Evaluation of cow-level risk factors for the development of winter dysentery in dairy cattle

David R. Smith From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by David R. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Paula J. Fedorka-Cray From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Paula J. Fedorka-Cray in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Ram Mohan From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Ram Mohan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Kenny V. Brock From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Kenny V. Brock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Thomas E. Wittum From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Thomas E. Wittum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Paul S. Morley From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Paul S. Morley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Kent H. Hoblet From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Kent H. Hoblet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
, and
Linda J. Saif From the Food Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691 (Smith, Brock, Saif); the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010 (Fedorka-Cray); the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, 8995 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (Mohan); and the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (Wittum, Morley, Hoblet).

Search for other papers by Linda J. Saif in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective

To identify exposures to etiologic agents and to identify characteristics that could explain risk of disease for adult cattle in herds affected by winter dysentery (WD).

Animals

229 lactating and nonlactating adult cattle (125 case and 104 control cattle) selected from 12 dairy herds.

Procedure

A case-control study, using multivariate conditional logistic regression and controlling for herd effects, was used to develop a model for risk factors associated with disease for each cow.

Results

Likelihood of developing disease increased as the ELISA value for bovine coronavirus (BCV) antigen detectable in feces increased (odds ratio [OR] = 2.94 for each 0.100 increase in BCV antigen ELISA value). Pregnant cattle were less likely to develop WD, compared with nonpregnant herdmates. Cows with high acute BCV antibody titers that seroresponded had greater odds of developing disease, compared with seroresponding cows with low acute titers. However, among those cows that did not serorespond, high acute antibody titers were associated with lower odds of developing the disease.

Conclusion

In herds affected by WD, ill cows were more likely to shed detectable amounts of BCV antigen in their feces, and pregnancy appeared to protect cattle from the disease. The measured interaction between BCV seroresponse and acute BCV antibody titer may be evidence of an immunopathologic condition, but could also have been attributable to dynamics of the ELISA or study design.

Clinical Relevance

Factors that explained a cow's risk for illness within WD-affected herds may have been surrogate measures for that cow's nonspecific and BCV-specific immune profile. (Am J Vet Res 1998;59:986–993)

Abstract

Objective

To identify exposures to etiologic agents and to identify characteristics that could explain risk of disease for adult cattle in herds affected by winter dysentery (WD).

Animals

229 lactating and nonlactating adult cattle (125 case and 104 control cattle) selected from 12 dairy herds.

Procedure

A case-control study, using multivariate conditional logistic regression and controlling for herd effects, was used to develop a model for risk factors associated with disease for each cow.

Results

Likelihood of developing disease increased as the ELISA value for bovine coronavirus (BCV) antigen detectable in feces increased (odds ratio [OR] = 2.94 for each 0.100 increase in BCV antigen ELISA value). Pregnant cattle were less likely to develop WD, compared with nonpregnant herdmates. Cows with high acute BCV antibody titers that seroresponded had greater odds of developing disease, compared with seroresponding cows with low acute titers. However, among those cows that did not serorespond, high acute antibody titers were associated with lower odds of developing the disease.

Conclusion

In herds affected by WD, ill cows were more likely to shed detectable amounts of BCV antigen in their feces, and pregnancy appeared to protect cattle from the disease. The measured interaction between BCV seroresponse and acute BCV antibody titer may be evidence of an immunopathologic condition, but could also have been attributable to dynamics of the ELISA or study design.

Clinical Relevance

Factors that explained a cow's risk for illness within WD-affected herds may have been surrogate measures for that cow's nonspecific and BCV-specific immune profile. (Am J Vet Res 1998;59:986–993)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1512 1511 445
PDF Downloads 149 149 2
Advertisement