Evaluation of cross-reactivity of allergens by use of intradermal testing in atopic dogs

Ralf S. Mueller Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Ralf S. Mueller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet
,
Phillip L. Chapman College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and the Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

Search for other papers by Phillip L. Chapman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Rodney E.W. Rosychuk Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Rodney E.W. Rosychuk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sonya V. Bettenay Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Sonya V. Bettenay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc
, and
Kathryn V. Fieseler Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Kathryn V. Fieseler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Abstract

Objective—To examine cross-reactivity of aeroallergens in Colorado and surrounding states by evaluating concurrent positive reactions of related and nonrelated allergens of intradermal tests in dogs.

Sample Population—Intradermal test results of 268 atopic dogs.

Procedure—A retrospective evaluation of skin test results for 268 dogs was performed. Pairs of closely related and nonrelated allergens were evaluated. Group 1 consisted of closely related allergens with demonstrated antibody cross-reactivity in humans. In group 2, allergens of the same plant group (ie, trees, grasses, or weeds) that were not closely related were paired. In group 3, allergen pairs were of different plant groups. Plant allergens were paired with dust mite allergens, animal dander, or mold spores in group 4. In the last group, allergens not derived from plants were paired. Data were evaluated twice by use of a different definition of a positive reaction. Significance of the difference between group means of log odds ratios was estimated by use of a bootstrap percentile confidence interval.

Results—Significant differences in the number of concurrent positive reactions were not found between related versus nonrelated grass, weed, or tree allergens. Significant differences in the number of concurrent positive reactions were found between plant allergens of different groups (ie, grasses, weeds, and trees) and plant allergens of the same groups, related or nonrelated , as well as between plant-derived and nonplant-derived allergens. Many dogs reacting to a specific allergen did not react to a closely related allergen at the same time.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—These results provide evidence against clinically relevant cross-reactivity and suggest that allergen-specific immunotherapy should be formulated on the basis of single allergen test results. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:874–879)

Abstract

Objective—To examine cross-reactivity of aeroallergens in Colorado and surrounding states by evaluating concurrent positive reactions of related and nonrelated allergens of intradermal tests in dogs.

Sample Population—Intradermal test results of 268 atopic dogs.

Procedure—A retrospective evaluation of skin test results for 268 dogs was performed. Pairs of closely related and nonrelated allergens were evaluated. Group 1 consisted of closely related allergens with demonstrated antibody cross-reactivity in humans. In group 2, allergens of the same plant group (ie, trees, grasses, or weeds) that were not closely related were paired. In group 3, allergen pairs were of different plant groups. Plant allergens were paired with dust mite allergens, animal dander, or mold spores in group 4. In the last group, allergens not derived from plants were paired. Data were evaluated twice by use of a different definition of a positive reaction. Significance of the difference between group means of log odds ratios was estimated by use of a bootstrap percentile confidence interval.

Results—Significant differences in the number of concurrent positive reactions were not found between related versus nonrelated grass, weed, or tree allergens. Significant differences in the number of concurrent positive reactions were found between plant allergens of different groups (ie, grasses, weeds, and trees) and plant allergens of the same groups, related or nonrelated , as well as between plant-derived and nonplant-derived allergens. Many dogs reacting to a specific allergen did not react to a closely related allergen at the same time.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—These results provide evidence against clinically relevant cross-reactivity and suggest that allergen-specific immunotherapy should be formulated on the basis of single allergen test results. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:874–879)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 60 0 0
Full Text Views 900 713 52
PDF Downloads 132 57 7
Advertisement