Development of an automated turbidimetric immunoassay for quantification of bovine serum immunoglobulin G

L. R. Etzel From AMPC Inc, 2325 North Loop Dr, PO Box 645, Ames, IA 50010 (Etzel, Strohbehn) and Midland Bioproducts, 800 Snedden Dr, PO Box 309, Boone, IA 50036 (McVicker).

Search for other papers by L. R. Etzel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
R. E. Strohbehn From AMPC Inc, 2325 North Loop Dr, PO Box 645, Ames, IA 50010 (Etzel, Strohbehn) and Midland Bioproducts, 800 Snedden Dr, PO Box 309, Boone, IA 50036 (McVicker).

Search for other papers by R. E. Strohbehn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
J. K. McVicker From AMPC Inc, 2325 North Loop Dr, PO Box 645, Ames, IA 50010 (Etzel, Strohbehn) and Midland Bioproducts, 800 Snedden Dr, PO Box 309, Boone, IA 50036 (McVicker).

Search for other papers by J. K. McVicker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS

SUMMARY

Objective

To develop an automated turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA) for measurement of bovine IgG.

Sample Population

24 bovine serum samples.

Procedure

IgG concentration was determined by use of the TIA, and results were compared with those of the radial immunodiffusion (RID) method. Variables were determined, using commercially available reagents and a clinical biochemical analyzer. For the TIA, polyclonal goat anti-bovine IgG (Fc specific) serum, bovine IgG calibrator serum, and polyethylene glycol reaction buffer were used. Sample concentrations were determined by the instrument, using the linear regression method of least squares. The accuracy of this assay was validated by referencing to a purified bovine IgG standard and by recovery of control standards. Parallelism was documented by assay linearity and serial sample dilution linearity. Interference resulting from hemolyzed samples was examined.

Results

The TIA method correlated positively (r = 0.9957) and significantly (P < 0.05) with the RID method, yielding a regression equation with slope of 0.78708 and y-intercept of 1.02102. Bias attributable to hemolysis was not observed.

Conclusions

The TIA method is automated, accurate, and precise for bovine serum IgG quantification.

Clinical Relevance

This assay provides sample results in approximately 10 minutes and may be used as an alternative to the manual RID method. (Am J Vet Res 1997;58:1201–1205)

SUMMARY

Objective

To develop an automated turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA) for measurement of bovine IgG.

Sample Population

24 bovine serum samples.

Procedure

IgG concentration was determined by use of the TIA, and results were compared with those of the radial immunodiffusion (RID) method. Variables were determined, using commercially available reagents and a clinical biochemical analyzer. For the TIA, polyclonal goat anti-bovine IgG (Fc specific) serum, bovine IgG calibrator serum, and polyethylene glycol reaction buffer were used. Sample concentrations were determined by the instrument, using the linear regression method of least squares. The accuracy of this assay was validated by referencing to a purified bovine IgG standard and by recovery of control standards. Parallelism was documented by assay linearity and serial sample dilution linearity. Interference resulting from hemolyzed samples was examined.

Results

The TIA method correlated positively (r = 0.9957) and significantly (P < 0.05) with the RID method, yielding a regression equation with slope of 0.78708 and y-intercept of 1.02102. Bias attributable to hemolysis was not observed.

Conclusions

The TIA method is automated, accurate, and precise for bovine serum IgG quantification.

Clinical Relevance

This assay provides sample results in approximately 10 minutes and may be used as an alternative to the manual RID method. (Am J Vet Res 1997;58:1201–1205)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1446 1418 81
PDF Downloads 127 116 5
Advertisement