Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author or Editor: Jaap Wagenaar x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search


Objective—To compare sensitivity and specificity of various polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo in bovine urine and to compare results of the optimal PCR assay with results of immunofluorescence, nucleic acid hybridization, and bacteriologic culture.

Animals—6 heifers.

Procedure—Heifers were exposed to serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis by conjunctival instillation of 106 leptospires on 3 successive days. Urine samples were collected before and after infection. Sensitivity and specificity of 5 PCR assays were compared, to determine the optimal assay for use with bovine urine samples. The optimal PCR assay was then compared with results of bacteriologic culture, nucleic acid hybridization, and immunofluorescence.

Results—A PCR assay with the best combination of specificity (100%) and sensitivity (91%) was selected for comparison with the other diagnostic tests. Sensitivity for nucleic acid hybridization was 55%, whereas sensitivity for bacteriologic culture and immunofluorescence was 89 to 93%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Bacteriologic culture, PCR, and immunofluorescence were sensitive for detection of L borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis in urine specimens of cattle, but a single technique was not the most sensitive for each animal tested. Therefore, the use of 2 techniques in combination is warranted for maximal sensitivity for diagnosis. (Am J Vet Res 2000;61:316–320)

Full access
in American Journal of Veterinary Research