Effects of intranasal inoculation with Bordetella bronchiseptica, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, or a combination of both organisms on subsequent infection with Pasteurella multocida in pigs

Susan L. Brockmeier Respiratory Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, 2300 Dayton Avenue, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010.

Search for other papers by Susan L. Brockmeier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Mitchell V. Palmer Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, 2300 Dayton Avenue, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010.

Search for other papers by Mitchell V. Palmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Steven R. Bolin Prion Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, 2300 Dayton Avenue, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010.
Present address is Animal Health Diagnostic Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Steven R. Bolin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Richard B. Rimler Respiratory Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, 2300 Dayton Avenue, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010.

Search for other papers by Richard B. Rimler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine effects of intranasal inoculation with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) or Bordetella bronchiseptica on challenge with nontoxigenic Pasteurella multocida in pigs.

Animals—Seventy 3-week-old pigs.

Procedure—In experiment 1, pigs were not inoculated (n= 10) or were inoculated with PRRSV (10), P multocida (10), or PRRSV followed by challenge with P multocida (10). In experiment 2, pigs were not inoculated (n = 10) or were inoculated with B bronchiseptica (10) or PRRSV and B bronchiseptica (10); all pigs were challenged with P multocida. Five pigs from each group were necropsied 14 and 21 days after initial inoculations.

ResultsPasteurella multocida was not isolated from tissue specimens of pigs challenged with P multocida alone or after inoculation with PRRSV. However, in pigs challenged after inoculation with B bronchiseptica, P multocida was isolated from specimens of the nasal cavity and tonsil of the soft palate. Number of bacteria isolated increased in pigs challenged after coinoculation with PRRSV and B bronchiseptica, and all 3 agents were isolated from pneumonic lesions in these pigs.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—Infection of pigs with B bronchiseptica but not PRRSV prior to challenge with P multocida resulted in colonization of the upper respiratory tract and tonsil of the soft palate with P multocida. Coinfection with PRRSV and B bronchiseptica predisposed pigs to infection of the upper respiratory tract and lung with P multocida. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and B bronchiseptica may interact to adversely affect respiratory tract defense mechanisms, leaving pigs especially vulnerable to infection with secondary agents such as P multocida. (Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:521–525)

Abstract

Objective—To determine effects of intranasal inoculation with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) or Bordetella bronchiseptica on challenge with nontoxigenic Pasteurella multocida in pigs.

Animals—Seventy 3-week-old pigs.

Procedure—In experiment 1, pigs were not inoculated (n= 10) or were inoculated with PRRSV (10), P multocida (10), or PRRSV followed by challenge with P multocida (10). In experiment 2, pigs were not inoculated (n = 10) or were inoculated with B bronchiseptica (10) or PRRSV and B bronchiseptica (10); all pigs were challenged with P multocida. Five pigs from each group were necropsied 14 and 21 days after initial inoculations.

ResultsPasteurella multocida was not isolated from tissue specimens of pigs challenged with P multocida alone or after inoculation with PRRSV. However, in pigs challenged after inoculation with B bronchiseptica, P multocida was isolated from specimens of the nasal cavity and tonsil of the soft palate. Number of bacteria isolated increased in pigs challenged after coinoculation with PRRSV and B bronchiseptica, and all 3 agents were isolated from pneumonic lesions in these pigs.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—Infection of pigs with B bronchiseptica but not PRRSV prior to challenge with P multocida resulted in colonization of the upper respiratory tract and tonsil of the soft palate with P multocida. Coinfection with PRRSV and B bronchiseptica predisposed pigs to infection of the upper respiratory tract and lung with P multocida. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and B bronchiseptica may interact to adversely affect respiratory tract defense mechanisms, leaving pigs especially vulnerable to infection with secondary agents such as P multocida. (Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:521–525)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 90 0 0
Full Text Views 3490 3095 108
PDF Downloads 245 112 7
Advertisement