Development and analytic validation of a radioimmunoassay for the quantification of canine calprotectin in serum and feces from dogs

Romy M. Heilmann Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4474.

Search for other papers by Romy M. Heilmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet
,
Jan S. Suchodolski Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4474.

Search for other papers by Jan S. Suchodolski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet, PhD
, and
Jörg M. Steiner Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4474.

Search for other papers by Jörg M. Steiner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To develop and analytically validate a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for the quantification of canine calprotectin (cCP) in serum and fecal extracts of dogs.

Sample Population—Serum samples (n = 50) and fecal samples (30) were obtained from healthy dogs of various breeds and ages.

Procedures—A competitive, liquid-phase, double-antibody RIA was developed and analytically validated by assessing analytic sensitivity, working range, linearity, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. Reference intervals for serum and fecal cCP concentrations were determined.

Results—Sensitivity and upper limit of the working range were 29 and 12,774 μg/L for serum and 2.9 and 1,277.4 μg/g for fecal extracts, respectively. Observed-to-expected ratios for serial dilutions of 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts ranged from 95.3% to 138.2% and from 80.9% to 118.1%, respectively. Observed-to-expected ratios for spiking recovery for 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts ranged from 84.6% to 121.5% and from 80.3% to 132.1%, respectively. Coefficients of variation for intra-assay and interassay variability were < 3.9% and < 8.7% for 6 serum samples and < 8.5% and < 12.6% for 6 fecal extracts, respectively. Reference intervals were 92 to 1,121 μg of cCP/L for serum and < 2.9 to 137.5 μg of cCP/g for fecal extracts.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The RIA described here was analytically sensitive, linear, accurate, precise, and reproducible for the quantification of cCP in serum and fecal extracts. This assay should facilitate research into the clinical use of serum and fecal cCP measurements in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease.

Abstract

Objective—To develop and analytically validate a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for the quantification of canine calprotectin (cCP) in serum and fecal extracts of dogs.

Sample Population—Serum samples (n = 50) and fecal samples (30) were obtained from healthy dogs of various breeds and ages.

Procedures—A competitive, liquid-phase, double-antibody RIA was developed and analytically validated by assessing analytic sensitivity, working range, linearity, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. Reference intervals for serum and fecal cCP concentrations were determined.

Results—Sensitivity and upper limit of the working range were 29 and 12,774 μg/L for serum and 2.9 and 1,277.4 μg/g for fecal extracts, respectively. Observed-to-expected ratios for serial dilutions of 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts ranged from 95.3% to 138.2% and from 80.9% to 118.1%, respectively. Observed-to-expected ratios for spiking recovery for 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts ranged from 84.6% to 121.5% and from 80.3% to 132.1%, respectively. Coefficients of variation for intra-assay and interassay variability were < 3.9% and < 8.7% for 6 serum samples and < 8.5% and < 12.6% for 6 fecal extracts, respectively. Reference intervals were 92 to 1,121 μg of cCP/L for serum and < 2.9 to 137.5 μg of cCP/g for fecal extracts.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The RIA described here was analytically sensitive, linear, accurate, precise, and reproducible for the quantification of cCP in serum and fecal extracts. This assay should facilitate research into the clinical use of serum and fecal cCP measurements in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease.

Idiopathic IBD of dogs is an important disorder, which is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal signs, such as loose feces, diarrhea, and weight loss. In many dogs, IBD poses a diagnostic challenge. No single criterion-referenced diagnostic test is currently available for the diagnosis of IBD or for assessment of severity or activity of IBD. Commonly, a combination of clinical signs, laboratory variables, and endoscopic and histologic findings is used for diagnosing and monitoring IBD in canine patients.1–3 Because the clinical signs are highly variable at various stages of the disease, a clinical scoring system has been proposed in 1 study4 and expanded in another study.3 A consensus for the classification of IBD on the basis of endoscopic and histologic criteria is still lacking and is currently being developed by the gastrointestinal standardization group of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association.

Laboratory markers represent objective measures for the assessment of gastrointestinal tract disorders. They are noninvasive or minimally invasive and simple to perform. Only a few immunologic and inflammatory markers have been correlated with clinical IBD activity in canine patients. Serum C-reactive protein, an acutephase reactant and nonspecific inflammatory marker, can be useful as a prognostic marker for IBD.1,4 However, in some studies,3,5 C-reactive protein did not reflect the severity of IBD in canine patients as assessed by clinical scores (eg, canine IBD activity index) or histologic grade. Other inflammatory markers for IBD in dogs have been studied less extensively or are less useful than is C-reactive protein.1,4,5 Hence, there is a need for novel laboratory markers that will aid in the management of dogs with IBD.

Calprotectin, a heterodimeric protein complex that binds Ca2+ and Zn2+ and has antimicrobial activity, is abundant in PMNs and macrophages. Calprotectin is contained in infiltrating myelomonocytic cells at sites of inflammation, where it is actively or passively released into the extracellular space as a result of cell disintegration.6,7 Epithelial cells (eg, keratinocytes) also express calprotectin after inflammatory activation or malignant transformation. In humans, increases in serum or plasma concentrations of calprotectin have been associated with various infectious and inflammatory conditions, autoimmune disorders, and malignancies.6,8 Because it reflects the phagocyte turnover in vivo, calprotectin has been used as an extremely sensitive but nonspecific inflammatory marker that correlates with local and systemic signs of disease activity.6,8,9 Serum calprotectin concentrations can be used to discriminate between active and quiescent Crohn's disease and are believed to be useful for the monitoring of clinical disease activity in humans with Crohn's disease.10

Increased fecal concentrations of calprotectin in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have been correlated with disease activity, as determined by use of endoscopy, histologic examination, and excretion of iodineradiolabeled PMNs.11,12 Increased fecal concentrations of calprotectin have also been associated with gastrointestinal neoplasms, infections, polyps, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents.12,13 Measurement of fecal calprotectin concentrations is simple to perform and widely used in human medicine as a diagnostic screening test, for monitoring treatment response and predicting clinical relapse in patients with IBD, and for discriminating organic from nonorganic intestinal disease (such as irritable bowel syndrome).14–16

An immunoassay for calprotectin measurement is currently available only for humans. Therefore, the objectives of the study reported here were to develop and analytically validate an RIA for the quantification of cCP in canine serum and fecal extracts and to evaluate the potential use of cCP concentrations as a clinical marker in dogs with IBD.

Materials and Methods

Sample Population—Serum was obtained from 50 healthy pet dogs of various breeds (median age, 4.0 years; range, 0.6 to 11.6 years). Food was withheld from these dogs for at least 12 hours before collection of blood samples. The protocol for collection of blood samples was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Review Committee at Texas A&M University (CRRC No. 2006-30). For use of the dogs in the study, owner consent was obtained for each dog. Serum was harvested within 2 hours after collection of blood samples and stored at −80°C until further use.

Fecal samples were collected from 30 healthy pet dogs of various breeds (median age, 3.7 years; range, 0.8 to 11.0 years) by their owners and from 12 healthy, kennel-housed research Beagles (median age, 8.3 years; range, 4.0 to 11.1 years). All 42 dogs were vaccinated (at a minimum) against canine distemper virus, canine adenovirus type 2, canine parvovirus, and rabies virus except for 1 dog, within 12 months prior to collection of fecal samples. Also, all 42 dogs had been dewormed at regular intervals and had not received any medications known to affect the gastrointestinal tract.

Collection and processing of fecal samples—Fecal samples were obtained by collection after observed defecation. After collection, feces were placed in preweighed polypropylene tubesa and immediately frozen at −20°C until further use. Feces were thawed, and aliquots of 1.3 g of feces (wet weight) were diluted 1:5 in fecal extraction buffer (20mM CH3CO2Na and 3mM CaCl2 [pH, 7.6]) containing a proteinase inhibitor cocktailb (1 tablet/25 mL). After homogenization by vigorous shaking for 30 minutes at approximately 23°C, suspensions were centrifuged for 20 minutes at 2,100 × g at 5°C. Supernatants were collected by use of serum filtersc and centrifuged for 30 minutes at 10,600 × g at 23°C. The final supernatants (fecal extracts) were stored frozen at −80°C until further use.

Production of tracer—A tracer was produced by labeling pure cCP with 125I by use of the chloramine T method.17 Briefly, previously purified cCPd (0.85 mg/mL) in 20mM CH3CO2Na and 3mM CaCl2 (pH, 7.6) was dissolved in 0.25M sodium phosphate (pH, 7.5). Chloramine T (2 mg/mL), sodium metabisulfite (0.4 mg/mL), potassium iodide (2 mg/mL), and 10% (wt/ vol) BSA were dissolved in 0.05M sodium phosphate (pH, 7.5). The radioiodination mixture contained 8.5 μg of cCP, 8.5 μL of 125I (0.85 mCi at the time of production), and 10 μL of chloramine T. After the mixture was stirred for 20 seconds at approximately 23°C, 100 μL of sodium metabisulfite and 860 μL of potassium iodide were added. To separate 125I-labeled cCP and free 125I, the mixture was loaded onto a dextran G-25 columne equilibrated with 10% (wt/vol) BSA. The RIAB (0.05M sodium phosphate, 0.02% [wt/vol] NaN3, and 0.5% [wt/vol] BSA [pH, 7.5]) was used as the mobile phase, and 1-mL aliquots were collected. Fractions containing protein were tested with antiserum and selected on the basis of the NSB and tracer-binding ratio for B0 (ie, B0/TC). The protein fraction with the lowest NSB at a B0/TC of approximately 50% was diluted in RIAB to yield a solution with approximately 30,000 CPM, and it was then stored until used to perform an RIA.

Specific activity of the tracer was estimated by use of a method described elsewhere.18 Effects of various storage conditions on the stability of radiolabeled cCP were investigated during a period of 45 days.19 Aliquots of tracer were stored at 4° or −20°C at 2 radiochemical concentrations (approx 0.2 and 2.3 mCi/L) in polypropylene containersf and also at 4°C and approximately 0.2 mCi/L in glass (noninert) containers.

Production of polyclonal antibodies and concentration test—Polyclonal antibodies against cCP were generated in 2 New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Both rabbits were repeatedly inoculated with pure cCP (in 20mM CH3CO2Na and 3mM CaCl2 [pH, 7.6]) in accordance with a technique described else where.20 The initial SC inoculation consisted of 200 μg of cCP emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant and was followed by 2 booster SC inoculations with 150 μg of cCP in incomplete Freund's adjuvant at intervals of 3 weeks. Ten days after each inoculation, blood samples were collected from each rabbit to evaluate antibody concentrations in the sera. Because sera obtained from both rabbits revealed an insufficient antibody response, the protocol for antibody production was modified, and both rabbits received 200 μg of cCP in incomplete Freund's adjuvant administered SC into the prescapular nodal area at intervals of 1 month. Subsequently, one of the rabbits was injected SC in the prescapular nodal area at monthly intervals with 150, 250, 250, 150, and 150 μg of cCP in incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Blood was collected 10 days after each inoculation, and antiserum was tested.

Polyclonal antibodies were purified by affinity chromatography by use of cCP coupled to N-hydroxysuccinamide–activated beaded agaroseg and screened for IgG by use of reducing SDS-PAGE.h Reactivity of purified anti-cCP IgG and antiserum was verified by precipitation testing against pure cCP, canine serum, and BSA by use of radial double immunodiffusion in agar gel (Ouchterlony technique).i

A simplified RIA was used to evaluate antisera in serial dilutions to obtain a B0/TC of approximately 50%21 and a low NSB (< 5%). Antiserum obtained after the fifth booster injection from the rabbit that received the most inoculations was selected for the RIA procedure (final dilution, 1:11,100).

Development of RIA—The RIA procedure was conducted at approximately 23°C in polypropylene tubes. Each tube contained 100 μL of standard solutions of pure cCP (serial 2-fold dilutions from 1,000.0 to 3.9 μg/L), a serum sample (1:4 dilution) or fecal extract (1:80 dilution) in RIAB, 100 μL of antiserum diluted 1:3,700 in RIAB containing 0.05% polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate, and 100 μL of tracer (approx 30,000 CPM). Standard solutions were prepared from concentrated pure cCP (0.85 mg/mL, as determined by use of the Bradford dye-binding methodj) in 20mM CH3CO2Na and 3mM CaCl2 (pH, 7.6). The B0 was determined by replacing cCP standard by RIAB. Tubes for NSB determination contained 200 μL of RIAB with a final concentration of 0.025% polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate and 100 μL of radiolabeled cCP. Tubes for TC determinations contained 100 μL of tracer. Standards, serum, and fecal samples were prepared in duplicate, whereas tubes for TC, NSB, and B0 were prepared in quadruplicate. Tubes were vortexed, and the mixtures incubated for 3 hours. To all tubes except the TC tube, 100 μL of normal rabbit serumk diluted 1:100 in RIAB and 1 mL of commercially available precipitating solutionl containing the second antibody were added. The mixtures were vortexed and then centrifuged for 30 minutes at 3,360 × g at 10°C to allow separation of free and bound fractions. Supernatants from all tubes, except the TC tubes, were carefully decanted, and the remaining pellets were washed with 1 mL of RIAB. Radioactivity in all tubes was measured for 120 seconds in an automated gamma counterm (82% counting efficiency). A statistical software packagen was used to calculate a quartic polynomial curve fit by use of the following equation: y = f [x] = a + (b × x) + (c × x2) + (d × x3) + (e × x4), where y is the dependent variable, a through e are coefficients describing the shape of the curve, and × is the independent variable. On the x-axis, concentrations of cCP standard solutions were recorded on a logarithmic scale, and values on the y-axis were calculated by use of the following equation22: y = (Bstandard/B0) × 100, where Bstandard represents the CPM for each standard solution (after subtraction of the NSB), and B0 is the CPM obtained for the B0 tube (after subtraction of the NSB). Results obtained from unknown samples were plotted against the calibration curve to determine sample concentrations of cCP in serum samples or fecal extracts. Test samples containing cCP in concentrations outside the standard range of the assay were further diluted by a factor of 2 and reassayed. Aliquots of diluted serum samples and fecal extracts with low, moderate, and high cCP concentrations were stored frozen at −80°C; they were included in each use of the RIA as quality-control samples to detect shifts in the assay.

Analytic validation of the RIA—The RIA was analytically validated by determination of analytic sensitivity, working range, linearity, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility by evaluating the minimum and maximum concentration detectable by the assay, dilutional parallelism, recovery of added cCP (spiking recovery), and intra-assay and interassay variability. Analytic sensitivity of the RIA was determined23 by analyzing 10 duplicates of the B0 tubes in 1 assay and calculating the mean and SD of precipitate counts for the zero cCP concentration. The cCP concentration that corresponded to the mean count minus 3 SDs transposed onto the standard curve was defined as analytic sensitivity (lower limit of the working range) of the RIA. The upper limit of the working range was determined by evaluating (in 1 assay) 10 duplicates of a sample containing cCP in a concentration 7 times the highest standard and calculating the mean and SD of precipitate counts at 7,000 μg/L. The cCP concentration that corresponded to the mean count plus 3 SDs transposed onto the standard curve was defined as maximum cCP concentration detectable in canine serum and fecal extracts of the RIA (upper limit of the working range).

To determine linearity, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of the RIA, samples with differing cCP concentrations were tested. Assay linearity was determined by use of 6 serum samples (3 samples were evaluated at dilutions of 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16, respectively, and 3 samples with higher cCP concentrations were evaluated at dilutions of 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, and 1:64, respectively). Linearity of the assay for canine fecal extracts was assessed by evaluation of 6 samples at final dilutions of 1:100, 1:200, 1:400, 1:800, and 1:1,600. Assay accuracy was tested by spiking 6 sera and 6 fecal extracts with known concentrations of cCP (0, 31.3, 62.5, 125.0, 250.0, and 500.0 μg/L and 0, 3.1, 6.3, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, and 100.0 μg/g for sera and fecal extracts, respectively). The percentage of standard antigen recovery was calculated as follows: (observed value/expected value) × 100. Precision of the assay was evaluated by assaying 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts 10 times within the same assay, followed by calculating the intra-assay CV as follows: CV = (SD/mean) × 100. Reproducibility of the assay was determined by analyzing 6 sera and 6 fecal extracts in 10 consecutive assays and calculating interassay CVs.

Existence of a position effect within the assay (end-of-run effect) was tested in sera from 5 dogs by analyzing each sample 70 times within the same assay. Mean cCP concentration calculated from the first 35 results was compared with the mean cCP concentration of the last 35 results by use of a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Species specificity of the RIA was validated by evaluating sera from 3 cats at dilutions of 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16.

Reference interval and stability of cCP in serum or plasma—A reference interval for serum cCP concentration was established by evaluating serum samples from 50 healthy pet dogs and calculating the central 95th percentile. Serum cCP concentrations were compared between healthy male and female dogs by use of a Mann-Whitney U test. Serum cCP concentrations were compared among dogs of various age groups (< 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 5, 5 to 7, and > 7 years) by use of a Kruskal-Wallis test. Paired cCP concentration in serum and plasma (EDTA was used as an anticoagulant) obtained from 25 pet dogs, which were submitted for use in an unrelated study, was analyzed by use of a Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired datum points and calculation of a Spearman rank sum correlation coefficient.

Stability of cCP in 21 serum samples and 14 plasma samples that had been stored frozen at −20°C for 15 weeks was evaluated by repeated quantification and comparison of cCP concentrations by use of a Wilcoxon signed rank test. On the basis of the results obtained, cCP stability was determined by use of a Friedman test in another 14 serum samples that had been stored frozen at −20°C for 5 and 10 weeks.

For all statistical tests, significance was defined as values of P ≤ 0.05. All P values represented 2-sided tests.

Within-subject variation and stability of cCP in fecal samples—To evaluate distribution of cCP in feces, the within-subject variation within a single defecation was assessed by comparing cCP concentrations in 4 dogs. Five spot samples (1.3 g/sample) were collected from various portions of feces from 1 defecation of each dog and extracted as described. The remainder of the feces for the 4 dogs was diluted 1:1 in fecal extraction buffer and thoroughly blendedo for 5 minutes. Three aliquots of this suspension were obtained, and extracts were prepared as described (final dilution, 1:5). The cCP concentration was quantified in all extracts. Variability of fecal cCP concentrations was assessed for each dog by calculating the CV.

Within-subject variation over time was evaluated by collecting fecal samples on 5 consecutive days from each of the 42 healthy dogs. The cCP was extracted and quantified from all fecal samples. To identify the most efficient strategy for sample collection and determine the minimum number of samples needed for reliable identification of dogs with high fecal concentrations of cCP, various combinations of sampling days (fecal samples collected on day 1; days 1 and 2; days 1, 2, and 3; days 1, 2, 3, and 4; and days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) were evaluated. Variability of fecal concentrations of cCP over time was assessed for each dog by calculating the mean fecal concentration of cCP and within-subject variation (ie, CV) for various combinations of sampling days, followed by statistical comparison by use of a Friedman test.

Finally, a reference interval for fecal concentration of cCP was established from the central 95th percentile of the mean fecal concentration of cCP in 3 samples (collected on days 1, 2, and 3) from each of the 30 healthy pet dogs. Mean fecal concentration of cCP for 5 sampling days was compared between healthy pet dogs of various age groups (< 3, 3 to 6, and > 6 years) by use of a Kruskal-Wallis test. Fecal concentrations of cCP were compared between healthy pet dogs and healthy, kennel-housed research Beagles by use of a Mann-Whitney U test. Stability of cCP in feces was evaluated by quantifying cCP in extracts prepared from 5 fecal samples (thoroughly blended to ensure consistency among aliquots in regard to cCP concentration) from 4 healthy dogs. The blended samples had been stored at −80°, −20°, 4°, and 23°C for 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days. Fecal concentrations of cCP in aliquots stored at those 4 temperatures for the 5 durations were compared by use of a Friedman test.

Results

Immunization with pure cCP in accordance with the modified vaccination protocol yielded a moderate titer of IgG anti-cCP antibodies in only 1 rabbit; antiserum in excess (1:500 dilution) bound slightly more than 85% of radiolabeled cCP. This antiserum and purified anti-cCP IgG resulted in single strong lines of immunoprecipitate when used in agar gel double-diffusion tests against pure cCP and canine sera, but no immunocrossreactivity against BSA was detected.

Specific activity of the tracer ranged from 62 to 114 Ci/mmol (mean 91 Ci/mmol; n = 8 tracers). Repeated determination of the B0/TC and sample analysis revealed the lowest stability of radiolabeled cCP when stored at 4°C in glass containers (Figure 1) . Decomposition was less pronounced in polypropylene containers, and improvements in stability were evident when the tracer was stored at −20°C. Optimal tracer stability was achieved for storage at −20°C in polypropylene tubes with approximate radioactivity of 0.2 mCi/L. When stored under these conditions, radiolabeled cCP yielded a fairly good sensitivity of the RIA up to 32 days with no effect on NSB, which allowed the tracer to be used for 1 month without refractionation.

Figure 1—
Figure 1—

Stability of radiolabeled cCP as measured by use of the B0/TC when samples were stored in polypropylene tubes at 0.2 mCi/L at −20°C (black circles) or 4°C (white circles), in polypropylene tubes at 2.3 mCi/L at −20°C (black squares) or 4°C (white squares), and in glass containers at 0.2 mCi/L at 4°C (white triangles). Results represent the B0/TC, which is the percentage of radiolabeled cCP bound to antiserum (final dilution, 1:11,100) for the B0 tubes.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 7; 10.2460/ajvr.69.7.845

A typical standard curve yielded a working range between 7 and 3,194 μg/L (Figure 2) . Because serum and fecal concentrations of cCP usually were > 70 μg/L and 3 μg/g, respectively, samples were appropriately diluted before quantitation (1:4 and 1:400 for serum and feces, respectively). Hence, analytic sensitivity of the RIA for serum and fecal samples was 29 μg/L and 2.9 μg/g, respectively, with a maximum detection limit of 12,774 μg/L and 1,277 μg/g, respectively. The serial dilution of serum and fecal samples with a wide range of cCP concentrations yielded dose-response curves parallel to the standard curve (Table 1). Expected and observed values for spiking recovery of the assay were highly correlated (Table 2). To test precision and reproducibility of the RIA, mean, SD, and intra-assay and interassay CV values were determined (Table 3). No end-of-run effect was detected when a sample was evaluated up to 70 times within the same assay (ie, mean cCP concentration of the first 35 aliquots of a sample did not differ significantly [P = 0.063] from the mean concentration of aliquots 36 to 70). No change in the standard curve was evident after aliquots of cCP standard dilutions had been stored at −80°C for up to 10 months. Although plasma cCP concentrations did not change significantly (P = 0.542) after 15 weeks of storage at −20°C, serum cCP concentrations decreased significantly (P < 0.001) after storage for the same number of weeks at the same storage temperature. However, serum cCP concentrations did not change significantly (P = 0.395) after storage at −20°C for 5 or 10 weeks.

Figure 2—
Figure 2—

Representative calibration plot for the estimation of cCP concentrations by use of a competitive, double-antibody RIA. A portion of the curve (gray shading) was used to quantify cCP in serum and fecal extracts. The Bstandard/B0 is determined, whereby Bstandard represents the CPM for each standard solution (after subtraction of the NSB) and B0 is the CPM obtained for the B0 tubes (after subtraction of the NSB).

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 7; 10.2460/ajvr.69.7.845

Table 1—

Representative results for dilutional parallelism of cCP as determined by use of a novel RIA in 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts obtained from dogs.

SpecimenDilutionObserved concentration*Expected concentration*Observed expected (%)
Serum1 in 82,654NANA
1 in 161,4561,327109.7
1 in 32700663105.5
1 in 64453332136.5
Fecal extract1 in 10044.1NANA
1 in 20023.122.0105.0
1 in 40011.011.099.5
1 in 8005.55.599.8
1 in 1,6002.92.8105.7

Values reported are $mUg/L for serum samples and $mUg/g for fecal extracts.

Observed-to-expected ratio for the serial dilution of 6 serum samples ranged from 95.3% to 138.2% (mean ± SD, 116.7 ± 12.2%) and of 6 fecal extracts ranged from 80.9% to 118.1% (mean ± SD, 97.6 ± 10.7%).

NA = Not applicable.

Table 2—

Representative results for spiking recovery of cCP as determined by use of a novel RIA in serum samples and fecal extracts obtained from dogs.

SpecimenSpike concentrationObserved concentration*Expected concentration*Observed/expected (%)
Serum01,229NANA
31.251,3171,260104.5
62.51,3401,291103.8
1251,5201,354112.3
2501,5681,479106.1
5002,1011,729121.5
Fecal extract09.3NANA
3.12513.412.5107.6
6.2514.115.690.6
12.524.821.8113.7
2538.234.3111.4
5059.359.3100.0
100105.9109.396.8

Observed-to-expected ratio obtained by spiking 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts with the indicated concentrations of cCP ranged from 84.6% to 121.5% (mean ± SD, 99.8 ± 8.3%) for serum samples and from 80.3% to 132.1% (mean ± SD, 101.8 ± 13.6%) for fecal extracts.

See Table 1 for remainder of key.

Table 3—

Precision (intra-assay variability) and reproducibility (interassay variability) of a novel RIA for cCP in 6 serum samples and 6 fecal extracts obtained from dogs.

VariableSerumFecal extract
Sample No.Mean ± SD (μg/L)CV (%)Sample No.Mean ± SD (μg/g)CV (%)
Intra-assay variability1656 ± 24.13.9113.8 ± 1.28.5
21,008 ± 23.92.5215.1 ± 1.38.5
31,046 ± 29.93.0326.5 ± 1.34.9
41,457 ± 37.62.7447.6 ± 1.94.0
51,787 ± 47.32.8552.8 ± 2.03.7
62,953 ± 47.61.7654.7 ± 1.93.4
AllNA2.8 ± 0.7AllNA5.5 ± 2.4
Interassay variability1443 ± 33.47.514.9 ± 0.510.4
2678 ± 54.88.1214.2 ± 1.410.0
31,217 ± 63.85.2316.6 ± 1.710.2
41,659 ± 84.85.1425.9 ± 3.212.4
51,941 ± 89.94.6533.8 ± 3.510.4
62,756 ± 241.18.7689.9 ± 11.312.6
AllNA6.6 ± 1.8AllNA11.0 ± 1.2

See Table 1 for key.

This novel RIA was able to detect calprotectin in feline sera. The serial dilution of 3 feline serum samples yielded observed-to-expected ratios between 96.0% and 134.2% (mean ± SD, 113.9 ± 13.9%).

Serum cCP concentrations in samples from 50 healthy pet dogs ranged from 76 to 1,292 μg/L (median, 241 μg/L); the reference interval for serum cCP concentration was established as 92 to 1,121 μg/L (Figure 3) . Median serum cCP concentrations did not differ significantly (P = 0.313) between healthy male and female dogs. Because there were too few sexually intact dogs, a possible correlation between reproductive status and serum cCP concentration could not be investigated. Median serum cCP concentrations did not differ significantly (P = 0.451) among various age groups of healthy dogs. Although significantly (P < 0.001) higher cCP concentrations were detected in plasma, compared with the cCP concentrations in serum (n = 25 paired samples), there was no correlation between serum and plasma concentrations (r = 0.078; Spearman rank sum correlation; Figure 4).

Figure 3—
Figure 3—

Scatterplot of serum cCP concentrations in specimens obtained from 50 healthy pet dogs. Each symbol represents the concentration for a specific dog. The median cCP concentration (solid horizontal line) and reference interval (dashed horizontal lines) were calculated.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 7; 10.2460/ajvr.69.7.845

Figure 4—
Figure 4—

Scatterplot of cCP concentrations in paired serum and plasma samples obtained from 25 dogs. The median cCP concentration measured in plasma samples in which EDTA was used as an anticoagulant (2,011 μg/L) was significantly (P < 0.001) higher, compared with the median cCP concentration measured in serum samples (563 μg/L). The median cCP concentration (solid horizontal line) is indicated for serum and plasma samples, but the reference interval (dashed horizontal lines) is indicated only for the serum samples.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 7; 10.2460/ajvr.69.7.845

For cCP concentrations in 5 spot samples collected from 1 defecation, the CV ranged from 18.4% to 59.8% (mean ± SD, 37.4 ± 14.9%; Table 4). For mean fecal concentrations of cCP in samples obtained during a 5-day sample collection period and in various numbers of samples for each of the 42 healthy dogs, the CV ranged from 0% to 165.9% (mean ± SD, 59.3 ± 42.4%) and from 0% to 178.3% (mean ± SD, 54.7 ± 41.5%), respectively. Although mean fecal concentrations of cCP were not significantly (P = 0.303) different among various combinations of sampling days, the respective CVs were significantly (P < 0.001) different between 2- and 3-day sample collections and between 2- and 4-day sample collections. Fecal concentrations of cCP in 5 samples from each of the 30 healthy pet dogs ranged from < 2.9 to 234.2 μg/g (median, 14.4 μg/g), with mean cCP concentration for 5-day sample collections ranging from < 2.9 to 122.1 μg/g (median, 15.5 μg/g). Mean cCP concentrations for 3-day sample collections in 30 healthy pet dogs ranged from < 2.9 to 142.4 μg/g (median, 20.1 μg/g); the reference interval for fecal concentrations of cCP was established as the mean for 3-day sample collections of < 2.9 to 137.5 μg/g (Figure 5) . Median values for mean fecal concentrations of cCP for 5-day sample collections did not differ significantly (P = 0.314) among healthy pet dogs of various age groups. Compared with concentrations for healthy pet dogs of various breeds, the mean fecal concentrations of cCP for 5-day sample collections were significantly (P = 0.050) higher in healthy, kennel-housed research Beagles (median, 36.5 μg/g). Median age differed significantly (P = 0.002; Mann-Whitney U test) between healthy pet dogs and kennel-housed research Beagles. Duration of storage of fecal samples at 4 temperatures did not cause significant changes in fecal concentrations of cCP (P = 0.674, 0.234, 0.674, and 0.282 for storage at −80°, −20°, 4°, and 23°C, respectively).

Table 4—

Concentrations of cCP in fecal extracts obtained from the same defecation in 4 dogs.

Fecal ExtractDog
1A*1B*234
Spot sample
 111.572.55.72.831.0
 25.4168.015.33.114.4
 37.5139.514.83.615.8
 411.773.313.94.519.2
 523.993.810.83.714.4
 Mean ± SD12.0 ± 7.2109.4 ± 42.512.1 ± 4.03.5 ± 0.718.9 ± 7.0
 CV (%)59.838.933.018.437.0
 Range5.4–23.972.5–168.05.7–15.32.8–4.514.4–31.0
Homogenate
 114.6101.49.33.221.4
 27.5116.59.72.321.5
 310.0120.68.54.221.3
 Mean ± SD10.7 ± 3.6112.8 ± 10.19.2 ± 0.63.2 ± 1.021.4 ± 0.1
 CV (%)33.79.06.330.70.5

Concentrations reported are μg/g of feces.

Represents feces of the same dog from 2 defecations 7 days apart.

Five spot samples (1.3 g/sample) were collected from various portions of the feces from 1 defecation of each dog and extracted.

After the 5 spot samples were collected, the remainder of the feces for the 4 dogs was diluted 1:1 in fecal extraction buffer and thoroughly blended for 5 minutes; 3 aliquots of this homogenate were obtained and extracted (final dilution, 1:5).

Figure 5—
Figure 5—

Scatterplot of fecal concentrations of cCP in samples obtained from 30 healthy pet dogs. Each symbol represents the mean cCP concentration for a 3-day sample collection for a specific dog. See Figure 3 for remainder of key.

Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 7; 10.2460/ajvr.69.7.845

Discussion

An RIA for the measurement of cCP in canine serum samples and fecal extracts was successfully developed. No end-of-run effect was detected for up to 70 aliquots of the same sample. Thus, the assay may be suitable for analysis of large numbers of samples. Analysis of results for the study reported here indicated that 50 μL of serum or 1.3 g of feces is required for accurate determination of cCP with this novel RIA and that specimens can be stored frozen for up to 10 weeks (serum) and at least 2 weeks (feces) for subsequent analysis. Moreover, cCP was stable in fecal samples from healthy dogs for up to 2 weeks at ambient temperature (approx 23°C). This finding potentially eliminates the necessity to ship frozen fecal specimens for laboratory analysis of cCP concentrations.

Sensitivity of the assay was calculated as 29 μg/L of serum or 2.9 μg/g of feces, respectively, which appears to be adequate when considering the reference intervals are 92 to 1,121 μg/L for serum samples and < 2.9 to 137.5 μg/g for fecal extracts, respectively. Our intent was to create a standard curve that encompassed a wide range of cCP concentrations; thus, a relatively concentrated antiserum was chosen for the RIA, which resulted in a loss in assay sensitivity. Considering reference intervals for both types of specimens, the dilutions used for samples, and the purpose of the assay to identify dogs with increased serum or fecal concentrations of cCP, this loss in sensitivity was regarded as inconsequential. An upper limit of the assay working range of more than 3 times the upper limit of the respective reference interval, and an upper limit of the reference interval within the lower third of the respective assay working range, indicated that the RIA has the potential to be highly exact in differentiating between clinically normal dogs and dogs with inflammatory conditions.

Observed-to-expected values for dilutional parallelism and spiking recovery for serum samples and fecal extracts of dogs indicated linearity and accuracy of the RIA. Precision and reproducibility of the assay were evident by the CVs for intra-assay and interassay variability. Because of the unavailability of cCP analogues, analytic specificity of the RIA for cCP could only be determined by use of dilutional parallelism and spiking recovery of cCP in serum and fecal samples from dogs. As more canine S100 proteins or analogues become available in the future, additional research into the specificity of the novel cCP RIA will need to be conducted to clarify this issue.

In contrast to serum calprotectin concentrations in humans,24 serum cCP concentrations were not significantly higher in male dogs. However, it must be emphasized that most of the male dogs tested were neutered.

Lack of correlation between paired serum and plasma concentrations of cCP indicated that serum and plasma concentrations of cCP cannot be quantified interchangeably, which is consistent with results in humans.9 A possible explanation could be time- or temperature-dependent activation of complement that has been reported25 in stored whole blood and plasma, which is then followed by C5a-induced release of calprotectin from PMNs, as determined in vitro.26 Consequently, varying the amount of time between sample collection and analysis could cause variations in plasma cCP concentrations. In contrast, serum clotting activates PMNs, which results in a release of PMN-activation markers (such as calprotectin), irrespective of time and temperature. Another possibility could be EDTA-mediated chelation of Ca2+, which is known to inhibit antigen-antibody reactions. In an attempt to increase specific uptake of cCP during the RIA, RIAB was supplemented with EDTA, which resulted in considerably higher cCP concentrations (data not shown). A high variability of cCP concentrations in plasma samples in the study reported here would suggest that cCP concentrations should be evaluated in serum samples.

Difficulties in generating antiserum against cCP in rabbits by vaccination in accordance with a protocol that has been used successfully for generating polyclonal antibodies against a multitude of antigens were unexpected because human calprotectin has been described as highly immunogenic in rabbits.27 However, the protocol for antibody production in that study27 differed slightly from the one in the study reported here with regard to intervals of injection and the adjuvant. Interestingly, modifying the injection site and increasing the amount of antigen inoculated, both of which are known to increase polyclonal antibody titers against weak immunogens, yielded a moderate anti-cCP titer in 1 rabbit. One possible explanation for an insufficient antibody response against cCP in rabbits could be extensive homology of the amino acid sequence of the antigenic sites of cCP and rabbit calprotectin (S100A8, 75.3%; S100A9, 69.6%28). Conservation of the human pendants, however, was similar at 73.0% and 62.3% for dogs and rabbits, respectively.28 Because the antibody response was similar in both rabbits, idiosyncrasy would appear to be unlikely. In contrast, in Ca2+-containing storage buffer, both cCP proteins (cS100A8 and cS100A9) assemble predominantly to a heterotetrameric complex of approximately 45 kd.d Presumably, this increases the immunogenicity of cCP because its monomeric forms (10.3 and 14.6 kd) are close to the minimum size for an immunogen (3 to 5 kd).

Polypropylene containers were used to store cCP tracer, which decreased the loss attributable to storage to half of the loss during storage in noninert glass containers. This is consistent with a marked affinity of human calprotectin for glass surfaces in the presence of Ca2+ ions27 and, presumably, accelerated catalytic degradation by the noninert surface.

Concentrations of cCP in fecal extracts from individual healthy dogs vary greatly; this could possibly be explained by a patchy emigration of cCP-expressing cells into the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal tract, which has been reported in cats.29 Because prolonged duration in the gastrointestinal tract may result in accumulation or concentration of fecal proteins, gastrointestinal transit time needs to also be considered as a factor in variation of fecal concentrations of cCP over time. Collection of several fecal samples from the same dog may counterbalance this physiologic variation. However, owner compliance and cost need to be considered to arrive at a reasonable compromise between reliability and economy. Consequently, within-subject variation over time was evaluated, and on the basis of the results of our study, analysis of 3 fecal samples collected on consecutive days would appear to satisfy this concern.

Significantly higher fecal concentrations of cCP in the Beagles of the research colony, compared with concentrations in pet dogs of various breeds, indicated a necessity to reevaluate the reference interval for fecal concentrations of cCP in dogs in research colonies. Because fecal concentrations of cCP did not differ significantly among pet dogs of various age groups, this finding cannot be attributed to the significantly higher age for the dogs in the research colony. A breed-specific, higher fecal concentration of cCP in Beagles needs to be considered.

Serum and fecal concentrations of cCP in healthy pet dogs were not normally distributed and contained 3 and 2 outlying datum points for serum and fecal samples, respectively. One possible explanation could be a relationship between body condition score and circulating inflammatory markers, which has been described in humans.30,31 However, because we believed this would have been beyond the scope of the study reported here, data on body condition scores of each dog were not obtained. An association between increased serum or fecal concentrations of cCP and vaccination also needs to be considered, especially when a modified-live viral vaccine or bacterial vaccine is used.

Detection of feline calprotectin by this assay was to be expected because cross-reactivity between cCP and feline calprotectin has been reported.d Moreover, linearity of the RIA for feline serum samples substantiates the potential application for the novel RIA in quantification of calprotectin in cats.

The RIA described in this report was sensitive, linear, accurate, precise, and reproducible, and it appears to have the potential to distinguish healthy dogs from dogs with inflammatory conditions, such as IBD. Further research into the clinical usefulness of the measurement of serum or fecal concentrations of cCP in dogs with inflammatory conditions, such as IBD, is being conducted.

ABBREVIATIONS

B0

Value for the zero-standard tube

B0/TC

Ratio of the value for the zero-standard tube to the total counts for the tracer tube

BSA

Bovine serum albumin

cCP

Canine calprotectin

CPM

Counts per minute

CV

Coefficient of variation

125I

Sodium iodide I 125

IBD

Inflammatory bowel disease

NSB

Nonspecific binding value

PMN

Polymorphonuclear neutrophilic leukocyte

RIA

Radioimmunoassay

RIAB

Radioimmunoassay buffer

TC

Total counts for the tracer tube

a.

Fecal collection tube (101 × 16.5 mm; including spatula), Sarstedt AG & Co, Nümbrecht, Germany.

b.

Complete EDTA-free proteinase inhibitor cocktail tablets, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.

c.

Fisherbrand serum filter system (IB model), Fisher Scientific Inc, Pittsburgh, Pa.

d.

Heilmann RM, Suchodolski JS, Steiner JM, et al. Purification and partial characterization of canine calprotectin (abstr), inProceedings. 25th Annu Am Coll Vet Intern Med Forum 2007;849.

e.

PD-10 desalting column (1.5 × 5 cm), GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Inc, Piscataway, NJ.

f.

Corning polypropylene tubes, Fisher Scientific Inc, Pittsburgh, Pa.

g.

HiTrap NHS-activated HP, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Inc, Piscataway, NJ.

h.

NuPAGE (10% Bis/Tris), Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.

i.

Immunodiffusion plates (agarose gelling), Pierce, Rockford, Ill.

j.

Coomassie Plus, Pierce, Rockford, Ill.

k.

Rabbit serum (sterile-filtered), Sigma-Aldrich Co, St Louis, Mo.

l.

Precipitating solution (N6), Diagnostic Products Corp, Los Angeles, Calif.

m.

Wallac 1470 WIZARD, PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences Inc, Wellesley, Mass.

n.

GraphPad Prism, version 5.0, GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, Calif.

o.

Tissue grinder Polytron PTMR-2100, Kinematica, Littau, Switzerland.

References

  • 1.

    Jergens AE. Clinical assessment of disease activity for canine inflammatory bowel disease. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2004;40:437445.

  • 2.

    Jergens AE, Moore FM, Haynes JS, et al. Idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease in dogs and cats: 84 cases (1987–1990). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;201:16031608.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Allenspach K, Wieland B, Gröne A, et al. Chronic enteropathies in dogs: evaluation of risk factors for negative outcome. J Vet Intern Med 2007;21:700708.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Jergens AE, Schreiner CA, Frank DE, et al. A scoring index for disease activity in canine inflammatory bowel disease. J Vet Intern Med 2003;17:291297.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    McCann TM, Ridyard AE, Else RW, et al. Evaluation of disease activity markers in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. J Small Anim Pract 2007;48:620625.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Johne B, Fagerhol MK, Lyberg T, et al. Functional and clinical aspects of the myelomonocyte protein calprotectin. Mol Pathol 1997;50:113123.

  • 7.

    Stříž I, Trebichavsky´ I. Calprotectin—a pleiotropic molecule in acute and chronic inflammation. Physiol Res 2004;53:245253.

  • 8.

    Sander J, Fagerhol MK, Bakken JS. Plasma levels of the leucocyte L1 protein in febrile conditions: relation to aetiology, number of leucocytes in blood, blood sedimentation reaction and C-reactive protein. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1984;44:357362.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Fagerhol MK, Dale I, Andersson T. Release and quantitation of a leukocyte derived protein (L1). Scand J Haematol 1980;24:393398.

  • 10.

    Lügering N, Stoll R, Kucharzik T, et al. Immunohistochemical distribution and serum levels of the Ca(2+)-binding proteins MRP8, MRP14 and their heterodimeric form MRP8/14 in Crohn's disease. Digestion 1995;56:406414.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Røseth AG, Fagerhol MK, Aadland E, et al. Assessment of the neutrophil dominating protein calprotectin in feces. A methodologic study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:793798.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Tibble J, Teahon K, Thjodleifsson B, et al. A simple method for assessing intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease. Gut 2000;47:506513.

  • 13.

    Røseth AG, Kristinsson J, Fagerhol MK, et al. Faecal calprotectin: a novel test for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer? Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:10731076.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Fagerhol MK. Calprotectin, a faecal marker of organic gastrointestinal abnormality. Lancet 2000;356:17831784.

  • 15.

    Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Bridger S, et al. Surrogate markers of intestinal inflammation are predictive of relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1522.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Røseth AG, Aadland E, Grzyb K. Normalization of faecal calprotectin: a predictor of mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004;39:10171020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Hunter WM, Greenwood FC. Preparation of 131 iodine-labeled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Nature 1962;194:495496.

  • 18.

    Chiang CS. A linear method for determining specific activity of tracers in radioimmunoassays. Clin Chem 1987;33:12451247.

  • 19.

    Ballard P, Stafford LE, Law B. The development and performance of a radioimmunoassay for the analysis of ZM 213,689, the major metabolite of meropenem—a carbapenem antibiotic—in plasma and urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1996;14:409417.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Vaitukaitis J, Robbins J, Nieschlag E, et al. A method for producing specific antisera with small doses of immunogen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1971;33:988991.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Berson SA, Yalow RS. General principles of radioimmunoassay. Clin Chim Acta 1968;22:5169.

  • 22.

    Midgley AR, Niswender GD, Rebar RW. Principles for the assessment of the reliability of radioimmunoassay methods (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity). Acta Endocrinol Suppl (Copenh) 1969;142:163184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Skelley DS, Brown LP, Besch PK. Radioimmunoassay. Clin Chem 1973;19:146186.

  • 24.

    Fagerhol MK, Andersson KB, Naess-Andresen CF, et al. Calprotectin (the L1 leukocyte protein). In: Smith VL, Dedman JR, eds. Stimulus response coupling: the role of intracellular calciumbinding proteins. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press, 1990;187210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Hyllner M, Arnestad JP, Bengtson JP, et al. Complement activation during storage of whole blood, red cells, plasma, and buffy coat. Transfusion 1997;37:264268.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Hetland G, Talgö GJ, Fagerhol MK. Chemotaxins C5a and fMLP induce release of calprotectin (leucocyte L1 protein) from polymorphonuclear cells in vitro. Mol Pathol 1998;51:143148.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Dale I, Fagerhol MK, Naesgaard I. Purification and partial characterization of a highly immunogenic human leukocyte protein, the L1 antigen. Eur J Biochem 1983;134:16.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ensemble Genome Browser Web site. Canis familiaris (CanFam 2.0). Available at: www.ensembl.org/Canis_familiaris/index.html. Accessed Mar 10, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Arndt H, Kubes P, Grisham MB, et al. Granulocyte turnover in the feline intestine. Inflammation 1992;16:549559.

  • 30.

    John BJ, Abulafi AM, Poullis A, et al. Chronic subclinical bowel inflammation may explain increased risk of colorectal cancer in obese people. Gut 2007;56:10341035.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Herder C, Schneitler S, Rathmann W, et al. Low-grade inflammation, obesity and insulin resistance in adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:45694574.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 107 0 0
Full Text Views 3229 2660 158
PDF Downloads 589 236 5
Advertisement