Urinary tract infections are associated with a temporary or permanent breach in host defense mechanisms that allows virulent microbes to adhere, multiply, and persist within the urinary tract. Infections can be confined to a single site within the urogenital tract, such as the renal pelvis (pyelonephritis), ureter (ureteritis), bladder (cystitis), urethra (urethritis), prostate gland (prostatitis), or vagina (vaginitis), or can be found at multiple sites.1 Although fungi and viruses also infect the urinary tract, UTIs are most commonly caused by bacteria such as Escherichia coli, which is the most common uropathogen.2–4
Cranberries consist primarily of water (88%), but they also contain organic acids (including salicylate), fructose, high amounts of vitamin C (200 mg/kg of fresh berries), flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, catechins, and triterpinoids.4,5 The E coli strains that cause UTIs have proteinaceous macromolecules (fimbriae) that facilitate adhesion of bacteria to uroepithelial cells in the urinary tract. In vitro and in vivo studies5,6 indicate that cranberry products prevent bacterial adhesion to cells in the wall of the urinary tract.
Studies5,7 indicate that the consumption of cranberry extract can prevent UTIs in women. However, there is a paucity of studies on the benefits of cranberries for prevention of UTIs in dogs. Therefore, the objectives of the study reported here were to investigate the effect of cranberry extract on the development of UTIs in dogs with a history of recurrent UTIs and to evaluate effects of urine obtained from dogs provided cranberry extract on adhesion of E coli to MDCK cells.
Materials and Methods
Animals
The in vivo experiment involved 12 client-owned female dogs, each of which had at least 3 UTIs during the preceding year. All dogs were confirmed to have recovered from the most recent UTI, as determined on the basis of results of urinalysis and bacterial culture of a urine sample.
The in vitro experiment involved 6 client-owned dogs (4 mixed-breed dogs, 1 Pug, and 1 Shih Tzu). There were 3 neutered males and 3 spayed females. Age of the dogs ranged from 7 to 11 years (mean, 8.9 years), and body weight ranged from 6.5 to 20.5 kg (mean, 13.6 kg). All 6 dogs were considered healthy at the time of enrollment, as determined on the basis of the medical history and results of a complete physical examination (no signs of urinary tract disease).
Owners provided consent for inclusion of the dogs in the study. All dogs received care in accordance with institutional animal care and use committee guidelines.
Experimental design
In vivo experiment—Dogs were allocated into 2 groups (6 dogs/group). One group comprised 4 Schnauzers and 2 Toy Poodles (3 spayed and 3 sexually intact; age of the dogs ranged from 7 to 14 years [mean, 9.8 years], and body weight ranged from 2.8 to 7.4 kg [mean, 5.6 kg]). These dogs received cephalexina (20 mg/kg, PO, q 12 h for 14 days). The second group comprised 4 Schnauzers and 2 Chihuahuas (4 spayed and 2 sexually intact; age of the dogs ranged from 5 to 12 years [mean, 8.0 years], and body weight ranged from 2.5 to 7.3 kg [mean, 5.3 kg]). Dogs in the second group received powdered cranberry extractb daily for 6 months. The powder was mixed with food and administered to each dog at the morning meal. The amount of cranberry extract provided to each dog was the dose specified on the product (1 g for dogs < 25 kg and 2 g for dogs ≥ 25 kg). The first day of administration of cephalexin or cranberry extract was designated as day 1.
Dogs were monitored throughout the experiment. Blood samples and voided urine samples were collected from each dog immediately before onset of cephalexin or cranberry extract administration and then once per month for 6 months. Once each month, a complete physical examination, hematologic examination, biochemical analysis, urinalysis, and bacterial culture of a urine sample were performed.
In vitro experiment—Dogs received powdered cranberry extractb (1 g for dogs < 25 kg and 2 g for dogs ≥ 25 kg) daily for 60 days (1 day before administration of cranberry extract was designated as day 0). The powder was mixed with food and administered to each dog at the morning meal. Voided urine samples were collected from each dog immediately before onset of cranberry extract administration and on days 30 and 60.
Preparation of urine samples
Urine samples were collected in the morning and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 minutes to precipitate particulate matter. Supernatant was removed with a sterile Pasteur pipette and vacuum-filtered by use of a commercial filtration unit with a 0.22-μm polyether-sulfone filterc; filtered urine was collected in a sterile 50-mL conical tube and frozen at −20°C for use in a bacteriostasis assay.
Propagation of uropathogenic E coli strains and preparation of bacterial suspensions
Three uropathogenic E coli strains (C1–50, C2–48, and C3–48) were isolated from dogs with UTI examined at the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital of the National Chung Hsing University. The E coli strains were grown on blood agar plates at 35°C for 24 to 48 hours. After distinct bacterial colonies appeared, the plates were sealed and stored at 4°C until used for the bacteriostasis assay.
An E coli colony was selected; it was then streaked onto trypticase soy agard and incubated overnight at 35°C. The next morning, E coli were suspended in 3 or 5 mL of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution. A standard bacterial concentration of 106 CFUs/mL, as determined by use of a 0.5-McFarland standard,8 was used for the bacteriostasis assay.
Bacteriostasis assay
A swab specimen of the bacterial suspension was smeared onto plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar.e Seven holes were punched in each agar plate; 1 hole was filled with 100 μL of sterile saline solution (negative control sample), and the remaining 6 holes were each filled with 100 μL of the urine sample of 1 dog at 1 time point. A disk containing enrofloxacinf was used as the positive control sample. A positive result was considered to be an inhibition zone with a diameter > 21 mm. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours, and the inhibition zone around each hole was then assessed.
Preparation of MDCK cells
The MDCK cells were obtained from the Graduate Institute of Veterinary Pathobiology at National Chung Hsing University. They were maintained in DMEMg that contained 4.5 g of glucose/L, sodium pyruvate, and 4mM stable glutamine and 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum supplemented with 1mM sodium pyruvate and 1% (vol/vol) antimicrobial (penicillin, streptomycin, and amphotericin B) solution. Stock cultures of cells were propagated in 75-cm2 plastic flasks at 37°C in a humidified 95% O2–5% CO2 atmosphere and passaged as needed.
Antiadhesion assay
The efficacy of cranberry extract for inhibiting bacterial adherence to MDCK cells was evaluated by use of an in vitro assay with modifications described elsewhere.9 Antiadhesion assays were performed as follows.
The MDCK cells that had grown to confluence at 37°C were placed in 96-well plastic plates (104 cells/well) for the antiadhesion assay. Culture media were discarded, and each well was washed with PBS solution (100 μL). The wash solution was discarded, and plates were tapped dry on absorbent paper. Immediately before the assay, MDCK cells were fixed with 5% methanol. An aliquot (100 μL) of methanol was added to each well, and plates were allowed to sit undisturbed for 2 minutes. The methanol was then discarded, and plates were tapped dry on absorbent paper. Plates were then further dried in a laminar flow hood for 10 minutes.
A test sample of urine plus bacteria was created by mixing an aliquot of the bacterial suspension (a standard bacterial concentration of 106 CFUs/mL, as determined by use of a 0.5-McFarland standard8) with urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration. The ratio was 1:10 (1 part bacterial suspension to 9 parts urine sample). Each well of a 96-well plastic plate was prepared by adding 50 μL of the test sample (urine plus bacteria) and 150 μL of DMEM (final volume, 200 μL/well) to the methanol-fixed MDCK cells. Plates were then incubated at 25°C for 30 minutes.
After incubation was complete, the plates were incubated for an additional 60 minutes at 35°C to permit bacterial attachment. After this 60-minute incubation was complete, nonadhered bacteria and media were removed by aspiration, and the wells were rinsed 3 times with PBS solution (200 μL/rinse). Then, 200 μL of DMEM plus 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum was added to each well. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 18 hours to allow growth of attached bacteria. After the 18-hour incubation was complete, absorbance for each well was determined at 650 nm by use of a microplate readerh and commercial software.i
Microscopic examination
The MDCK cells that had grown to confluence at 37°C were placed in 24-well plastic plates (5 × 104 cells/well) for the antiadhesion assay. Culture media were discarded, and each well was washed with PBS solution (100 μL). The wash solution was discarded, and plates were tapped dry on absorbent paper. Immediately before the assay, MDCK cells were fixed with 5% methanol. An aliquot (200 μL) of methanol was added to each well, and plates were allowed to sit undisturbed for 2 minutes. The methanol was then discarded, and plates were tapped dry on absorbent paper. Plates were then further dried in a laminar flow hood for 10 minutes.
A test sample of urine plus bacteria was created by mixing an aliquot of the bacterial suspension (a standard bacterial concentration of 106 CFUs/mL, as determined by use of a 0.5-McFarland standard8) with urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration. The ratio was 1:10 (1 part bacterial suspension to 9 parts urine sample). Each well of a 24-well plastic plate was prepared by adding 200 μL of the test sample (urine plus bacteria) and 300 μL of DMEM (final volume, 200 μL/well) to the methanol-fixed MDCK cells. Plates were then incubated at 25°C for 30 minutes.
After the initial incubation was complete, the plates were incubated for an additional 3 hours. Slides were stained with crystal violet and examined microscopically (1,000X magnification).
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were tested by use of the Student t test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate results for the antiadhesion assay and microscopic examination.
Results
In vivo experiment
None of the 12 dogs developed a UTI during the experimental period as determined on the basis of a lack of clinical signs and laboratory results (especially results for bacterial culture of a urine sample) that yielded no evidence of infection. On the basis of the medical history of these dogs, 12 cases of UTI (95% confidence interval, 10 to 14 cases of UTI) would have been expected during the 6-month experimental period. No adverse effects attributable to treatment were reported.
In vitro experiment
Results of the bacteriostasis assay were the same for urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after the onset of cranberry extract administration to the 6 dogs. Enrofloxacin (positive control sample) yielded the only inhibition zone (diameter > 30 mm). No inhibition zone was observed around the sterile saline solution (negative control sample) or the urine samples of the 6 dogs (Figure 1).
Bacterial adhesion was reduced for urine samples obtained at 30 and 60 days from each of the 6 dogs, compared with results for the urine sample obtained before administration of cranberry extract. Mean ± SEM absorbance for C1–50 E coli cultured in plates containing MDCK cells with urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration was 0.81 ± 0.03, 0.24 ± 0.01, and 0.16 ± 0.02, respectively (Figure 2). Mean ± SEM absorbance for C2–48 E coli cultured in plates containing MDCK cells with urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration was 0.80 ± 0.03, 0.24 ± 0.01, and 0.14 ± 0.02, respectively. Mean ± SEM absorbance for C3–48 E coli cultured in plates containing MDCK cells with urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration was 0.81 ± 0.02, 0.24 ± 0.02, and 0.12 ± 0.01, respectively. Mean absorbance for the 3 E coli strains cultured with MDCK cells and urine samples obtained at 30 and 60 days was significantly lower than the absorbance for culture with the urine sample obtained before onset of cranberry extract administration. Moreover, mean absorbance of the 3 E coli strains cultured with MDCK cells and urine obtained at 60 days was also lower than that for urine samples obtained before and at 30 days after onset of administration of cranberry extract.
Adherence of the 3 E coli strains was decreased from a mean of 101.84 adherent bacteria/MDCK cell after incubation with urine samples obtained before cranberry extract administration to 16.44 and 4.00 adherent bacteria/MDCK cell after incubation with urine samples obtained at 30 and 60 days, respectively. Mean ± SEM number of C1–50 E coli adhering to MDCK cells was 95.17 ± 10.65, 12.67 ± 3.5, and 3.17 ± 2.04 for the urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration, respectively (Figure 3). Mean ± SEM number of C2–48 E coli adhering to MDCK cells was 109.17 ± 10.61, 16.33 ± 3.5, and 4.17 ± 2.64 for the urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration, respectively. Mean ± SEM number of C3–48 E coli adhering to MDCK cells was 101.17 ± 9.52, 20.33 ± 3.56, and 4.67 ± 1.86 for the urine samples obtained before and 30 and 60 days after onset of cranberry extract administration, respectively. Compared with the mean adherence for the urine sample obtained before onset of cranberry extract administration, the mean E coli adherence to the MDCK cells for the urine samples obtained at 30 and 60 days was significantly lower. Moreover, the mean E coli adherence to the MDCK cells was significantly lower for the urine sample obtained at 60 days than for the urine sample obtained at 30 days. Adherence of E coli to MDCK cells was evident during microscopic examination (Figure 4).
Discussion
In the in vivo experiment reported here, an antimicrobial and powdered cranberry extract were administered to prevent UTIs in dogs. None of the dogs developed UTIs, as determined on the basis of clinical signs and laboratory results, which corresponded with results of another study.5 Some studies6,10,11 of humans indicate that the use of cranberries to prevent UTIs is better than the prophylactic use of low-dose antimicrobials because long-term use of antimicrobials increases the risk of antimicrobial resistance.
In the present study, the effect of cranberry extract on the prevention of bacterial adhesion was evaluated in vitro. Urine samples were collected from dogs receiving cranberry extract and used to determine antibacterial effects. Because E coli are the most common uropathogenic bacteria in dogs with UTIs,2–4 those bacteria were used in the present study. Three E coli strains were prepared for use in bacteriostasis and antiadhesion assays and microscopic examination. The bacteriostasis assay revealed no inhibition zone around the urine samples and negative control sample, whereas the positive control sample (enrofloxacin) had an antibacterial effect (diameter of inhibition zone > 30 mm). This indicated 2 possibilities: the concentration of bacteria was too high for the cranberry extract to inhibit growth, or the urine samples from dogs receiving cranberry extract had no bacteriostatic activity.
Results of previous studies12–15 as well as the present study suggest that cranberries do not have an effect on inhibition of bacterial growth. Instead, it is hypothesized that cranberries prevent UTIs by blocking adherence of bacteria to the uroepithelium.16–18 Evidence to support this hypothesis was obtained in an in vitro study11 of fimbriated E coli present in the urine 2 hours after ingestion of cranberry extract. In fact, the mean absorbance for the 3 E coli strains cultured with MDCK cells and urine samples obtained at 30 and 60 days was significantly lower than that after culture with the urine sample obtained before onset of cranberry extract administration, which indicated that the urine samples collected after administration of the cranberry extract had an antiadhesion effect. One possible mechanism of action may be that cranberry compounds act as receptor analogues and bind to the fimbriae of E coli, which thus competitively inhibits their adhesion. It has been confirmed that E coli isolated from dogs with UTIs most commonly express type-1 fimbriae.19 Furthermore, the main mechanism of in vitro adherence to canine uroepithelial cells involves a mannose-sensitive mechanism.20 Components of the cranberry extract also might have altered P-fimbriated uropathogenic bacteria in other ways, such as by reducing adhesion capabilities, reducing fimbrial length and density, or inducing other morphological changes.18,21,22
Mean E coli adherence to MDCK cells after incubation with urine samples obtained at 30 and 60 days was significantly lower, compared with adherence after incubation with the urine sample obtained before administration of the cranberry extract. Moreover, mean E coli adherence was significantly lower after incubation with the urine sample obtained at 60 days, compared with results after incubation with the urine sample obtained at 30 days.
In the present study, MDCK cells were used because they are a good in vitro method of screening to detect bacteria virulence23 or determining the pathogenesis of various bacterial infections, including those attributable to uropathogenic E coli.24,25 Adhesion of uropathogenic E coli to epithelial cells can lead to ascending UTIs, which range from nonclinical bacteriuria to cystitis and acute pyelonephritis to more severe acute lobar nephronia.26 Bacterial adhesion to uroepithelial cells by fimbrial or nonfimbrial adhesins in bacterial renal infections is an important factor in the subsequent development of UTIs in the upper urinary tract (ie, calyx, renal pelvis, and ureter) via the ascending route.27 The effect of cranberry extract on E coli adhesion to both kidney epithelial cells and uroepithelial cells derived from dogs has been described.28 Results for the microscopic examination performed in the present study correlate with results of another study28 that also revealed antiadhesion activity of cranberries or cranberry extract on E coli adherence to specific primary-cultured uroepithelial cells.28 The antiadherence effect of cranberries is not restricted to a particular group of E coli strains, which might otherwise be caused by interference with specific receptor-ligand modes of bacterial adhesion or by inhibition of expression of the bacterial fimbriae.21,29 The effect of cranberry intake might be synergistic, but the details remain unclear. In the present study, we minimized the possible bias associated with a noncontrolled trial by developing a bioassay to test adhesion of bacteria to MDCK cells that were cultured with urine obtained from dogs after they had received cranberry extract.
Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing concern. Therefore, alternative strategies such as consumption of cranberries or cranberry extract may be an option for prevention of UTIs in dogs. The present study revealed that the efficacy of cranberry extract for the prevention of UTIs was almost the same as that for an antimicrobial (cephalexin), with a lower risk of antimicrobial resistance or superinfection.30 Analysis of the results of the study reported here indicated that cranberry extract decreased E coli adherence to MDCK cells but did not inhibit bacterial growth. This effect suggested that cranberry extract has a potential clinical benefit for the prevention of UTIs in dogs.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript represents a portion of a thesis submitted by Dr. Chou to the Department of Veterinary Medicine of National Chung Hsing University as partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Veterinary Medicine degree.
Supported in part by the Enough Co, Taiwan.
The authors thank Dr. Jiunn-Wang Liao for providing the cell culture supplement and for technical assistance.
ABBREVIATIONS
DMEM | Dulbecco modified Eagle medium |
MDCK | Madin-Darby canine kidney |
UTI | Urinary tract infection |
Footnotes
Keflex, 250-mg capsule, Taiwan Biotech Co, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
120 g/pack, Cranimals, West Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Millex GV, Millipore Ireland BV, Carrigtwohill Co, Cork, Ireland.
Difco, Becton Dickinson and Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ.
BBL, Becton Dickinson and Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ.
Test disc, Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England.
Mediatech Inc, Tewksbury, Mass.
Sunrise Infinite F200, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland.
Magellan, version 6.6, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland.
References
1. Pressler B, Bartges JW. Urinary tract infections. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, eds. Textbook of small animal veterinary internal medicine. 7th ed. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2010;2036–2047.
2. Norris CR, Williams BJ, Ling GV, et al. Recurrent and persistent urinary tract infections in dogs: 383 cases (1969–1995). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 484–492.
3. Ling GV, Norris CR, Franti CE, et al. Interrelations of organism prevalence, specimen collection method, and host age, sex, and breed among 8,354 canine urinary tract infections (1969–1995). J Vet Intern Med 2001; 15: 341–347.
4. Hisano M, Bruschini H, Nicodemo AC, et al. Cranberries and lower urinary tract infection prevention. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012; 67: 661–668.
5. Bailey DT, Dalton C, Daugherty FJ, et al. Can a concentrated cranberry extract prevent recurrent urinary tract infections in women? A pilot study. Phytomedicine 2007; 14: 237–241.
6. Stothers L. A randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and cost effectiveness of naturopathic cranberry products as prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in women. Can J Urol 2002; 9: 1558–1562.
7. Tempera G, Corsello S, Genovese C, et al. Inhibitory activity of cranberry extract on the bacterial adhesiveness in the urine of women: an ex-vivo study. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2010; 23: 611–618.
8. McFarland J. The nephelometer: an instrument for estimating the number of bacteria in suspension used for calculating the opsonic index and for vaccines. JAMA 1907; XLIX:1176–1178.
9. Turner A, Chen SN, Joike MK, et al. Inhibition of uropathogenic Escherichia coli by cranberry juice: a new antiadherence assay. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53: 8940–8947.
10. Bennett J, Brown CM. Use of herbal remedies by patients in a health maintenance organization. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 2000; 40: 353–358.
11. Howell AB, Foxman B. Cranberry juice and adhesion of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens. JAMA 2002; 287: 3082–3083.
12. Avorn J, Monane M, Gurwitz JH. Reduction of bacteriuria and pyuria after ingestion of cranberry juice. JAMA 1994; 271: 751–754.
13. Monroy-Torres R, Macías AE. Does cranberry juice have bacteriostatic activity? [in Spanish] Rev Invest Clin 2005; 57: 442–446.
14. Raz R, Chazan B, Dan M. Cranberry juice and urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38: 1413–1419.
15. Tong H, Heong S, Chang S. Effect of ingesting cranberry juice on bacterial growth in urine. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63: 1417–1419.
16. Howell AB, Vorsa N, Der Marderosian AD, et al. Inhibition of the adherence of P-fimbriated Escherichia coli to uroepithelial-cell surfaces by proanthocyanidin extracts from cranberries. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1085–1086.
17. Ledda A, Bottari A, Luzzi R, et al. Cranberry supplementation in the prevention of non-severe lower urinary tract infections: a pilot study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015; 19: 77–80.
18. Liu Y, Black MA, Caron L, et al. Role of cranberry juice on molecular-scale surface characteristics and adhesion behavior of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006; 93: 297–305.
19. Yuri K, Nakata K, Katae H, et al. Distribution of uropathogenic virulence factors among Escherichia coli strains isolated from dogs and cats. J Vet Med Sci 1998; 60: 287–290.
20. Senior DF, deMan P, Svanborg C. Serotype, hemolysin production, and adherence characteristics of strains of Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53: 494–498.
21. Ahuja S, Kaack B, Roberts J. Loss of fimbrial adhesion with the addition of vaccinium macrocarpon to the growth medium of P-fimbriated Escherichia coli. J Urol 1998; 159: 559–562.
22. Habash MB, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, et al. Adsorption of urinary components influences the zeta potential of uropathogen surfaces. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces 2000; 19: 13–17.
23. Hirakata Y, Finlay BB, Simpson DA, et al. Penetration of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through MDCK epithelial cell monolayers. J Infect Dis 2000; 181: 765–769.
24. Altman E, Harrison BA, Latta RK, et al. Galectin-3-mediated adherence of Proteus mirabilis to Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Biochem Cell Biol 2001; 79: 783–788.
25. Lin PY, Chiu CH, Chu C, et al. Invasion of murine respiratory tract epithelial cells by Chryseobacterium meningosepticum and identification of genes present specifically in an invasive strain. New Microbiol 2006; 29: 55–62.
26. Cheng CH, Su LH, Tsau YK, et al. Comparison of virulence variations on MDCK monolayers by Escherichia coli isolated from acute lobar nephronia and acute pyelonephritis. New Microbiol 2011; 34: 65–72.
27. Tseng MH, Lo WT, Lin WJ, et al. Changing trend in antimicrobial resistance of pediatric uropathogens in Taiwan. Pediatr Int 2008; 50: 797–800.
28. Di Martino P, Agniel R, David K, et al. Reduction of Escherichia coli adherence to uroepithelial bladder cells after consumption of cranberry juice: a double-blind randomized placebocontrolled cross-over trial. World J Urol 2006; 24: 21–27.
29. Reid G, Hsiehl J, Potter P, et al. Cranberry juice consumption may reduce biofilms on uroepithelial cells: pilot study in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 2001; 39: 26–30.
30. McMurdo MET, Argo I, Phillips G, et al. Cranberry or trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections? A randomized controlled trial in older women. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63: 389–395.