Objective—To characterize echocardiographic and ECG findings in ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) evaluated at a clinical practice.
Design—Retrospective case series.
Animals—95 client-owned ferrets.
Procedures—Medical records of all ferrets that had a cardiac evaluation (echocardiogram with or without ECG) performed between January 1994 and November 2009 were reviewed. Data analyzed included signalment; primary clinical sign or physical examination finding that prompted cardiac evaluation; echocardiographic diagnosis; ECG diagnosis; radiographic diagnosis (if radiographs were obtained within 1 month before or after the echocardiogram); presence of congestive heart failure (CHF) defined as pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, or ascites determined to be of cardiac origin; and any available follow-up echocardiographic or ECG diagnoses.
Results—Valvular regurgitation (VR) was the most common abnormal echocardiographic finding and was diagnosed in 49 of 95 ferrets, of which 44 had aortic VR, 24 had mitral VR, and 23 had > 1 valve affected. Congestive heart failure was diagnosed in 17 of 95 ferrets, which included all 4 ferrets that had dilated cardiomyopathy. Of the 65 ferrets with ECG results, 26 had atrioventricular block, of which 7 had third-degree atrioventricular block and 6 had CHF, syncope, or weakness.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The most frequent echocardiographic abnormality found in ferrets was VR, most commonly affecting the aortic and mitral valves. Dilated cardiomyopathy was infrequently diagnosed but was generally associated with CHF. The most frequent ECG abnormality was atrioventricular block, and third-degree atrioventricular block was often associated with CHF, weakness, or syncope.
Objective—To assess the frequency of heart murmurs
in overtly healthy cats.
Sample Population—103 healthy domestic cats.
Procedure—Background information and physical
characteristics were assessed in cats that were candidates
for blood donation during an 8-month period. For
cats with heart murmurs, additional information collected
included murmur timing, grade, point of maximal
intensity, and presence of additional heart sounds.
Results—Heart murmurs were detected in 22 of the
103 (21%) cats. Echocardiography was performed in 7
of those 22 cats. The echocardiogram was considered
normal in 1 cat; in the other 6 cats, diagnoses included
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (interventricular septal
hypertrophic form [IVSH]; n = 4), left ventricular
concentric hypertrophy with valvular disease (1), and
equivocal IVSH (1). Thirteen cats had more than 1
examination during the study; 3 of them developed
heart murmurs. There were no significant differences
in age, sex, breed, coat color, eye color, or heart rate
between cats with and without murmurs. Among the
103 cats, there were 6 pairs of siblings from 6 multiple-
cat households and 16 cats from 7 multiple-cat
households in which the cats were not related; the
proportion of cats with murmurs was higher in the
related cats (5/12) than in the unrelated cats (3/16),
but the difference was not significant.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated
that heart murmurs are detectable in a large
proportion of overtly healthy cats and that many murmurs
appear to be caused by structural heart disease
that is in a clinically latent state. ( J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:384–388)
Objective—To develop, validate, and evaluate a questionnaire (Cats’ Assessment Tool for Cardiac Health [CATCH] questionnaire) for assessing health-related quality of life in cats with cardiac disease.
Animals—275 cats with cardiac disease.
Procedures—The questionnaire was developed on the basis of clinical signs of cardiac disease in cats. A CATCH score was calculated by summing responses to questionnaire items; possible scores ranged from 0 to 80. For questionnaire validation, owners of 75 cats were asked to complete the questionnaire (10 owners completed the questionnaire twice). Disease severity was assessed with the International Small Animal Cardiac Health Council (ISACHC) classification for cardiac disease. Following validation, the final questionnaire was administered to owners of the remaining 200 cats.
Results—Internal consistency of the questionnaire was good, and the CATCH score was significantly correlated with ISACHC classification. For owners that completed the questionnaire twice, scores were significantly correlated. During the second phase of the study, the CATCH score ranged from 0 to 74 (median, 7) and was significantly correlated with ISACHC classification.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that the CATCH questionnaire is a valid and reliable method for assessing health-related quality of life in cats with cardiac disease. Further research is warranted to test the tool's sensitivity to changes in medical treatment and its potential role as a clinical and research tool.