Effect of intensity of fecal pat sampling on estimates of Escherichia coli O157 prevalence

Alejandro Echeverry Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.

Search for other papers by Alejandro Echeverry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Guy H. Loneragan Feedlot Research Group, Division of Agriculture, College of Agriculture, Nursing and Natural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79016.

Search for other papers by Guy H. Loneragan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Bruce A. Wagner USDA:Animal Plant Health Inspection Service:Veterinary Services:Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Mail Stop 2E7, 2150 Centre Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80526.

Search for other papers by Bruce A. Wagner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Mindy M. Brashears Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.

Search for other papers by Mindy M. Brashears in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate site-to-site variation within fecal pats from cattle with regard to detection of Escherichia coli O157 and determine the effect on the accuracy of prevalence estimates of assay of multiple samples collected from the same fecal pat.

Sample Population—120 freshly voided fecal pats collected from 2 beef feedlots.

Procedures—5 samples were systematically collected from each fecal pat and analyzed for E coli O157 via selective preenrichment techniques, immunomagnetic separation, and biochemical tests. Presumptive isolates were definitively identified via agglutination assays and polymerase chain reaction techniques. Best estimators of prevalence were calculated from the distribution of E coli O157–positive samples per pat.

Results—Of the 120 fecal pats, 96, 13, 4, 2, 3, and 2 fecal pats had 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 E coli O157–positive samples, respectively. The greatest estimate of E coli O157 prevalence (20%) was achieved when all 5 samples were assessed; this estimate represented a 2.4- fold increase in prevalence, compared with that provided via analysis of 1 sample/pat (8.2%). Compared with assessment of 5 sites/pat, the relative sensitivity of detecting an E coli O157–positive fecal pat via analysis of 1 site/pat was 40.1%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that estimates of E coli O157 prevalence derived from sampling of 1 location/pat are likely underestimates of the true prevalence of this pathogen in fecal pats (and by extension, cattle). Additional research is warranted to confirm these results in situations of high and low prevalence and across different feedlots. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:2023–2027)

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate site-to-site variation within fecal pats from cattle with regard to detection of Escherichia coli O157 and determine the effect on the accuracy of prevalence estimates of assay of multiple samples collected from the same fecal pat.

Sample Population—120 freshly voided fecal pats collected from 2 beef feedlots.

Procedures—5 samples were systematically collected from each fecal pat and analyzed for E coli O157 via selective preenrichment techniques, immunomagnetic separation, and biochemical tests. Presumptive isolates were definitively identified via agglutination assays and polymerase chain reaction techniques. Best estimators of prevalence were calculated from the distribution of E coli O157–positive samples per pat.

Results—Of the 120 fecal pats, 96, 13, 4, 2, 3, and 2 fecal pats had 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 E coli O157–positive samples, respectively. The greatest estimate of E coli O157 prevalence (20%) was achieved when all 5 samples were assessed; this estimate represented a 2.4- fold increase in prevalence, compared with that provided via analysis of 1 sample/pat (8.2%). Compared with assessment of 5 sites/pat, the relative sensitivity of detecting an E coli O157–positive fecal pat via analysis of 1 site/pat was 40.1%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest that estimates of E coli O157 prevalence derived from sampling of 1 location/pat are likely underestimates of the true prevalence of this pathogen in fecal pats (and by extension, cattle). Additional research is warranted to confirm these results in situations of high and low prevalence and across different feedlots. (Am J Vet Res 2005;66:2023–2027)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 29 0 0
Full Text Views 1005 894 277
PDF Downloads 123 97 3
Advertisement