Comparisons of morphometric measurements and serum insulin-like growth factor concentration in healthy cats and cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Vicky K. Yang Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA 01536.

Search for other papers by Vicky K. Yang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Lisa M. Freeman Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA 01536.

Search for other papers by Lisa M. Freeman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
John E. Rush Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA 01536.

Search for other papers by John E. Rush in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Abstract

Objective—To compare morphometric measurements and serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) concentration in cats with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and assess the hypothesis that cats with HCM have larger body size and skeletal features and higher serum IGF-1 concentrations than healthy cats.

Animals—25 cats with HCM and 22 healthy control cats.

Procedures—Physical examination and echocardiography were performed to classify cats into the HCM and control groups. Data collected from each cat included diet history, body weight, body condition score, lengths of the humerus and 4th and 12th thoracic vertebrae, heart size, head length and width, and abdominal circumferences. Comparisons of these variables were made between groups.

Results—Body condition score in HCM-affected and control cats did not differ significantly. However, median head width; lengths of the head, 4th and 12th thoracic vertebrae, and humerus; and body weight in the HCM-affected group were significantly greater than values in the control group. Median serum concentration of IGF-1 was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—These data suggested that among the study cats, those with HCM were skeletally larger, but not more obese, than healthy cats. Whether this was attributable to differences in early growth or other causes requires additional investigation.

Abstract

Objective—To compare morphometric measurements and serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) concentration in cats with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and assess the hypothesis that cats with HCM have larger body size and skeletal features and higher serum IGF-1 concentrations than healthy cats.

Animals—25 cats with HCM and 22 healthy control cats.

Procedures—Physical examination and echocardiography were performed to classify cats into the HCM and control groups. Data collected from each cat included diet history, body weight, body condition score, lengths of the humerus and 4th and 12th thoracic vertebrae, heart size, head length and width, and abdominal circumferences. Comparisons of these variables were made between groups.

Results—Body condition score in HCM-affected and control cats did not differ significantly. However, median head width; lengths of the head, 4th and 12th thoracic vertebrae, and humerus; and body weight in the HCM-affected group were significantly greater than values in the control group. Median serum concentration of IGF-1 was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—These data suggested that among the study cats, those with HCM were skeletally larger, but not more obese, than healthy cats. Whether this was attributable to differences in early growth or other causes requires additional investigation.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the most common form of heart disease in cats. Multiple genetic mutations have been identified in humans with HCM; however, to date, a myosin-binding protein C mutation in Maine Coon cats and Ragdoll cats is the only gene mutation identified in association with HCM in felids.1–4 However, a genetic basis of this disease is suspected in cats affected with HCM.

Although genetic factors may predispose cats to the development of HCM, the interaction between genetics and environmental factors may also play a role in the development or manifestation of the HCM phenotype. Environmental factors such as diet and growth patterns may influence disease severity and the time of onset for this condition. Such a link between cardiac function, early growth, and diet has been determined in other species. For example, mice that express a mutant β-myosin heavy chain have significantly depressed cardiac contractile function when fed a soy-rich diet, compared with the effect of being fed a casein-rich diet.5 This change in cardiac function is especially pronounced in male mice.5 In hamsters, environmental stress such as exercise has also been found to affect the development of cardiomyopathy.6 By increasing the amount of exercise during infancy, both the expression of β-myosin heavy-chain mRNA and the degree of degenerative mitochondrial changes in cardiomyocytes were decreased.6 Among humans, individuals with fast early growth and those who are fed high-nutrient diets as infants will later develop higher adult body weight, higher adult blood pressure, and a predisposition for the development of cardiovascular diseases than other individuals.7–11 In utero nutritional conditions may also play a role; studies12–14 in sheep have revealed that maternal nutrient restriction results in left ventricular hypertrophy in the offspring. This is thought to be related to increased circulating IGF-1 activity, but could also be the result of increased blood angiotensin-II concentration or upregulation of myocardial genes for α-cardiac actin, caveolin-1, and titin.13–15 Therefore, in cats, it seems plausible that dietary intake during early developmental stages that results in faster growth may be a determinant in the severity of HCM; if this proves to be true, then dietary manipulations may be able to alter the disease progression or phenotypic expression of HCM in cats.

In a previous study,16 cats with HCM had significantly higher concentrations of serum growth hormone, compared with concentrations in healthy control cats. Growth hormone secretion is pulsatile, and a single measurement might not provide a complete assessment of growth hormone secretion. Because IGF-1 is the mediator of the growth-promoting effects of growth hormone, measurement of serum IGF-1 concentration may be a better method of assessment for growth hormone status. Insulin-like growth factor is also of interest because of its correlation with body size and nutritional status.17

Typically, the heart size of a dog or cat will vary proportionally with the animal's body size or vertebral length.18,19 In contrast, cats with HCM have higher heart-to-body weight ratios20 and larger heart dimensions for their body sizes.21 To our knowledge, no other morphometric measurements have been assessed in cats with HCM. The purpose of the study reported here was to compare morphometric measurements and serum IGF-1 concentration in cats with and without HCM. Dietary history was also assessed. Our hypothesis was that cats with HCM would have larger body size and skeletal features and higher serum IGF-1 concentrations than healthy cats.

Materials and Methods

Cats—Cats with HCM that were evaluated by the Cardiology Service at the Foster Hospital for Small Animals at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine were eligible for inclusion in the study. To be included, HCM-affected cats had to have echocardiographic measurements consistent with HCM (ie, left ventricular free wall or interventricular septal thickness in diastole > 0.60 cm in combination with other echocardiographic findings consistent with HCM).21 On the basis of results of serum total thyroxine concentration measurement for all cats > 6 years of age, cats with hyperthyroidism were excluded. Cats with hypertension (defined as a systolic arterial blood pressure > 170 mm Hg) were excluded by measurement of blood pressure via a Doppler technique. Because of the extreme head dimensions of brachycephalic cats, cats of this skull type were excluded from the study. Maine Coon cats also were excluded because of their large body size. Furthermore, on the basis of results of laboratory assessments, cats known to have diabetes mellitus, renal failure, neoplasia, congenital aortic stenosis, or other major systemic diseases were excluded from the study. Healthy cats that were owned by clients, faculty, students, and staff were considered eligible for inclusion in the study if the cats had no abnormal cardiovascular findings detected during physical and echocardiographic examinations. As for the HCM-affected cats, apparently healthy cats with hyperthyroidism, hypertension, or other known major diseases were excluded. The study was approved by the Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and all owners signed an informed consent form before enrolling their cats in the study.

Assessments—For each cat, body weight and BCS were recorded. Body condition score was assessed on a scale of 1 to 9, in which a score of 1 was emaciated, 5 was ideal, and 9 was obese.22 Echocardiography (2-dimensional and M-mode assessments) was performed specifically for study purposes or as part of the cats' medical care; all echocardiographic data were collected at the time of each cat's enrollment for the study. Lateral and dorsoventral thoracic radiographic views were obtained for measurement of V4, V12, VHS,18,19 maximal chest width at the level of the eighth rib (measured on the dorsoventral view), and humerus length (measured on the lateral view). The VHS was not calculated for cats with pleural effusion. The mean thickness of each cat's subcutaneous adipose tissue layer at the level of the eighth rib in the dorsoventral radiographic view was calculated from measurements taken from the right and left sides of the thorax, and the thickness of the adipose tissue layer ventral to the sternum at the level of the seventh rib in the lateral radiographic view was also measured. Radiography was performed by use of a digital radiography system, and measurements were performed by 1 investigator (JER) who was provided only with the cat's medical record number (ie, the investigator was not aware of the group to which the cat had been allocated).

In addition to measurements obtained from the thoracic radiographs, morphometric measurements were assessed in each cat as follows: head width (measured from the left zygomatic arch to the right zygomatic arch by use of a commercial calipera) and length (measured as the distance from the occipital protuberance to the tip of the nose by use of a commercial calipera [Figure 1]) and the circumference of the abdomen, just cranial to the tuber coxae (measured by use of a tape measure).

Figure 1—
Figure 1—

Photograph of a cat obtained during head width measurement (distance from the left zygomatic arch to the right zygomatic arch; A) and head length measurement (distance from the occipital protuberance to the tip of the nose; B) by use of a caliper.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 8; 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.1061

Dietary histories of the enrolled cats were obtained. Each owner was asked to complete a survey that included questions regarding diet, current feeding methods (eg, ad libitum feeding or provision of measured meal amounts and provision of treats or dietary supplements), age at which the cat underwent ovariohysterectomy or castration, whether the cat had ever been over-weight, and the owner's assessment of his or her cat's size at 6 months of age (eg, very small, somewhat small, normal size, somewhat large, or very large). A blood sample (5 mL) was collected via jugular venipuncture with minimal restraint after food had been withheld for 8 hours. Serum was separated from each blood sample and then frozen at −80°C until analysis; serum IGF-1 concentrations were measured via high-performance liquid chromatography.

Statistical analysis—On the basis of results of a small pilot study, sample size calculations revealed that 20 cats/group would provide at least 80% power to detect a difference between the HCM-affected and control groups, with α set at 0.05. Data distributions were examined graphically. Because many of the continuous variables were not normally distributed, nonparametric statistical tests were used. Categoric variables, such as sex and breed, were compared between the HCM-affected and control groups by use of χ2 analysis. The continuous variables, such as age, body weight, and head width and length, were compared by use of a Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical analyses were performed by use of a commercial statistical software program.b A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Forty-seven cats were enrolled in the study, of which 25 were assigned to the HCM-affected group and 22 were assigned to the control group. For the HCM-affected group, other systemic diseases were excluded on the basis of historical information and results of clinicopathologic analyses performed in 24 of 25 cats. Results of a CBC and serum biochemical profile were unavailable for 1 of the 25 cats in the HCM-affected group (a 3-year-old castrated male domestic shorthair cat that had no history of other medical issues; systolic arterial blood pressure value and serum thyroxine concentration were within reference limits). Age (P = 0.58), sex (P = 0.32), and breed distribution (P = 0.25) in the HCM-affected and control groups were not significantly different (Table 1). Values of echocardiographic variables indicative of HCM were greater in HCM-affected cats, compared with values in the control cats; differences in the thickness of the left ventricular free wall in diastole and systole (P < 0.001), thickness of the interventricular septum in diastole and systole (P < 0.001), the size of the left atrium (P < 0.001), and the left atrial-to-aortic diameter ratio (P < 0.001) were evident. Cardiac size (based on the VHS in both thoracic radiographic views) was larger in the HCM-affected group, compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in systolic arterial blood pressure (P = 0.92) or heart rate (P = 0.89) between the 2 groups.

Table 1—

Comparison of age, breed, sex, and cardiovascular variables (physical, echocardiographic, and radiographic assessments) in 25 cats with HCM and 22 healthy control cats. Data are reported as median (range).

VariableControl groupHCM-affected groupP value*
Age (y)6(2-14)6(2-14)0.58
Sex0.32
Sexually intact male20
Castrated male1522
Sexually intact female00
Spayed female53
Breed0.25
DSH1722
DLH53
Heart rate (beats/min)170(130-210)170(140-210)0.89
Systolic arterial blood pressure (mm Hg)138(118-175)132(90-178)0.92
IVSd(cm)0.49 (0.40-0.58)0.72(0.54-1.15)< 0.001
LVWd (cm)0.47 (0.36-0.56)0.72(0.26-1.16)< 0.001
LVIDd(cm)1.47(1.25-1.65)1.39(1.22-2.18)0.52
IVSs(cm)0.76 (0.55-0.90)0.95(0.66-1.29)< 0.001
LVWs (cm)0.81 (0.62-0.97)0.98(0.30-1.37)< 0.001
LVIDs(cm)0.67 (0.49-0.94)0.67(0.35-1.57)0.94
Left atrium (cm)1.23(0.95-1.44)1.80(1.04-3.14)< 0.001
Aorta (cm)1.04(0.88-1.10)1.06(0.83-1.29)0.27
Left atrial-to aortic diameter ratio1.23(0.89-1.54)1.59(1.04-3.54)< 0.001
VHS (lateral radiographic view assessment)7.6 (6.9-9.0)8.6(7.5-11.0)< 0.001
VHS (dorsoventral radiographic view assessment)8.0 (7.0-9.3)9.1 (7.9-12.0)< 0.001

DSH = Domestic shorthair. DLH = Domestic longhair. IVSd = Interventricular septal wall thickness during diastole. LVWd = Left ventricular free wall thickness during diastole. LVIDd = Left ventricular internal dimension during diastole. IVSs = Interventricular septal wall thickness during systole. LVWs = Left ventricular free wall thickness during systole. LVIDs = Left ventricular internal dimension during systole.

A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Left atrium measurement obtained at end-systole from standard M-mode location.

Compared with the control group, body weight was significantly (P = 0.047) higher in the HCM-affected group. Seventy percent (33/47) of all cats in the study were overweight (BCS, 6 to 7) or obese (BCS, 8 to 9). Measures of body fat, including BCS (P = 0.17), subcutaneous fat thickness measured on the dorsoventral (P = 0.75) and lateral (P = 0.99) radiographic views, and abdominal circumference (P = 0.13), were not significantly different between groups (Table 2). However, mean values of V4 (P = 0.02) and V12 (P = 0.01), chest width (P < 0.001), humerus length (P = 0.02), head length (P = 0.006), and head width (P = 0.02) were all significantly larger in the HCM-affected group, compared with findings in the control group. No significant difference in median serum IGF-1 concentration in HCM-affected cats (n = 16) and control cats (16) was detected.

Table 2—

Comparison of body condition, morphometric measurements (physical and radiographic assessments), and serum IGF-1 concentration in 25 cats with HCM and 22 healthy control cats. Data are reported as median (range).

VariableControl groupHCM-affected groupP value*
Weight (kg)5.2 (3.4-7.8)6.0 (3.2-7.9)0.047
BCS6.0 (4.5-8.5)6.5(5.0-8.5)0.17
V4(mm)10.1(8.4-11.5)10.4(8.9-11.9)0.02
V12(mm)14.0(12.9-16.1)15.0(12.2-17.1)0.01
Chest width (mm)75.7 (66.4-89.5)85.0 (68.4-99.8)0.001
Subcutaneous fat thickness (dorsoventral radiographic view assessment [mm])18.2(7.3-42.7)21.9(7.0-39.6)0.75
Subcutaneous fat thickness (lateral radiographic view assessment [mm])16.1 (7.7-29.7)15.0(7.0-33.9)0.99
Head length (cm)10.59(10.02-12.16)11.66(8.55-12.70)0.006
Head width (cm)7.43(6.71-8.50)8.11(6.24-8.75)0.02
Abdominal circumference (cm)44.7 (30.8-54.0)48.0(37.0-61.0)0.13
Humerus length (mm)95.8(86.2-107.0)99.7(81.3-115.5)0.02
IGF-1 (nmol/L)98.0(26.3-179.8)98.5(56.0-130.0)0.84

Assessed on a scale of 1 to 9.

Number of cats evaluated in the HCM-affected group or control group was 16.

See Table 1 for remainder of key.

On the basis of information received from each owner, there were no significant differences between the HCM-affected and control groups with regard to the number of owners that fed treats (n = 5 and 7, respectively; P = 0.31), the number of cats being fed ad libitum (6 and 8, respectively; P = 0.30), or owners' estimates of their cat's size at 6 months of age (P = 0.41). Cats in the HCM-affected group were neutered at a median age of 8 months (range, 3 to 48 months), whereas cats in the control group were neutered at a median age of 6 months (range, 2 to 120 months; P = 0.74). However, because some owners had adopted their cat when it was > 6 months old, questions regarding the age at which it was neutered (HCM group, n = 18; control group, 16) and size at 6 months of age (HCM group, 17; control group, 10) could not be answered by all owners. Most owners (HCM group, 21/25; control group, 16/22) responded that their cats were or had been overweight (P = 0.35).

Discussion

The most striking finding of the present study was that cats with HCM had a larger body size than healthy cats; skeletal components, including the vertebrae, skull, and long bones such as the humerus, were larger in HCM-affected cats. The larger skeletal size in HCM-affected cats may indicate faster early growth, which possibly results from differences in early nutritional status or genetic traits. Because the pedigrees of the study cats were unknown, it also is possible that some were descendants of Maine Coon cats, which have a predisposition for HCM and large body size.

Another interesting finding was that, although cats with HCM had larger skeletal features, they were not more frequently overweight than were cats in the control group. Nonetheless, 70% of all cats in the study were overweight or obese. The most recent estimate of prevalence for overweight and obese body conditions in cats is 35%.23 Therefore, even though most of the control cats and many of the HCM cats were owned by veterinary students and staff, the prevalence of over-weight and obese body conditions in this cat population was extremely high.

In the present study, significant differences between the current feeding patterns, the age at the time of castration or ovariohysterectomy, the owner's impression of the cat's size at 6 month of age, and whether the cat had ever been overweight were not identified. Gathering accurate long-term diet history from owners proved to be difficult in our study. Not all cats had been cared for by the same owner since they were kittens; some owners had adopted their cats after 6 months of age. Therefore, many owners could not accurately report the body condition of their cat at a young age and were not aware of its early-age feeding pattern; some owners did not know the exact age at which their cat had been neutered. Furthermore, as reported by Scarlett et al,24 a high percentage of cat owners cannot accurately diagnose obesity in their pets and most tend to underestimate their pet's actual body size. Therefore, the owners in the present study could also have underestimated the actual body size of their pet at 6 month of age. As a result, the relationship between early nutritional status and larger skeletal size of cats with HCM cannot be reliably established on the basis of these data alone and remains a topic for future investigation.

A difference in serum IGF-1 concentration between HCM-affected and control cats was not detected in our study, but measurement of serum IGF-1 concentration in adult animals might not reflect their nutritional status during the neonatal period or episodes of fast growth. In humans, circulating IGF-1 concentration is low at birth but increases quickly during the first year; a peak value is attained during puberty, after which time the concentration decreases.25 Therefore, if the pattern of changes in IGF-1 concentration is similar in cats, serum IGF-1 concentrations measured in adult cats in the present study will reflect postpubertal IGF-1 concentrations because all of those cats were > 2 years old. Future investigations might be devised to evaluate circulating IGF-1 concentrations in young, growing cats that are predisposed to HCM or that carry a genetic mutation that is known to cause HCM.

There are a number of limitations to the study of this report. Among the study cats, the length of hair differed and was a potential source of measurement error. The variation in hair length could have affected abdominal circumference measurements. However, head length and width measurements were less influenced by variation in hair length because those assessments used bony protuberances as landmarks. Distribution of adipocytes can vary among animals; in cats, adipocytes are often preferentially distributed to the abdominal region in cats and differential fat distribution could alter metabolic effects. In markedly obese cats, the cardiac border was difficult to trace on the dorsoventral radiographic view, which could have affected the accuracy of the VHS derived from those views. Another potential measurement error in VHS in cats was the variable degree of vertebral column curvature in the lateral thoracic radiographic views; the calculated VHS values could have been anomalously low for cats with extremely curved vertebral columns. Investigators may have been aware of a cat's group allocation (HCM affected or control) during measurement of head size and abdominal circumference. Although radiographic measurements were performed by 1 investigator who was unaware of the cats' group allocations, measurements for cats with cardiomegaly or pleural effusion were not obtained in a blinded manner. In future studies, a blinded investigator should perform all morphometric measurements to avoid possible investigator bias.

The results of the present study support the hypothesis that cats with HCM have different morphometric features than healthy control cats. On the basis of multiple skeletal measurements, cats with HCM were larger, but not more obese, than control cats. Studies to examine the relationships among genetics, dietary intake, early growth patterns, and adult skeletal size and the effects these factors have on the development of cardiovascular disease in cats are warranted.

ABBREVIATIONS

BCS

Body condition score

HCM

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

IGF-1

Insulin-like growth factor-1

V4

Length of the fourth thoracic vertebra

V12

Length of the 12th thoracic vertebra

VHS

Vertebral heart score

a.

No. 52-008-006-1, Fred V Fowler Co, Newton, Mass.

b.

Systat, version 11.0, SPSS, Chicago, Ill.

References

  • 1.

    Kittleson MD, Meurs KM, Munro MJ, et al. Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in maine coon cats: an animal model of human disease. Circulation 1999;99:31723180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Fox PR, Liu SK, Maron BJ. Echocardiographic assessment of spontaneously occurring feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an animal model of human disease. Circulation 1995;92:26452651.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Meurs KM, Sanchez X, David RM, et al. A cardiac myosin binding protein c mutation in the maine coon cat with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:35873593.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Meurs KM, Norgard MM, Ederer MM, et al. A substitution mutation in the myosin binding protein C gene in ragdoll hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Genomics 2007;90:261264.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Stauffer BL, Konhilas JP, Luczak ED, et al. Soy diet worsens heart disease in mice. J Clin Invest 2006;116:209216.

  • 6.

    Tatsuguchi M, Hiratsuka E, Machida S, et al. Swimming exercise in infancy has beneficial effect on the hearts in cardiomyopathic Syrian hamsters. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 2004;25:6976.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Daniels SR, Arnett DK, Eckel RH, et al. Overweight in children and adolescents: pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation 2005;111:19992012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Li X, Li S, Ulusoy E, et al. Childhood adiposity as a predictor of cardiac mass in adulthood. Circulation 2004;110:34883492.

  • 9.

    Singhal A, Cole TJ, Fewtrell M, et al. Is slower early growth beneficial for long-term cardiovascular health? Circulation 2004;109:11081113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Singhal A, Cole TJ, Fewtrell M, et al. Promotion of faster weight gain in infants born small for gestational age. Is there an adverse effect on later blood pressure? Circulation 2007;115:213220.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Strauss RS, Dietz WH. Growth and development of term children born with low birth weight: effects of genetic and environmental factors. J Pediatr 1998;133:6772.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Vonnahme KA, Hess BW, Hansen TR, et al. Maternal undernutrition from early-to mid-gestation leads to growth retardation, cardiac ventricular hypertrophy, and increased liver weight in the fetal sheep. Biol Reprod 2003;69:113140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Dong F, Ford SP, Fang CX, et al. Maternal nutrient restriction during early to mid gestation up-regulated cardiac insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors associated with enlarged ventricular size in fetal sheep. Growth Horm IGF Res 2005;15:291299.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Han HC, Austin KJ, Nathanielsz PW, et al. Maternal nutrient restriction alters gene expression in the ovine fetal heart. J Physiol 2004;558:111121.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Kingdom JC, McQueen J, Connell JM, et al. Fetal angiotensin II levels and vascular (type I) angiotensin receptors in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:476482.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Kittleson MD, Pion PD, DeLellis LA, et al. Increased serum growth hormone concentration in feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:320324.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Hwang KJ, Lee KH. The effect of obesity and nutrient intake on serum IGF-1 and serotonin levels in school children. Korean J Nutr 2002;35:524530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Buchanan JW, Büecheler J. Vertebral scale system to measure canine heart size in radiographs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:194214.

  • 19.

    Litster AL, Buchanan JW. Vertebral scale system to measure heart size in radiographs of cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;216:210214.

  • 20.

    Baty CJ, Malarkey DE, Atkins CE, et al. Natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and aortic thromboembolism in a family of domestic shorthair cats. J Vet Intern Med 2001;15:595599.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Rush JE, Freeman LM, Fenollosa NK, et al. Population and survival characteristics of cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 260 cases (1990–1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:202207.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Laflamme D. Development and validation of a body condition score system for cats: a clinical tool. Feline Pract 1997;25(5–6):1318.

  • 23.

    Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med 2006;4:177186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Scarlett JM, Donoghue S, Saidla J, et al. Overweight cats: prevalence and risk factors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994;18:S22S28.

  • 25.

    Bunn RC, King WD, Winkler MK, et al. Early developmental changes in IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein-1, and IGF binding protein-3 concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid of children. Pediatr Res 2005;58:8993.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 95 0 0
Full Text Views 471 289 25
PDF Downloads 293 128 17
Advertisement