Evaluation of rapid staining techniques for cytologic diagnosis of intracranial lesions

Sam N. Long Department of Small Animal Clinical Studies, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.

Search for other papers by Sam N. Long in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc
,
T. James Anderson Department of Small Animal Clinical Studies, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.

Search for other papers by T. James Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM&S, PhD
,
Fenella H. A. Long Department of Pathology, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.

Search for other papers by Fenella H. A. Long in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM&S, MVSc, MACVSc
, and
Pamela E. J. Johnston Department of Pathology, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.

Search for other papers by Pamela E. J. Johnston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM&S, PhD

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate 4 rapid supravital stains and 3 preparation techniques for use in the intraoperative diagnosis of intracranial lesions.

Animals—10 dogs and 1 cat euthanatized for intracranial lesions.

Procedure—Specimens were taken from lesions and slides prepared, using 3 techniques: touch impression, medium-pressure impression, or smear preparation. Preparations were then stained with 4 stains: modified Wright stain, May-Grünwald-Giemsa, toluidine blue, and zynostain and examined in a blinded randomized fashion. Cytologic diagnosis was compared with histopathologic diagnosis and classified on the basis of identification of the pathologic process and specific diagnosis into the following categories: complete correlation, partial correlation, or no correlation.

Results—An overall diagnostic accuracy of 81% (107/132) was achieved on the basis of a combination of partial and complete correlation. Of the stains examined, modified Wright stain appeared to be most accurate, with complete correlation in 17 of 33 (52%) specimens and partial correlation in 12 of 33 (36%) specimens. Of the preparation methods, touch preparation and smear preparation provided the most accurate results, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 82% (36/44) for both methods. However, smear preparations appeared to be of greater diagnostic value, with fewer nondiagnostic specimens, compared with touch preparations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Cytologic preparations provide a useful diagnostic tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of intracranial lesions. All stains examined yielded promising results, the most accurate of which appeared to be the modified Wright stain. The smear preparation appeared to be the preparation method of greatest diagnostic value. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:381–386)

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate 4 rapid supravital stains and 3 preparation techniques for use in the intraoperative diagnosis of intracranial lesions.

Animals—10 dogs and 1 cat euthanatized for intracranial lesions.

Procedure—Specimens were taken from lesions and slides prepared, using 3 techniques: touch impression, medium-pressure impression, or smear preparation. Preparations were then stained with 4 stains: modified Wright stain, May-Grünwald-Giemsa, toluidine blue, and zynostain and examined in a blinded randomized fashion. Cytologic diagnosis was compared with histopathologic diagnosis and classified on the basis of identification of the pathologic process and specific diagnosis into the following categories: complete correlation, partial correlation, or no correlation.

Results—An overall diagnostic accuracy of 81% (107/132) was achieved on the basis of a combination of partial and complete correlation. Of the stains examined, modified Wright stain appeared to be most accurate, with complete correlation in 17 of 33 (52%) specimens and partial correlation in 12 of 33 (36%) specimens. Of the preparation methods, touch preparation and smear preparation provided the most accurate results, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 82% (36/44) for both methods. However, smear preparations appeared to be of greater diagnostic value, with fewer nondiagnostic specimens, compared with touch preparations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Cytologic preparations provide a useful diagnostic tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of intracranial lesions. All stains examined yielded promising results, the most accurate of which appeared to be the modified Wright stain. The smear preparation appeared to be the preparation method of greatest diagnostic value. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:381–386)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 40 0 0
Full Text Views 168 103 6
PDF Downloads 79 47 3
Advertisement