Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for
- Author or Editor: Margaret Chu x
- Refine by Access: All Content x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether conservative lateral surgical margins (equal to tumor diameter for tumors < 2 cm in diameter or 2 cm for larger tumors) were noninferior to wide (3-cm) lateral surgical margins for achieving tumor-free histologic margins following excision of grade I and II cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs) in dogs.
ANIMALS
83 grade I and II MCTs excised with a deep surgical fascial margin and requisite lateral surgical margins from 68 dogs from 2007 to 2017. Tumors representing scar revision or local recurrence were excluded.
PROCEDURES
A pathology department database was searched to identify qualifying MCTs, and medical records were cross-referenced to obtain data regarding patients and tumors. Outcome (complete vs incomplete excision as histologically determined) was compared between conservative- and wide-margin groups. A noninferiority margin of ≥ 0.9 was used for the risk ratio (probability of complete excision for the conservative- vs wide-margin group), implying that noninferiority would be established if the data indicated that the true risk of complete excision with the conservative-margin approach was at worst 90% of that for the wide-margin approach.
RESULTS
The proportion of excised MCTs with tumor-free histologic margins was similar between the conservative- (43/46 [93%]) and wide- (34/37 [92%]) margin groups. There were no differences in tumor diameter or location between treatment groups. The risk ratio (1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.19) met the criterion for noninferiority.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The conservative-margin approach appeared to be noninferior to the wide-margin approach for achieving tumor-free histologic margins in the dogs of this study, and its use could potentially reduce the risk of postoperative complications. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2020;256:567-572
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To explore the differences in outcomes between dogs with intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSSs) partially occluded with a mattress suture with pledgets or attenuated with cellophane banding.
METHODS
74 dogs with IHPSSs were included in this retrospective study. Medical records between January 2000 and February 2020 were evaluated for information on dogs undergoing laparotomy with cellophane banding (group C) or mattress suture with pledgets (group P) for treatment of IHPSSs, including specific outcomes of survival time, persistence of clinical signs, and necessity of continued medical management. Primary veterinarians and owners were contacted for long-term follow-up.
RESULTS
51 dogs were entered in group C and 23 in group P. The duration of surgery was 154.6 minutes (136.3 to 170 minutes) for group C and 154.9 minutes (128.9 to 180.9 minutes) for group P. The short-term mortality rate was 2% for group C and 4% for group P. Dogs in group C had a median survival time of 3,537 days, while dogs in group P had a median survival time of 2,141 days. In the long term, dogs in group P received more medications than dogs in group C, but the distribution of the quality-of-life score was not different.
CONCLUSIONS
Mattress suture with pledgets can be used as an alternative to cellophane banding.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
For dogs with IHPSSs where full surgical dissection for placement of cellophane band is not possible, partial occlusion of the shunt with a mattress suture with pledgets is a viable option with acceptable long-term outcomes.