Objective—To determine risk factors for development
of sequestra in cattle and identify factors associated
with a successful outcome.
Procedure—Medical records of cattle treated at veterinary
teaching hospitals in North America were
reviewed. To determine risk factors for osseous
sequestration, breed, age, and sex of cattle with
osseous sequestration were compared with breed,
age, and sex of all other cattle admitted during the
Results—110 cattle were included in the study. Three
had 2 sequestra; thus, 113 lesions were identified.
Most sequestra were associated with the bones of
the extremities, most commonly the third metacarpal
or third metatarsal bone. Ninety-two animals were
treated surgically (ie, sequestrectomy), 7 were treated
medically, 3 were initially treated medically and
were then treated surgically, and 8 were not treated.
Follow-up information was available for 65 animals
treated surgically and 6 animals treated medically.
Fifty-one (78%) animals treated surgically and 5 animals
treated medically had a successful outcome.
Cattle that were 6 months to 2 years old had a significantly
increased risk of developing a sequestrum,
compared with cattle < 6 months old. Cattle in which
sequestrectomy was performed with the aid of local
anesthesia were significantly more likely to undergo 2
or more surgical procedures than were cattle in which
sequestrectomy was performed with the aid of general
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggest
that sequestrectomy will result in a successful
outcome for most cattle with osseous sequestration.
(J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:376–383)
OBJECTIVE To evaluate agreement among diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia for scores determined by use of a simple descriptive scale (SDS) or a composite grading scale (CGS) for quality of recovery of horses from anesthesia and to investigate use of 3-axis accelerometry (3AA) for objective evaluation of recovery.
ANIMALS 12 healthy adult horses.
PROCEDURES Horses were fitted with a 3AA device and then were anesthetized. Eight diplomates evaluated recovery by use of an SDS, and 7 other diplomates evaluated recovery by use of a CGS. Agreement was tested with κ and AC1 statistics for the SDS and an ANOVA for the CGS. A library of mathematical models was used to map 3AA data against CGS scores.
RESULTS Agreement among diplomates using the SDS was slight (κ = 0.19; AC1 = 0.22). The CGS scores differed significantly among diplomates. Best fit of 3AA data against CGS scores yielded the following equation: RS = 9.998 × SG0.633 × ∑UG0.174, where RS is a horse's recovery score determined with 3AA, SG is acceleration of the successful attempt to stand, and ∑UG is the sum of accelerations of unsuccessful attempts to stand.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Subjective scoring of recovery of horses from anesthesia resulted in poor agreement among diplomates. Subjective scoring may lead to differences in conclusions about recovery quality; thus, there is a need for an objective scoring method. The 3AA system removed subjective bias in evaluations of recovery of horses and warrants further study.