Evaluation of well-being, productivity, and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls

Leena Anil Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Leena Anil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Sukumarannair S. Anil Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Sukumarannair S. Anil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVSc, PhD
,
John Deen Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by John Deen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Samuel K. Baidoo Southern Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN 56093.

Search for other papers by Samuel K. Baidoo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Jonathan E. Wheaton College of Veterinary Medicine, and the Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Jonathan E. Wheaton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To compare well-being, performance, and longevity of gestating sows housed in stalls or in pens with an electronic sow feeder (ESF).

Animals—382 pregnant sows of parities 1 through 6.

Procedure—Sows were housed in separate stalls (n = 176) or group pens (206) with an ESF. Well-being of sows was assessed at various time points in terms of injuries, salivary cortisol concentration, and behavior in a novel arena or to a novel object. Farrowing performance and longevity of sows were also assessed.

Results—Total injury scores (TIS) of sows in pens were significantly higher at initial introduction and mixing. In stall-housed sows, TIS was significantly higher during late gestation. The TIS and cortisol concentration were significantly lower in stall-housed sows, compared with values for sows in pens. As parity increased, the likelihood of higher median TIS decreased significantly in pen-housed sows and increased significantly in stall-housed sows. The TIS of sows in pens was negatively correlated with body weight and backfat thickness, whereas these correlations were positive in stall-housed sows. Farrowing performance and results for novel arena or objects did not differ. Proportion of sows removed was significantly higher for pens than for stalls; lameness was the major reason for removal for both systems.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Stalls impose space restrictions for larger sows, resulting in injuries during late gestation. Interventions are needed to minimize aggression during initial introduction and mixing and at the ESF in pens to reduce severe injuries or lameness of gestating sows. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1630–1638)

Abstract

Objective—To compare well-being, performance, and longevity of gestating sows housed in stalls or in pens with an electronic sow feeder (ESF).

Animals—382 pregnant sows of parities 1 through 6.

Procedure—Sows were housed in separate stalls (n = 176) or group pens (206) with an ESF. Well-being of sows was assessed at various time points in terms of injuries, salivary cortisol concentration, and behavior in a novel arena or to a novel object. Farrowing performance and longevity of sows were also assessed.

Results—Total injury scores (TIS) of sows in pens were significantly higher at initial introduction and mixing. In stall-housed sows, TIS was significantly higher during late gestation. The TIS and cortisol concentration were significantly lower in stall-housed sows, compared with values for sows in pens. As parity increased, the likelihood of higher median TIS decreased significantly in pen-housed sows and increased significantly in stall-housed sows. The TIS of sows in pens was negatively correlated with body weight and backfat thickness, whereas these correlations were positive in stall-housed sows. Farrowing performance and results for novel arena or objects did not differ. Proportion of sows removed was significantly higher for pens than for stalls; lameness was the major reason for removal for both systems.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Stalls impose space restrictions for larger sows, resulting in injuries during late gestation. Interventions are needed to minimize aggression during initial introduction and mixing and at the ESF in pens to reduce severe injuries or lameness of gestating sows. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1630–1638)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 133 0 0
Full Text Views 2589 2233 165
PDF Downloads 422 169 13
Advertisement