Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author or Editor: Suzanne L. Zweigart x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search

Objective

To describe and compare a simple continuous suture pattern with a simple interrupted pattern for enterotomy closure or end-to-end intestinal anastomosis.

Design

Retrospective study.

Animals

58 dogs and 25 cats that underwent enterotomy or intestinal resection and anastomosis.

Procedure

Signalment, surgical procedure, suture pattern, suture material, confirmation of dehiscence, and follow-up were reviewed. Groups were compared by procedure (anastomosis or enterotomy) and by suture pattern.

Results

57 animals underwent continuous closure; 26 had interrupted closure. Only polydioxanone or polypropylene suture materials were used. Overall, 81 (98%) animals had no signs of intestinal dehiscence and survived > 2 weeks. Two animals had confirmed dehiscence after foreign body removal, 1 of 57 (2%) after continuous closure, and 1 of 26 (4%) after interrupted closure.

Clinical Implications

The simple continuous closure pattern is an acceptable alternative to simple interrupted closure for small intestinal anastomosis or enterotomy closure. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:1507-1510)

Free access
in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association