Antibody index and specific antibody quotient in horses after intragastric administration of Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts

Katherine A. Heskett Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

Search for other papers by Katherine A. Heskett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
and
Robert J. MacKay Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

Search for other papers by Robert J. MacKay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To investigate the use of a specific antibody index (AI) that relates Sarcocystis neurona–specific IgG quotient (QSN) to total IgG quotient (QIgG) for the detection of the anti–S neurona antibody fraction of CNS origin in CSF samples obtained from horses after intragastric administration of S neurona sporocysts.

Animals—18 adult horses.

Procedures—14 horses underwent intragastric inoculation (day 0) with S neurona sporocysts, and 4 horses remained unchallenged; blood and CSF samples were collected on days – 1 and 84. For purposes of another study, some challenged horses received intermittent administration of ponazuril (20 mg/kg, PO). Sarcocystis neurona–specific IgG concentrations in CSF (SNCSF) and plasma (SNplasma) were measured via a direct ELISA involving merozoite lysate antigen and reported as ELISA units (EUs; arbitrary units based on a nominal titer for undiluted immune plasma of 100,000 EUs/mL). Total IgG concentrations in CSF (IgGCSF) and plasma (IgGplasma) were quantified via a sandwich ELISA and a radial immunodiffusion assay, respectively; QSN, QIgG, and AI were calculated.

Results—Following sporocyst challenge, mean ± SEM SNCSF and SNplasma increased significantly (from 8.8 ± 1.0 EUs/mL to 270.0 ± 112.7 EUs/mL and from 1,737 ± 245 EUs/mL to 43,169 ± 13,770 EUs/mL, respectively). Challenge did not affect total IgG concentration, QSN, QIgG, or AI.

Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceS neurona–specific IgG detected in CSF samples from sporocyst-challenged horses appeared to be extraneural in origin; thus, this experimental challenge may not reliably result in CNS infection. Calculation of a specific AI may have application to the diagnosis of S neurona–associated myeloencephalitis in horses.

Abstract

Objective—To investigate the use of a specific antibody index (AI) that relates Sarcocystis neurona–specific IgG quotient (QSN) to total IgG quotient (QIgG) for the detection of the anti–S neurona antibody fraction of CNS origin in CSF samples obtained from horses after intragastric administration of S neurona sporocysts.

Animals—18 adult horses.

Procedures—14 horses underwent intragastric inoculation (day 0) with S neurona sporocysts, and 4 horses remained unchallenged; blood and CSF samples were collected on days – 1 and 84. For purposes of another study, some challenged horses received intermittent administration of ponazuril (20 mg/kg, PO). Sarcocystis neurona–specific IgG concentrations in CSF (SNCSF) and plasma (SNplasma) were measured via a direct ELISA involving merozoite lysate antigen and reported as ELISA units (EUs; arbitrary units based on a nominal titer for undiluted immune plasma of 100,000 EUs/mL). Total IgG concentrations in CSF (IgGCSF) and plasma (IgGplasma) were quantified via a sandwich ELISA and a radial immunodiffusion assay, respectively; QSN, QIgG, and AI were calculated.

Results—Following sporocyst challenge, mean ± SEM SNCSF and SNplasma increased significantly (from 8.8 ± 1.0 EUs/mL to 270.0 ± 112.7 EUs/mL and from 1,737 ± 245 EUs/mL to 43,169 ± 13,770 EUs/mL, respectively). Challenge did not affect total IgG concentration, QSN, QIgG, or AI.

Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceS neurona–specific IgG detected in CSF samples from sporocyst-challenged horses appeared to be extraneural in origin; thus, this experimental challenge may not reliably result in CNS infection. Calculation of a specific AI may have application to the diagnosis of S neurona–associated myeloencephalitis in horses.

Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis is a neurologic disease that affects horses that have lived in North or South America.1 In most cases, EPM is caused by the apicomplexan protozoan Sarcocystis neurona.2 Horses are infected by ingestion of S neurona sporocysts shed by infected opossums (Didelphis spp).3

Presently, there is no laboratory test that conclusively establishes the diagnosis of EPM prior to death. Since 1992, several different antibody-based tests have been introduced that provide ancillary support for the diagnosis.4–6 A positive result of these tests includes detection of anti–S neurona antibody in either CSF or serum samples via western blot analysis7 or a high titer of anti–S neurona antibody in serum via an indirect fluorescent antibody test6,8 or an S neurona agglutination test.5

Western blot analysis for S neurona–specific IgG in CSF is still the most widely used ancillary test for EPM in horses. The principle underlying the use of western blot analysis in this context is that the presence of S neurona–specific IgG in CSF is strongly suggestive of infection of the CNS by the organism. Results of an early study9 of horses with histologically confirmed EPM indicated that although western blot analysis of serum had poor specificity for diagnosis of EPM in horses with neurologic disease, western blot analysis of CSF was highly sensitive and specific. By contrast, more recent data10,11 indicated that even western blot analysis of CSF has low specificity and poor positive predictive value for diagnosis of EPM.

With regard to CSF, it is likely that many falsepositive western blot results reflect contamination of samples with antibody-positive blood either during collection or via transfer across a permeable blood-CSF barrier. In CSF samples obtained from horses, results of western blot analysis for detection of antibodies against S neurona can be converted from negative to positive by the introduction of blood with a high antibody titer, even at a concentration as low as 8 RBCs/μL.12

In many instances, positive results of western blot analysis for detection of anti–S neurona antibodies in CSF collected from healthy horses cannot be accounted for by blood contamination alone. For example, positive western blot results have been reported for uncontaminated (< 10 RBCs/μL) CSF samples from 79 of 254 (31%) healthy horses11 and for CSF collected from 4 of 7 horses that had been inoculated with a killed S neurona vaccine and subsequently seroconverted.13 False-positive results that are not attributable to blood contamination likely reflect normal diffusion of anti– S neurona antibody from blood into CSF. At equilibrium, all plasma proteins are partitioned between the CSF and plasma at a fairly constant ratio or quotient.14,15 Thus, as plasma protein concentration increases, there is a proportional increase in concentration of the protein in CSF. For S neurona–specific IgG, the CSF concentration of diffused antibody may increase to reach the threshold of detection via western blot analysis. Consequently, it is possible that a positive western blot result for a sample of CSF obtained from a horse may simply reflect a strong systemic antibody response to S neurona.

To improve the specificity and positive predictive value of western blot analysis (or any other immunologic technique) for the diagnosis of EPM in horses, it is essential that anti–S neurona antibody of systemic origin is distinguished from that of CNS origin. A specific AI that is designed to detect CNS-derived antibody16,17 was adapted from a method introduced for the identification of anti–Toxoplasma gondii antibody synthesized in the anterior chamber of the eye.18 The AI is the ratio of the quotients for the specific antibody of interest and total immunoglobulin. Theoretically, because a specific antibody should be partitioned between blood and CSF in the same ratio as total antibody, AI must be close to 1.0 in healthy animals. Reference ranges for AI for human applications are 0.7 to 1.3, with clinical relevance ascribed to values > 1.4.16 The AI, which identifies a fraction of specific antibody synthesized in the CNS, can be compared with the immunoglobulin index; the immunoglobulin index is the ratio of the total immunoglobulin quotient and Qalb and is used to detect CNS synthesis of immunoglobulin without regard to antibody specificity.19,20 Specific antibody indices have been used clinically to identify CNS involvement in humans infected with agents such as Borrelia burgdorferi,21 Angiostrongylus cantonensis,22 T gondii,23 and Trypanosoma brucei.24

Specific antibody quotients and AI may have application to the diagnosis of EPM in horses. The purpose of the study reported here was to investigate the use of a specific AI that relates QSN to QIgG for the detection of the specific anti–S neurona antibody fraction of CNS origin in CSF samples obtained from horses after administration of S neurona sporocysts. This experimental challenge provided a controlled setting in which to monitor horses that had no anti–S neurona antibody detectable in CSF via western blot analysis initially as they responded to induced S neurona infection. After administration of sporocysts to horses in other studies,25–27 CSF samples yielded positive western blot results at 19 to 61 days after challenge. In some studies,27–29 challenged horses also developed abnormal neurologic signs and inflammatory changes in the CNS consistent with EPM.

Materials and Methods

Sample description—Plasma and CSF samples were obtained from 18 horses used in an S neurona challenge experiment to assess the effect of intermittent administration of ponazuril on infection; complete results are reported elsewhere.30 Samples were available from 4 groups of horses. In group 1 (n = 4), 612,500 S neurona sporocysts were administered intragastrically to each horse (day 0); no antiprotozoal treatment was given. In group 2 (n = 5), 612,500 S neurona sporocysts were administered intragastrically to each horse; treatment with the antiprotozoal drug ponazuril (20 mg/kg, PO) was given every 7 days (beginning day 5 after inoculation). In group 3 (n = 5), 612,500 S neurona sporocysts were administered intragastrically to each horse; treatment with ponazuril (20 mg/kg, PO) was given every 14 days (beginning on day 12 after inoculation). In group 4 (n = 4), horses were neither challenged nor treated. Blood and CSF samples obtained on the day immediately prior to sporocyst challenge (start of study; day −1) and at the termination of the experiment at day 84 (end of study) were analyzed for this study. Cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from anesthetized horses via puncture of the atlantooccipital space. Although RBC counts were not determined, all CSF samples were transparent and colorless; in the experience of the authors, such samples have RBC counts < 100 RBCs/μL (typically < 10 RBCs/μL26,31). Albumin concentrations in CSF and blood samples were determined and used to calculate Qalb as a measure of blood contamination of samples.32

Culture and enrichment of S neurona—The WSU-1 isolate of S neurona was grown in BT cells,a as previously described.33 In brief, BT cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 0.01M HEPES, 1mM sodium pyruvate, penicillin G sodium (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), 2mM L-glutamine, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum; the culture was kept at 37°C in 5% carbon dioxide in air. Sarcocystis neurona merozoites were added to flasks of confluent BT cells. After 7 to 14 days of culture, most BT cells had lysed and released large numbers of merozoites into the medium. Cell debris was removed from culture supernatants by passage through a 24-gauge hypodermic needle followed by low-speed centrifugation (19 × g for 5 minutes). Merozoites were then pelleted via centrifugation at 388 × g for 20 minutes, resuspended in PBSS, and counted. The merozoite suspension was layered over iodixanol with hydrophilic polysaccharide (specific gravity, 1.079)b and centrifuged at 400 × g for 45 minutes. The pellet, which was highly enriched with S neurona merozoites, was then resuspended in PBSS and washed by 5 cycles of centrifugation (507 × g for 10 minutes) and aspiration. Washed merozoites were used for horse inoculations and the S neurona ELISA.

Preparation of polyclonal anti–S neurona antibody—A 3-year-old mixed-breed gelding was used for the provision of anti–S neurona polyclonal antibody. Merozoites were prepared on the day of each inoculation. Approximately 108 live merozoites/dose were administered IM on days 0, 14, and 28 and IV on day 42. Blood was collected 2 weeks after the final inoculation and was used to prepare immune plasma, which was stored frozen in aliquots at −80°C.

Quantification of IgG in CSF via ELISA—A sandwich ELISA34 was developed to measure IgG in equine CSF. Affinity-purified sheep anti-horse IgG heavy and light chainsc were used as the coating antibody, horse reference serumc was used as the standard, and wholemolecule horseradish peroxidase–conjugated rabbit anti-horse IgGd was used as the detecting antibody. The IgG concentration in undiluted reference serum (2,324 mg/dL) was determined via radial immunodiffusion assay.e Coating antibody (1:8,000 in 100 μL of carbonatebicarbonate buffer) was added to microtitration platesf that were kept at 4°C for 3 hours and then washed 4 times with PBSST. Next, blocking buffer (3% bovine serum albumind in PBSST) was added to wells. After incubation at room temperature (approx 22°C) for 20 hours, blocking buffer was washed off and 100 μL of either equine reference serum or an experimental sample was added to each well for an additional period of 1 hour at room temperature. Standard curves for absorbance versus IgG concentration were formed by use of serial 2-fold dilutions of reference serum ranging from 1:80,000 (290 ng/mL) to 1:2,560,000 (9 ng/mL). Cerebrospinal fluid samples were diluted 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 for assay. After washing wells with PBSST, 100 μL of secondary antibody (1:45,000) was added and plates were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Next, plates were washed 4 times and 100 μL of tetramethylbenzidineg peroxidase substrate was added to each well. Thirty minutes later, the reaction was stopped by addition of hydrochloric acid. Plates were assessed at a wavelength of 450 nm.h

A standard curve for optical density (at 450 nm) versus total IgG concentration was generated for each plate, and the best-fit 4-factor sigmoidal curve was determined via nonlinear regression analysis. The IgG concentrations in CSF samples were then quantified by interpolation from the standard curve.

Quantification of IgG concentration in plasma via radial immunodiffusion assay—For determination of total IgG concentration in plasma samples, radial immunodiffusion assays were performed at an external laboratory.i

ELISA for S neurona–specific IgG—For use in the S neurona ELISA, merozoites were prepared as described and mixed with a protein extraction reagentj for 20 minutes. Remaining cell debris was removed via centrifugation (13,000 × g for 10 minutes), and the protein concentration of the lysate was determined by use of a microbicinchoninic acid method.k

A direct ELISA was developed for the detection of S neurona–specific IgG. A stock solution of S neurona lysate (protein concentration, 5.6 mg/mL) was used as the coating antigen, immune plasma from the S neurona–inoculated horse was used for generation of a standard curve, and horseradish peroxidase–labeled rabbit anti-horse IgGc was used as the detecting antibody.

Lysate (100 μL [0.5 μg of protein/mL]) in coating buffer (carbonate-bicarbonate buffer; pH, 9.6) was added to the wells of microtitration plates.g After incubation for 20 hours at 4°C, coated plates were washed 4 times with PBSST. After a 2-hour blocking and washing step, serial 2-fold dilutions of 100 μL of immune plasma (1:800 to 1:25,600 in PBSST) were added for 1 hour at room temperature. Plates were again washed, and detecting antibody (1:2,000 in PBSST) was added to wells; incubation was performed at room temperature for 1 hour. After a final washing procedure, 100 μL of tetramethylbenzidine was added to wells. Plates were shielded from light at room temperature for 15 minutes, and the reaction was then stopped by the addition of hydrochloric acid. Plates were assessed at a wavelength of 450 nm.

A standard curve for log optical density (at 450 nm) versus S neurona IgG titer was generated for each plate, and the best-fit 4-factor sigmoidal curve was determined via nonlinear regression analysis. The S neurona–specific IgG titers of samples on that plate were then determined by interpolation into the standard curve. These values were expressed as EUs, arbitrary units that were based on a nominal titer of 100,000 EUs/mL for undiluted immune plasma.

Western blot analysis—Cerebrospinal fluid samples collected at the start (day −1) and end (day 84) of the study from all 18 study horses underwent western blot analysis. All western blot analyses were performed at a single commercial laboratory.i Results were reported as positive, nonspecific positive, or negative depending on the band pattern revealed by samples.26

Calculation of QSN, QIgG, and AI—The QSN, QIgG, and specific AI were calculated by use of equations as follow:

article image

Statistical analysis—Because results for groups 1 through 4 did not meet assumptions for normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk W test35) or homogeneity of variance (Levene statistic36), group data were analyzed by use of nonparametric tests. Effects of group on Qalb, CSF albumin concentration, SNplasma, SNCSF, QSN, IgGplasma, IgGCSF, QIgG, and AI at each of the 2 time points (ie, start and end of the study) were examined by use of Kruskal-Wallis tests. When a significant effect of group was identified, the difference between values for the pair of groups was explored by use of a Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequent analyses involved comparisons between group 4 (unchallenged control horses; n = 4) and the combined group of challenged horses (groups 1, 2, and 3; 14). Because these reclassified data sets did not meet the homogeneity-of-variance assumption for ANOVA, they were transformed as natural log values. Transformed data were examined via a repeated-measures ANOVA involving the general linear model univariate procedure, with time (ie, start of study vs end of study) as the within-subjects factor and challenge as a between-subjects factor. Effect of challenge was determined as P values for time × challenge. For data grouped by western blot analysis, log-transformed values were analyzed for effect of western blot classification via a 1-factor ANOVA involving the general linear model univariate procedure. When a significant effect of western blot result was identified, the difference between values for a pair of groups was examined post hoc by use of a Tukey honest significant difference test. In all instances, significance was ascribed to a value of P ≤ 0.05. A commercial statistical software packagel was used to perform analyses.

Results

By day 42 after inoculation, CSF samples from all 4 horses in group 1 (those challenged with S neurona sporocysts but not treated with ponazuril) and 7 of the other 10 challenged horses in groups 2 and 3 yielded positive western blot results. All Qalb values (median, 1.38; range, 1.05 to 1.96) were less than the published32 upper limit for adult horses (2.35). Albumin concentrations in CSF samples ranged from 21.8 to 51.6 mg/dL (median, 32.4 mg/dL). Significant effect of treatment or time after S neurona challenge on CSF albumin concentration and Qalb was not identified. Consistent abnormal clinical signs or histologic CNS lesions attributable to S neurona challenge were not observed in the horses of any group.30

Sarcocystis neurona–specific IgG titers in plasma and CSF and total IgG concentration in CSF samples were quantified via an ELISA that was developed for the study. The lower limits of detection for total IgG and S neurona–specific IgG were approximately 10 ng/mL and 3.8 EUs/mL, respectively. For the total IgG ELISA, the mean ± SEM coefficient of variation for repeated assay of samples was 9.1 ± 1.4% within assays and 10.7 ± 1.9% between assays. The coefficient of variation for repeated assay of samples for the S neurona–specific IgG ELISA was 9.3 ± 2.3% within assays and 16.0 ± 4.0% between assays. Although an effort was made to adapt the ELISA for measurement of plasma total IgG concentration, IgG measurements had poor parallelism34; thus, plasma IgG concentration was determined via radial immunodiffusion assay.

Initially, group data were analyzed for effects of time and treatment via nonparametric tests. At the end of the study time point (ie, after sporocyst challenge), significant differences in SNplasma and SNCSF between each of the challenge groups 1, 2, and 3 and control group 4 were detected; however, no effect of ponazuril treatment was identified among groups 1 through 3 for any of the variables examined. Because significant differences were not detected among the S neurona challenge groups, data from these 3 groups were combined for subsequent analyses. When results were log transformed, all data sets relating to comparisons between the group of unchallenged control horses (n = 4) and the combined group of challenged horses (n = 14) met assumptions for normal distribution and equal variance and were evaluated via univariate or repeated-measures general linear model procedures.

Prior to sporocyst challenge at the start of the study, there were no significant differences in any of the variables examined between the challenge and control groups (Table 1). Significant effects of challenge on SNplasma and SNCSF were detected. The CSF-to-plasma ratio of these titers (ie, QSN) did not change significantly after challenge, reflecting the fact that mean plasma and CSF anti–S neurona antibody titers increased proportionally (25- and 31-fold increases, respectively) in horses inoculated with S neurona sporocysts. A significant effect of challenge was not identified for QIgG or AI.

Table 1—

Antibody index and quotients (mean ± SEM) in plasma and CSF samples collected from 14 horses before (day –1) and 84 days after inoculation* (day 0) with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts (start and end of study, respectively) and from 4 unchallenged control horses at similar time points.

VariableGroupStart of studyEnd of studyIntergroup comparison of end of study data (P value)
SNserum (EUs/mL)Control2,010 ± 3014,434 ± 1,257< 0.01
Challenge1,737 ± 24543,169 ± 13,770
SNCSF (EUs/mL)Control9.0 ± 1.29.1 ± 0.7< 0.01
Challenge8.8 ± 1.0270.0 ± 112.7
QSNControl0.46 ± 0.040.35 ± 0.050.32
Challenge0.52 ± 0.040.60 ± 0.10
IgGserum (mg/dL)Control3,369 ± 5563,227 ± 1750.96
Challenge3,135 ± 2013,099 ± 131
IgGCSF (mg/dL)Control14.5 ± 3.019.6 ± 2.90.18
Challenge20.0 ± 1.720.4 ± 2.8
QIgGControl0.42 ± 0.020.59 ± 0.070.06
Challenge0.64 ± 0.020.64 ± 0.07
AIControl1.08 ± 0.090.75 ± 0.150.13
Challenge0.82 ± 0.060.94 ± 0.11

Each horse was administered 612,500 S neurona sporocysts intragastrically.

Horses in the control group were unchallenged and received no antiprotozoal treatment; of the 14 horses in the challenge group 1, 4 received no antiprotozoal treatment, 5 received treatment with ponazuril (20 mg/kg, PO) every 7 days (beginning day 5 after inoculation), and 5 received treatment with ponazuril (20 mg/kg, PO) every 14 days (beginning on day 12 after inoculation).30

A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Western blot results were obtained for all CSF samples. The IgG values were classified on the basis of negative, nonspecific positive, or positive western blot results, and differences among these classification groups were analyzed (Table 2). There were significant effects of western blot classification on SNplasma and SNCSF values. Furthermore, within these variables, each post hoc pairwise comparison revealed a significant difference. Significant effects of western blot classification were not identified for QSN, IgGplasma, IgGCSF, QIgG, or AI.

Table 2—

Antibody index and quotients (mean ± SEM) for plasma and CSF samples collected from 14 horses before (day –1) and 84 days after inoculation* (day 0) with S neurona sporocysts (start and end of study, respectively) and from 4 unchallenged control horses at similar time points after data were classified on the basis of results of western blot analysis of CSF.

VariableWestern blot result (No. of CSF samples)  Pvalue
 Negative (20)Nonspecific positive (5)Positive (11)
SNplasma (EUs/mL)3,455 ± 917a24,303 ± 16,128b59,687 ± 16,882c< 0.01
SNCSF (EUs/mL)8.8 ± 0.5a88.5 ± 59.8b400.4 ± 149.6c< 0.01
QSN0.41 ± 0.040.35 ± 0.060.69 ± 0.140.06
IgGplasma (mg/dL)3,123 ± 1283,537 ± 4583,118 ± 1520.53
IgGCSF (mg/dL)17.5 ± 1.822.0 ± 4.721.7 ± 4.00.53
QIgG0.55 ± 0.050.63 ± 0.110.67 ± 0.10.57
AI0.85 ± 0.110.64 ± 0.161.05 ± 0.140.19

Within a row, values with different superscripts are significantly (P < 0.05) different.

See Table 1 for key.

Discussion

In the present study, an ELISA was developed for quantification of S neurona–specific IgG in plasma and CSF and calculation of QSN (the CSF-to-plasma ratio). Because there is some reported variation in the specificities of serum anti–S neurona antibody among horses37 and heterogeneity in surface antigen expression among different S neurona isolates,38 whole-cell merozoite detergent lysate was used as the ELISA antigen. Calculation of a specific AI does not require detection of antibody against any particular antigen of an infectious agent; instead, AI is based on a presumption that the quotient for the specific antibody of interest (the CSF-to-plasma ratio for any quantifiable antibody against an infectious agent) equals the quotient for total immunoglobulin unless additional specific antibody is synthesized in the CNS.15

Total IgG concentration in CSF samples collected from horses also was successfully measured by use of an ELISA developed specifically for this study. Although the assay was useful over a wide range of CSF IgG concentrations, it was not accurate or reproducible when used for measurement of plasma IgG concentration. Plasma IgG concentration was therefore quantified via a radial immunodiffusion assay that used a goat antibody of the same nominal specificity (equine IgG heavy and light chains) as the sheep capture antibody used in the ELISA. One of the precepts involved in generation of AI is that a quotient pair is the product of a single assay technique.15 Because 2 different IgG assays were used in the present study, it is possible that absolute values for QIgG—and therefore values of AI—were less accurate than they would have been if a single assay had been used. Despite this potential problem, the mean AI value of 0.81 calculated for CSF and plasma samples collected before sporocyst challenge at the start of the study was within the reference range of 0.7 to 1.3 used for most human clinical applications.15,16 Also, because the combination of assays used for generation of QIgG values was the same for all samples, there should have been no effect of assay type on comparisons among groups classified by western blot result or by challenge status. To optimize accuracy and minimize variability of QIgG in future investigations of the use of AI in EPM diagnosis, it will be important to use a technique for IgG quantification that will be effective for both plasma and CSF samples from horses, as has been done previously for calculation of IgG index.20,32

A potential confounding factor in any study involving S neurona assays of CSF is blood contamination of samples. In our study, RBC counts were not performed; thus, the extent of blood contamination of CSF samples could not be evaluated. However, for various reasons, it is unlikely that such contamination affected study results and conclusions. All samples were clear and transparent and were obtained from the atlantooccipital site during anesthesia; in the authors' experience, such samples reliably have < 10 RBCs/μL and certainly < 100 RBCs/μL. Any effect of RBC contamination should be distributed randomly across groups and should not cause an artifactual treatment effect. All values for Qalb (a crude measure of blood contamination) were < 2.0. Because blood contamination would equally increase the plasma IgG contribution to the numerator and denominator of the equation for AI, effects of blood contamination should be slight. For example, for a hypothetic set of CSF and plasma samples with values of SNplasma = 40,000 EUs/mL and IgGplasma = 3,000 mg/dL versus SNCSF = 150 EUs/mL and IgGCSF = 12 mg/dL (similar to those found in the present study), addition of blood containing 107 RBCs/μL to CSF at a final concentration of 1,000 RBCs/μL would change the AI value from 0.938 to 0.939.

Even with the technical limitations described, the effect of S neurona sporocyst challenge on QSN and AI was interesting. Despite the 25-fold increase in mean S neurona–specific IgG titer in CSF following sporocyst challenge, QSN and AI did not change significantly. Similarly, significant effects of western blot classification on QSN and AI were not detected even though the mean anti– S neurona antibody titer of CSF samples that yielded positive results via western blot analysis (400.4 EUs/mL) was significantly greater than that of samples that yielded negative results via western blot analysis (8.8 EUs/mL). Taken together, these results suggested that the increase in mean intrathecal anti–S neurona antibody titer associated with sporocyst challenge was not attributable to synthesis within the CNS, but simply reflected increased circulating anti–S neurona antibody concentration. Because the AI relates S neurona–specific IgG titer to total IgG concentration, movement of specific antibody into the CSF, whether as a result of passive diffusion across an intact blood-CSF barrier, leakage across a porous barrier, or blood contamination during sample collection, would not be expected to affect AI.

In the present study, horses inoculated with 612,500 S neurona sporocysts did not develop consistent abnormal neurologic signs or have histologic findings indicative of CNS infection; however, CSF samples obtained from all challenged but untreated horses yielded positive western blot results at 42 days after challenge, which is consistent with the range of 19 to 61 days for post challenge immunoconversion in CSF in previously reported studies.25–27 In light of the AI values determined in challenged horses, which were not considered abnormal on the basis of data from humans, these results raise the possibility that experimental S neurona sporocyst challenge in horses may not reliably result in CNS infection. It is possible that QSN and AI would be abnormally high in horses that underwent more aggressive challenge protocols than that used in the present study. For example, horses given 106 biologically active sporocysts and then transported over long distances consistently developed abnormal clinical signs and some had CNS inflammation.25

Although analysis of clinical samples was not part of the present study, it is reasonable to assume that QSN and AI values would be high in samples from horses with EPM. Antibody index values in samples from humans with neuroborreliosis are > 2.0 according to approved diagnostic criteria.39 By contrast, samples from humans with nonneurologic borreliosis or other infectious forms of encephalitis (attributable to infection with herpes simplex virus, HIV, or herpes zoster virus) have AI values < 1.415,39; reciprocal specificity for AIs for agents involved in these other forms of encephalitis was also determined.

A potential advantage of determination of AI in the diagnosis of EPM in horses is that the technique should accurately identify the CNS-derived fraction of specific antibody and diminish the specificity problems of currently available tests that rely on the presence of antibody in CSF (western blot analysis),9 semiquantification of anti–S neurona antibody in CSF (semiquantitative western blot analysis),26 or preset serum antibody titer ranges (indirect fluorescent antibody testing).6 The IgG index, a calculation derived from QIgG and Qalb, has been used in an effort to identify CNS-derived anti– S neurona antibody.20,32 However, because the IgG index does not use specific antibody and is exquisitely sensitive to contamination of CSF samples with blood,12 it appears to have little usefulness in the diagnosis of EPM. Because AI assumes that blood-origin specific antibody would be in the same proportion in CSF as it is in blood, low-level blood contamination should not affect the accuracy or interpretation of AI.

Most applications of AI in human medicine require measurement of specific antibody of multiple isotypes.17,40 The diagnostic usefulness of each isotype is difficult to predict on the basis of serum isotype profiles. Immunoglobulin G, IgA, and IgM dominance are characteristic of the intrathecal antibody responses of humans with neurosyphilis-, neurotuberculosis-, or mumps-associated encephalitis, respectively.15 It is not known which immunoglobulin isotype is most important during the CNS response to S neurona. Although all currently available commercial diagnostic tests detect S neurona–specific IgG, S neurona-specific IgM has been detected by use of western blot in serum and CSF obtained from horses inoculated with S neurona sporocysts.41 Sarcocystis neurona immunoassays, such as the one used by the authors and previously by others,37,38,41 are easily adapted to measurement of different isotypes, and generation of contemporaneous AIs for multiple isotypes could provide greater predictive power than that provided by the IgG AI alone.

In the present study, a specific anti–S neurona AI was used to investigate the origins of S neurona–specific IgG in CSF samples obtained from horses inoculated with S neurona sporocysts. At 42 days after challenge, CSF samples collected from most of the challenged horses yielded positive western blot results, but S neurona–specific IgG appeared to be of systemic origin. Additional investigation will be required to determine the usefulness of AI for diagnosis of EPM in horses.

ABBREVIATIONS

EPM

Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis

AI

Antibody index

Qalb

Albumin quotient

QSN

Anti–Sarcocystis neurona antibody quotient

QIgG

Quotient for total IgG

BT

Bovine turbinate

PBSS

PBS solution

PBSST

PBS solution with 0.5% Tween 20

EU

ELISA unit

SNCSF

Concentration of S neurona–specific IgG in CSF

SNplasma

Concentration of S neurona–specific IgG in plasma

IgGCSF

Total IgG concentration in CSF

IgGplasma

Total IgG concentration in plasma

a.

CRL-1390, ATCC, Manassas, Va.

b.

Optiprep, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo.

c.

Bethyl Laboratories Inc, Montgomery, Tex.

d.

Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo.

e.

VMRD Inc, Pullman, Wash.

f.

Immulon 2 HB, Thermo Labsystems, Franklin, Mass.

g.

SureBlue, KPL Inc, Gaithersburg, Md.

h.

Bio-Tek plate reader, Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, Vt.

i.

Neogen, Lexington, Ky.

j.

Yeast protein extraction reagent, Pierce Biotechnology Inc, Rockford, Ill.

k.

Microtiter plate protocol, Pierce Biotechnology Inc, Rockford, Ill.

l.

SPSS, version 12.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill.

References

  • 1.

    Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Saville WJ, et al. A review of Sarcocystis neurona and equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). Vet Parasitol 2001;95:89131.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Dubey JP, Davis SW, Speer CA, et al. Sarcocystis neurona n. sp. (Protozoa: Apicomplexa), the etiologic agent of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. J Parasitol 1991;77:212218.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Fenger CK, Granstrom DE, Langemeier JL, et al. Identification of opossums (Didelphis virginiana) as the putative definitive host of Sarcocystis neurona. J Parasitol 1995;81:916919.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Granstrom DE, Dubey JP, Davis SW, et al. Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis: antigen analysis of cultured Sarcocystis neurona merozoites. J Vet Diagn Invest 1993;5:8890.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Dubey JP, Mitchell SM, Morrow JK, et al. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Toxoplasma gondii in wild horses from central Wyoming. J Parasitol 2003;89:716720.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Duarte PC, Daft BM, Conrad PA, et al. Evaluation and comparison of an indirect fluorescent antibody test for detection of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona, using serum and cerebrospinal fluid of naturally and experimentally infected, and vaccinated horses. J Parasitol 2004;90:379386.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Granstrom DE. Recent advances in the laboratory diagnosis of equine parasitic diseases. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1995;11:437442.

  • 8.

    Duarte PC, Daft BM, Conrad PA, et al. Comparison of a serum indirect fluorescent antibody test with two Western blot tests for the diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. J Vet Diagn Invest 2003;15:813.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Granstrom DE. Diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis: western blot analysis, in Proceedings. 11th Annu Meet Am Coll Vet Intern Med Forum 1993;587589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Daft BM, Barr BC, Gardner IA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of western blot testing of cerebrospinal fluid and serum for diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis in horses with and without neurologic abnormalities. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:10071013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Bernard WV. Equine protozoal myelitis—laboratory tests and interpretation, in Proceedings. Int Equine Neurol Conf 1997;711.

  • 12.

    Miller MM, Sweeney CR, Russell GE, et al. Effects of blood contamination of cerebrospinal fluid on western blot analysis for detection of antibodies against Sarcocystis neurona and on albumin quotient and immunoglobulin G index in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215:6771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Witonsky S, Morrow JK, Leger C, et al. Sarcocystis neurona-specific immunoglobulin G in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of horses administered S neurona vaccine. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:98103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Reiber H. Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta 2001;310:173186.

  • 15.

    Reiber H, Peter JB. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis: disease-related data patterns and evaluation programs. J Neurol Sci 2001;184:101122.

  • 16.

    Felgenhauer K, Reiber H. The diagnostic significance of antibody specificity indices in multiple sclerosis and herpes virus induced diseases of the nervous system. Clin Invest 1992;70:2837.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Reiber H, Lange P. Quantification of virus-specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: sensitive and specific detection of antibody synthesis in brain. Clin Chem 1991;37:11531160.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Goldmann H, Witmer R. Antikorper im Kammerwasser. Ophthalmologica 1954;127:323330.

  • 19.

    Ganrot K, Laurell CB. Measurement of IgG and albumin content of cerebrospinal fluid, and its interpretation. Clin Chem 1974;20:571573.

  • 20.

    Andrews FM, Geiser DR, Sommardahl CS, et al. Albumin quotient, IgG concentration, and IgG index determinations in cerebrospinal fluid of neonatal foals. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:741745.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Tumani H, Nolker G, Reiber H. Relevance of cerebrospinal fluid variables for early diagnosis of neuroborreliosis. Neurology 1995;45:16631670.

  • 22.

    Dorta-Contreras AJ, Reiber H. Intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins in eosinophilic meningoencephalitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1998;5:452455.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Contini C, Fainardi E, Cultrera R, et al. Advanced laboratory techniques for diagnosing Toxoplasma gondii encephalitis in AIDS patients: significance of intrathecal production and comparison with PCR and ECL-western blotting. J Neuroimmunol 1998;92:2937.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Lejon V, Reiber H, Legros D, et al. Intrathecal immune response pattern for improved diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in trypanosomiasis. J Infect Dis 2003;187:14751483.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Sofaly CD, Reed SM, Gordon JC, et al. Experimental induction of equine protozoan myeloencephalitis (EPM) in the horse: effect of Sarcocystis neurona sporocyst inoculation dose on the development of clinical neurologic disease. J Parasitol 2002;88:11641170.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Cutler TJ, MacKay RJ, Ginn PE, et al. Immunoconversion against Sarcocystis neurona in normal and dexamethasone-treated horses challenged with S. neurona sporocysts. Vet Parasitol 2001;95:197210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Fenger CK, Granstrom DE, Gajadhar AA, et al. Experimental induction of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis in horses using Sarcocystis sp. sporocysts from the opossum (Didelphis virginiana). Vet Parasitol 1997;68:199213.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Saville WJ, Sofaly CD, Reed SM, et al. An equine protozoal myeloencephalitis challenge model testing a second transport after inoculation with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts. J Parasitol 2004;90:14061410.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Saville WJ, Stich RW, Reed SM, et al. Utilization of stress in the development of an equine model for equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. Vet Parasitol 2001;95:211222.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    MacKay RJ, Tanhauser ST, Gillis KD, et al. Effect of intermittent oral administration of ponazuril on experimental Sarcocystis neurona infection of horses. Am J Vet Res 2008;69:403409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Cutler TJ, MacKay RJ, Ginn PE, et al. Are Sarcocystis neurona and Sarcocystis falcatula synonymous? A horse infection challenge. J Parasitol 1999;85:301305.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Andrews FM, Maddux JM, Faulk D. Total protein, albumin quotient, IgG and IgG index determinations for horse cerebrospinal fluid. Prog Vet Neurol 1996;1:197204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Long MT, Hines MT, Knowles DP, et al. Sarcocystis neurona: parasitemia in a severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) horse fed sporocysts. Exp Parasitol 2002;100:150154.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Harlow E, Lane DP. Immunoassays. In: Harlow E, Lane DP, eds. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988;553613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965;52:591611.

  • 36.

    Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variance. In: Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, et al, eds. Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Palo Alto, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1960;278292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Hoane JS, Morrow JK, Saville WJ, et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of equine antibodies specific to Sarcocystis neurona surface antigens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005;12:10501056.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Marsh AE, Hyun C, Barr BC, et al. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies developed against Sarcocystis neurona. Parasitol Res 2002;88:501506.

  • 39.

    Wilske B. Microbiological diagnosis in Lyme borreliosis. Int J Med Microbiol 2002;291(suppl 33):114119.

  • 40.

    Reiber H. Flow rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)—a concept common to normal blood-CSF barrier function and to dysfunction in neurological diseases. J Neurol Sci 1994;122:189203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Murphy JE, Marsh AE, Reed SM, et al. Development and evaluation of a Sarcocystis neurona-specific IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Vet Intern Med 2006;20:322328.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Contributor Notes

Ms. Heskett's present address is 8398 E 450 South, Carthage, IN 46115.

Supported by the State of Florida Pari-Mutuel Wagering Trust Fund.

Address correspondence to Dr. MacKay.
  • 1.

    Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Saville WJ, et al. A review of Sarcocystis neurona and equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). Vet Parasitol 2001;95:89131.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Dubey JP, Davis SW, Speer CA, et al. Sarcocystis neurona n. sp. (Protozoa: Apicomplexa), the etiologic agent of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. J Parasitol 1991;77:212218.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Fenger CK, Granstrom DE, Langemeier JL, et al. Identification of opossums (Didelphis virginiana) as the putative definitive host of Sarcocystis neurona. J Parasitol 1995;81:916919.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Granstrom DE, Dubey JP, Davis SW, et al. Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis: antigen analysis of cultured Sarcocystis neurona merozoites. J Vet Diagn Invest 1993;5:8890.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Dubey JP, Mitchell SM, Morrow JK, et al. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Toxoplasma gondii in wild horses from central Wyoming. J Parasitol 2003;89:716720.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Duarte PC, Daft BM, Conrad PA, et al. Evaluation and comparison of an indirect fluorescent antibody test for detection of antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona, using serum and cerebrospinal fluid of naturally and experimentally infected, and vaccinated horses. J Parasitol 2004;90:379386.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Granstrom DE. Recent advances in the laboratory diagnosis of equine parasitic diseases. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1995;11:437442.

  • 8.

    Duarte PC, Daft BM, Conrad PA, et al. Comparison of a serum indirect fluorescent antibody test with two Western blot tests for the diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. J Vet Diagn Invest 2003;15:813.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Granstrom DE. Diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis: western blot analysis, in Proceedings. 11th Annu Meet Am Coll Vet Intern Med Forum 1993;587589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Daft BM, Barr BC, Gardner IA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of western blot testing of cerebrospinal fluid and serum for diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis in horses with and without neurologic abnormalities. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:10071013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Bernard WV. Equine protozoal myelitis—laboratory tests and interpretation, in Proceedings. Int Equine Neurol Conf 1997;711.

  • 12.

    Miller MM, Sweeney CR, Russell GE, et al. Effects of blood contamination of cerebrospinal fluid on western blot analysis for detection of antibodies against Sarcocystis neurona and on albumin quotient and immunoglobulin G index in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215:6771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Witonsky S, Morrow JK, Leger C, et al. Sarcocystis neurona-specific immunoglobulin G in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of horses administered S neurona vaccine. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:98103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Reiber H. Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta 2001;310:173186.

  • 15.

    Reiber H, Peter JB. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis: disease-related data patterns and evaluation programs. J Neurol Sci 2001;184:101122.

  • 16.

    Felgenhauer K, Reiber H. The diagnostic significance of antibody specificity indices in multiple sclerosis and herpes virus induced diseases of the nervous system. Clin Invest 1992;70:2837.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Reiber H, Lange P. Quantification of virus-specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: sensitive and specific detection of antibody synthesis in brain. Clin Chem 1991;37:11531160.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Goldmann H, Witmer R. Antikorper im Kammerwasser. Ophthalmologica 1954;127:323330.

  • 19.

    Ganrot K, Laurell CB. Measurement of IgG and albumin content of cerebrospinal fluid, and its interpretation. Clin Chem 1974;20:571573.

  • 20.

    Andrews FM, Geiser DR, Sommardahl CS, et al. Albumin quotient, IgG concentration, and IgG index determinations in cerebrospinal fluid of neonatal foals. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:741745.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Tumani H, Nolker G, Reiber H. Relevance of cerebrospinal fluid variables for early diagnosis of neuroborreliosis. Neurology 1995;45:16631670.

  • 22.

    Dorta-Contreras AJ, Reiber H. Intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins in eosinophilic meningoencephalitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1998;5:452455.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Contini C, Fainardi E, Cultrera R, et al. Advanced laboratory techniques for diagnosing Toxoplasma gondii encephalitis in AIDS patients: significance of intrathecal production and comparison with PCR and ECL-western blotting. J Neuroimmunol 1998;92:2937.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Lejon V, Reiber H, Legros D, et al. Intrathecal immune response pattern for improved diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in trypanosomiasis. J Infect Dis 2003;187:14751483.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Sofaly CD, Reed SM, Gordon JC, et al. Experimental induction of equine protozoan myeloencephalitis (EPM) in the horse: effect of Sarcocystis neurona sporocyst inoculation dose on the development of clinical neurologic disease. J Parasitol 2002;88:11641170.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Cutler TJ, MacKay RJ, Ginn PE, et al. Immunoconversion against Sarcocystis neurona in normal and dexamethasone-treated horses challenged with S. neurona sporocysts. Vet Parasitol 2001;95:197210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Fenger CK, Granstrom DE, Gajadhar AA, et al. Experimental induction of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis in horses using Sarcocystis sp. sporocysts from the opossum (Didelphis virginiana). Vet Parasitol 1997;68:199213.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Saville WJ, Sofaly CD, Reed SM, et al. An equine protozoal myeloencephalitis challenge model testing a second transport after inoculation with Sarcocystis neurona sporocysts. J Parasitol 2004;90:14061410.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Saville WJ, Stich RW, Reed SM, et al. Utilization of stress in the development of an equine model for equine protozoal myeloencephalitis. Vet Parasitol 2001;95:211222.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    MacKay RJ, Tanhauser ST, Gillis KD, et al. Effect of intermittent oral administration of ponazuril on experimental Sarcocystis neurona infection of horses. Am J Vet Res 2008;69:403409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Cutler TJ, MacKay RJ, Ginn PE, et al. Are Sarcocystis neurona and Sarcocystis falcatula synonymous? A horse infection challenge. J Parasitol 1999;85:301305.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Andrews FM, Maddux JM, Faulk D. Total protein, albumin quotient, IgG and IgG index determinations for horse cerebrospinal fluid. Prog Vet Neurol 1996;1:197204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Long MT, Hines MT, Knowles DP, et al. Sarcocystis neurona: parasitemia in a severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) horse fed sporocysts. Exp Parasitol 2002;100:150154.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Harlow E, Lane DP. Immunoassays. In: Harlow E, Lane DP, eds. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988;553613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965;52:591611.

  • 36.

    Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variance. In: Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, et al, eds. Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Palo Alto, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1960;278292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Hoane JS, Morrow JK, Saville WJ, et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of equine antibodies specific to Sarcocystis neurona surface antigens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005;12:10501056.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Marsh AE, Hyun C, Barr BC, et al. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies developed against Sarcocystis neurona. Parasitol Res 2002;88:501506.

  • 39.

    Wilske B. Microbiological diagnosis in Lyme borreliosis. Int J Med Microbiol 2002;291(suppl 33):114119.

  • 40.

    Reiber H. Flow rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)—a concept common to normal blood-CSF barrier function and to dysfunction in neurological diseases. J Neurol Sci 1994;122:189203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Murphy JE, Marsh AE, Reed SM, et al. Development and evaluation of a Sarcocystis neurona-specific IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Vet Intern Med 2006;20:322328.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement