AVMA Journals

February 2012, Vol. 73, No. 2, Pages 248-256

Evaluation of an alternative method of herd classification for infection with paratuberculosis in cattle herds in the United States

Saraya Tavornpanich, DVM, MPVM, PhD; Scott J. Wells, DVM, PhD; Charles P. Fossler, DVM, PhD; Allen J. Roussel, DVM, MS; Ian A. Gardner, BVSc, MPVM, PhD
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108. (Tavornpanich, Wells); Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, 2150 Centre Ave, Building B, Fort Collins, CO 80526. (Fossler); Department of Large Animal Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843. (Roussel); Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616. (Gardner)

Dr. Tavornpanich's present address is Section for Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute, Ullevålsveien 68, Pb 750 Sentrum, N-0106 Oslo, Norway.

Dr. Gardner's present address is Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.

Supported by USDA APHIS.

Address correspondence to Dr. Wells ().

Objective—To develop a better system for classification of herd infection status for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease [JD]) in US cattle herds on the basis of the risk of potential transmission of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratubeculosis.

Sample—Simulated data for herd size and within-herd prevalence; sensitivity and specificity for test methods obtained from consensus-based estimates.

Procedures—Interrelationships among variables influencing interpretation and classification of herd infection status for JD were evaluated by use of simulated data for various herd sizes, true within-herd prevalences, and sampling and testing methods. The probability of finding ≥ 1 infected animal in herds was estimated for various testing methods and sample sizes by use of hypergeometric random sampling.

Results—2 main components were required for the new herd JD classification system: the probability of detection of infection determined on the basis of test results from a sample of animals and the maximum detected number of animals with positive test results. Tables were constructed of the estimated probability of detection of infection, and the maximum number of cattle with positive test results or fecal pools with positive culture results with 95% confidence for classification of herd JD infection status were plotted. Herd risk for JD was categorized on the basis of 95% confidence that the true within-herd prevalence was ≤ 15%, ≤ 10%, ≤ 5%, or ≤ 2%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Analysis of the findings indicated that a scientifically rigorous and transparent herd classification system for JD in cattle is feasible.

Full Text PDF (486 KB) PDF Plus (422 KB)

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (486 KB)
View PDF Plus (422 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

Quick Search
Saraya Tavornpanich
Scott J. Wells
Charles P. Fossler
Allen J. Roussel
Ian A. Gardner

AVMA logo

American Veterinary Medical Association
Copyright © 2021  


Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.