, Cmax, and mean concentration) of salicylate and cortisol were analyzed descriptively via inspection of the time-concentration curve. The AUC for salicylate and the AUEC for cortisol were calculated by use of the trapezoidal rule.

Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of XKB time-concentration data was performed (RG) by use of a commercially available software program.y Pharmacokinetic parameters determined were AUC (first to last measured concentration) by the trapezoidal rule, slope of the terminal portion of the time-concentration curve (λz), terminal elimination half-life time (t1/2el), Tmax, Cmax, total body clearance per fraction of drug absorbed (Cl/F), volume of distribution per fraction of drug absorbed (Vz/F), and MRT. These parameters are represented in the following equations:

article image

in which D is the dose, AUMC is the area under the moment curve, AUC0−∞ is the AUC from 0 to infinity, and Clast is the last measured concentration.

Statistical analysis—Individual and combined effects of XKB and SAL were analyzed statistically. All calves that received XKB (XKB and SAL+XKB groups) were compared with those that did not receive XKB (placebo and SAL groups). The same comparison was performed for calves receiving salicylate. The effect of study day was determined by evaluating the interaction between phase and treatment. Additionally, study outcomes were compared among treatment groups. The cortisol data within each period were evaluated for evidence of departure from normality by use of statistical software.z There was significant evidence of departure from normality for several of the cortisol parameters; therefore, data were ranked by use of the statistical software.z An ANOVA was conducted on unranked and ranked data with fixed effects of period, salicylate treatment, and combined XKB treatment and the interactions of these 3 effects. Means and SEs reported are LSMs and pooled SEMs. For the unranked data, LSM and SEM are reported. The P values reported to assess significance among the LSMs are those derived from the analysis of the ranked data. Data for ADG, chute exit velocity, and EDA were analyzed by use of a commercial software program.aa Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Animals—Rescue analgesia was not administered during this study because no overt signs of pain were evident in calves after castration and dehorning. Scrotal circumference ranged from 12.5 to 23.5 cm, horn-base diameter ranged from 22.3 to 50.9 mm, and horn length ranged from 23.4 to 73.4 mm. Two calves from the placebo group and 2 calves in the SAL+XKB group developed thrombophlebitis during different phases of the study and therefore were not included in all statistical analyses. No evidence of a treatment day (phase) × treatment interaction was detected for cortisol response (P = 0.160), weight gain (P = 0.24), chute exit velocity (P = 0.41), or EDA (P = 0.67). Therefore, data were pooled across study days for all analyses.

ADG—The ADG ± SEM for the first 13 days after castration and dehorning were summarized (Figure 1). Castration and dehorning had a significant (P = 0.043) impact on ADG among all treatment groups. Calves in the SAL and SAL+XKB treatment groups had a significantly (P = 0.029) higher ADG for the first 13 days after castration and dehorning than did calves in the placebo and XKB groups. A large scrotal circumference was associated with a decrease in ADG following castration and dehorning (P = 0.004).

Figure 1—
Figure 1—

Mean ± SEM ADG for calves treated with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution administered IM (placebo; n = 8); 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; n = 10); 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB, n = 10); and SAL+XKB (XKB+SAL; n = 8). Average daily gains with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Chute exit velocity—The chute exit velocity for 1 calf in the placebo group and 1 calf in the SAL+XKB groups during period 1 was not recorded because of a failure to reset the timer and was not included in the statistical analysis. Another calf in the SAL+XKB group became sternally recumbent between the sensors and therefore an accurate velocity could not be determined and its data were not included in the analysis. One calf in the placebo group and 1 calf in the SAL group became sternally recumbent in the squeeze chute during the dehorning procedure in period 2; however, this did not influence the chute exit velocity.

No evidence of an effect of castration and dehorning on exit velocity was detected across treatment groups (P = 0.65). Exit velocity was greater after catheterization (1.53 ± 0.09 m/s) than in period 1 (0.99 ± 0.09 m/s) and period 2 (0.99 ± 0.09 m/s; P < 0.001). Compared with placebo-treated calves (1.69 ± 0.15 m/s), calves that received XKB alone (0.85 ± 0.14 m/s; P = 0.002) or SAL+XKB (0.86 ± 0.15 m/s; P = 0.002) took longer to exit the chute. However, there was no evidence of a difference in exit velocity between SAL (1.29 ± 0.15 m/s) and placebo-treated calves (P = 0.23).

EDA—The EDAs of the 4 treatment groups over time were summarized (Figure 2). A treatment effect (P = 0.017) was detected; specifically, the EDA of calves treated with XKB (from 10 to 50 minutes and 1.5 hours after actual castration and dehorning) and SAL+XKB (10 minutes to 1.5 hours) were significantly (P < 0.050) lower, compared with EDAs in the other treatment groups. There was also a significant (P < 0.001) difference in EDA depending on the point measured after treatment. A significant (P = 0.001) difference existed between phase number and time of EDA recording. There was also a significant (P < 0.001) difference between treatment group and time of EDA recording. However, no period effect (P = 0.300) on EDA was evident (ie, sham castration and sham dehorning vs castration and dehorning).

Figure 2—
Figure 2—

Mean ± SEM EDA scores for calves treated with saline solution administered IM (placebo; n = 6); 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 6); 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; 6); and SAL+XKB (6).

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Serum cortisol concentration—Mean ± SEM serum cortisol concentrations measured during periods 1 and 2 were graphically displayed (Figures 3 and 4). All parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUEC0–1 h, AUEC1–6 h, and AUEC6–24 h) for serum cortisol concentration were significantly (P < 0.001) different in period 2 versus period 1. Unless otherwise indicated, for cortisol analysis, groups were compared in the following manner: all calves receiving XKB (XKB vs SAL+XKB), no XKB (placebo vs SAL), all calves receiving SAL (SAL vs SAL+XKB), and no SAL (placebo vs XKB). Compared with values in period 1, cortisol Tmax was significantly (P < 0.001) shorter and cortisol Cmax, AUEC0–1 h, AUEC1–6 h, and AUEC6–24 h were significantly (P < 0.001) greater in period 2.

Figure 3—
Figure 3—

Mean serum cortisol concentrations in calves treated with saline solution administered IM (placebo; n = 10); 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 10); 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; 10); and SAL+XKB (10) after sham castration and sham dehorning.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Figure 4—
Figure 4—

Mean serum cortisol concentrations in calves treated with saline solution administered IM (placebo; n = 10); 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 10); 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; 10); and SAL+XKB (10) after actual castration and dehorning.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Because of the large variability in individual serum cortisol concentrations in calves receiving XKB in period 1, compared with concentrations in calves not receiving XKB, the difference in mean serum cortisol concentrations between these 2 groups was nonsignificant (P = 0.384). However, the cortisol Tmax for calves in the SAL+XKB group was significantly less than that in the placebo (P = 0.015) and XKB (P = 0.006) groups during period 2 (Figure 5). The difference in cortisol Cmax between calves treated with or without XKB during period 2 was nonsignificant (P = 0.254; Figure 6), as was the difference between calves that did or did not receive SAL during period 2 (P = 0.345).

Figure 5—
Figure 5—

Mean ± SEM Tmax for serum cortisol concentrations in calves treated with 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; n = 20); not treated with XKB (20); treated with 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 20); and not treated with SAL (20) after sham castration and sham dehorning (period 1) and actual castration and dehorning (period 2). The Tmax values of serum cortisol concentrations with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Figure 6—
Figure 6—

Mean ± SEM Cmax for serum cortisol concentrations in calves treated with 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; n = 20); not treated with XKB (20); treated with 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 20); and not treated with SAL (20) after sham castration and sham dehorning (period 1) and actual castration and dehorning (period 2). The Cmax values of serum cortisol concentrations with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

The AUEC estimates for serum cortisol concentration in calves that received XKB and calves that received SAL were compared at 3 distinct intervals (ie, from 0 to 1 hours after sham or actual surgery [AUEC0–1 h], 1 to 6 hours afterward [AUEC1–6 h], and 6 to 24 hours afterward [AUEC6–24 h]; Figure 7; Table 1). A period effect was detected between periods 1 and 2 for all 3 measurement intervals. For AUEC0–1 h, the value was significantly (P = 0.007) less during period 2 in all calves that received XKB than in all those that did not receive XKB. Furthermore, the AUEC0–1 h of the XKB-only group was significantly lower than that of the placebo (P = 0.016) or SAL groups (P = 0.042) during period 2. A significant difference was not detected for AUEC1–6 h (P = 0.389) and AUEC6–24 h (P = 0.208) between all calves that received XKB and those that did not. The difference in AUEC0–1 h between calves that did and did not receive SAL was nonsignficant (P = 0.872) during period 2; however, the AUEC1–6 h was significantly (P = 0.024) less during period 2 for all calves that received SAL. Additionally, AUEC1–6 h was significantly less in the SAL-only group than in the placebo (P = 0.030) and XKB groups (P = 0.028) during period 2. There was also a lower AUEC6–24 h for the combined SAL groups, compared with value for the combined XKB groups in period 2; however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.064).

Figure 7—
Figure 7—

Mean AUECs for serum cortisol concentrations in calves treated with 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; n = 20); not treated with XKB (20); treated with 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 20); and not treated with SAL (20) during the first hour (black portion of bars), 1 through 6 hours (gray portion), and 6 through 24 hours (hatched portion) after sham castration and sham dehorning (period 1) and actual castration and dehorning (period 2). The AUECs with different letters within the same time period differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Table 1—

Mean AUEC for serum cortisol concentrations at various intervals in calves treated with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution administered IM (placebo; n = 10); 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; 10); 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; 10); or a combination of SAL and XKB (SAL+XKB; 10) during sham castration and sham dehorning (period 1) and actual castration and dehorning (period 2).

GroupPeriodAUEC0–1 h (h•nmol/L)AUEC1–6 h (h•nmol/L)AUEC6-24 h (h•nmol/L)
Placebo192.56c152.06c,d597.36b,c,d
 2132.19a342.90a756.28a,b
SAL184.293c,d119.06d434.29c,d
 2119.94a216.36b,c583.64a,d
XKB142.10e123.81d574.37a,c
 293.99b,c,d322.96a756.21a
SAL+XKB148.93e131.36d455.51c,d
 2104.57a,b,c259.94a,b637.6a,b

AUEC0–1 h = AUEC from 0 to 1 hours after period 1 or 2.

AUEC1–6 h = AUEC from 1 to 6 hours after period 1 or 2.

AUEC6–12 h = AUEC from 6 to 12 hours after period 1 or 2.

Within columns, means with different superscript letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).

XKB pharmacokinetic parameter estimates—Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, volume of distribution per fraction of drug absorbed, total body clearance per fraction of drug absorbed, MRT, and terminal elimination half-life time) for XKB were determined by noncompartmental analysis and summarized (Table 2). Additionally, the plasma pharmacokinetic profiles were summarized (Figures 8 and 9). The volume of distribution per fraction of drug absorbed was significantly (P = 0.045) greater in the SAL+XKB group, compared with that in the XKB group.

Figure 8—
Figure 8—

Mean ± SEM plasma drug concentrations in calves treated with 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; n = 10) immediately prior to castration and dehorning.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Figure 9—
Figure 9—

Mean ± SEM plasma drug concentrations in calves treated with 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (concentration data not shown) and 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (SAL+XKB; n = 10) immediately prior to castration and dehorning.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

SAL pharmacokinetic parameter estimates—The Tmax, Cmax, AUC, and mean plasma drug concentration were determined for SAL and SAL+XKB and summarized (Table 3). Plasma salicylate concentration was graphically displayed (Figure 10). Calves in the SAL and SAL+XKB group received doses of SAL that ranged from 13.62 to 151.99 mg of salicylate/kg from 24 hours prior to period 1 to 48 hours after period 2.

Figure 10—
Figure 10—

Mean ± SEM plasma SAL concentration in calves treated with 2.5 to 5 mg SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (n = 10) or treated with SAL and 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (SAL+XKB; 10) from 24 hours prior to sham castration and sham dehorning to 48 hours after actual castration and dehorning.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, 10; 10.2460/ajvr.72.10.1305

Table 2—

Mean ± SEM pharmacokinetic estimates derived from noncompartmental analysis of data from calves treated with 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (XKB; n = 10) or 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption and XKB (SAL+XKB; 10) prior to sham castration and sham dehorning (period 1) and actual castration and dehorning (period 2).

 XylazineKetamineButorphanol
VariableXKBSAL+XKBXKBSAL+XKBXKBSAL+XKB
t1/2λz (min)96.40 ± 20.33a122.47 ± 24.90a67.43 ± 11.13a95.56 ± 9.75a68.23 ± 7.13a74.32 ± 8.14a
Tmax (min)9.5 ± 0.5a11.0 ± 1.0a10.0 ± 1.3a9.0 ± 1.4a9.5 ± 0.5a12.0 ± 1.3a
Cmax (ng/mL)20.95 ± 1.68a19.50 ± 2.07a14.97 ± 1.91a12.32 ± 1.91a7.07 ± 0.55a6.21 ± 0.68a
AUC0-∞ (h•ng/mL)16.68 ± 1.44a17.48 ± 1.19a12.90 ± 2.4a12.40 ± 2.06a6.82 ± 0.47a6.57 ± 0.49a
Vz/F (L/kg)6.70 ± 1.09a8.27 ± 1.54a12.11 ± 2.15a18.67 ± 2.15b6.11 ± 0.59a6.98 ± 7.10a
Cl/F (mL/min/kg)53.69 ± 4.89a49.30 ± 2.72a184.28 ± 33.73a167.51 ± 33.73a64.03 ± 4.92a68.51 ± 8.03a
MRT (min)96.31 ± 18.15a120.03 ± 22.48a67.43 ± 10.46a95.56 ± 10.46a85.62 ± 8.14a94.45 ± 9.57a

AUC0-∞ = Area under the curve from 0 to infinity. CI/F = Total body clearance per fraction of drug absorbed. t1/2λz = Terminal elimination half-life. Vz/F = Volume of distribution per fraction of dose absorbed.

Within a row, estimates with different superscript letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Table 3—

Mean ± SEM pharmacokinetic parameters for plasma SAL concentrations in calves treated with 2.5 to 5 mg of SAL/mL administered PO through free-choice water consumption (SAL; n = 10) or treated with SAL and 0.05 mg of xylazine/kg, 0.1 mg of ketamine/kg, and 0.025 mg of butorphanol/kg administered IM (SAL+XKB; 10) from 24 hours prior to sham castration and sham dehorning to 48 hours after actual castration and dehorning.

VariableSALSAL+XKB
AUC (min•μg/mL)4,923.26 ± 856.335,054.18 ± 695.21
SAL concentration throughout period 1 (μg/mL)32.41 ± 12.8627.31 ± 6.79
SAL concentration throughout period 2 (μg/mL)40.36 ± 12.1955.107 ± 10.795
Tmax (h)*41.768.93
Cmax (μg/mL)61.134 ± 10.31263.223 ± 10.837
Mean SAL concentration (μg/mL)32.20 ± 1.5930.07 ± 1.23

SEM not calculated.

Discussion

As concern for improving the welfare of livestock increases, the need for pain management research in cattle becomes more necessary. The objective of the study reported here was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of XKB administered IM and SAL administered PO and to compare their effect on biomarkers of pain and distress following sham (period 1) and actual (period 2) castration and dehorning. Results indicated that the treatment of cattle prior to castration and dehorning with SAL alone or in combination with XKB increased ADG and decreased circulating cortisol concentrations. Currently, protocols for the provision of analgesic treatment are not routinely used during most routine animal husbandry procedures. In a survey15 of bovine practitioners, 21% of US veterinarians reported using analgesia at the time of castration. In a similar Canadian survey,28 6.9% of beef calves and 18.7% of dairy calves (both < 6 months old) reportedly received treatments to provide pain relief during castration. In a survey29 of dairy practices in the Northeastern and Central United States, 12.4% of dairy personnel administered an anesthetic at the time of dehorning and 1.8% provided analgesic treatment. This may be due to the absence of FDA-approved, long-acting, cost-effective analgesic drugs with established withdrawal times.

Studies designed to examine the combined effect of castration and dehorning are scarce, although 90% of veterinarians responding to a survey15 reported castrating and dehorning calves concurrently. Several studies4–8,21,30–40 have measured short-term changes in serum cortisol concentration as a method to determine the extent and duration of distress associated with castration or dehorning in cattle. In a previous study34 involving 2- to 4-month-old untreated bull calves, a mean peak serum cortisol concentration of 68 nmol/L was reported within 30 minutes after surgical castration and the duration of increase in serum cortisol concentration from the pretreatment value was > 4 hours. During a study35 involving 3-month-old calves dehorned with a Barnes dehorner, the mean serum cortisol concentration increased to 76 nmol/L within 0.5 hours after dehorning, decreased to 45 nmol/L between 1.5 to 2.5 hours after dehorning, and decreased further to pretreatment concentrations within 4.5 to 8 hours after dehorning.

In the present study, the mean serum cortisol concentration of calves in the placebo group ranged from 141.46 to 34.94 nmol/L at 20 and 360 minutes after castration and dehorning, respectively. These values are higher than those reported for some studies in which castration or dehorning was performed alone. The increase in serum cortisol likely reflects the cumulative stress of performing castration and dehorning procedures in series; however, this difference could also be attributed to differences in trial design or variability in cortisol response between animals.

The development of a drug regimen to reduce the decrease in ADG after painful management procedures would make such practices practical and desirable for cattle producers. Furthermore, possible production benefits resulting from that increase in ADG would likely make the addition of analgesic treatments to castration and dehorning protocols more cost-effective. Research4,41 reveals that use of analgesics and anesthetics influences feed intake and weight gain after painful procedures. For example, investigators4 found calves treated with local anesthesia during surgical castration, but not burdizzo castration, had a greater ADG than in cattle castrated without a local anesthetic. Another study41 revealed that calves treated with ketoprofen prior to and 2 to 7 hours after dehorning, in addition to treatment with xylazine and lidocaine (administered as a local anesthetic at the time of the procedure), gained more weight (1.2 ± 0.4 kg) than control calves that received only a local anesthetic or xylazine and lidocaine during the first 24 hours after dehorning.

The period effect on serum cortisol concentration could be attributed to pain associated with castration and dehorning, which caused a greater physiologic rise in concentrations during period 2 than in period 1. It should be considered that an increase in serum cortisol concentration is not necessarily attributable to painful stimuli but may also increase when an animal is distressed. This was demonstrated in period 1 as an increase in cortisol values at the time of sham castration and dehorning; however, that increase was not as great as the increase in period 2. In a previous dehorning study,37 serum cortisol concentrations were reported to increase 2-fold in response to distress caused by handling and peak 4- to 5-fold in response to dehorning with rechargeable or conventional electric dehorners. In the present study, cortisol concentrations increased 3-fold from time 0 to reach the Cmax in period 1 in response to sham castration and dehorning across all treatment groups and approximately 4-fold in period 2 in response to castration and dehorning.

Investigations of the effect of extended administeration of an analgesic and anti-inflammatory compound on ADG in livestock undergoing painful procedures are lacking. The results of the study reported here support the hypothesis that extended exposure to an NSAID in painful situations may be beneficial because ADG was significantly greater for 13 days after castration and dehorning in calves receiving SAL in drinking water provided ad libitum. This effect may in part be attributable to prolonged analgesic effects by the drug but may also be due to anti-inflammatory effects. Additional research on the effectiveness of analgesics on feed intake and ADG over a prolonged period after castration and dehorning would be beneficial. This research could determine whether analgesia impacts final market weight or cost in feed to compensate for loss in ADG after painful procedures.

Assessment of chute exit velocity has typically been used in studies of temperament in cattle. A study11 of the effect of injections and handler visibility on chute exit velocity found no correlation between the 2 events. The hypothesis that painful procedures, such as castration and dehorning, are associated with faster chute exit velocity has not been tested. However, chute activity during castration appears to decrease after the administration of butorphanol and xylazine.8 Results of the present study indicated that chute exit velocity was indeed reduced in calves receiving XKB, particularly during period 1. This can most likely be attributed to the sedative effects of XKB resulting in a slower reaction time exiting the chute than in the SAL and placebo groups. However, there was no significant difference between period 1 and 2 in any treatment group. This suggests that chute exit velocity may not be a specific indicator of pain and distress, particularly in acclimated Holstein calves.

Electrodermal activity is the measurement of the electrical resistance between 2 electrodes applied to the skin.13 It can be influenced by changes in resistance as a result of changes in sympathetic outflow.13 Devices are available to measure EDA, although there is a paucity of data to support this use in livestock species. In rats, EDA measurement provides an inaccurate assessment of postoperative pain because pain scores do not decrease with increasing doses of analgesics.14 In the present study, a significant decrease in EDA values coinciding with the presence of quantifiable plasma drug concentrations was observed in calves that received XKB. After 90 minutes, EDA increased and was not significantly different from values in other treatment groups. It is noteworthy that a difference in EDA between study periods was not observed. Therefore, EDA measurement was not a reliable indicator of pain associated with dehorning and castration in the calves in our study.

The observed differences in EDA in the XKB-treated calves were likely due to the α2-adrenergic receptor agonist effect of xylazine on eccrine sweat gland output and to the sedative effect of this combination. The nasal planum of calves in which the EDA measurements were obtained contains a dense population of serous nasolabial glands, or eccrine glands.42 Unmyelinated postganglionic sympathetic axons surround eccrine sweat glands, which secrete water, electrolytes, and mucin when stimulated.43 Therefore, these alterations in electrolyte secretion likely changed the conductivity of the skin in XKB-treated calves and thus the EDA measurements. Similarly, differences between phases during recording times were likely due to fluctuations in ambient temperature or humidity between days of the study or individual variation among calves; however, this was not investigated.

In the present study, XKB, SAL, or both were used. Butorphanol is an opioid drug that has partial receptor agonist-antagonist effects. Butorphanol provides analgesia by binding to κ (partial agonist) and μ (antagonist) receptors. When combined with xylazine, butorphanol lowers the dose required to provide analgesia and enhances the sedative effect.19 The combined effect of xylazine and butorphanol on pain associated with dehorning was investigated in a dehorning study38 revealing that coadministration of the drugs alone or in combination with a cornual nerve block significantly decreased the change in mean circulating cortisol concentration immediately after dehorning, compared with the change in untreated calves. Xylazine has sedative and analgesic effects when administered to cattle at doses ranging from 0.05 to 0.3 mg/kg.44 Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist that can yield analgesic and dissociative effects when administered IV to calves at doses ranging from 2 to 4 mg/kg.45,46 A combination of low-dose xylazine (0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg), ketamine (0.04 to 0.1 mg/kg), and butorphanol (0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg) administered IV or IM in cattle is reported to provide mild sedation without the adverse effect of recumbency.47

Plasma cortisol concentrations reach a peak within 30 minutes after dehorning, after which values decrease to a plateau concentration that persists for 5 to 6 hours.48,49 Therefore, we chose to examine cortisol concentrations from 0 minutes to 1 hour because this coincided with peak cortisol concentrations and peak XKB concentrations. In the present study, XKB was rapidly absorbed following IM administration and achieved a peak concentration approximately 10 minutes after administration. The administration of this drug combination appeared to attenuate the increase in cortisol concentration during castration and dehorning from 0 minutes to 1 hour after treatment. Therefore, treatment with XKB is likely to be more effective than placebo or SAL alone for controlling short-term distress associated with castration and dehorning.

The effects of XKB are short-lived17; therefore, it was not surprising that the effects of the coadministration of XKB on serum cortisol concentration did not persist > 1 hour. An IV dose of 0.2 mg of xylazine/kg was associated with a peak plasma xylazine concentration of 1.050 μg/mL, an absorption t1/2 of 36.48 minutes, and a total body clearance of 42 mL/min/kg.44 Ketamine administered IV in calves had a t1/2 of 60.5 ± 5.4 minutes and a total body clearance of 40.39 ± 6.6 mL/min/kg.50 In addition, IV administration of ketamine in mature Holstein cows at a dose of 5 mg/kg results in the following pharmacokinetic parameters: Cmax of 18.135 ± 22.720 ng/mL, Tmax of 0.083 hours, AUC of 4,484 ± 1,398 ng•h/mL, and elimination t1/2 of 1.80 ± 0.0 hours.25 In a previous study,51 dairy cows that received 0.25 mg of butorphanol/kg IV had a t1/2 of 82 minutes, total body clearance of 34.6 ± 77 mL/kg/min, and mean AUC of 7,567 ± 54 ng•min/mL. In the present study, the t1/2 was 109.43 ± 22.62 minutes for xylazine, 81.45 ± 10.44 minutes for ketamine, and 71.28 ± 7.64 minutes for butorphanol. Differences between the present and previous studies include lower drug dosages and a longer t1/2 of drugs used (with the exception of butorphanol, which had a shorter t1/2). Total body clearance for all 3 drugs was also found to be greater than in previous studies. The Tmax for ketamine in the present study was also longer than values reported previously.

More variability between period 1 and period 2 was evident in the present study for the Tmax of serum cortisol concentration. This variability was most likely the result of individual calf variability in response to treatment with XKB. A previous study39 involving 4- to 6-month-old bull calves found no significant difference in Tmax for serum cortisol concentration between calves surgically castrated versus those undergoing simulated castration. Another study52 found a significantly longer Tmax in calves blocked with 11 mL of lidocaine in the spermatic cord or a caudally administered epidural injection with xylazine (0.05 mg/kg) and lidocaine HCl (0.4 mg/kg), compared with burdizzo castration without analgesia and burdizzo castration following administration of ketoprofen (3 mg/kg, IV). The Tmax might be shorter during painful procedures because a painful stimulus would quickly increase cortisol secretion, and the Tmax was shorter in period 2 versus period 1 for calves that received SAL but not for any other treatment group.

Research into the effects of salicylic acid derivatives (ie, salicylate) on the change in biomarkers of pain after castration and dehorning is deficient in the literature. The only study21 to date that involved SAL administration during castration found a bolus of SAL (50 mg/kg, IV) administered to calves prior to castration reduced the cortisol Cmax, compared with the value in calves receiving aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) PO immediately prior or with calves left untreated before castration. The efficacy of other NSAIDs (eg, carprofen) in minimizing increases in serum cortisol concentration that are caused by castration and dehorning has not been established. Various concentrations of ketoprofen administered IV to cattle prior to castration fail to reduce the initial peak in serum cortisol concentration that is associated with castration; however, serum cortisol concentrations from 2 to 6 hours after castration were significantly reduced.6 Treatment with SAL (SAL and SAL+XKB groups) in our study resulted in a decrease in serum cortisol concentrations from 1 to 6 hours after castration and dehorning. However, we could not establish whether the same effect would have been observed following oral administration of a single dose of SAL as opposed to multiple dosing during the sham and castration and dehorning periods. The AUEC for serum cortisol concentration was examined from 1 to 6 hours after the sham and actual procedures because this coincided with a previously described plateau phase21 in which the effect of SAL should predominate. This decrease in concentration supports salicylate as having analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. It can be concluded that although SAL may not provide immediate analgesia at the time of a painful procedure, at the dosing regimen described here, it may provide analgesia and reduce inflammation for several hours after painful procedures. Furthermore, this effect could have future implications for the use of SAL in chronic pain management. Research will be necessary to determine the duration of treatment to minimize the cost and maximize the efficiency of treatment with SAL in drinking water.

Limited research has been conducted to establish estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters of salicylate administered PO in cattle. The bioavailability of salicylate when administered PO in cattle is reportedly 61.05%.bb One study21 found that SAL administered IV at 50 mg/kg at the time of castration in calves attenuated peak cortisol response when plasma drug concentrations were > 25 μg/mL. In the present study, mean plasma salicylate concentrations at the time of castration and dehorning were > 25 μg/mL (SAL, 40.36 μg of SAL/mL; SAL+XKB, 55.11 μg of SAL/mL). Therefore, the observed attenuation of the cortisol response in the present study was in agreement with results of previous studies.21 The consumption of SAL-treated water by calves in the SAL and SAL+XKB groups after castration and dehorning on day 0 (period 2) at 72 hours after initiation of SAL treatment decreased markedly. However, the mean plasma drug concentration of salicylate remained > 25 μg/mL in most calves until treatment with SAL ceased on day 2. This was likely due to constant access to medicated water as well as dose accumulation resulting from the plasma elimination t1/2 of 4.31 ± 0.42 hours as previously reportedbb for SAL administered PO.

Compounded drugs used in studies must have documented tissue residue information, including withdrawal times as well as concentration, carrier, and stability data.53 Under the AMDUCA,23 ELDU is permitted for relief of suffering in cattle, provided specific conditions are met. These conditions include that ELDU is permitted only by or under the supervision of a veterinarian, such use is allowed only for FDA-approved animal and human drugs and is only permitted when the health of the animal is threatened and not for production purposes, ELDU in feed is prohibited, and ELDU in general is not permitted if it results in a violative food residue. Although salicylic acid derivatives are marketed for use in cattle and swine in the United States, the use of salicylate in the manner conducted in the present study would be considered compounding because there are no FDA-approved aspirin or SAL formulations available for use in animals.54 Aspirin has a recommended meat and milk withdrawal time of 24 hours.54 Further studies are needed to evaluate tissue residues when SAL is used as described for the present study. Xylazine administered at a dose of 0.05 to 0.30 mg/kg IM has a recommended withdrawal time of 4 days in meat and 24 hours in milk.55 The Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank has suggested that withdrawal times for ketamine at dosages up to 10 mg/kg IM be 3 days for meat and 48 hours for milk.56 Butorphanol has a suggested withdrawal time of 48 hours.57

In the study reported here, castration and dehorning in series was associated with an increase in plasma cortisol concentration in excess of values previously32,34 reported for either castration or dehorning in Holstein calves. Co-administration of XKB alone or in combination with salicylate in drinking water attenuated the cortisol response after castration and dehorning. Furthermore, ADG in calves that received free-choice salicylate was significantly greater than in calves in the placebo and XKB groups, suggesting NSAID treatment in water may mitigate negative performance effects associated with castration and dehorning in calves. Chute exit velocity was not a specific indicator of pain and distress associated with castration and dehorning; however, administration of XKB significantly decreased chute exit velocity. Electrodermal activity measurement was not a specific indicator of pain associated with dehorning and castration, but EDA measurement may be influenced by pharmacological effects that were unrelated to analgesic activity in calves. These findings suggest that administration of SAL through drinking water may provide long-term performance benefits.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADG

Average daily gain

AUC

Area under the plasma cortisol concentration-time curve

AUEC

Area under the effect curve

Cmax

Maximum plasma concentration

EDA

Electrodermal activity

ELDU

Extralabel drug use

LSM

Least squares means

MRT

Mean residence time

m/z

Mass-to-charge ratio

SAL

Sodium salicylate

Tmax

Time to maximum plasma concentration

XKB

Xylazine, ketamine, and butorphanol

a.

Draxxin, Pfizer, New York, NY.

b.

Covexin 8, Schering Plough, Summit, NJ.

c.

Bovi-shield Gold 4, Pfizer, New York, NY.

d.

Ultra Boss Pour-on insecticide, Schering Plough, Summit, NJ.

e.

Hospira Inc, Lake Forest, Ill.

f.

MILACATH, MILA International, Florence, Ken.

g.

Baxter Health Care Corp, Deerfield, Ill.

h.

Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Wash.

i.

SireMaster, Ice Corp, Manhattan, Kan.

j.

Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Penn.

k.

Anased, Lloyd Lab, Shenandoah, Iowa.

l.

Ketaset, Fort Dodge, Fort Dodge, Iowa.

m.

Torbugesic, Fort Dodge, Fort Dodge, Iowa.

n.

Stone Manufacturing and Supply Co Inc, Kansas City, Mo.

o.

Farmtek Wireless rodeo electronic timing system, Farmtek Inc, Wylie, Tex.

p.

For-Most, Hawarden, Iowa.

q.

Kendall, Mansfield, Mass.

r.

Pain Gauge, Public Health Information Systems Inc, Dublin, Ohio.

s.

Immulite 1000 Cortisol, DPS, Los Angeles, Calif.

t.

Shimadzu Prominence, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, Md.

u.

API 4000, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.

v.

Millipore Corp, Billerica, Mass.

w.

Waters Xbridge Phenyl C18, 50 mm × 2.1 mm × 5 μm, Waters Corp, Milford, Mass.

x.

TDx, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.

y.

WinNonlin, Pharsight Corp, Cary, NC.

z.

SAS, version 9.1, Cary, NC.

aa.

JMP, version 7.0.2, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.

bb.

Barron SL, Gehring R, Reinbold JR, et al. Development of a model for pain during castration and dehorning (poster presentation). Merck Merial Summer Scholars Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich, July 2008.

References

  • 1.

    Rollin BE. Annual meeting keynote address: animal agriculture and emerging social ethics for animals. J Anim Sci 2004; 82: 955964.

  • 2.

    AVMA. Backgrounder: welfare implications of the castration of cattle. Available at: www.avma.org/reference/backgrounders/castration_cattle_bgnd.asp. Accessed Jun 5, 2009.

  • 3.

    AVMA. Backgrounder: welfare implications of the dehorning of cattle. Available at: www.avma.org/issues/policy/animal_welfare/dehorning_cattle.asp. Accessed Jun 22, 2011.

  • 4.

    Fisher AD, Crowe MA, Alonso de la Varga ME, et al. Effect of castration method and the provision of local anesthesia on plasma cortisol, scrotal circumference, growth, and feed intake of bull calves. J Anim Sci 1996; 74: 23362343.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Mellor DJ, Cook CJ, Stafford KJ. Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. In: Moberg GP, Mench JA, eds. In: The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. New York: CABI Publishing, 2000;171198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Ting STL, Earley B, Crowe MA. Effect of repeated ketoprofen administration during surgical castration of bulls on cortisol, immunological function, feed intake, growth, and behavior. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 12531264.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Pang WY, Early B, Sweeny T, et al. Effect of carprofen administration during banding or burdizzo castration of bulls on plasma cortisol, in vitro interferon- production, acute-phase proteins, feed intake, and growth. J Anim Sci 2006; 84: 351359.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Gonzalez LA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Caulkett NA, et al. Pain mitigation after band castration of beef calves and its effects on performance, behavior, Escherichia coli, and salivary cortisol. J Anim Sci 2008; 2: 802810.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Knight TW, Cosgrove GP, Death AF, et al. Effect of method of castrating bulls on their growth rate and liveweight. N Z J Agric Res 2000; 43: 187192.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Faulkner DB, Eurell T, Tranquilli WJ, et al. Performance and health of weanling bulls after butorphanol and xylazine administration at castration. J Anim Sci 1992; 70: 29702974.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Muller R, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Shah MA, et al. Effect of neck injection and handler visibility on behavioral reactivity of beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2008; 86: 12151222.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Curley KO, Paschal JC, Welsh TH Jr et al. Technical note: exit velocity as a measure of cattle temperament is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls. J Anim Sci 2006; 84: 31003103.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Benford SM, Dannemiller S. Use of electrodermal activity for assessment of pain/stress in laboratory animals. Animal Laboratory News 2004; 1: 1323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Richardson CA, Niel L, Leach MC, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a novel electronic pain assessment device, the Pain Gauge®, for measuring postoperative pain in rats. Lab Anim 2007; 41: 4654.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Coetzee JF, Nutsch A, Barbur LA, et al. A survey of castration methods and associated livestock management practices performed by bovine veterinarians in the United States. BMC Vet Res 2010; 6:12.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Stafford KJ, DJ Mellor. The welfare significance of cattle: a review. N Z Vet J 2005; 53: 271278.

  • 17.

    Doherty TJ, Kattesh HG, Adcock MG, et al. Effects of a concentrated lidocaine solution on the acute phase stress response to dehorning in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 42324239.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Kissin I. Preemptive analgesia at the crossroad. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 754756.

  • 19.

    Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ. Preanesthetics and anesthetic adjuncts. In: Lumb and Jones' veterinary anesthesia. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1996;183209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Langston VC. Therapeutic management of inflammation. In: Howard JL, Smith RA, eds. Current veterinary therapy 4: food animal practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2003;712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Coetzee JF, Gehring R, Bettenhausen AC, et al. Attenuation of acute plasma cortisol response in calves following intravenous sodium salicylate administration prior to castration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2007; 30: 305313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Veterinary Medicine Expert Committee on Drug Information, United States Pharmacopeia. USP Veterinary Pharmaceutical Information Monographs. Anti-inflammatories. J Vet Pharmacol Ther2004; 27 (suppl 1:) 414.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Gehring R, Coetzee JF, Tarus-Sang J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ketamine and its metabolite norketamine administered at a sub-anesthetic dose together with xylazine to calves prior to castration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2008; 32: 124128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Sellers G, Lin HC, Riddell MG, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ketamine in plasma and milk of mature Holstein cows. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2010; 33: 480484.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Stroud LR, Solomon BA, Shenassa E, et al. Long-term stability of maternal prenatal steroid hormones from the National Collaborative Perinatal Project: still valid after all these years. Psychoneurolendocrinology 2007; 32: 140150.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Niedorf F, Hogr HH, Kietzmann M. Simultaneous determination of ketamine and xylazine in canine plasma by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2003; 791: 421426.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Hewson CJ, Dohoo IR, Lemke KA, et al. Canadian veterinarians' use of analgesics in cattle, pigs and horses in 2004 and 2005. Can Vet J 2007; 48: 155164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Fulwider WK, Grandin T, Rollin BE, et al. Survey of dairy management practices on one hundred thirteen North Central and northeastern United States Dairies. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 16861692.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Chase CC Jr, Larsen RE, Randel RD, et al. Plasma cortisol and white blood cell responses in different breeds of bulls: a comparison of two methods of castration. J Anim Sci 1995; 73: 975980.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Fisher AD, Crowe MA, O'Naullain EM, et al. Effects of cortisol on in vitro interferon-γ production, acute-phase proteins, growth and feed intake in a calf castration model. J Anim Sci 1997; 75: 10411047.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Fisher AD, Knight TW, Cosgrove GP, et al. Effects of surgical or banding castration on stress responses and behavior of bulls. Aust Vet J 2001; 79: 279284.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Earley B, Crowe MA. Effects of ketoprofen alone or in combination with local anesthesia during castration of bull calves on plasma cortisol, immunological, and inflammatory responses. J Anim Sci 2002; 80: 10441052.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ, Todd SE, et al. Effects of local anaesthesia or local anaesthesia plus a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug on the acute cortisol response of calves to five different methods of castration. Res Vet Sci 2002; 73: 6170.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ, Todd SE, et al. The effect of different combinations of lignocaine, ketoprofen, xylazine, and tolazoline on the acute cortisol response to dehorning calves. N Z Vet J 2003; 51: 219226.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Benford SM, Dannemiller S. Use of electrodermal activity for assessment of pain/stress in laboratory animals. Animal Laboratory News 2004; 1: 1323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Wohlt JE, Allyn ME, Zajac PK, et al. Cortisol increases in plasma of Holstein heifer calves from handling and method of electrical dehorning. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77: 37253729.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Grondahl-Nielsen C, Simonsen HB, Lund JD, et al. Behavioral, endocrine and cardiac responses in young calves undergoing dehorning without and with use of sedation and analgesia. Vet J 1999; 158: 1420.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Coetzee JF, Lubbers BL, Toerber SE, et al. Plasma concentrations of substance P and cortisol in beef calves after castration or simulated castration. Am J Vet Res 2008; 69: 751762.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Stillwell G, Lima MS, Broom DM. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on long-term pain in calves castrated by use of an external clamping technique following epidural anesthesia. Am J Vet Res 2008; 69: 744749.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Faulkner PM, Weary DM. Reducing pain after dehorning in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83: 20372041.

  • 42.

    Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. The head and ventral neck of the ruminants. In: Textbook of veterinary anatomy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002; 627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Sato K. The physiology, pharmacology, and biochemistry, of the eccrine sweat gland. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 1977; 79: 51131.

  • 44.

    Garcia-Villar R, Toutain PL, Alvinerie M, et al. The pharmacokinetics of xylazine hydrochloride: an interspecific study. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1981; 4: 8792.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Grant C, Upton RN. The anti-nociceptive efficacy of low dose intramuscular xylazine in lambs. Res Vet Sci 2001; 70: 4750.

  • 46.

    Postner LP, Burns P. Injectable anaesthetic agents. In: Riviere JE, Papich MG, eds. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009; 283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Abrahamsen EJ. Chemical restraint in ruminants. In: Current veterinary therapy food animal practice. 5th ed. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2009;546549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Sutherland MA, Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ, et al. Cortisol responses to dehorning of calves given a 5-h local anaesthetic regimen plus phenylbutazone, ketoprofen, or adrenocorticotropic hormone prior to dehorning. Res Vet Sci 2002; 73: 115123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Sylvester SP, Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ, et al. Acute cortisol responses of calves to scoop dehorning using local anaesthesia and/or cautery of the wound. Aust Vet J 1998; 76: 118122.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Waterman AE. The pharmacokinetics of ketamine administered intravenously in calves and the modifying effect of pre-medication with xylazine hydrochloride. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1984; 7: 125130.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Court MH, Dodman NH, Levine HD, et al. Pharmacokinetics and milk residues of butorphanol in dairy cows after single intravenous administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1992; 15: 2835.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Ting ST, Earley B, Hughes JM, et al. Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth, and behavior. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 12811293.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    American Academy of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. AAVPT position paper regarding the evaluation of scientific manuscripts that involve the administration of compounded drugs to animals. Available at: www.aavpt.org/documents/Manustripts_Compound_Drug_Position.pdf. Accessed Jun 30, 2010.

  • 54.

    Smith GW, Davis JL, Tell LA, et al. Extralabel use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 697701.

  • 55.

    Haskell SR, Gehring R, Payne M, et al. Update on FARAD food animal drug withholding recommendations. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 12771278.

  • 56.

    Craigmill AL, Rangel-Lugo MR, Damian P, et al. Extralabel use of tranquilizers and general anesthetics. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 302304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Papich MG. Drug residue considerations for anesthetics and adjunctive drugs in food producing animals. Vet Clin North Food Anim Pract 1996; 12: 693705.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 138 0 0
Full Text Views 1271 733 33
PDF Downloads 606 261 14
Advertisement