Effect of anesthesia and surgery on energy expenditure determined by indirect calorimetry in dogs with malignant and nonmalignant conditions

Gregory K. Ogilvie From the Comparative Oncology Unit, Departments of Clinical Sciences (Ogilvie, Salman, Kesel) and Pathology (Fettman), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Gregory K. Ogilvie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Mowafak D. Salman From the Comparative Oncology Unit, Departments of Clinical Sciences (Ogilvie, Salman, Kesel) and Pathology (Fettman), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Mowafak D. Salman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVMS, MPVM, PhD
,
M. Lynne Kesel From the Comparative Oncology Unit, Departments of Clinical Sciences (Ogilvie, Salman, Kesel) and Pathology (Fettman), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by M. Lynne Kesel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Martin J. Fettman From the Comparative Oncology Unit, Departments of Clinical Sciences (Ogilvie, Salman, Kesel) and Pathology (Fettman), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Martin J. Fettman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective

To determine energy expenditure (EE) of apparently resting, client-owned dogs with malignant or nonmalignant diseases that were recovering from anesthesia and surgery, and compare those values with values from clinically normal, apparently resting, client-owned dogs.

Animals

40 apparently resting, client-owned dogs that had been given general anesthesia for various elective and nonelective surgical procedures, and 30 apparently resting, clinically normal client-owned dogs used as controls.

Procedure

EE was determined, using an open-flow indirect calorimetry system. Each dog was evaluated before and after surgery (0, 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery, then at suture removal > 14 days later) and compared with apparently resting, clinically normal, client-owned dogs (n = 30). Parameters evaluated were rate of oxygen consumption (Vo2 /kg of body weight: ml/min/kg; Vo2 /kg0.75: ml/min/kg0.75), EE (EE/kg: kcal/kg/d; EE/kg0.75: kcal/kg0.75/d), and respiratory quotient.

Results

Surgery and anesthesia did not significantly alter any of these parameters at any time assessed in any group. The pretreatment Vo. and EE were significantly lower in the dogs with cancer, compared with dogs of other groups.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the EE of a re-stricted group of dogs that undergo anesthesia and surgery for malignant and nonmalignant conditions does not increase from baseline values or when compared with values in clinically normal, client-owned dogs.

Clinical Relevance

This information may be of value when planning nutritional treatment for dogs recovering from anesthesia and surgery. (Am J Vet Res 1996;57:1321-1326)

Abstract

Objective

To determine energy expenditure (EE) of apparently resting, client-owned dogs with malignant or nonmalignant diseases that were recovering from anesthesia and surgery, and compare those values with values from clinically normal, apparently resting, client-owned dogs.

Animals

40 apparently resting, client-owned dogs that had been given general anesthesia for various elective and nonelective surgical procedures, and 30 apparently resting, clinically normal client-owned dogs used as controls.

Procedure

EE was determined, using an open-flow indirect calorimetry system. Each dog was evaluated before and after surgery (0, 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery, then at suture removal > 14 days later) and compared with apparently resting, clinically normal, client-owned dogs (n = 30). Parameters evaluated were rate of oxygen consumption (Vo2 /kg of body weight: ml/min/kg; Vo2 /kg0.75: ml/min/kg0.75), EE (EE/kg: kcal/kg/d; EE/kg0.75: kcal/kg0.75/d), and respiratory quotient.

Results

Surgery and anesthesia did not significantly alter any of these parameters at any time assessed in any group. The pretreatment Vo. and EE were significantly lower in the dogs with cancer, compared with dogs of other groups.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the EE of a re-stricted group of dogs that undergo anesthesia and surgery for malignant and nonmalignant conditions does not increase from baseline values or when compared with values in clinically normal, client-owned dogs.

Clinical Relevance

This information may be of value when planning nutritional treatment for dogs recovering from anesthesia and surgery. (Am J Vet Res 1996;57:1321-1326)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1172 1160 110
PDF Downloads 70 62 1
Advertisement