Use of a computerized system for evaluation of equine spermatozoal motility

Dickson D. Varner From the Departments of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery (Varner) and Veterinary Anatomy (Johnson, Vaughan), College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4475.

Search for other papers by Dickson D. Varner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Scott D. Vaughan From the Departments of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery (Varner) and Veterinary Anatomy (Johnson, Vaughan), College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4475.

Search for other papers by Scott D. Vaughan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
, and
Larry Johnson From the Departments of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery (Varner) and Veterinary Anatomy (Johnson, Vaughan), College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4475.

Search for other papers by Larry Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

SUMMARY

Three ejaculates from each of 3 stallions were used to evaluate a computerized system (Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer; htma) for measuring equine spermatozoal motility. Variance components (ejaculate-within-stallion, chamber-within-ejaculate, and microscopic field-within-chamber) were determined for each stallion after diluting ejaculates to 25 × 106 spermatozoa/ml with a skim milk-glucose seminal extender. The htma was compared with frame-by-frame playback videomicrography (video) for determining: percentage of spermatozoal motility and spermatozoal number in microscopic fields; curvilinear velocity and straight-line velocity of individual spermatozoa for 5 track types; and repeatability of those velocity measurements. The effect of spermatozoal number per microscopic field on incidence of intersecting spermatozoa and the outcome of intersecting spermatozoa also were evaluated. Greatest variability in motility measures was generally attributed to the microscopic field-within-chamber component. The htma was highly correlated with video for estimation of spermatozoal numbers per microscopic field (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) and motility (r = 0.97; P < 0.001); however over the entire range of spermatozoal numbers, the htma yielded higher spermatozoal numbers per microscopic field (P < 0.05) and higher motility (P < 0.05) than did video. The htma- and video-derived measurements of curvilinear and straight-line velocities were highly correlated for all spermatozoal track types, but both measures were higher (P < 0.05) by use of the htma than by use of video for most track types. For 3 of 5 track types, measurements of curvilinear and straight-line velocities were less variable (P < 0.05), using the htma, rather than video. Using the htma, the number of intersecting spermatozoa was highly correlated with spermatozoal numbers per microscopic field (r = 0.97; P < 0.001). The percentage of erroneous track interpretations involving intersecting spermatozoa was high (85.3 ± 2.7%). The htma was a reliable system for determining percentage of spermatozoal motility and velocity measures in video recordings of equine semen diluted to spermatozoal concentration of 25 × 106/ml prior to evaluation.

SUMMARY

Three ejaculates from each of 3 stallions were used to evaluate a computerized system (Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer; htma) for measuring equine spermatozoal motility. Variance components (ejaculate-within-stallion, chamber-within-ejaculate, and microscopic field-within-chamber) were determined for each stallion after diluting ejaculates to 25 × 106 spermatozoa/ml with a skim milk-glucose seminal extender. The htma was compared with frame-by-frame playback videomicrography (video) for determining: percentage of spermatozoal motility and spermatozoal number in microscopic fields; curvilinear velocity and straight-line velocity of individual spermatozoa for 5 track types; and repeatability of those velocity measurements. The effect of spermatozoal number per microscopic field on incidence of intersecting spermatozoa and the outcome of intersecting spermatozoa also were evaluated. Greatest variability in motility measures was generally attributed to the microscopic field-within-chamber component. The htma was highly correlated with video for estimation of spermatozoal numbers per microscopic field (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) and motility (r = 0.97; P < 0.001); however over the entire range of spermatozoal numbers, the htma yielded higher spermatozoal numbers per microscopic field (P < 0.05) and higher motility (P < 0.05) than did video. The htma- and video-derived measurements of curvilinear and straight-line velocities were highly correlated for all spermatozoal track types, but both measures were higher (P < 0.05) by use of the htma than by use of video for most track types. For 3 of 5 track types, measurements of curvilinear and straight-line velocities were less variable (P < 0.05), using the htma, rather than video. Using the htma, the number of intersecting spermatozoa was highly correlated with spermatozoal numbers per microscopic field (r = 0.97; P < 0.001). The percentage of erroneous track interpretations involving intersecting spermatozoa was high (85.3 ± 2.7%). The htma was a reliable system for determining percentage of spermatozoal motility and velocity measures in video recordings of equine semen diluted to spermatozoal concentration of 25 × 106/ml prior to evaluation.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 480 480 248
PDF Downloads 59 59 2
Advertisement