Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author or Editor: Takayuki Kobayashi x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search


Objective—To establish a method of F-wave examinations and to determine values of F-wave conduction velocity (FWCV) and F-wave latency for the tibial nerve of clinically normal dogs.

Animals—21 clinically normal dogs.

Procedure—The F-waves were elicited from the interosseous muscles via stimulation of the tibial nerve. The FWCV was determined by using the F-wave shortest value and the surface distance corresponding to the tibial nerve length. Correlation between the smallest latency value of the F-wave and the length of the tibial nerve and between the FWCV and rectal temperature were closely examined.

Results—F-wave latency was proportional to the length of the tibial nerve (correlation coefficient, 0.929). Mean ± SD FWCV was 77.98 ± 8.62 m/s. Regression equation was as follows: F-wave latency = 2.799 + (0.029 X length of the tibial nerve). The FWCV was increased when the measured rectal temperature was high. Correlation coefficient between FWCV and rectal temperature was 0.665.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—In the study reported here, we established a reliable method for clinical evaluation of the F-wave. When assessing nerve conduction velocity, it is essential to measure nerve length along the pathway that the nerve impulse travels. This method of F-wave examination is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of suspected dysfunction of the peripheral nervous system. (Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1262–1264)

Full access
in American Journal of Veterinary Research


Objective—To establish a method of F-wave evaluation and to determine normative values of F-wave parameters, including F-wave conduction velocity, persistence, and amplitude for the tibial nerve in cats.

Animals—30 clinically normal cats.

Procedures—F-waves elicited in the interosseous muscles by stimulation of the tibial nerve were recorded, and linear regression analyses of the shortest latency versus the length of the tibial nerve and the limb length were performed. F-wave persistence was calculated by dividing the number of recorded F-waves by the number of stimuli.

Results—The correlation coefficient between F-wave latency and nerve length was 0.92, and that between F-wave latency and limb length was 0.58. Mean ± SD F-wave conduction velocity of the tibial nerve was calculated to be 97.1 ± 5.0 m/s. Linear regression analysis yielded the regression equation as follows: F-wave latency (milliseconds) = 2.60 + (0.02 × nerve length [mm]). Mean F-wave persistence and amplitude were 98.7 ± 2.3% and 1.01 ± 0.62 mV, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that nerve length should be used for nerve conduction studies of F-waves in felids. The regression equation for F-wave latency, conduction velocity, persistence, and amplitude may contribute to the diagnosis of nervous system diseases or injury in cats, such as trauma to the spinal cord or diabetic neuropathy.

Full access
in American Journal of Veterinary Research