Outbreaks of neurologic disease caused by mutant hypervirulent strains (neuropathotypes) of EHV-1 have been reported with increasing frequency during the past several years.1–6 Equine herpesvirus-1 myeloencephalopathy has an impact on equine welfare and the potential for causing catastrophic losses in the economy of equine-related businesses because of characteristically high morbidity and case fatality rates; refractoriness to prevention by vaccination; and the ability to affect horses of all breeds, ages, and vaccination statuses.7–14
Outbreaks of neurologic disease are thought to be initiated by viral reactivation and concomitant nasal shedding of the mutant herpesvirus by latently infected carrier horses. Development of a minimally invasive antemortem test for detection of carriers of neuropathotype strains of EHV-1 would enable a test-and-segregate approach to minimizing the risk of outbreaks resulting from reactivation of latent virus in carrier horses. In this report, the technique and performance of a test involving lymph node biopsy for antemortem detection of neuropathogenic EHV-1 infection are described.
Materials and Methods
Experimental animals—The procedure for antemortem detection of EHV-1 latency and subsequent identification of latent virus pathotype was performed in 2 categories of adult horses. The first group was composed of 24 young mixedbreed mares that had been experimentally infected as weanlings 4 to 5 years previously with neuropathogenic (n = 12 horses) or non-neuropathogenic (12) strains of EHV-1. The second group of horses was composed of 12 aged Thoroughbred mares donated by commercial horse farms to the University of Kentucky because of chronic problems with infertility, laminitis, or other forms of lameness. The 24 experimentally infected horses were kept together as an isolated group in a 10-acre grass field. None of the horses had clinical signs or laboratory evidence of EHV-1 infection at the time of MLN biopsy.
MLN biopsy procedure—Mares were sedated by IV administration of 10 mg of butorphanol tartrate solution and 500 mg of xylazine hydrochloride solution. After 5 minutes, horses were anesthetized via IV administration of 1.0 g of ketamine hydrochloride solution. With a sterile scalpel blade, a 1.5- inch incision was made through the skin overlying palpable MLNs. An aggregate of lymph nodes weighing approximately 1.0 g was aseptically freed from surrounding connective tissue by means of blunt dissection and placed in sterile saline (0.9% NaCl) solution for transport on ice to the laboratory.
Preparation of DNA from MLN tissue—For isolation of cellular DNA from MLN tissues, 750 mg of tissue was finely minced with a sterile disposable scalpel blade, homogenized in 5.0 mL of lysis buffer solution (10mM Tris-HCl [pH, 8.0]; 100mM EDTA; 0.5% SDS), and incubated for approximately 24 hours at 50°C with proteinase Ka (concentration, 100 μg/mL) and ribonuclease Ab (concentration, 20 μg/mL). Purification of DNA from the digested cell lysate proceeded via 2 extractions with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohola (25:24:1) solution and precipitation of DNA from the aqueous phase with ammonium acetate and isopropanol. The DNA precipitate was collected by use of centrifugation, rinsed twice with 70% ethanol, dissolved in 2.0 mL of sterile water, and quantitated by measuring spectrometric absorbance at 260 nm.
Detection of EHV-1 DNA by PCR assay—The DNA purified from MLN tissue was tested for EHV-1 DNA by use of the magnetic bead, sequence-capture, nested PCR method.15–19 The procedure involves oligonucleotidehybridization enrichment and biotin-streptavidin magnetic bead technology for capture of EHV-1 DNA and was developed for detection of rare, low-abundance sequences below the detection threshold of conventional nested PCR assays. Two thousand four hundred micrograms of each MLN DNA preparation was analyzed for EHV-1 DNA. Mandibular lymph node DNA was digested overnight at 37°C with 7,500 units of Bgl-II restriction endonuclease,c denatured by boiling for 10 minutes, and hybridized for 24 hours at 60°C with 24 pmol of a biotinylated capture oligonucleotide (Appendix) complementary to the EHV-1 gene sequence encoding the viral DNA polymerase (ie, ORF30). Six hundred micrograms of streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beadse was added to the hybridization mixture, and the mixture was incubated for 24 hours at 43°C. After washing, beads were dispensed into six 100-μL PCR reaction mixtures containing 200μM each of deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 2.5mM MgCl2, 5 units of Taq DNA polymerase,f and 0.25μM ORF30 primers designed to amplify a 256-bp gene fragment that encompasses the site of the mutation associated with neuropathotype strains of EHV-1 (ORF30 G2254).20 The biotinylated capture oligonucleotide and the amplification primers used are specific for EHV-1 and do not cross-amplify DNA from EHV-4. Amplification via PCR was performed according to the following specifications: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 minutes; 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 65°C for 1 minute; and a final extension at 65°C for 10 minutes. The second round of PCR consisted of amplification of 2 μL of a 1:10 dilution of the first PCR product with a nested set of primers and the same thermocycler specifications. After the second round of PCR amplification, reaction mixtures were analyzed for a 256-bp DNA fragment by use of electrophoresis through 1.5% agarose gel.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected at the time of MLN biopsy from each of the 36 horses were also assayed for EHV-1 DNA with an identical amount (2.4 mg) of PBMC DNA and the same sequence-capture, nested PCR procedure.
To minimize the possibility of contamination of reaction tubes with previously amplified PCR products or from another test sample, sample DNA preparation, PCR assay setup and amplification, and postamplification analysis were performed in separate rooms. Also, room-dedicated reagents, micropipets, and filtered pipet tips were used. Finally, a comparable mass of MLN tissue in which there was no EHV-1 DNA (collected from horses submitted for necropsy) was processed alongside each set of test samples.
To compare detection sensitivity of the magnetic bead, sequence-capture PCR method with that of conventional nested and real-time PCR assays, DNA preparations from the MLN of each of the 36 horses were also tested via the other 2 formats.21,22
Reverse transcription-PCR assay—To rule out the possibility of active (rather than latent) EHV-1 infection in the horses with positive PCR assay results, RNA was isolated from MLN tissue of 6 of the mares with positive results by means of extraction with total RNA isolation reagentg and subjected to magnetic bead–based, sequence-capture reverse transcriptase–nested PCR23 by use of the same capture probe and PCR primers as described.
Pathotype identification of latent EHV-1—For MLNs with positive results for EHV-1 DNA, the 256-bp fragments amplified by sequence-capture, nested PCR were sequenced to identify the base at the polymorphic site (ie, position 2254 of ORF30) that allows determination of the pathotype of the latent herpesvirus strain (ie, neuropathotype [G2254] or nonneuropathotype [A2254]). The 256-bp amplicons were purified by use of a DNA purification resin.b Nucleotide sequence determination of the amplicons was performed at the University of Kentucky core sequencing facility by use of an automated fluorescence sequencerh and cycle sequencingh technology.
Results
Biopsy specimens of MLNs collected from each of the 36 mares were tested for EHV-1 DNA. Results of tests for detection of EHV-1 latency and identification of the pathotype of each latent virus strain were summarized (Table 1). Mandibular lymph node tissue from 26 of the 36 (72%) study mares contained latent EHV-1 DNA. Equine herpesvirus-1 DNA was detected in 18 of the 24 (75%) experimental mares that had been inoculated 4 to 5 years previously with known neuropathogenic or non-neuropathogenic EHV-1 strains. Both pathotypes were identified in the latently infected mares, and in each instance, the pathotype of latent EHV-1 detected in the MLN was identical to the pathotype with which the horse had been inoculated intranasally 4 to 5 years earlier. Latent viral DNA was detected in 10 of the 12 mares inoculated with neuropathogenic strains of EHV-1 as weanlings. The results yielded no evidence for differences between the 2 EHV-1 pathotypes in their capacity for establishing postinfection latency. Eight of the 12 donated mares (67%) had positive test results for latent EHV-1 in MLN tissue, and only 1 of those 8 mares had a neuropathogenic strain of EHV-1. Sequence data at the polymorphic site (2254 A/G) of ORF30 revealed no evidence of coinfection with both EHV-1 pathotypes in any of the mares latently infected with the virus.
Frequency (%) of detection of latent EHV-1 DNA in MLNs by group in 36 horses.
Mare group | Test yielding positive results for EHV-1 DNA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Group size | Sequence-capture nested PCR | Conventional nested PCR | Real-time PCR | |
Experimentally infected with neuropathogenic EHV-1 | 12 | 10 (83) | 5 (42)* | 5 (42)* |
Experimentally infected with non-neuropathogenic EHV-1 | 12 | 8 (67) | 4 (33)* | 4 (33)* |
Donated with unknown EHV-1 infection history | 12 | 8 (67)† | 4 (33)* | 4 (33)* |
The same horses had positive results for EHV-1 by the conventional nested and real-time PCR assays.
One of these 8 horses had the neuropathotype strain, and 7 had nonneuropathotype strains of EHV-1.
None of the PBMC samples collected from the 26 horses with latent EHV-1 DNA in the MLN contained EHV-1 DNA. Only 13 of the 26 (50%) horses with positive results for EHV-1 DNA via sequence-capture PCR assay also had positive results according to conventional nested or real-time PCR assays. The specificity of the antemortem detection procedure for detection of latent EHV-1 was validated by the absence of PCR amplification in EHV-1–negative MLN DNA samples to which EHV-4 DNA had been added.
Results of reverse transcription–PCR assay yielded no evidence of EHV-1 RNA transcribed from the ORF30 gene in MLN tissue from any of 6 tested mares that had positive results for EHV-1 DNA.
The A2254-to-G2254 mutation unique to the ORF30 gene in neuropathogenic strains of EHV-1 creates a Sal I cleavage site and a consequent restriction fragment length polymorphism in the 256-bp DNA fragment of ORF30 amplified by PCR. Agarose gel electrophoretic analysis of DNA fragments generated by Sal I digestion of the 256-bp amplicon provided an alternative and simple approach (compared with DNA sequencing) for differentiation of neuropathogenic from non-neuropathogenic strains of EHV-1 (Figure 1) The results also revealed that the quantitative burden of latent viral DNA in MLNs varied among horses (Figure 2). In some horses, EHV-1 DNA was amplified from all 6 sample replicates, whereas in others, as few as 1 or 2 replicates contained detectable viral DNA.
Discussion
The technique described in the present study permitted determination of whether certain horses carry DNA of neuropathogenic strains of EHV-1 latently sequestered in cells of the respiratory tract lymph nodes. A single-point mutation (A-to-G transition) in EHV-1 ORF30 that encodes the catalytic subunit of the viral DNA polymerase is highly associated with the viral attribute of neuropathogenicity.20 The recent increase in outbreaks of neurologic disease caused by such EHV-1 mutants has generated a practical need for identifying latent carriers of mutant neuropathogenic strains of the virus.
Detection of rare herpesviral DNA sequences among large quantities of host cellular DNA is of key importance in investigations of EHV-1 latency. Both conventional nested PCR and real-time PCR techniques are limited by the sample mass that can be tested (microgram quantities), reducing their detection of ultra-low–frequency target molecules. The present report describes the development and validation of an alternative enhanced-sensitivity PCR methodology (sequence-capture, nested PCR) and its usefulness in antemortem detection of latent EHV-1 DNA in biopsy specimens of MLN tissue. The 3 steps of the technique are enrichment of EHV-1 DNA from a large sample mass of cellular DNA by means of hybridization to a biotinylated EHV-1 allele-specific oligonucleotide, capture of the oligo–EHV-1 hybrids on streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads, and amplification of the captured EHV-1 DNA by use of nested PCR. A final step of nucleotide sequencing or restriction fragment length polymorphism of the amplified DNA permits pathotype identification of the latent virus. The settings for temperature, time, and concentration during the procedure were optimized for detection of latent EHV-1 DNA in MLN tissue. Results of preliminary studies designed to assess the detection threshold of the sequence-capture PCR method by testing for low numbers of EHV-1 DNA molecules in a dilution series indicated that the threshold for detection was limited only by the volume of sample available for analysis. The technique used in the study enables detection of EHV-1 DNA molecules at very low concentrations in large amounts (ie, in milligram quantities) of cellular DNA. A procedure for antemortem screening of groups of horses for carriers of latent neuropathogenic strains of EHV-1 has not previously been available.
To ascertain whether the technique could be used for screening horses for latent EHV-1 infections and for determining the pathotype of detected latent virus, MLNs of 24 experimental horses with previous exposure to known pathotypes of EHV-1 and of 12 horses with unknown EHV-1 infection histories were tested. Results of those experiments indicate that the procedure is a minimally invasive, practical, and low-threshold technique for detecting latent neuropathotype EHV-1 in live horses. Furthermore, the studies confirm that survivors of EHV-1 neurologic disease may become latently infected carriers of the hypervirulent neuropathotype strains.
Two unexpected findings resulted from the study. First, in 50% of the horses in which latent EHV-1 infection was detected in the MLN via sequence-capture nested PCR, the latent virus load was below the threshold of detection for conventional nested and real-time PCR assays. Second, EHV-1 DNA was not detected in the PBMCs of horses whose MLNs contained latent virus. Because only 6 μg of MLN DNA was screened by the conventional and real-time PCR assays (ie, six 1-μg replicates), 400 individual reactions would be required to achieve a level of detection similar to that of the sequence-capture PCR technique. Thus, results of studies that use only conventional PCR techniques or test only peripheral blood leukocytes as means of detecting latent EHV-1 infections would underestimate the true prevalence of both herpesviral pathotypes in the study sample. Regarding the nature of the cell type in which latent EHV-1 infection is established, data suggest that a sessile, noncirculating cell immobilized within lymph nodes may harbor the latent viral DNA molecules. Another question raised by results of the present study is whether EHV-1 DNA detected in PBMCs in previous investigations24–26 on latency represented a true latent state or active persistent infection by the virus.
The present study also revealed that the quantitative burden of latent viral DNA in MLNs varied among horses. The MLNs of some horses contained latent EHV-1 DNA molecules in numbers low enough to result in a Poisson sampling distribution (ie, a substantial fraction of replicate samples without detectable EHV-1 DNA). It was this category of horses in which latency was not detected by conventional formats of PCR testing.
Critical to the success of the detection methodology was the large-mass sampling and testing (eg, 2.4 mg of cellular DNA purified from 750 mg of MLN tissue from each horse and tested as six 400-μg replicates). With conventional nested or real-time PCR assays, only microgram quantities of target DNA can be tested without encountering target-excess inhibition. The benefits of biotinylated oligonucleotide–magnetic bead enrichment of EHV-1 DNA and the ensuing removal of inhibitory substances associated with such large starting masses of cellular DNA are essential features of the enhanced sensitivity of sequence-capture PCR methodologies. Therefore, it is likely that the prevalence of latent EHV-1 even in MLN tissues would also be underestimated in studies in which only single, small-volume test samples of the tissues were evaluated.
Importantly, the restriction fragment length polymorphism associated with the sequence difference between the 2 pathotypes of EHV-1, apparent after Sal I digestion of the 256-bp PCR amplicon of ORF30, offers a simple, rapid, and less-expensive alternative to DNA sequencing for pathotype identification of latent EHV-1.
ABBREVIATIONS
EHV | Equine herpesvirus |
MLN | Mandibular lymph node |
ORF | Open reading frame |
PBMC | Peripheral blood mononuclear cells |
Ribonuclease-A, DNase-free, Wizard PCR preps kit, Promega, Madison, Wis.
Bgl-II restriction endonuclease, New England BioLabs, Beverly, Mass.
Oligonucleotide primers and biotinylated capture probe, Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa.
Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin, Dynal Inc, Lake Success, NY.
HotMaster Taq DNA polymerase, Eppendorf, Westbury, NY.
TRI reagent, Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Model 9600 DNA sequencer, BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing chemistry, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.
References
- 1
Allen GP, Powell DG. Equine herpesvirus neurological disease in the USA and United Kingdom. Equine Dis Q 2003;12:2–3.
- 2
van Maanen C, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM & Damen EA, et al. Neurological disease associated with EHV-1 infection in a riding school: clinical and virological characteristics. Equine Vet J 2001;33:191–196.
- 3
Cardwell J, Smith K & Newton R, et al. EHV paralytic disease in the south of England. Vet Rec 2003;152:441–442.
- 4
Studdert MJ, Hartley CA & Dynon K, et al. Outbreak of equine herpesvirus type 1 myeloencephalitis: new insights from virus identification by PCR and the application of an EHV-1-specific antibody detection ELISA. Vet Rec 2003;153:417–423.
- 5
Reed SM, Toribio RE. Equine herpesvirus 1 and 4. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2004;20:631–642.
- 6
Henninger RW, Reed SM & Saville J, et al. Epidemic neurologic disease due to equine herpesvirus-1 at a university equestrian center. J Vet Intern Med 2006; in press.
- 7
Jackson TA, Kendrick JW. Paralysis of horses associated with equine herpesvirus 1 infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1971;158:1351–1357.
- 8
Charlton KM, Mitchell D & Girard A, et al. Meningoencephalomyelitis in horses associated with equine herpesvirus 1 infection. Vet Pathol 1976;13:59–68.
- 9
Little PB, Thorsen J. Disseminated necrotizing myeloencephalitis: a herpes-associated neurological disease of horses. Vet Pathol 1976;13:161–171.
- 10
Platt H, Singh H, Whitwell KE. Pathological observations on an outbreak of paralysis in broodmares. Equine Vet J 1980;12:118–126.
- 11
Greenwood RS, Simpson AB. Clinical report of a paralytic syndrome affecting stallions, mares and foals on a Thoroughbred studfarm. Equine Vet J 1980;12:113–117.
- 12
Whitwell KE, Blunden AS. Pathological findings in horses dying during an outbreak of the paralytic form of Equid herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) infection. Equine Vet J 1992;24:13–19.
- 13
Donaldson MT, Sweeney CR. Equine herpes myeloencephalopathy. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1997;19:864–871.
- 14
Wilson WD. Equine herpesvirus 1 myeloencephalopathy. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1997;13:53–72.
- 15
Morgan JG, Dolganov GM & Robbins SE, et al. The selective isolation of novel cDNAs encoded by the regions surrounding the human interleukin 4 and 5 genes. Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20:5173–5179.
- 16
Tagle DA, Swaroop M & Lovett M, et al. Magnetic bead capture of expressed sequences encoded within large genomic segments. Nature 1993;361:751–753.
- 17
Mangiapan G, Vokurkam M & Schouls L, et al. Sequence capture-PCR improves detection of mycobacterial DNA in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:1209–1215.
- 18
Stinear T, Davies JK & Jenkin GA, et al. Identification of Mycobacterium ulcerans in the environment from regions in southeast Australia in which it is endemic with sequence capture-PCR. Applied Environ Microbiol 2000;66:3206–3213.
- 19
MacKay WG, Williams CL & McMillan M, et al. Evaluation of protocol using gene capture and PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in feces. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:4589–4593.
- 20↑
Nugent J, Birch-Machin I & Smith KC, et al. Analysis of equid herpesvirus 1 strain variation reveals a point mutation of the DNA polymerase strongly associated with neuropathogenic versus nonneuropathogenic disease outbreaks. J Virol 2006;80:4047–4060.
- 21
Borchers K, Slater J. A nested PCR for the detection and differentiation of EHV-1 and EHV-4. J Virol Meth 1993;45:331–336.
- 22
Allen GP, Breathnach CC. Quantification by real-time PCR of the magnitude and duration of leukocyte-associated viraemia in horses infected with neuropathogenic vs non-neuropathogenic strains of EHV-1. Equine Vet J 2006;38:252–257.
- 23↑
Muir P, Nicholson F & Jhetam M, et al. Rapid diagnosis of enterovirus infection by magnetic bead extraction and polymerase chain reaction detection of enterovirus RNA in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:31–38.
- 24
Welch HM, Bridges CG & Lyon AM, et al. Latent equid herpesviruses 1 and 4: detection and distinction using the polymerase chain reaction and co-cultivation from lymphoid tissues. J Gen Virol 1992;73:261–268.
- 25
Edington N, Welch HM, Griffiths L. The prevalence of latent equid herpesviruses in the tissues of 40 abattoir horses. Equine Vet J 1994;26:140–142.
- 26
Smith D, Hamblin AS & Iqbal J, et al. In vitro reactivation of latent EHV-1 from CD5+ and CD8+ leukocytes indirectly by IL-2 or chorionic gonadotrophin. J Gen Virol 1998;79:2997–3004.
Appendix
Oligonucleotide capture probe and PCR amplification primersd used to detect EHV-1 DNA in MLN tissue collected via biopsy from 36 horses.
Primer or probe | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sequence-capture probe | |||||||
Biotin-ORF30-R-#4 | BioTEG-CCG TAA ACC GAG TTG CAT ATC ACC | ||||||
Outer PCR primers | |||||||
ORF30-F-#8 | GTG GAC GGT ACC CCG GAC | ||||||
ORF30-R-#2 | GTG GGG ATT CGC GCC CTC ACC | ||||||
Nested PCR primers | |||||||
ORF30-F-#7 | GGG AGC AAA GGT TCT AGA CC | ||||||
ORF30-R-#3 | AGC CAG TCG CGC AGC AAG ATG |