Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, α2-adrenoceptor agonists, and opioids are the most commonly used drug classes to provide analgesia in horses. Although each of these can be effective individually or in combinations, they can also have substantial adverse effects.1–7 Equine clinicians continue to search for drugs to be used for pain management that cause less severe cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or behavioral changes than currently available analgesics.
Ketamine hydrochloride is a noncompetitive antagonist at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the spinal cord.8–11 It also has effects on opioid,12,13 monoaminergic,14 and muscarinic receptors,13,15,16 as well as voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels.17,18 Following IV administration, ketamine undergoes widespread distribution.19 Biotransformation occurs in the liver where the drug is converted to norketamine.20 At anesthetic doses, ketamine has a variety of cardiovascular effects, including increases in cardiac index, mean aortic pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, and heart rate.21–24 Ketamine does not appear to have an effect on gastrointestinal motility and has only minimal and transient effects on ventilation.24,25 In fact, ketamine appears to decrease airway resistance in dogs and humans.26,27
Subanesthetic amounts of ketamine have been used to provide analgesia in small companion animal and human patients.28–32 Following oral or IM administration in people, serum concentrations of ketamine as low as 0.04 and 0.150 μg/mL, respectively, have been associated with analgesia.28 Ketamine has been evaluated for its use in human patients with asthma,33 limb amputations,34 and chronic pain. It has also been examined for its analgesic effects following ovariohysterectomy and limb amputations in dogs.29,30
In horses, ketamine has been used for more than 2 decades as an injectable anesthetic agent in conjunction with α2-adrenoceptor agonists such as xylazine. Ketamine is usually administered IV at a dose of 2.2 mg/kg, and anesthesia is maintained with circulating concentrations of approximately 1 μg of ketamine/mL.35 Infusions of ketamine have been shown to decrease the minimum alveolar concentration of halothane in horses.23 Without prior medication with drugs such as xylazine or diazepam, this dose of ketamine can cause undesirable excitation and muscular rigidity.36 More recently, ketamine has been used by caudal epidural injection to provide analgesia for the perineal region and locally for peripheral nerve blocks in the distal portion of the limbs of horses.37,38 Pharmacokinetic properties of a single dose of ketamine in horses, mules, and donkeys have been evaluated.35,39,40 The disappearance half-life ranged from 42 to 65 minutes in horses.35,39
To provide long-term analgesia in people, ketamine administration at 0.3 to 1.2 mg/kg/h as a CRI has been recommended.41 This regimen allows the effects of ketamine to be titrated as well as prevents substantial variation in analgesic effects as serum concentrations fluctuate between subsequent doses. To our knowledge, no reports exist on the pharmacokinetics or clinical assessment of a CRI of subanesthetic amounts of ketamine to horses.
Ketamine could represent an analgesic drug for use in equine patients that are systemically compromised from cardiovascular, respiratory, or gastrointestinal diseases. On the basis of clinical experience and research with other species, we hypothesize that ketamine can be used safely as an analgesic agent in horses. The purposes of the study reported here were to determine an appropriate dose, evaluate clinical physical examination and hemodynamic parameters associated with this dose, and describe the pharmacokinetics of CRI ketamine in horses.
Materials and Methods
Animals—Eight horses (2 for a pilot study and 6 for the principal study) were used. The pilot study horses consisted of a 10-year-old Quarter Horse gelding with a body weight of 550 kg and a 22-year-old Arabian mare with a body weight of 384 kg. The 6 principal study horses included 2 breeds (3 Quarter Horses and 3 Thoroughbreds) with a median body weight of 498 kg (range, 366 to 623 kg). Three of the principal study horses were mares, and 3 were geldings. Approval of the study was obtained from the University Laboratory Animal Care Committee at Texas A&M University.
Prior to the start of the infusions, body weight of each horse was recorded by use of a digital walk-on scale, a complete physical examination was performed, and catheters were placed in both jugular veins of each horse. Ketamine hydrochloridea was diluted in saline (0.9% NaCl) solution to a concentration of 3 mg/mL and administered IV through the left-sided catheter with an infusion pump.b
Pilot study—Each horse was maintained in a padded recovery stall during the infusion of ketamine and for 2 hours following the end of infusion. Feed was withheld during the infusion, but intermittent access to water was provided. The first horse received ketamine HCl at a rate of 0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours, followed by 0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours, with a total infusion time of 12 hours. The second horse received ketamine HCl at a rate of 0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours, followed by 1.6 mg/kg/h for 2 hours. The latter infusion was stopped prematurely as a result of behavioral changes in this horse.
Throughout the infusion, horses were under continuous observation and the heart rate was recorded every 15 minutes. Activity, as measured by the number of right forelimb footsteps within a 2-minute period, was also recorded every 15 minutes according to a previously described technique.42 Blood samples, approximately 20 mL, were serially collected throughout the infusions and processed as will be described.
Principal study—The 6 horses used in this part of the study were housed in indoor stalls for a total of 84 hours (48 hours prior to infusion, 12 hours during infusion, and 24 hours following infusion) with free access to feed (Bermuda grass hay) and water. The dose of ketamine HCl was randomized as follows: 3 horses received the high dose (0.8 mg/kg/h) for 6 hours, followed by the low dose (0.4 mg/kg/h) for 6 hours. The other 3 horses received the low dose (0.4 mg/kg/h) for 6 hours, followed by the high dose (0.8 mg/kg/h) for 6 hours.
Blood samples were collected from the right jugular vein prior to the start of the infusions, at 30-minute intervals throughout the infusion, and at 30-minute intervals for 6 hours following the end of infusion. All blood samples were collected into evacuated tubes containing lithium heparin.
Values for physiologic variables were recorded prior to the start of infusion, at 1-hour intervals during the infusion, and at 1-hour intervals for 6 hours following the end of infusion. Heart rate was evaluated by cardiac auscultation, and respiratory rate was recorded by observation of thoracic movement. Indirect blood pressure measurements were made by use of a tail cuff and a recorder,c according to product guidelines43 and as previously described.44 Tail cuffs were placed prior to the start of the study and fixed in place with adhesive tape to ensure consistency of placement throughout the study.
Analgesic testing was performed prior to the start of infusion, at 6 hours into the infusion (immediately before dose change), at 12 hours into the infusion (immediately before stopping), and at 6 hours after the end of infusion. Testing was performed with a modified hoof tester fitted with an electronic force transducer (load cell)d to measure isometric force applied to the withers and radius.45 The force was manually applied and increased until either the point of gross purposeful movement or a total elapsed period of 1 minute. Gross purposeful movement was defined as lifting of the leg when the stimulus was applied to the radius and reflex skin twitch when the stimulus was applied to the withers. The applied force was amplified, displayed by a signal processor,e and then recorded. Locations for placement of the hoof tester were identified prior to the study, and the overlying hair was clipped to maintain consistent placement between measurements. The location at the withers was approximately 5 cm to either side of the highest point. The location at the radius was approximately 6 cm proximal to the accessory carpal bone. All measurements were performed 3 times with approximately 1 minute of rest between each force application.
Plasma ketamine concentrations—Plasma was harvested by centrifugation and frozen at 80°C until analyzed. Following solid-phase extraction, concentrations of ketamine in plasma were determined by HPLC. Samples were extracted in triplicate and randomly analyzed. Mepivacaine (8.72 μg) was added as an internal standard to 4 mL of plasma, followed by addition of 5 mL of 0.2M phosphate buffer (pH, 5.2).
Samples were loaded onto a preconditioned (5 mL of methanol and 5 mL of HPLC grade water, followed by 3 mL of 1N acetic acid) 500-mg C8-aromatic sulfonic acid mixedbed solid-phase extraction column. The column was rinsed with 5 mL of 0.2M phosphate buffer, followed by 3 mL of 1N acetic acid and then 5 mL of methanol. It was then dried for 15 minutes under a vacuum of 10 to 15 inches of mercury, followed by washing with 5 mL of hexane and then 5 mL of methanol. Ketamine was eluted with 5 mL of a solution of dichloromethane:methanol:ammonium hydroxide (60:40:4; vol/vol). Samples were dried under nitrogen at 45°C. The residue was dissolved in 300 μL of a solution of dichloromethane:isopropanol (10:1; vol/vol) and then transferred into an HPLC vial. Samples were dried under nitrogen and resuspended in 60 μL of HPLC solvent.
The HPLC instrument was equipped with a C-18 column (2.0 × 250 mm). The mobile phase was acetonitrile (water with 3% triethylamine:3% tetrahydrofuran; pH adjusted to 5.3 with phosphoric acid [7:93; vol/vol]). The injection volume was 20 μL. Wavelengths monitored were 208 nm (used for quantification) and 216 nm. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min.
Calibrators were prepared in duplicate by addition of appropriate volumes of ketamine to 4 mL of blank plasma. Calibrators had internal standards added and were extracted as already described. Calibrators were prepared by the addition of the appropriate volume of ketamine to produce concentrations of 1.084, 0.650, 0.434, 0.325, 0.217, and 0.108 μg/mL. Quality control samples were prepared in triplicate at each concentration and extracted as already described. Quality control samples were prepared by spiking 4 mL of blank equine plasma with the appropriate volume of ketamine to produce concentrations of 0.615, 0.383, and 0.182 μg/mL.
Pharmacokinetic analysis—Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with commercial software.f The mean value of the triplicate analysis for concentrations of ketamine in plasma was used for modeling. All values below the limit of quantification (0.047 μg/mL) were excluded. Concentration-time course for each horse was analyzed individually, and the values reported as median (range) for the group were analyzed statistically. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used on the basis of a prerequisite of achieving an absorption and distribution equilibrium.
The following measurable parameters were estimated by use of pharmacokinetics software: Css was the concentration of drug in plasma at steady state; AUC was the area under the timeversus-concentration curve to the last time point of infusion, estimated by use of the trapezoidal method; AUMC was the area under the moment curve and was the plot of time versus concentration × time from time zero to infinity; KE was the elimination rate constant, estimated by use of the plasma concentration at time points during the approach to steady state. The following derived parameters were then calculated with the pharmacokinetics program with the following equations:


where Cl is total body clearance and ko is the infusion rate,


where Vss is the apparent volume of distribution at steady state and dose = ko (time of infusion),


where MRT is the mean residence time,


where Kd is the rate constant of disappearance,


where T1/2d is the half-life of disappearance, and


where T1/2E is the half-life of elimination and K10 is the rate constant of elimination from the central compartment.
Ketamine analysis—The limit of quantitation for ketamine (signal to noise > 10 and the quantitative level was within ± 20% of target) was 0.047 μg/mL. Withinand between-day precision was calculated by use of a 1-way ANOVA and values for the mean sum of squares. Mean accuracy was 114%, 102%, and 112% for the 0.615, 0.383, and 0.182 μg/mL concentrations, respectively. Estimates of within-day coefficients of variation for concentrations of 0.615, 0.383, and 0.182 μg of ketamine/mL of plasma were 14.8%, 13.9%, and 16.8%; between-day coefficients of variation were 22.9%, 15.9%, and 17.2%.
Statistical analysis—Statistical analysis was performed with commercial software.g Comparisons of physiologic variables were made between values obtained from low-dose ketamine administration in all 6 horses and values obtained from high-dose ketamine administration in all 6 horses. Specifically, the preinfusion value, the 6-hour infusion value, the 12-hour infusion value, and the 6-hour postinfusion value were compared by use of a nonparametric ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) test. When over-all group differences were significant (P < 0.05), pairwise comparisons were made with the post hoc Dunn test. Values for the respective pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the 2 doses by use of a Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Pilot study—The first horse (0.4 and 0.8 mg/kg/h) did not have any signs of adversity. The second horse did not have any abnormal behavior at the lower dose (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), but approximately 2 hours after the start of infusion of the high dose (1.6 mg/kg/h), the horse had signs of excitation. The previously described activity score, as measured by the number of right forelimb footsteps within a 2-minute period, ranged from 0 to 29 during low-dose ketamine administration in this horse but ranged from 32 to 57 during high-dose ketamine administration. Initially, that horse had exaggerated responses to movement, light, and noise. The behavior increased in severity to the point that the infusion was discontinued. A blood sample that was obtained shortly before the onset of those signs had a concentration of 0.28 μg of ketamine/mL of plasma. After the infusion of ketamine was discontinued, 0.01 mg of detomidine/kg was administered IV. All signs of excitation ceased, and the horse did not have any other abnormal behavior during the following 2 hours of observation.
Principal study—All horses in the principal study tolerated infusions well, and none had any abnormal behavior during or following the infusion. Throughout the infusions, all horses continued to eat, defecate, and urinate normally. Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure decreased significantly (P = 0.02 for both comparisons) at 6 hours after infusion, compared with before infusion values (Table 1; Figures 1 and 2). Significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were not found between the 2 groups of horses (ie, horses given ketamine at 0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours, followed by 0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours and vice versa; Table 2; Figures 3 and 4).
Median (range) values for clinical parameters prior to ketamine infusion, during low-dose (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours; n = 3) and high-dose (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours; 3) ketamine infusion, and at 6 hours following infusion of ketamine in horses.
Clinical parameters | Time relative to CRI of ketamine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prior to | During low dose | During high dose | After | P values | |
Heart rate (beats/min) | 34 (28–40)* | 32 (28–36) | 30 (24–36) | 26 (24–32)* | 0.02 |
Respiratory rate (breaths/min) | 20 (16–32) | 20 (12–36) | 22 (8–28) | 12 (8–36) | 0.34 |
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 125 (101–140) | 124 (102–137) | 130 (98–134) | 119 (93–133) | 0.04 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 92 (77–100) | 88 (64–96) | 89 (79–96) | 81 (74–94) | 0.16 |
Mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) | 105 (95–108)* | 99 (72–109) | 102 (90–107) | 91 (86–106)* | 0.02 |
Activity (footsteps/2 min) | 2.5 (0–6) | 2.0 (0–6) | 5.5 (0–8) | 2.5 (0–8) | 0.82 |
Analgesia at withers (ft-lb)† | 12 (9–16)* | 7.5 (2–11) | 10 (2–14) | 5 (3–8)* | 0.02 |
Analgesia at radius (ft-lb)† | 12 (8–17)* | 8 (5–9) | 6 (3–14) | 6 (3–7)* | 0.02 |
Significant (P<0.05) difference between time points.
Multiply by 0.1383 to convert to meter-kilogram.
Median (range) values of pharmacokinetic parameters for low-dose (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours;n = 3) and high-dose (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours; 3) ketamine infusion in horses.
Pharmacokinetic parameters | Low-dose data | High-dose data | Combined data | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cmax (μg/mL) | 0.067 (0.052–0.095) | 0.137 (0.056–0.175) | 0.076 (0.052–0.176) | 0.0625 |
Cl (mg/[h•(μg/mL)]) | 2,966 (2,065–4,335) | 3,113 (2,455–6,101) | 3,113 (2,065–6,101) | 0.5625 |
MRT (h) | 3.11 (3.07–3.61) | 3.26 (3.07–3.61) | 3.11 (0.310–3.61) | 0.8438 |
AUC ([h•(μg/mL)]) | 0.401 (0.310–0.570) | 0.820 (0.336–1.055) | 0.459 (0.310–1.055) | 0.0625 |
AUMC (h•h•[μg/mL]) | 1.34 (1.00–1.74) | 2.55 (1.03–3.69) | 1.43 (1.00–3.69) | 0.0625 |
Vss (mL/kg) | 19.9 (12.9–26.7) | 18.2 (15.9–47.8) | 18.2 (12.9–47.8) | 0.3125 |
Kd (1/h) | 0.321 (0.277–0.326) | 0.307 (0.277–0.326) | 0.321 (0.277–0.326) | 0.8438 |
T1/2d (h) | 2.16 (2.13–2.50) | 2.26 (2.13–2.50) | 2.16 (2.13–2.50) | 0.8438 |
K10 (1/h) | 8.98 (1.64–14.9) | 5.7 (1.64–13.9) | 8.85 (1.64–13.9) | 0.6875 |
T1/2E (h) | 0.077 (0.05–0.422) | 0.181 (0.05–0.422) | 0.078 (0.05–0.422) | 0.8438 |
Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration of ketamine. Cl = Total body clearance of ketamine. MRT = Mean residence time. AUC = Area under the time-versus-concentration curve. AUMC = Area under the moment curve. Vss = Volume of distribution at steady state. Kd (equivalent to 1/MRT) = Rate constant of disappearance. T1/2d (equivalent to 0.693 X MRT) = Half-life of disappearance. K10 = Rate constant of elimination from the central compartment. T1/2E (equivalent to 0.693 ÷ K10) = Half-life of elimination.

Mean ± SD change in heart rate in horses (n = 3) that received the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), compared with baseline values prior to the start of infusions.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Mean ± SD change in heart rate in horses (n = 3) that received the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), compared with baseline values prior to the start of infusions.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484
Mean ± SD change in heart rate in horses (n = 3) that received the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), compared with baseline values prior to the start of infusions.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Mean ± SD change in heart rate in horses (n = 3) that received the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), compared with baseline values prior to the start of infusions.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Mean ± SD change in heart rate in horses (n = 3) that received the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), compared with baseline values prior to the start of infusions.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484
Mean ± SD change in heart rate in horses (n = 3) that received the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), compared with baseline values prior to the start of infusions.
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Plasma ketamine concentrations during and after infusion in a representative horse from the group that received the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours).
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Plasma ketamine concentrations during and after infusion in a representative horse from the group that received the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours).
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484
Plasma ketamine concentrations during and after infusion in a representative horse from the group that received the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours).
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Plasma ketamine concentrations during and after infusion in a representative horse from the group that received the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours).
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484

Plasma ketamine concentrations during and after infusion in a representative horse from the group that received the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours).
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484
Plasma ketamine concentrations during and after infusion in a representative horse from the group that received the high-dose CRI of ketamine (0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours), followed by the low-dose CRI of ketamine (0.4 mg/kg/h for 6 hours).
Citation: American Journal of Veterinary Research 67, 9; 10.2460/ajvr.67.9.1484
Discussion
Reluctance to use ketamine in horses without prior sedation is primarily the result of concerns about the possibility for an excitatory response. However, the administered dose or circulating concentration of ketamine at which excitement or abnormal behavior may occur has not been identified. No recognized differences were observed between sexes regarding response to ketamine, and our study was not designed to determine that. Results of our study indicate that ketamine can be administered to horses at a dose up to 0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours without adverse behavioral effects. Higher rates of ketamine administration may be possible (0.9 to 1.5 mg/kg/h) but were not evaluated in our study.
No analgesic effect could be demonstrated during or following the ketamine infusion. Ketamine did not appear to produce any sedation, and horses may have become conditioned to the stimulus over time. In fact, a small but significant increase in sensitivity in both testing regions was observed, as shown by a response to a smaller amount of stimulus with each subsequent testing. Our study was not blinded, and it is possible that this could have affected the observed responses. Similar types of pain models have been used to evaluate a number of other pain medications in horses and have demonstrated a beneficial effect of ketamine in some other species.46–49
Heart rates and blood pressures prior to the start of ketamine administration were similar to previously reported values.50 Although the median heart rate and blood pressure declined during infusion of ketamine, the changes were not significant. However, bradycardia and decreased mean arterial blood pressure detected 6 hours following cessation of the infusion of ketamine was significant. Cardiovascular changes associated with subanesthetic doses of ketamine have not been previously described.
The decrease in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure after infusion that was observed in our study was unexpected but could be attributable to the action of a persistent metabolite. Alternatively, these effects may represent a compensatory response following the termination of the sympathomimetic effects of the drug. The decrease in heart rate could be clinically important, as 3 of the 6 horses developed a bradycardia of 24 beats/min. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the concentration of metabolites and cardiovascular effects. It is also possible that this difference could have occurred as the result of normal diurnal variation.
The median respiratory rate remained relatively constant throughout the ketamine infusion. This is consistent with previous findings that suggest that ketamine does not have a substantial effect on the respiratory system. Activity reported for horses in our study is consistent with a lack of sedation but also did not demonstrate an increase in movement.
The maximum plasma concentrations of ketamine (median, 0.137 μg/mL; range, 0.056 to 0.176 μg/mL) obtained during the 0.8 mg/kg/h infusion rate was approximately twice that (median, 0.067 μg/mL; range, 0.052 to 0.095 μg/mL) obtained during the infusion rate of 0.4 mg/kg/h. Those concentrations were above those needed to provide analgesia after IV administration in people.51 Our study was not able to establish a minimum concentration that provided analgesia in horses. Clinical trials or alternative models may be required to identify that value.
Values for pharmacokinetic parameters in our study differed from those reported for studies35,39 with horses after single-dose IV bolus and short infusion. Specifically, our study found a shorter elimination halflife, longer distribution half-life, higher volume of clearance, and larger apparent volume of distribution, compared with other studies.35,39 Our data indicate that steady state was achieved after infusion at each rate.
Two important differences exist between the design of our study and prior studies, and these may explain, at least in part, the pharmacokinetic values obtained. One is the use of premedications or inhalation anesthetics in other studies.35,39 Research evaluating the pharmacokinetics of ketamine in dogs, calves, and cats that were not premedicated found greater clearance and shorter half-life of elimination, compared with those values for studies52–55 in which additional anesthetics or medications were administered. Further research will be required to evaluate the effect of α2-adrenoceptor agonists or inhalation anesthetics on the clearance of ketamine in horses.
The second major difference between our study and prior research is the achievement and maintenance of a steady-state concentration by continuous infusion. Values for pharmacokinetic parameters from a study55 with a single IV bolus estimates the distribution and elimination half-lives based on the assumption that the initial rapid decrease in plasma concentration is the result of distribution and that the slower terminal phase represents elimination. Although this assumption holds true for many drugs, our data suggest that this may not be true for ketamine in horses. It is possible that the terminal half-life reported in prior studies may reflect elimination but may be limited by kinetics of distribution and redistribution. That difference must be the result of the delayed distribution of ketamine in horses relative to its elimination.56
Observations made in prior studies evaluating ketamine in people provide some support for this interpretation of data. Specifically, during continuous infusions of ketamine, the reported elimination half-life was 79 ± 8 minutes,21 whereas values for the same parameter following a single IV injection has ranged from 155 ± 12 minutes to 299 ± 94 minutes, depending on the condition of the patient.28,57 Additional studies in which ketamine was administered to people by longer-term CRIs found an elimination half-life of approximately 1 hour,58 with 85% of the drug being eliminated within 2 hours.59
Observations made in our study may have been strengthened by more samples at time points during the early part of infusion and immediately following the cessation of infusion. Our study design was based on a reported elimination half-life of 42 minutes.35 Additionally, because concentrations of ketamine rapidly decreased to less than the limit of quantitation after infusion was discontinued, it was necessary to eliminate some data points following the cessation of infusion, restricting our ability to calculate, for some horses, the terminal half-life after the infusion was stopped.
In conclusion, subanesthetic doses of ketamine up to 0.8 mg/kg/h for 6 hours did not cause signs of excitement in horses, but an analgesic effect was not obtained with the method of analgesic testing used in our study. Mild, postinfusion bradycardia and hypotension were associated with that dose of ketamine. Pharmacokinetic results of our study indicate that in horses, ketamine may have greater clearance, longer distribution half-life, and shorter elimination half-life than previously described.
ABBREVIATIONS
CRI | Continuous rate infusion |
HPLC | High-performance liquid chromatography |
Ketaset (100 mg/mL), Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, Iowa.
Baxter Flo-Gard 6200, Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Ill.
Propaq 106 EL, Protocol Systems, Beaverton, Ore.
Universal load cell, RSC-50 lbs, Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik Inc, Marlboro, Mass.
Signal processor, MVD 2630, Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik Inc, Marlboro, Mass.
WinNonLin, version 3.0A, Pharsight Corp, Palo Alto, Calif.
InStat 3.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, Calif.
References
- 1
Bueno AC, Cornick-Seahorn J & Seahorn TL, et al. Cardiopulmonary and sedative effects of intravenous administration of low doses of medetomidine and xylazine to adult horses. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:1371–1376.
- 2
Merritt AM, Burrow JA, Hartless CS. Effect of xylazine, detomidine, and a combination of xylazine and butorphanol on equine duodenal motility. Am J Vet Res 1998;59:619–623.
- 3
Trim CM, Hanson RR. Effects of xylazine on renal function and plasma glucose in ponies. Vet Rec 1986;118:65–67.
- 4
Nolan AM, Besley W & Reid J, et al. The effects of butorphanol on locomotor activity in ponies: a preliminary study. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1994;17:323–326.
- 5
Sojka JE, Adams SB & Lamar CH, et al. Effect of butorphanol, pentazocine, meperidine, or metoclopramide on intestinal motility in female ponies. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:527–529.
- 6
Adams SB, Lamar CH, Masty J. Motility of the distal portion of the jejunum and pelvic flexure in ponies: effects of six drugs. Am J Vet Res 1984;45:795–799.
- 7
MacAllister CG, Morgan SJ & Borne AT, et al. Comparison of adverse effects of phenylbutazone, flunixin meglumine, and ketoprofen in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;202:71–77.
- 8
Orser BA, Pennefather PS, MacDonald JF. Multiple mechanisms of ketamine blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Anesthesiology 1997;86:903–917.
- 9
Salt TE, Wilson DG, Prasad SK. Antagonism of N-methyl-asparate and synaptic responses of neurons in the rat ventrobasal thalamus by ketamine and MK-801. Br J Pharmacol 1988;94:443–448.
- 10
Hall R, Murdoch J. Brain protection: physiological considerations. Part II: the pharmacology of brain protection. Can J Anaesth 1990;37:762–777.
- 11
Brockmeyer DM, Kendig JJ. Selective effects of ketamine on amino acid-mediated pathways in neuronal rat spinal cord. Br J Anaesth 1995;74:79–84.
- 12
Smith DJ, Bouchal RL & DeSanctis CA, et al. Properties of the interaction between ketamine and opioid binding sites in vivo and in vitro. Neuropharmacology 1987;26:1253–1260.
- 13
Hurstveit O, Maurset A, Øye I. Interaction of the chiral forms of ketamine with opioid, phencyclidine, and muscarinic receptors. Pharmacol Toxicol 1995;77:355–359.
- 14↑
Crisp T, Perrotti JM & Smith DL, et al. The local monoaminergic dependency of spinal ketamine. Eur J Pharmacol 1991;194:167–172.
- 15
Mimura MA, Namiki R & Kishi T, et al. Central cholinergic action produces antagonism to ketamine anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992;36:460–462.
- 16
Durieux ME. Inhibition by ketamine of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor function. Anesth Analg 1995;81:57–62.
- 17
Baum VC, Tecson ME. Ketamine inhibits transsarcolemmal calcium entry in guinea pig myocardium: direct evidence by single cell voltage clamp. Anesth Analg 1991;73:804–807.
- 18
Yamakage M, Hirshman CA, Croxton TL. Inhibitory effects of thiopental, ketamine, and propofol on voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells. Anesthesiology 1996;83:1274–1282.
- 20↑
Adams JD, Baillie TA & Trevor AJ, et al. Studies on the biotransformation of ketamine. 1-Identification of metabolites produced in vitro from rat liver microsomal preparations. Biomed Mass Spectrom 1981;8:527–538.
- 21↑
Idvali J, Ahlgren I & Aronsen KF, et al. Ketamine infusions: pharmacokinetics and clinical effects. Br J Anaesth 1979;51:1167–1172.
- 22
Tweed WA, Minuck M, Mymin D. Circulatory responses to ketamine anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1972;37:613–619.
- 23↑
Muir WW, Sams R. Effects of ketamine infusion on halothane minimal alveolar concentration in horses. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:1802–1806.
- 24
Haskins SC, Farver TB, Patz JD. Ketamine in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:1855–1860.
- 25
Fass J, Bares R & Hermsdorf V, et al. Effects of intravenous ketamine on gastrointestinal motility in the dog. Intensive Care Med 1995;21:584–589.
- 26
Hirshman CA, Downes H & Farbood A, et al. Ketamine block of bronchospasm in experimental canine asthma. Br J Anaesth 1979;51:713–718.
- 27
Huber FC, Reves JG & Gutierrez J, et al. Ketamine: its effect on airway resistance in man. South Med J 1972;65:1176–1180.
- 28↑
Grant IS, Nimmo WS, Clements JA. Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of IM and oral ketamine. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:805–810.
- 29
Wagner AE, Walton JA & Hellyer PW, et al. Use of low doses of ketamine administered by constant rate infusion as an adjunct for postoperative analgesia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:72–75.
- 30
Slingsby LS, Waterman-Pearson AE. The post-operative analgesic effects of ketamine after canine ovariohysterectomy—a comparison between pre- or post-operative administration. Res Vet Sci 2000;69:147–152.
- 31
Bhattacharya A, Gurnani A & Sharma PK, et al. Subcutaneous infusion of ketamine and morphine for relief of postoperative pain: a double-blind comparative study. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:456–459.
- 32
Gurnani A, Sharma PK & Rautela RS, et al. Analgesia for acute musculoskeletal trauma: low-dose subcutaneous infusion of ketamine. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:32–36.
- 33↑
Petrillo TM, Fortenberry JD & Linzer JF, et al. Emergency department use of ketamine in pediatric status asthmaticus. J Asthma 2001;38:657–664.
- 34↑
Nikolajsen L, Hansen CL & Nielsen J, et al. The effect of ketamine on phantom pain: a central neuropathic disorder maintained by peripheral input. Pain 1996;67:69–77.
- 35↑
Kaka JS, Klavano PA, Haton WL. Pharmacokinetics of ketamine in the horse. Am J Vet Res 1979;40:978–981.
- 36↑
Muir WW. Intravenous anesthetics and anesthetic techniques in horses. In:Muir WW, Hubbell JAE, ed.Equine anesthesia monitoring and emergency therapy. St Louis: Mosby Year Book Inc, 1991;281–309.
- 37
Gomez de Segura IA, De Rossi R & Santos M, et al. Epidural injection of ketamine for perineal analgesia in the horse. Vet Surg 1998;27:384–391.
- 38
López-Sanromán FJ, Cruz JM & Santos M, et al. Evaluation of the local analgesic effect of ketamine in the palmar digital nerve block at the base of the proximal sesamoid (abaxial sesamoid block) in horses. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:475–478.
- 39
Waterman AE, Robertson SA, Lane JG. Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered ketamine in the horse. Res Vet Sci 1987;42:162–166.
- 40
Matthews NS, Taylor TS & Hartsfield SM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ketamine in mules and mammoth asses premedicated with xylazine. Equine Vet J 1994;26:241–243.
- 41↑
White PF, Way WL, Trevor AJ. Ketamine—its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Anesthesiology 1982;56:119–136.
- 42↑
Kamerling SG, Dequick DJ & Weckman TJ, et al. Dose-related effects of ethylketazocine on nociception, behaviour and autonomic responses in the horse. J Pharm Pharmacol 1986;38:40–45.
- 44↑
Carroll GL, Matthews NS & Hartsfield SM, et al. The effect of detomidine and its antagonism with tolazoline on stress-related hormones, metabolites, physiologic responses, and behavior in awake ponies. Vet Surg 1997;26:69–77.
- 45↑
Carroll GL, Boothe DM & Hartsfield SM, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of butorphanol in llamas after intravenous and intramuscular administration. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:1263–1267.
- 46
Moens Y, Lanz F & Doherr MG, et al. A comparison of the antinociceptive effects of xylazine, detomidine and romifidine on experimental pain in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003;30:183–190.
- 47
Schatzman U, Ambruster S & Strucki F, et al. Analgesic effect of butorphanol and levomethadone in detomidine sedated horses. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001;48:337–342.
- 48
Lizarraga I, Castillo F & Valderrama ME, et al. An analgesic evaluation of isoxsuprine in horses. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2004;51:370–374.
- 49
Huang C, Li HT & Shi YS, et al. Ketamine potentiates the effect of electroacupuncture on mechanical allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neurosci Lett 2004;368:327–331.
- 50↑
Parry BW, McCarthy MA, Anderson GA. Survey of resting blood pressure values in clinically normal horses. Equine Vet J 1984;16:53–58.
- 51↑
Clements JA, Nimmo WS. The pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of ketamine in man. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:27–30.
- 52
Schwieger IM, Szlam F, Hug CC. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ketamine in dogs anesthetized with enflurane. J Pharmacokin Biopharm 1991;19:145–156.
- 53
Kaka JS, Hayton WL. Pharmacokinetics of ketamine and two metabolites in the dog. J Pharmacokin Biopharm 1980;8:193–202.
- 54
Waterman AE. Influence of predmedication with xylazine on the distribution and metabolism of intramuscularly administered ketamine in cats. Res Vet Sci 1983;35:285–290.
- 55↑
Waterman AE. The pharmacokinetics of ketamine administered intravenously in calves and the modifying effect of premedication with xylazine hydrochloride. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1984;7:125–130.
- 56↑
Rowland M, Rozer TN. Distribution kinetics. In:Rowland M, Tozer TN, eds.Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. 3rd ed.Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co, 1995;313–339.
- 57
Hijazi Y, Bodonian C & Bolon M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and haemodyanmics of ketamine in intensive care patients with brain or spinal cord injury. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:155–160.
- 58↑
Kawamanta M, Ujike Y & Miyabe M, et al. Continuous infusion of ketamine and midzolam for prolonged sedation in the intensive care unit [in Japanese]. Masui 1991;40:1793–1798.
- 59↑
Matsuki A, Ishihara H & Kotani N, et al. A clinical study on total intravenous anesthesia with droperiodol, fentanyl and ketamine—2. Pharmacokinetics following the end of continuous ketamine infusion [in Japanese]. Masui 1991;40:61–65.