Evaluation of small-intestinal submucosa implants for repair of meniscal defects in dogs

Janet A. Welch Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832.

Search for other papers by Janet A. Welch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Ronald D. Montgomery Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832.

Search for other papers by Ronald D. Montgomery in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Stephen D. Lenz Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832.

Search for other papers by Stephen D. Lenz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Pamela Plouhar DePuy Inc, 700 Orthopaedic Dr, Warsaw, IN 46581.

Search for other papers by Pamela Plouhar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Walter R. Shelton Mississippi Sports Medicine, 1325 E Fortification St, Jackson, MS 39202.

Search for other papers by Walter R. Shelton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD

Abstract

Objective—To assess the effects of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) implants on the healing of meniscal lesions in dogs.

Animals—16 adult Greyhounds of both sexes.

Procedure—Unilateral osteotomy was performed at time 0 to disrupt the medial collateral ligament attachment, and two (1 cranial and 1 caudal) 4-mm circular defects were created in the avascular portion of the medial meniscus. One defect was filled with an SIS graft, and the other defect remained empty (control). Three months later, the identical procedure was performed on the contralateral limb. Three months after the second surgery, dogs were euthanatized, and meniscal tissue specimens from both stifle joints were collected for gross, histologic, biomechanical, and biochemical evaluations.

Results—Regenerative tissue was evident in 4 (2 SIS-implanted and 2 control) of 16 defects examined histologically. In 3 defects, this thin bridge of tissue was composed of immature haphazardly arranged fibrous connective tissue with a relatively uniform distribution of fibroblasts. Aggregate modulus, Poisson ratio, permeability, and shear modulus were not significantly different between control and SIS-implanted defects either 3 or 6 months after surgery. Hydroxyproline content also did not differ between SIS-implanted and control defects at 3 or 6 months.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Implantation of porcine SIS into experimentally induced meniscal lesions in dogs did not promote tissue regeneration. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:427–431)

Abstract

Objective—To assess the effects of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) implants on the healing of meniscal lesions in dogs.

Animals—16 adult Greyhounds of both sexes.

Procedure—Unilateral osteotomy was performed at time 0 to disrupt the medial collateral ligament attachment, and two (1 cranial and 1 caudal) 4-mm circular defects were created in the avascular portion of the medial meniscus. One defect was filled with an SIS graft, and the other defect remained empty (control). Three months later, the identical procedure was performed on the contralateral limb. Three months after the second surgery, dogs were euthanatized, and meniscal tissue specimens from both stifle joints were collected for gross, histologic, biomechanical, and biochemical evaluations.

Results—Regenerative tissue was evident in 4 (2 SIS-implanted and 2 control) of 16 defects examined histologically. In 3 defects, this thin bridge of tissue was composed of immature haphazardly arranged fibrous connective tissue with a relatively uniform distribution of fibroblasts. Aggregate modulus, Poisson ratio, permeability, and shear modulus were not significantly different between control and SIS-implanted defects either 3 or 6 months after surgery. Hydroxyproline content also did not differ between SIS-implanted and control defects at 3 or 6 months.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Implantation of porcine SIS into experimentally induced meniscal lesions in dogs did not promote tissue regeneration. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:427–431)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 0 0
Full Text Views 1781 1688 637
PDF Downloads 77 39 1
Advertisement